logo
For 20 years this novel has reduced the most hardened critics to tears

For 20 years this novel has reduced the most hardened critics to tears

For more than a decade, Kazuo Ishiguro had a box file in his study marked 'Students Novel'. In it were notes, diagrams and some pages of a story he'd tried to write in 1990, then again in 1995. Each time he'd abandoned the attempt and had written a completely different novel.
He knew his students would share a strange destiny that would shorten their lives but also make them feel special. But what would that destiny be? Here was where he got stuck. He'd played around with ideas such as a virus or radioactive poisoning, but it all seemed too melodramatic.
In 2001, he returned to his project with fresh ideas. They were inspired partly by new developments in science, and partly by the contact he'd had with a new generation of British writers such as Alex Garland and David Mitchell. While Ishiguro had come of age in an era when literary fiction avoided any whiff of 'popular' genres, the younger writers had no such qualms. They blithely incorporated all sorts of influences from science fiction, fantasy and horror into their work.
'My growing familiarity with these younger colleagues excited and liberated me', Ishiguro writes. 'They opened windows for me I'd not thought to open before. They not only educated me into a wider, vibrant culture, they brought to my own imagination new horizons.'
He writes this in his introduction to the 20th anniversary edition of Never Let Me Go, the extraordinary novel that gradually emerged from those early notes. It's the Nobel Prize winner's most-read novel, has sold in millions, is widely studied and has been translated into 50 languages. It's been adapted into a film, two stage plays and a Japanese TV series.
Like many fans, I remember vividly my first reading. It starts so quietly, narrated in simple and artless prose by Kathy, a student at Hailsham, a mysterious boarding school in the English countryside with kind teachers and a nostalgic Enid-Blyton feel. We follow the everyday lives of Kathy and her two schoolfriends, Ruth and Tommy, as they grow into young adults.
Gradually the purpose of the school is revealed. I won't give it away except to say there's a dark future for these idealistic, hopeful kids and their tender feelings for one another.
Talking of tender feelings, this is a novel that reduces the most hardened critics to tears. 'No matter how many times I read it … it breaks my heart all over again,' writes Alix Ohlin in the Los Angeles Review of Books. 'I was nothing less than stunned by it,' David Sexton writes in the New Statesman. He reread it on a day ferry when he was a judge for the 2005 Booker Prize (it nearly won, but the casting vote went to John Banville's The Sea) and was glad he was in a windowless cabin, 'so tearful it made me'.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Sherrie Hewson refuses to go out without makeup on: 'I'd rather bury myself in the back garden...'
Sherrie Hewson refuses to go out without makeup on: 'I'd rather bury myself in the back garden...'

Perth Now

time9 hours ago

  • Perth Now

Sherrie Hewson refuses to go out without makeup on: 'I'd rather bury myself in the back garden...'

Sherrie Hewson refuses to go out without wearing makeup. The 74-year-old actress has been a mainstay on British television for decades but insisted that she would rather "bury [herself] in the back garden" than go out with a bare face. She told MyWeekly: "I would rather bury myself in my back garden than go outside without make-up on. I love to go full face glam and describe my style as a bit of everything." The former 'Benidorm' star added that one of her "pet hates" in life is being called old, and tries to take inspiration from her late mother when it comes to ageing. She said: "Being called a pensioner or senior citizen is one of my pet hates. It infers you're past it and that's rubbish. I don't want to be treated in a certain way because of my age. "My mum was 89 when she died. But up until near the end, she went out dancing every night, she sailed, she went on skiing holidays. She never thought, 'Oh, I'm a certain age so I mustn't do that any more!'" The former 'Coronation Street' actress thinks that it is "important" that others do the same, and insisted she will never let anything like age get in the way of what she really wants to do. She added: "I think it's important that we all stand up and say and do the same. We must stop being so timid and downtrodden. Get out there, do what you want! Go bungee-jumping if it's what you've always dreamed of! Don't ever let anyone stop you from being who you are."

I've spent time with tech oligarchs – you have no idea just how weird they are
I've spent time with tech oligarchs – you have no idea just how weird they are

Sydney Morning Herald

time14 hours ago

  • Sydney Morning Herald

I've spent time with tech oligarchs – you have no idea just how weird they are

Last week, Jesse Armstrong, the British director behind Succession, released his first feature-length film – a thinly veiled satire about the tech oligarchs who dominate our lives and, increasingly, have a say over what constitutes free speech. Though it would be easy to write Mountainhead off as pure fiction, to anyone who has spent time around these people, as I have, it was eerily accurate. The four fictional billionaires are flush with obscene wealth accumulated in the technological miracle of the past two decades. Having all flown in on their respective private jets, they decamp to a remote mansion for a weekend of poker and bounce between 'friendly' shit talking, writing their net worth on their chests, planning a coup, and watching mass violence unfold around the world thanks to one of the character's apps (likely a nod to Facebook's amplification of content that ultimately contributed to genocide in Myanmar). In writing the script, Armstrong borrowed from real life, using Elon Musk, Peter Thiel, Mark Andreesen and Sam Bankman-Fried as inspiration. Some of the most important and influential people of Silicon Valley, these men all share a belief in the saving grace of their own genius, even as one of them serves a 25-year sentence for duping people out of billions. Loading Though the world mostly thinks of Silicon Valley as some kind of liberal bastion, at its core, it is libertarian (even the film's title is a nod to 'the godmother of American libertarianism', Ayn Rand). When I lived in San Francisco, where I was working for the Biden-Harris administration and the Democratic National Convention, I quickly realised that the prevailing attitude is that governments and regulations are pesky and burdensome – that they only serve to obstruct technological progress they're too small-minded to understand. Working among and moving in the same social circles as senior tech executives and some of today's best known billionaires, you'd see just how weird they were. They would brag about sleeping in the office or demanding staff miss important family events. I once watched the son of a tech billionaire demand that a senior US government official record a video to ask a girl out for him. In 2022, when autonomous-driving taxis started appearing on the streets of San Francisco, this confrontation between big-tech cockiness and government process showed up loud and clear. The businesses making the taxis failed to notify local officials before rolling out the vehicles, and only partially released their data to regulators. When one tech company's fleet was taken off the roads due to safety concerns, other tech companies lobbied to get rid of human taxi drivers entirely. Sure, there's a lot less awkward chat in driverless taxis, but for technology with such a profound impact as vehicles driving around a city with no human behind the wheel, transparent oversight should be non-negotiable.

I've spent time with tech oligarchs – you have no idea just how weird they are
I've spent time with tech oligarchs – you have no idea just how weird they are

The Age

time14 hours ago

  • The Age

I've spent time with tech oligarchs – you have no idea just how weird they are

Last week, Jesse Armstrong, the British director behind Succession, released his first feature-length film – a thinly veiled satire about the tech oligarchs who dominate our lives and, increasingly, have a say over what constitutes free speech. Though it would be easy to write Mountainhead off as pure fiction, to anyone who has spent time around these people, as I have, it was eerily accurate. The four fictional billionaires are flush with obscene wealth accumulated in the technological miracle of the past two decades. Having all flown in on their respective private jets, they decamp to a remote mansion for a weekend of poker and bounce between 'friendly' shit talking, writing their net worth on their chests, planning a coup, and watching mass violence unfold around the world thanks to one of the character's apps (likely a nod to Facebook's amplification of content that ultimately contributed to genocide in Myanmar). In writing the script, Armstrong borrowed from real life, using Elon Musk, Peter Thiel, Mark Andreesen and Sam Bankman-Fried as inspiration. Some of the most important and influential people of Silicon Valley, these men all share a belief in the saving grace of their own genius, even as one of them serves a 25-year sentence for duping people out of billions. Loading Though the world mostly thinks of Silicon Valley as some kind of liberal bastion, at its core, it is libertarian (even the film's title is a nod to 'the godmother of American libertarianism', Ayn Rand). When I lived in San Francisco, where I was working for the Biden-Harris administration and the Democratic National Convention, I quickly realised that the prevailing attitude is that governments and regulations are pesky and burdensome – that they only serve to obstruct technological progress they're too small-minded to understand. Working among and moving in the same social circles as senior tech executives and some of today's best known billionaires, you'd see just how weird they were. They would brag about sleeping in the office or demanding staff miss important family events. I once watched the son of a tech billionaire demand that a senior US government official record a video to ask a girl out for him. In 2022, when autonomous-driving taxis started appearing on the streets of San Francisco, this confrontation between big-tech cockiness and government process showed up loud and clear. The businesses making the taxis failed to notify local officials before rolling out the vehicles, and only partially released their data to regulators. When one tech company's fleet was taken off the roads due to safety concerns, other tech companies lobbied to get rid of human taxi drivers entirely. Sure, there's a lot less awkward chat in driverless taxis, but for technology with such a profound impact as vehicles driving around a city with no human behind the wheel, transparent oversight should be non-negotiable.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store