Wendy's Launches Famous Burger Patties in Grocery Stores—But Fans Have Questions
If you spend enough time on FoodTok as I am lately, you may have come across some rather interesting news about Wendy's. It appears fans of the fast-food chain are starting to spot Wendy's beef patties being sold in grocery stores. It's the kind of thing that would make anyone do a double take. And because the few images out there all look more or less the same, it's making some folks wonder if it's really legit.
I reached out to Wendy's Corporate for verification and yes, it's true. Wendy's has just released new all-beef patties in select Kroger (and King Soopers—also owned by Krogers) stores in just two cities in the U.S., and they are keeping everything else pretty hush hush.
When I asked for more details, a spokesperson offered a canned response about the Dave Thomas empire 'pursuing opportunities to bring (their) fresh, famous food to customers in new and exciting ways.' That might also be alluding to the fact that the brand rolled out their chili in stores sometime last year.
Related:
@snackolater actually reviewed that last year, though, and said it wasn't exactly comparable to their in-store chili. Could that mean the same goes for the in-store burgers?
As of now, the only real information I can offer is that the patties are being sold in 1 pound four-packs and are only available in Columbus, OH and Denver, CO. Also, it's important to note that Wendy's has long prided itself on using 'fresh, never frozen' beef for its burgers, and the in-store burgers are also technically fresh, as you can see from @juicyhoneycc's TikTok below.
The same person also made a different TikTok where she showed followers how she bought and prepared the patty herself. Curious folks in the comments have since asked her to offer more insight ('How do they taste?' asked one, 'What you rate them 0/10 ⁉️⁉️⁉️⁉️' asked another), but so far they haven't replied. It's a missed opportunity given that no one's actually sharing what they think of these so far.
Up Next:
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
3 hours ago
- USA Today
This TikTok-famous retro pink toothpaste is 15% off ahead of Prime Day
Get a brighter, fresher smile with the cult-favorite whitening toothpaste on sale at Amazon. If you've ever scrolled through TikTok lately, chances are you've seen the iconic pink tube of Euthymol Whitening Toothpaste. With its vintage-inspired packaging, bold minty flavor and cult following, this British-born toothpaste is making waves stateside. Right now, you can grab the Euthymol Pink Whitening Toothpaste for up to 15% off on Amazon as part of the retailer's early Prime Day deals. Whether you're restocking your bathroom cabinet or want to try a new whitening toothpaste for summer 2025, this is the perfect opportunity to upgrade your oral care routine on a budget. Early Prime Day deal: Euthymol Pink Whitening Toothpaste Euthymol Pink Whitening Toothpaste The Euthymol Pink Whitening Toothpaste is trending on TikTok and 15% off ahead of Amazon Prime Day 2025. Save at Amazon today What makes the Euthymol Pink Whitening Toothpaste so special? Euthymol isn't your average toothpaste. With a unique pink shade, it is immediately a more playful and fun toothpaste. But, it is backed by very serious results like offering visibly brighter teeth and fresher breath. Here are some highlights: Plus, it comes in a recyclable aluminum tube that is a great perk for eco-conscious shoppers. With over 120 years of oral care heritage, Euthymol has earned a loyal fanbase for its no-nonsense formula and retro charm. It's especially loved by those with sensitive gums, thanks to its gentle yet effective ingredients. What are the early Prime Day deals? Save up to 15% at Amazon The Prime Day sale starts on Tuesday, July 8 and will run through the end of day on Friday, July 11.
Miami Herald
5 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Nike fumbles its biggest launch of the year
Nike desperately needs a comeback. Sales are down, and the brand has been grasping for ways to win back the audience it used to own - especially women. In the past few months, it's shuffled leadership, made sweeping organizational changes, and promised a new era. But there's been one initiative everyone has watched more closely than the rest. Related: Nike's house is not in order, and customers may pay the price This wasn't just a product drop. It was supposed to be a cultural reset, the kind of launch that makes headlines and stirs hype on TikTok before a single item even hits the site. A move that signals Nike gets it - that it can keep pace with the brands Gen Z and Millennial women actually want to wear. Internally, it was treated like a major turning point. And externally, anticipation was sky-high. But without warning, the launch is off the calendar. No update. No rollout. Just a quiet delay, and a whole lot of unanswered questions. And that's a this was the one drop Nike couldn't afford to miss. Image source: Nike/Skims The highly anticipated NikeSKIMS line, a collaboration with Kim Kardashian's $4 billion shapewear empire SKIMS, has been officially delayed. Nike then-President of Consumer and Marketplace Heidi O'Neill had said the partnership, originally scheduled to launch this spring, brought together the best of both brands, "unlock[ing] an incredible opportunity to disrupt the industry with our shared passion and commitment to innovation." The line is now expected to debut later this year, according to Bloomberg. No new date has been confirmed, and the delay wasn't caused by suppliers or shipping issues. Instead, it was an internal decision, one Nike and Kardashian made to "get the product right." Related: Nike delivers bad news for customers "We will invite even more athletes into sport and movement with product that makes them feel strong and sexy," the company said. The line was supposed to include apparel, footwear, and accessories. But in the time since it was announced, O'Neill - a key architect of the partnership - has exited the company. Meanwhile, Nike's new CEO, Elliott Hill, has been doubling down on the SKIMS partnership as a high-stakes brand revival strategy. But now, with no launch in sight, that strategy is looking shakier by the day. This delay wouldn't be such a big deal if Nike wasn't already under so much pressure. Nike's third-quarter revenues were $11.3 billion, down 9% from the same time last year, according to its recent earnings report. Meanwhile, Nike (NKE) stock has declined nearly 20% year to date, and investor sentiment continues to weaken. That kind of context turns a simple delay into something louder...a major red flag in the middle of an attempted reinvention. It also raises questions about internal alignment. If this was the moment to reconnect with the female consumer, what happened behind the scenes to justify hitting pause? Nike maintains the partnership is strong. But now it's facing the tough task of rebuilding buzz around a launch that's already lost momentum. And when the SKIMS line finally lands, let's hope the moment hasn't passed Nike by. Related: Kim Kardashian's billion-dollar brand just made a major move The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.
Yahoo
10 hours ago
- Yahoo
‘I just want finality': GOP greets newest TikTok extension with resignation
President Donald Trump's latest move to keep TikTok alive is yet again frustrating congressional Republicans, many of whom object to China's continued involvement in the popular app but just want to be done with the whole drama. 'Not my favorite thing,' Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.), along-time proponent of the ban, deadpanned, when asked about the president's plan to issue another extension. He spoke a day before the White House confirmed Trump signed a 90-day suspension of enforcement of the law requiring TikTok to divest from ByteDance, its China-based parent company, throwing another lifeline to the short-form video app. By Friday, some House lawmakers registered a note of resigned irritation. The extension — Trump's third since the law went into effect on Jan. 19 — is a unilateral decision not envisioned in the bipartisan law passed by Congress and upheld last year by the Supreme Court. Rep. Darin LaHood (R-Ill.), a member of the House Intelligence and China committees, told POLITICO. 'The national security concerns and vulnerabilities are still there, and they have not gone away. I would argue they've almost become more enhanced in many ways." But Trump's extension of the TikTok law largely boxed out Republicans in both chambers who have shown little inclination — beyond stern words — to prevent him from making these postponements almost routine. Many GOP lawmakers saw themselves as granting the president space to cut a promised deal while the White House deals with urgent priorities, like trade negotiations and the Israel-Iran conflict. 'In light of everything going on, I think he did the right thing,' Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.), a China hawk who voted for the ban, told POLITICO of Trump. 'I have concerns about all kinds of things — that [the extension] is on the list — but it's not at the top of the list.' Though Trump has promised his TikTok negotiations areclosely tied to trade talks with China, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent testified last week to a Senate panel that TikTok's sale wasnot currently a part of the negotiations with China, raising a further potential obstacle to Trump inking a deal in the near future. Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), a close ally of the president and longtime national-security hawk said earlier in the week: 'The sooner we get that issue solved, the better,' without offering any ideas for further enforcement. 'I just want finality,' Senate Judiciary Chair Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) told POLITICO. 'I want some certainty and just know that the Congress isn't being played when we make a decision [that the app] be sold.' Another member of the House China Committee, Rep. Zach Nunn (R-Iowa), told POLITICO, 'No more extensions. It's time to follow through.' Rep. Dan Newhouse (R-Wash.), also a member of the China panel, noted in a post on X Thursday the law only allows one extension of the compliance deadline, adding, 'I was proud to support the ban of TikTok and believe the law should be implemented as written.' With their comments, the lawmakers echoed House China Chair John Moolenaar (R-Mich.), who in early June called for the U.S. to 'let [TikTok] go dark' to bring China to the table to negotiate. He reiterated that stance on Friday. 'Delays only embolden the Chinese Communist Party,' Moolenaar said in a statement to POLITICO. 'I urge the administration to enforce the law as written and protect the American people from this growing national security threat." Still, observers say Republicans are not exercising their leverage to demand the White House enforce the law they helped write, for example by withholding funding or congressional oversight hearings. "I keep reading that Republicans are 'frustrated' and 'impatient' about their TikTok law being ignored, but they should stop complaining to reporters and take it up with Trump,' said Adam Kovacevich, founder and CEO of the pro-tech Chamber of Progress. Among the Republicans being undercut by the president is his own secretary of state. Marco Rubio — who as senator was one of the loudest critics of TikTok's ties to China, and a huge backer of the app's ban — has been conspicuously silent as Trump has repeatedly granted more time to strike a deal for its sale. 'You have to decide what's more important, our national security and the threat that it poses to our national security,' Rubio told POLITICO in March 2023, as Congress was considering a ban. 'You have to weigh that against what you might think the electoral consequences of it are. For me, it's an easy balancing act. I mean, there is no balance. I'm always going to be for our national security.' A spokesperson for Rubio at the State Department did not respond to a request for comment. Democrats — even those who support keeping TikTok online — say Trump's approach is the wrong one. 'These endless extensions are not only illegal, but they also put TikTok's fate in the hands of risk-averse corporate shareholders,' Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) told POLITICO in a statement. 'This is deeply unfair to TikTok's creators and users. I'm prepared to work towards a solution, but Trump isn't coming to the table.'
