Sarkozy stripped of France's highest state award
Established by Napoleon Bonaparte in 1802, the Legion of Honor (Légion d'honneur) is currently France's highest award. It is bestowed for exemplary civil or military service and is regarded as a mark of distinction and official recognition of exceptional merit. The rules of the Legion of Honor mandate the exclusion of any recipient sentenced to a term of imprisonment of one year or more.
The exclusion stems from a conviction in what has become known as the 'wiretapping affair.' In 2021, Sarkozy, who led France from 2007 to 2012, was found guilty of attempting to bribe a judge in exchange for confidential information about a separate investigation related to his 2007 presidential campaign.
In 2023, the former president was handed a three-year prison sentence, including two years suspended and the remaining one at home with electronic monitoring. In late 2024, the Court of Cassation, France's highest court, upheld the sentence that Sarkozy had sought to challenge.
The revocation makes Sarkozy the second head of the French state to be stripped of the Legion of Honor; the first was the notorious Marshal Philippe Petain. The head of the Nazi puppet regime of Vichy France during World War II was convicted of high treason in 1945.
The decision to strip Sarkozy of the award came despite the reported reluctance of current French President Emmanuel Macron, who said in April that he thought that the former head of state 'deserves respect.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Russia Today
6 hours ago
- Russia Today
The Alaska summit was a success. The challenge is to make it last
Do not expect Western mainstream media, NATO-EU Europe's politicians, or the Zelensky regime and its surrogates to admit it, but there is no doubt that the Alaska summit between the Russian and American presidents was a success. Not a breakthrough either, but clearly also more than an 'it's-good-they're-at-least-talking' event. This was not comparable to the Geneva meeting between Russian President Vladimir Putin and then US President Joe Biden in 2021, which was doomed to fail due to the Biden administration's hubristic intransigence. Fundamentally, both sides – no, not only one – have scored what Western pundits love to call 'wins': The US has shown the EU-NATO Europeans that it and it alone decides when and how it talks to Russia and with what aims. The European vassals find this hard to grasp because it's an application of genuine sovereignty, something they don't have or want anymore. Russia, for its part, has shown that it can negotiate while the fighting continues and that it is under no legal or moral obligation – or any practical pressure – to stop fighting before negotiations show results it finds satisfying. The fact that we know so little – at this point at least – about the specific, detailed content of the summit talks and their outcomes is, actually, a sign of seriousness. That is how diplomacy worth the name works: calmly, confidentially, and patiently taking the time to achieve a decent, robust result. In that context, US President Donald Trump's explicit refusal to make public what points of disagreement remain and have prevented a breakthrough for now is a very good sign: Clearly, he believes that they can be cleared up in the near future and, thus, deserve discretion. Yet we do have a few hints allowing for some plausible guessing about the summit's vibe: Not surprisingly, both leaders made no secret of their respect and even guarded sympathy for each other. That is – and has always been – a good thing, too. But in and of itself that cannot carry an agreement about Ukraine or a broader policy of normalization (or perhaps even a new détente, if we are all very lucky). For that, both Trump and Putin are too serious about adhering to national interests. More tellingly, immediately after the meeting, Trump used a Fox News interview to state three important things. He confirmed that there was 'much progress,' acknowledged that the Russian president wants peace, and told Zelensky 'to make a deal.' When Putin, at a short press conference, warned Brussels and Kiev not to try to sabotage the talks, Trump did not contradict the Russian leader. The commemorative events accompanying the summit carried more than one message. Publicly honoring the American-Russian (then Soviet) alliance of World War Two obviously implied that the two countries then cooperated intensely across a deep ideological divide, which, today, does not even exist anymore. But arguably, there was a second, subtle message here: Another – if often unjustly 'forgotten' (in the words of historian Rana Mitter) – ally of World War Two was, after all, China. In that sense, Putin's deliberate and repeated invocations of the memory of Washington-Moscow cooperation was also yet another signal that Russia would not be available for any 'reverse Kissinger' fantasies of splitting the Moscow-Beijing partnership. By now, Trump has had phone conversations with Kiev, as well as EU capitals. There, too, we know little. Yet it is interesting to note that nothing we have heard about these conversations indicates another change of mind on Trump's side. For now at least, the American president seems to leave little hope to European bellicists and the regime in Kiev that he will turn against Moscow again. There are reports that Trump may have shifted his position toward that of Russia, preferring talks about peace to the Ukrainian demand to focus on only a ceasefire first. This makes sense, especially since they and the mainstream media aligned with them cannot stop trying to lecture Trump on, in essence, how gullible they consider him. It is to be hoped that the US president has had enough of Zelensky, Bolton, the New York Times and co. telling him publicly that he is a fool about to be duped by the big bad Russians. The adequate punishment for these offensive inanities is to make triple sure their authors find themselves entirely irrelevant. This is the single most important question about the future of what has been successfully begun (or really, publicly continued) at the Alaska summit. Russia has been exceedingly consistent and is giving no sign that it intends to become less predictable. But the West has been fractious and volatile. This is the moment when Washington has to stick to a course of normalization with Moscow regardless of what its European clients and the Ukrainian regime want. Ironically, not listening much to them, if need be, is best for their people as well.
Russia Today
7 hours ago
- Russia Today
Trump-Zelensky call ‘wasn't easy'
The phone call between US President Donald Trump and Ukraine's Vladimir Zelensky after the Alaska summit on Friday 'wasn't easy,' Axios correspondent Barak Ravid claimed on Saturday, citing a source with direct knowledge. Key European leaders later joined the call as well. According to Ravid, Trump spoke with Zelensky for about an hour. Also on the line were Secretary of State Marco Rubio and special envoy Steve Witkoff, both of whom had earlier taken part in the talks with the Russian delegation. The leaders of the UK, France, Italy, Germany, Finland, Poland, as well as NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, later joined the call, which lasted another 30 minutes, according to the journalist. Ravid described the call as 'not easy,' though he did not elaborate on this, adding only that Trump insisted that 'a fast peace deal is better than a ceasefire.' The US president later confirmed the sentiment, writing: 'It was determined by all that the best way to end the horrific war between Russia and Ukraine is to go directly to a Peace Agreement, which would end the war, and not a mere Ceasefire Agreement, which often times do not hold up.' Zelensky said that during the phone call with Trump the two agreed that he would come on Monday to Washington to discuss in person the outcome of the summit. Ukraine and its Western backers have for months been pushing for a temporary ceasefire. While Russia has never ruled out the idea, it has argued that such a step would allow Kiev to receive more Western weapons, continue forced mobilization, and recover its losses at a time when Russian troops are pressing their advantage on the battlefield. Meanwhile, both Putin and Trump praised the Alaska talks as productive. The US president said that they moved closer to resolving the conflict while urging Zelensky to 'make a deal.'
Russia Today
a day ago
- Russia Today
Yerevan court extends Russian-Armenian tycoon's arrest
A Yerevan court has extended the arrest of Russian-Armenian billionaire Samvel Karapetyan, a critic of Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan, by two months despite a recent ruling that found it unlawful. Karapetyan's legal team called Friday's decision by the anti-corruption court 'illogical,' and said it showed that 'there is no justice in Armenia.' The businessman's lawyer, Liana Gasparyan, said they plan to turn to the Criminal Court of Appeals and will continue the legal who leads the Moscow-based Tashir Group, was arrested in June on charges of inciting a power grab, linked to his support for the Armenian Apostolic Church. The church was active in protests after Prime Minister Pashinyan agreed to transfer border villages to Azerbaijan, a move that drew public backlash. As the situation intensified, authorities detained Karapetyan along with several high-ranking clerics on charges related to an attempted coup. Around the same time, the government began steps to nationalize his energy company, Electric Grids of Armenia. Karapetyan, whose net worth is estimated by Forbes at $3.2 billion, won an international arbitration case in July when the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce ruled that the Armenian government must not confiscate his company. In response, officials in Yerevan said they would act according to domestic law. Karapetyan's family has reportedly filed a $500 million legal claim against the Armenian government in response to the nationalization of his company. Earlier this week, an appeals court ruled that Karapetyan's June arrest was unlawful. His lawyer said he was wrongfully held for more than nine hours and described the decision as further proof of violations in the case, calling the detention unjustified and said it is in contact with Armenia regarding Karapetyan's detention, noting that while it views the matter as Armenia's internal affair, it hopes the country stays prosperous, stable, and friendly toward legal team also thanked supporters who gathered at the courthouse. They added that his 'In Our Way' movement – a 'fundamentally new' political initiative unveiled in July – will officially launch at the end of August. They described the project as a new chapter in Armenia's political life.
