logo
DVF CEO Graziano de Boni Talks Evolution of the Brand and Product and First Collection Since Return of Creative Director Nathan Jenden

DVF CEO Graziano de Boni Talks Evolution of the Brand and Product and First Collection Since Return of Creative Director Nathan Jenden

Yahoo29-01-2025

Diane von Furstenberg continues to reimagine itself for today's consumer.
Over the past 16 months, Graziano de Boni, the brand's chief executive officer, has upgraded the product and rebuilt the team in an effort to evolve the 53-year-old company into a primarily direct-to-consumer operation.
More from WWD
David Beckham Picks Up Philanthropy Award in Davos, Champions Children in Speech
Diane von Furstenberg, David Beckham and Riken Yamamoto to Receive Crystal Awards at Davos
Cindy Crawford, Lauren Sanchez and Jessica Alba Toast Diane von Furstenberg in L.A.
'The word here is everything is evolving. We are evolving. We're not revolutionizing, we're not reinventing, and we're not relaunching,' de Boni said in an interview. 'We are a 53-year-old heritage brand at this point. We went through the ups and downs of the economy, the market and trends…and have passed the test of time. We're not looking to reinvent. We're just trying to make sure that what we're doing is relevant and correct for today's woman, as simple as that.'
One of his most significant steps is taking DVF's global business operations back in-house, which becomes effective Feb. 1.
For the last four years, DVF has been in an operating partnership with Glamel Trading Ltd., a Hong Kong-based firm. Glamel's China team handled production while DVF's London team was in charge of global e-commerce and wholesale jointly with the brand's New York team, which handled the design direction, print, social media, public relations and marketing. DVF decided to limit the partnership with Glamel, and now Glamel will only handle distribution of its products in the Greater China region — as it did from 2010 until 2020.
Another important move was bringing back Nathan Jenden, who returned to the brand in January 2024 as a consulting designer and was named creative director this month. Jenden, who has been with DVF on and off since 2001, and most recently left in 2020, was responsible in the past for some of DVF's bestselling styles.
The first collection under Jenden's creative direction is spring 2025, which will hit retail on Sunday.
De Boni succeeded Gabby Hirata, who was CEO from 2019 to 2023 and became global president of Halara.
De Boni said he originally met von Furstenberg through Domenico De Sole, who called him up and said that he had to meet with Diane. 'So I met Diane and basically two weeks after that, I joined the company,' de Boni said. Von Furstenberg asked him to come in and figure out where the brand was at and develop a plan of options of what should be next. 'So that was my original mandate,' he said.
De Boni met with the partners, spoke to people and visited China a few times. They soon concluded that the best go-forward situation for the company was to bring the business operations back in-house.
De Boni has an extensive designer background, having previously been CEO of Armani USA, president of Reed Krakoff, president and CEO of Prada USA and president and CEO of Valentino USA. Most recently, he founded de Boni Consulting in 2018.
When asked whether von Furstenberg was still involved with the collection's design (she has previously told WWD she wants to spend more time with her philanthropy, her women's work and living in Venice), de Boni said, 'Diane, as you know, is omnipresent. And I want her to be absolutely even more so on the creative side.'
In a separate interview, von Furstenberg said that taking back the license was not exactly what she was planning. 'But I had time since COVID-19 [to think about the business]. That was an opportunity for me to step back and to look and see if the business was even worth it. But then there were things that happened such as the DVF exhibition in Brussels and the Hulu documentary.
'I realized this brand is a real brand that's more than 50 years [old]. It stood for so much for women, and so many generations,' said von Furstenberg, who was speaking from Venice. Last week, she received the Annual Crystal Award at the World Economic Forum annual Meeting in Davos, Switzerland. The award is given to cultural leaders who have made significant contributions to advancing social, environmental and creative progress worldwide.
Von Furstenberg confirmed that she asked De Sole what she should do, telling him how the brand is even sustainable because if you go into a vintage store, you see DVF dresses that have belonged to two generations of women. De Sole suggested that she needed to hire someone to make a plan. 'He said he was going to Italy, and 'I'll call you in a week,' and instead he called me half an hour later, and said he wanted me to meet this guy [de Boni]. Everything in life is also about timing,' von Furstenberg said. She hired him and gave him one year to make a plan. 'He went to China and he came back and said, 'You have to take this back,'' she said.
DVF said she keeps telling de Boni, 'I'm an older woman, but I am involved. I pretend I'm not. It's like somebody who's taking a brand and the person is no longer alive, but I am alive. Because everything is changing so much, it's kind of exciting to take this old brand that has so many generations of women, and every time there's a new 20-year-old, they get excited about it,' von Furstenberg said. 'It's a very unique situation. Graziano is great. He's European, he knows America and he understands manufacturing and understands everything. He believes in the brand so much, and he wants to make it happen so much,' von Furstenberg said.
Without any fanfare, Jenden returned quietly a year ago. 'Everything happened silently, I don't have investors and I don't have to announce everything,' von Furstenberg said. 'Other than my early years, when it was me on it, he was definitely by far the best one [designer]. It's like your children. People work with you and they all try to reinvent everything. But then they leave. And when when they leave they really understand what the brand is about,' she said.
Von Furstenberg said there are no licensing deals in place. 'The brand is as virgin as it's ever been. That's also very exciting. We have no commitment, no one to check it with. It's really about taking control of the product, taking control of the narrative and choose the best distribution and with digital and pop-ups. It's nice not to have to carry over things that are heavy,' she said.
Von Furstenberg said she wouldn't consider selling the intellectual property to a brand management company such as Authentic Brands Group or WHP Global. 'I could have already done that when I really needed it. I'm not going to do that,' she said. 'I have no debt, I have no investors, I don't owe anything to anyone. I've taken care of everyone,' von Furstenberg said. She said her son, Alexander von Furstenberg, granddaughter Talita von Furstenberg and husband Barry Diller are on the board.
'There's no reason to sell anything. We may, along the line, partner with people who could bring something, but not money. Now it's very clean, I didn't think I would get back the control,' Diane von Furstenberg said. 'Everyone on the team believes in it so much. It is a brand that has value, much more than I thought.'
She said the DVF designers are coming to Venice next week to work on the collection. 'I have a big place in Venice and it's very inspiring to work here,' she said.
As for her modus operandi, she said, 'You keep on improvising. That's what life is about. As long as you are true to yourself and as long as you don't lie, you really don't get in trouble. You go through highs, you go through lows, but you've got to be honest. The product has to be honest and the narrative has to be honest, and you have to good fabrics. Otherwise, it falls apart,' she said.
There's no question the company had some major challenges in recent years. As von Furstenberg discussed in a WWD story in 2023, during the time leading up to COVID-19, the company was losing money, had too many outlet stores and she had to decide whether to declare bankruptcy or sell the business. There were much-publicized layoffs in the U.S., Britain and France and multiple store closings.
'I had offers, but then I would have to relinquish all of the assets, the archives, the trademarks.…I started to make a list of the assets — and my family wouldn't let me relinquish the assets,' von Furstenberg said during that 2023 interview.
At the time, she said she wiped the slate clean and decided to manufacture only ready-to-wear, which was generating $130 million in retail sales and became profitable again. There were no licensing agreements and they were basically rebuilding the brand, which von Furstenberg called 'the third rebirth' at the company.
At the height of the company in 2014, DVF was generating about $500 million in retail volume. The company declined to reveal the volume today. During the 2023 interview, von Furstenberg said the company wasn't for sale and she would welcome the expertise of partners to help and would be looking to hire a creative director.
In October 2023, de Boni stepped in and developed a three-step plan for the business. The first and most important was to set up design and make sure they had the talent they needed. The whole idea was not just to bring the design back in-house and rehire Jenden, but also to elevate and improve the products, materials and quality, de Boni said.
The brand also reintroduced more luxurious fabrics such as silk. While they are working with better materials and products, de Boni said the prices are only going up slightly. He said they still have a good offering of dresses at $398 at retail, but they never had dresses more than $1,000. Now they are going above $1,000 for certain materials such as silk georgette and chiffons.
The spring collection will be introduced online and in its retail stores, such as DVF's Meatpacking District store, on Sunday.
De Boni stressed that they are a democratic brand with an aristocratic DNA. 'There's Diane, the Princess and the European aristocrat.' But on the other side is they've always been a very accessible and approachable product.
According to de Boni, they are managing the business as a designer brand and not a contemporary label. He said it has nothing to do with price points, but the way one treats and respects the brand, the branding, the product and the quality relative to the price points. 'It's all in attitude and that spirit is very important for me, for us and everything we do in the company,' he said. If you ask, people think Diane von Furstenberg is a designer brand, he said.
The second step was evolving their content, narrative and image. 'I said we need to surround ourselves with New York-based talent. So we started to go outside and we started to engage with a stylist and photographer, and people are helping us create this evolved image of DVF. Because I don't need to tell you, you can have a great product, but if the image doesn't match it.…' The campaign will be mostly digital.
The third step was to have a closer relationship to the consumer, and the business will be mostly DTC. During the transition, they made the decision to rethink how they are distributed and should be positioned. 'And we came to the conclusion that wholesale in the traditional way is not really a model that we want to pursue in that respect. We decided to get out of all wholesale and work to set up a significant retail distribution partnership,' de Boni said.
Starting with the spring 2025 collection, DVF is being distributed at Neiman Marcus, in addition to dvf.com and the DVF stores — one each in New York, Brussels, Azerbaijan, Thailand and 48 stores in China. At Neiman's, it will be mostly on the retailer's e-commerce site, in addition to four brick-and-mortar locations.
'The idea of being special [and not over-distributed] is a way to evolve and elevate the presence of the brand in the market,' he said.
DVF has added employees in sourcing, product and the product development side. The collection is made primarily in China. Right now, it's a relatively small team working at headquarters. Von Furstenberg's granddaughter, Talita, remains co-chairwoman. Von Furstenberg herself is the other co-chairwoman.
De Boni said over the years, von Furstenberg had all kinds of products such as shoes, bags and accessories, but they are not in conversations with any companies about licensing deals. 'We are a ready-to-wear brand first,' he said. 'We're very happy with that. For now, I want to really set up the ready-to-wear and make sure that we're doing the best we can and build it. You know, one day we will have the opportunity to expand in other categories and all that.'
He said that they've had a two-year transitional period. '2024 was the year of working to set it up and take the business back in-house. 2025 is the year where we basically go live and test and see what works and what doesn't work, and improve what's not working.' And eventually, they'll be set up for growth past 2025, he said.
International distribution is another growth opportunity. The company's e-commerce is global and the Chinese partner is remaining their distributor. 'And we're very happy with that remaining, and they've been a terrific partner. We've very grateful for Greater China. It's also mainland China, Hong Kong, Macau and Taiwan.'
Globally, they are working on similar retail distribution partnerships (such as Neiman Marcus) in major regions of the world.
Last year, DVF did a successful collaboration with Target, which de Boni claimed was one of the best collaborations the mass retailer has ever done. 'It was super successful at a business level. It was great for our brands, we actually learned a lot of things. We loved the way they put the product together and merchandised it.' He said it also underscores how the brand is both democratic and aristocratic. 'The elasticity of the brand is incredible and it's all because of Diane,' de Boni said.
De Boni said he's there full time and committed to the brand. 'You know, I love the brand and I love Diane. I love what she stands for. I'm actually having so much fun and love working with Diane. I'm here to support her.'
He said he's also there to make sure they keep building brand equity that creates long-term value 'and really help her with anything she needs to make sure that her legacy is really forever, and that's the goal.'
'If it takes an extra year, or an extra two years…it's been 53 years that she's been in business. And honestly, it's a privilege and it's really a unique situation for any brand to be in this position,' he said.
What's unique to DVF it has a double helix DNA, he said. He explained that there's the super strong product identity of the wrap dress that hundreds of millions of consumers know by name. And then there's the other identity — the purpose of Diane and what she stands for.
'We see consumers coming into our stores and sometimes they come to buy from us because they love the brand and product or because they love the message of Diane. It's the combination of the two. For sure, women know both. How many brands have that strong duality of DNA identity?' he said.
He said they'll be working on plans at the end of the year for brand development. In the meantime, he said, 'We are going to be steady, ambitious but not in a rush. A key element of building legacy is time.'
Best of WWD
Bottega Veneta Through the Years
Chanel's Ambassadors Over The Years
Ranking Fashion's Longest-serving Creative Directors

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

What to know about inspections of Iran's nuclear program by the IAEA ahead of a key board vote
What to know about inspections of Iran's nuclear program by the IAEA ahead of a key board vote

Hamilton Spectator

time22 minutes ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

What to know about inspections of Iran's nuclear program by the IAEA ahead of a key board vote

VIENNA (AP) — Iran's nuclear program remains a top focus for inspectors from the International Atomic Energy Agency, particularly as any possible deal between Tehran and the United States over the program would likely rely on the agency long known as the United Nations' nuclear watchdog. This week, Western nations will push for a measure at the IAEA's Board of Governors censuring Iran over its noncompliance with inspectors, pushing the matter before the U.N. Security Council. Barring any deal with Washington, Iran then could face what's known as 'snapback' — the reimposition of all U.N. sanctions on it originally lifted by Tehran's 2015 nuclear deal with world powers, if one of its Western parties declares the Islamic Republic is out of compliance with it. All this sets the stage for a renewed confrontation with Iran as the Mideast remains inflamed by Israel's war on Hamas in the Gaza Strip . And the IAEA's work in any case will make the Vienna-based agency a key player. Here's more to know about the IAEA, its inspections of Iran and the deals — and dangers — at play. Atoms for peace The IAEA was created in 1957. The idea for it grew out of a 1953 speech given by U.S. President Dwight D. Eisenhower at the U.N., in which he urged the creation of an agency to monitor the world's nuclear stockpiles to ensure that 'the miraculous inventiveness of man shall not be dedicated to his death, but consecrated to his life.' Broadly speaking, the agency verifies the reported stockpiles of member nations. Those nations are divided into three categories. The vast majority are nations with so-called 'comprehensive safeguards agreements' with the IAEA, states without nuclear weapons that allow IAE monitoring over all nuclear material and activities. Then there's the 'voluntary offer agreements' with the world's original nuclear weapons states — China, France, Russia, the United Kingdom and the U.S. — typically for civilian sites. Finally, the IAEA has 'item-specific agreements' with India, Israel and Pakistan — nuclear-armed countries that haven't signed the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty. That treaty has countries agree not to build or obtain nuclear weapons. North Korea, which is also nuclear armed, said it has withdrawn from the treaty, though that's disputed by some experts. The collapse of Iran's 2015 nuclear deal Iran's 2015 nuclear deal with world powers, negotiated under then-President Barack Obama, allowed Iran to enrich uranium to 3.67% — enough to fuel a nuclear power plant but far below the threshold of 90% needed for weapons-grade uranium. It also drastically reduced Iran's stockpile of uranium, limited its use of centrifuges and relied on the IAEA to oversee Tehran's compliance through additional oversight. But President Donald Trump in his first term in 2018 unilaterally withdrew America from the accord , insisting it wasn't tough enough and didn't address Iran's missile program or its support for militant groups in the wider Mideast. That set in motion years of tensions, including attacks at sea and on land . Iran now enriches up to 60%, a short, technical step away from weapons-grade levels. It also has enough of a stockpile to build multiple nuclear bombs, should it choose to do so. Iran has long insisted its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes, but the IAEA, Western intelligence agencies and others say Tehran had an organized weapons program up until 2003. IAEA inspections and Iran Under the 2015 deal, Iran agreed to allow the IAEA even greater access to its nuclear program. That included permanently installing cameras and sensors at nuclear sites. Those cameras, inside of metal housings sprayed with a special blue paint that shows any attempt to tamper with it, took still images of sensitive sites. Other devices, known as online enrichment monitors, measured the uranium enrichment level at Iran's Natanz nuclear facility. The IAEA also regularly sent inspectors into Iranian sites to conduct surveys, sometimes collecting environmental samples with cotton clothes and swabs that would be tested at IAEA labs back in Austria. Others monitor Iranian sites via satellite images. In the years since Trump's 2018 decision, Iran has limited IAEA inspections and stopped the agency from accessing camera footage . It's also removed cameras . At one point, Iran accused an IAEA inspector of testing positive for explosive nitrates , something the agency disputed. The IAEA has engaged in years of negotiations with Iran to restore full access for its inspectors. While Tehran hasn't granted that, it also hasn't entirely thrown inspectors out. Analysts view this as part of Iran's wider strategy to use its nuclear program as a bargaining chip with the West. What happens next Iran and the U.S. have gone through five rounds of negotiations over a possible deal, with talks mediated by the sultanate of Oman . Iran appears poised to reject an American proposal over a deal this week, potentially as soon as Tuesday. Without a deal with the U.S., Iran's long-ailing economy could enter a freefall that could worsen the simmering unrest at home. Israel or the U.S. might carry out long-threatened airstrikes targeting Iranian nuclear facilities. Experts fear Tehran in response could decide to fully end its cooperation with the IAEA, abandon the the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty and rush toward a bomb. If a deal is reached — or at least a tentative understanding between the two sides — that likely will take the pressure off for an immediate military strike by the U.S. Gulf Arab states, which opposed Obama's negotiations with Iran in 2015, now welcome the talks under Trump. Any agreement would require the IAEA's inspectors to verify Iran's compliance. But Israel, which has struck at Iranian-backed militants across the region, remains a wildcard on what it could do. Last year, it carried out its first military airstrikes on Iran — and has warned it is willing to take action alone to target Tehran's program, like it has in the past in Iraq in 1981 or Syria in 2007. ___ Associated Press writer Stephanie Liechtenstein contributed to this report. ___ The Associated Press receives support for nuclear security coverage from the Carnegie Corporation of New York and Outrider Foundation . The AP is solely responsible for all content. ___ Additional AP coverage of the nuclear landscape: Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .

Why China's auto, tech giants threaten Tesla's self-driving future
Why China's auto, tech giants threaten Tesla's self-driving future

Yahoo

time35 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Why China's auto, tech giants threaten Tesla's self-driving future

By Norihiko Shirouzu AUSTIN, Texas (Reuters) -Chinese electric-vehicle makers led by BYD beat Tesla in the competition to produce affordable electric vehicles. Now, many of those same fierce competitors are pulling into the passing lane in the global race to produce self-driving cars. BYD shook up China's smart-EV industry earlier this year by offering its 'God's Eye' driver-assistance package for free, undercutting the technology Tesla sells for nearly $9,000 in China. 'With God's Eye, Tesla's strategy starts to fall apart,' said Shenzhen-based BYD investor Taylor Ogan, an American who has owned several Teslas and driven BYD cars with God's Eye, which he called more capable than Tesla's 'Full Self-Driving' (FSD). It's not just BYD. Other Chinese auto and tech companies are offering affordable EVs with FSD-like technology for a relative pittance. China's Leapmotor and Xpeng, for instance, offer systems capable of highway and urban driving in $20,000 vehicles. A slew of Chinese firms are chasing the same technology, an industry push backed by China's government. BYD's assisted-driving hardware costs are far lower than Tesla's, according to analyses performed for Reuters by companies that dismantle and analyze vehicles for automakers. The comparisons, which have not been previously reported, show that BYD's costs to procure components and build a system with radar and lidar are about the same as Tesla's FSD, which doesn't have such sensors. That undercuts Tesla's unusual technological approach, which aims to save costs by nixing such sensors and relying solely on cameras and artificial intelligence. The rising competition from Chinese smart-EV players is among the chief problems confronting Tesla CEO Elon Musk after his rocky tenure as a Trump administration advisor as he refocuses on his business empire - as Tesla vehicle sales are tanking globally. The stakes are made higher by a moment-of-truth challenge this month in Tesla's home base of Austin, Texas, where it plans to launch a robotaxi trial with 10 or 20 vehicles after a decade of Musk's unfulfilled promises to deliver self-driving Teslas. Tesla did not respond when reached for comment about its Chinese competitors. Previously, Musk has described Chinese car companies as the most competitive in the world. Chinese competition was one factor driving Tesla's strategic pivot away from mass-market EVs last year, when Reuters reported it had killed plans to build an all-new EV expected to cost $25,000. Musk has since staked Tesla's future instead on self-driving robotaxis, the hopes for which now underpin the vast majority of the automaker's stock-market value of roughly $1 trillion. Now Tesla faces the same stiff competition on vehicle autonomy from many of the same Chinese automakers who undercut its affordable-EV plans. Adding to the challenge are tech firms including Chinese smartphone giant Huawei, which supplies autonomous-driving technology to major Chinese automakers. Short of full autonomy, today's driver-assistance systems offer a critical competitive edge in China, the world's largest car market, where Tesla sales are falling amid a protracted price war among scores of homegrown EV brands. Tesla is further handicapped by China's regulations preventing it from using data collected by Tesla cars in China to train the artificial intelligence underpinning FSD. Tesla has been negotiating with Chinese officials, so far without success, to get permission to transfer such data back to the United States for analysis. Tesla's competitors in China do benefit from subsidies and other forms of policy support from Beijing for advanced assisted driving technology. Their advantages also stem from another consequential factor: cut-throat smart-EV competition that has characterized their industry over the past decade. The resulting EV boom created economies of scale and the industry's tendency to forgo some profit margins to expand new technologies' market penetration quickly, leading to lower manufacturing costs. STREETS OF SHENZHEN BYD investor Ogan, of Shenzhen-based Snow Bull Capital, has a front-row seat to China's autonomous-tech battleground. He recently drove several BYD models equipped with God's Eye, he said, and didn't have to take over driving in any of them while traveling the congested streets of Shenzhen, a bustling southern China megalopolis of 18 million people. Another notable smart-EV player in China is Huawei, experts say. Huawei lends its technology and branding to a half dozen automakers including heavyweights Chery, SAIC and Changan, and has lower-profile partnerships with more than a dozen other carmakers, Huawei representatives said. Reuters journalists rode in an Aito M9 — a luxury electric SUV from Seres with Huawei driver-assistance technology — as it navigated Shenzhen roadways in April. With a driver's hands off the wheel, the vehicle exited a highway seamlessly into a congested urban zone, where the M9 proceeded cautiously and slowed to a crawl as a construction worker appeared like he might walk into the roadway. At one point the vehicle turned right and slowly drifted left to avoid two men unloading boxes from a parked truck. The vehicle then parallel parked itself at Huawei's Shenzhen headquarters. Huawei was among several Chinese companies, including automakers Zeekr, Changan and Xpeng, that touted progress towards fully-autonomous cars at April's Shanghai auto show, even as Beijing announced a new marketing crackdown on terms such as 'smart' and 'intelligent' driving in the wake of a deadly crash in a Xiaomi vehicle involving driver-assistance technology. Huawei said it's ready to undergo a new validation regime being developed by Chinese regulators to certify so-called Level 3 driving systems, meaning they are capable enough to allow drivers to look away unless notified by the system to take over. Zeekr, a luxury brand of China auto giant Geely, also plans to soon sell cars with Level 3 systems. Tesla has yet to release such an "unsupervised" version of FSD because its technology needs more training to operate without a driver's hands on the wheel and eyes on the road. Tesla plans to launch self-driving robotaxis in Austin this month. Little is known about its plans. The company has said it aims to initially deploy between 10 and 20 fare-collecting driverless robotaxis in restricted geographic areas of the city, which Tesla has not publicly identified. 'GOD'S EYE' ON THE CHEAP Chinese EV makers are moving quickly to develop driver-assistance systems in a market where car-buyers are demanding them at a faster pace than in other regions, analysts say. Their ability to do so at lower costs poses the biggest threat to Tesla's new autonomy-based business model. BYD buyers can get an FSD-comparable version of God's Eye as a standard feature in cars priced at about $30,000. The cheapest FSD-equipped Tesla in China is a Model 3 selling for about $41,500. According to an analysis by A2MAC1, a Paris-based tear-down firm that benchmarks components, the mid-level God's Eye version most comparable to Tesla's FSD runs on an Nvidia computing chip with data collected through 12 cameras, five radars, 12 ultrasonic sensors, and one lidar sensor, at a cost of $2,105. That compares to $2,360 for Tesla's FSD, which uses cameras without sensors and two AI chips, the firm estimates. Cameras, radar and ultrasonic sensors are 40% cheaper in China than comparable devices in Europe and the United States, A2MAC1 estimates. Lidar sensors cost about 20% less, the firm says. Sensor costs have fallen because China's EV boom created economies of scale, said A2MAC1 engineer Elena Zhelondz. The fierce competition also pushed carmakers and suppliers to accept lower profits on driver-assistance equipment, she said. BYD's 22% gross margin will likely fall as it gives away God's Eye but it will benefit from a vehicle-sales boost, said Chris McNally, head of global automotive and mobility research for advisory firm Evercore. MORE CARS, MORE MILES, BETTER AI Falling behind the Chinese brands on driver-assistance technology would compound Tesla's challenges in China, where it's already losing market share to rivals including BYD, which sells an entry-level EV for less than $10,000. The growing scale of BYD and others could also provide a technological advantage: Racking up more miles on China roads helps train the AI technology needed to perfect automated-driving systems. BYD has a 'clear and ongoing market-share driving advantage' over Tesla in gathering such on-road data to refine God's Eye, Evercore's McNally said, adding that advantage might only increase as offering God's Eye for free helps sell more BYD vehicles. BYD's scale also helps lower costs by providing uncommon leverage over suppliers. In November, a BYD executive in charge of passenger-vehicle operations wrote to suppliers telling them that the automaker sold 4.2 million vehicles last year (more than double the number of Teslas sold) because of 'technical innovation, economies of scale, and a low-cost supply chain.' The executive noted the new year would likely bring more growth, but also fiercer competition. Without specifically mentioning God's Eye, he ended the letter by asking the suppliers for an across-the-board 10% price cut on all parts and systems starting on January 1, calling the new year a final 'knockout round.' Sign in to access your portfolio

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store