Tommy Sheridan says he has been 'victimised' by Glasgow City Council
The city's Health and Social Care Partnership told former MSP Sheridan that all future applications for jobs would be rejected due to him serving jail time for perjury.
Glasgow City Council has declined to comment as there is an ongoing case over the issue at the Court of Session.
Sheridan told BBC Scotland News that his gender critical views on trans rights were a factor in the decision by the council, adding he had "no doubt whatsoever" that he was being blacklisted.
He said: "I don't think it chimes with the spirit of the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act to hold against someone a 15-year-old conviction.
READ MORE: Stirling Labour councillors face no-confidence vote
"Particularly when I've already had to go through a vetting process, a very stiff vetting process from the body that was set up to regulate social care."
Sheridan (below) went to Scotland's highest civil court after he received a rejection letter in August last year, in a bid to get the decision overturned.
The Court of Session heard social work bosses refused to give Sheridan a job because of the 'unacceptable level of risk' his perjury conviction posed to a council.
(Image: NQ) In 2011, Sheridan was found to have had lied under oath during a £200,000 defamation action against the News of the World newspaper and was sentenced to three years in jail.
He was subsequently declared bankrupt in 2022 after running up debts while trying to prove he had been wrongfully imprisoned.
He appealed against his conviction in 2015, and again in 2016. Both applications were refused.
Sheridan's political career was derailed when stories appeared in the News of the World alleging he had taken cocaine and cheated on his wife Gail at swingers' parties.
READ MORE: Cuts to PIP will plunge families further into poverty, research says
He had risen to prominence as a fierce opponent of the poll tax and led the SSP as a serious political force in Scotland, culminating in the passage of his bill to outlaw poindings and warrant sales.
But after successfully suing the now-defunct weekly tabloid for defamation, his case was reviewed and he was later found to have lied to court – resulting in a three-year sentence, of which he served one year.
Sheridan said: "If I was applying for a job in the PR department that may have been a consideration.
"But dealing with people who have got social problems, trying to help people, trying to use your values, your skills, your knowledge, trying to make people's lives better. I don't understand it at all."
He said he believed his views on trans issues were a factor.
"I think being a socialist is always difficult for some of the SNP councillors, but I think the biggest area would be my gender critical views," he told the Scotcast podcast.
"I don't share the SNP's position that someone can declare that they're a man or a woman. I believe in biology, I believe in science, and so does the law now.
"Now, those are gender critical views that Glasgow City Council SNP group don't agree with. So I've got no doubt in my mind that that's part of the package."
Sheridan previously led the Scottish Socialist Party at Holyrood. They won several seats in 1999 and 2003.
Most recently, he was elected to the governing body of the Alba Party and has put his name forward in the hope of being selected as an Alba candidate for the Scottish Parliament.
He said his own "lived experience" behind bars made him an ideal candidate for a youth social work job in criminal justice.
"I come from a very working class background, brought up in a housing scheme, having been in and around jails for the best part of 20-odd years," he said.
"I have intimate knowledge of the processes, challenges and what prison is really like."
Sheridan is still awaiting a decision on his action at the Court of Session.
His lawyer said the council acted unlawfully in its decision to permanently exclude him from social work jobs.
Glasgow City Council's lawyer Paul Reid KC told the court the local authority acted lawfully and were legally entitled to refuse employment.
Lord Young said he would issue a verdict in the near future.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
STV News
an hour ago
- STV News
Pilot of 'transformative' minimum income proposed after Scottish election
An expert group commissioned by ministers has set out a 'road map' to implementing a minimum income guarantee in Scotland, saying it will be a 'fundamental change to the social contract'. The group of charities, campaigners and academics say there should be a pilot of the policy following next year's Holyrood election. A minimum income guarantee would establish an income level below which nobody is allowed to fall, through reform to social security, work, and services. In a suite of recommendations, the group says the Scottish child payment should be doubled to £55 per week by 2031 and sanctions in the welfare system should be effectively ended. They say an interim minimum income payment could be established by 2036, in line with the relative poverty level. Some of the group's welfare changes would cost £671m per year by 2030/31, in today's prices. However these would require just over £300m of additional spending if the UK Government scraps the two-child limit and ends the five-week wait for universal credit, the group said. The costs have led the Conservatives to describe the policy as 'bizarre and unaffordable'. Work on a minimum income guarantee was first committed to in the Scottish Government's 2021 legislative programme, under Nicola Sturgeon's tenure as First Minister. Russell Gunson from the Robertson Trust chaired the expert group. He said: 'A minimum income guarantee could be transformative, putting in place a universal guarantee that's there for everyone in Scotland. 'Given the levels of poverty and inequality we see, we must act urgently. 'With technological change and an ageing population, we need to build security for all to make sure we can take the economic opportunities in front of Scotland. 'A minimum income guarantee could future-proof Scotland.' Addressing questions about the affordability, Mr Gunson added: 'The first steps we set out over the next five years are affordable in the current context, and doable within existing powers. 'We can't wait – and we don't need to wait – to begin to make the changes outlined in this report. 'We know poverty, inequality, and insecurity costs us dearly in financial terms and in lost potential.' However Conservative finance spokesman Craig Hoy was dismissive of the proposal. He said: 'The SNP have made no serious attempt to rein in wasteful public spending and a soaring welfare bill. Now this report shows that a minimum income guarantee would cost billions – when Scottish taxpayers are already footing the bill for spending that is simply unsustainable and unaffordable. 'The SNP's existing plans involve benefits spending £2bn higher than other parts of the country by the end of the decade – and it's Scottish workers that will be saddled with the cost, when they are already paying the highest rates of tax in the UK. 'The SNP should immediately rule out this bizarre and unaffordable policy and reverse their reckless spending plans.' The Scottish Government has been approached for comment. Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
SNP considers handing Scots thousands in benefits to guarantee minimum income
SNP ministers are considering 'guaranteeing' Scots an income of up to £28,000 each by handing out billions of pounds more in benefits. An expert group commissioned by the Scottish Government has recommended establishing a minimum income guarantee, below which nobody is allowed to fall. The SNP was told the cap should be set at £11,500 per year for a single adult, £20,000 for a couple and £28,000 for a couple with a child or a single parent with two children. Claimants would receive less if they had another source of income, such as a salary, and the payment would 'gently' taper off as earnings increased. Those earning higher amounts would receive nothing. It would be paid out via a variety of sources, including social security benefits and cutting the cost of services in kind, like childcare and public transport. The report said the payout could also be subjected to a 12-month time limit, after which claimants would revert to 'strengthened' benefits provided under the current welfare system. A Scottish Government analysis said the policy would cost £8.1 billion a year, falling to £5.9 billion if tapering was introduced. The expert group recommended that the huge cost be funded through income and council tax hikes on better-off Scots. It argued that £500 million could be generated by carrying out a council tax revaluation and increasing the amount paid in the higher bands. In addition, it recommended freezing the salary thresholds for Scotland's income tax bands, a stealth tax that means workers would pay more when they received pay rises. 'Fundamental change to the social contract' However, the move was called 'bizarre and unaffordable' by Scottish Tories. Around 1.5 million Scots earning at least £30,318 already pay more income tax than if they lived elsewhere in the UK. There are six tax bands in Scotland, double the total south of the border, and the top band is 3p higher. The group of charities, campaigners and academics said there should be a pilot of the policy following next year's Holyrood election, with an interim minimum income guarantee established by 2036. They said the plan, which the SNP pledged to examine when Nicola Sturgeon was First Minister, would be a 'fundamental change to the social contract'. 'Bizarre and unaffordable' Craig Hoy, the Scottish Tories' Shadow Finance Secretary, said SNP ministers should 'immediately rule out this bizarre and unaffordable policy'. He added: 'This report shows that a minimum income guarantee would cost billions when Scottish taxpayers are already footing the bill for spending that is simply unsustainable and unaffordable. 'The SNP's existing plans involve benefits spending £2 billion higher than other parts of the country by the end of the decade – and it's Scottish workers that will be saddled with the cost when they are already paying the highest rates of tax in the UK.' The group recommended 'strengthening the existing safety net' between 2026 and 2031, including scrapping the two-child benefit cap and the five-week wait for the first Universal Credit payment. UK ministers should 'end punitive conditions and sanctions' in the welfare system, the report said, while their SNP counterparts doubled the Scottish Child Payment to £55 per week. These 'initial steps' would cost the Scottish Government £671 million per year, the study estimated. Between 2031 and 2036, SNP ministers would be handed new powers by the UK Government to implement the minimum income guarantee and a commission set up to decide on its level. The minimum income guarantee would 'replace Universal Credit payments and where possible combine with other means-tested entitlements for simplicity,' the study said. 'We must act urgently' Russell Gunson of the anti-poverty charity the Robertson Trust, who chaired the group, said: 'A minimum income guarantee could be transformative, putting in place a universal guarantee that's there for everyone in Scotland. Given the levels of poverty and inequality we see, we must act urgently. 'The first steps we set out over the next five years are affordable in the current context, and doable within existing powers. We can't wait – and we don't need to wait – to begin to make the changes outlined in this report.' Shirley-Anne Somerville, the SNP's Social Justice Secretary, welcomed the report but she said there were 'no plans to change tax policy'. She said: 'We will consider the Expert Group's report and the accompanying research and respond to the recommendations of the Expert Group in due course.'
Scotsman
2 hours ago
- Scotsman
Readers' Letters: You're on to a loser looking for substance in a Swinney speech
John Swinney's promise to sort out Scotland sparked scepticism Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Rachel Amery is an optimist (Analysis, 17 June). John Swinney has said he is going to overhaul public services – in much the same way as Nicola Sturgeon said that she would close the attainment gap in schools and establish a publicly-owned, not-for-profit energy company. So I'll believe it when I see it. Ms Amery has to admit 'there was not a lot of specific detail on what will be changing on the back of this reset'. Well, colour me surprised. Her example of possible change in the NHS that Swinney intimated amounts to emulating England's success (shock! horror!) in having had for some years an NHS app that 'makes it easier to manage appointments, make it simple to access test results' and more. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Where Ms Amery is spot on is in writing: 'Despite the lack of clear detail, he made a big deal out of this speech.' Don't SNP leaders always do that? First Minister John Swinney at the Scotland 2050 Conference at Edinburgh's Assembly Rooms yesterday (Picture: Jeff) Jill Stephenson, Edinburgh Not enough John Swinney's promise re: winter fuel payment needs to take account of the different tax rates people pay in Scotland. Those up to £35,000 in England and Wales will have more money left after tax before they get their winter fuel payment. If the First Minister does not want pensioners to have less than their counterparts down south to spend on heating he will need to give the allowance to those up to £37,000. Elizabeth Hands, Armadale, West Lothian Distraction ahoy So John Swinney insists independence is within reach. Really? Or is he simply terrified of former SNP voters, at next year's Holyrood elections, migrating either to independence backing Greens and Alba or to pro-UK Labour or Reform? Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Keir Starmer has made clear that there'll be no referendum during this Westminster parliament, and I can't see any other Westminster party or coalition granting another Scexit vote during the next. The reality is that Swinney doesn't want voters judging the SNP on their shocking mismanagement of Scottish public services in the Sturgeon/Yousaf/Swinney eras and seeks to distract voters with yet another independence campaign. Yet surely the SNP has failed the independence movement, too? It's been 11 years since we voted to remain in the UK and opinion poll trends have shown support primarily for us to continue to do so. Remember that the SNP has continually been in power during this period and has failed to deliver another referendum. The 2026 Holyrood election looks tough for Swinney and I suspect he's going to have to try harder than beating the independence drum again when most of us are more concerned with the management of the NHS, education, housing and roads. Martin Redfern, Melrose, Roxburghshire Share power Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad A lead article by Alexander Brown (16 June) reviews the need for a Mayor plus additional devolved powers for the City of Glasgow. An additional feature from Andrew Carter stated that: 'If Glasgow performed in line with comparable European cities, the Scottish economy would be 4.6 per cent higher'! This failure is due to the refusal of the SNP to honour the pledge given by the 2020 Communities Secretary, Aileen Campbell, that the Scottish Government would implement the Andy Wightman bill to give local councils European-style safeguards following the May 2021 election. Not a single SNP first minister has honoured that pledge to the people of Scotland over the past four years. However, in a speech of 14 May 2024 to mark the 25th anniversary of the Scottish Parliament, Anas Sarwar pledged to push power out of Holyrood and into the regions of Scotland Time, therefore, for all Scots outwith the environs of Edinburgh to give Anas Sarwar and the Scottish Labour Party the opportunity to deliver on a pledge that John Swinney and the SNP have refused to honour! Ian Moir, Castle Douglas, Dumfries & Galloway Still waiting Back in 2007 one of the first things new first minister Alex Salmond promised was a focus on more efficient government and the reform of nine departments of the 'Executive', 27 executive agencies and the 152 quangos. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad He added: 'I'm not sure we need that complexity for a nation of five million. If you're going to have joined-up government you need less bits to join up.' Eighteen years later and one of the relics of that hopeful regime, John Swinney, appeared on stage in a gas-lit fug of smoke and mirrors to swear he's going to finish the job. Where's he getting his inspiration from? The spirit of Alex Salmond or the spectre of Trump, Farage, Reform and DOGE? One thing we can be sure of: it ain't gonna happen on John Swinney's watch. Allan Sutherland, Stonehaven, Aberdeenshire What democracy? I see that without having consulted all the Members of Parliament, whom we, the people, elected to represent our interests, Keir Starmer is sending more jet fighters to the Middle East. In response to questions from the Press, Starmer refused to rule out them being used to protect Israel from Iranian attacks. I wonder if anybody asked if he would rule out them being used to protect Iran, Iraq, Lebanon, Syria, Yemen, Gaza or the West Bank from Israeli air attacks. But we know the answer to that already. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad How blatant do his actions and those of Trump and others have to be before the penny drops for those who still believe we live in a democracy. David J Crawford, Anniesland, Glasgow Just saying... On Monday many of our newspapers carried a large photo of Donald Trump hosting what was said to be the largest US military parade in decades. I quote from Wikipedia's entry on the Nuremberg Rallies: 'The rallies became a national event following Adolf Hitler's rise to power in 1933, and were thereafter held annually. Once the Nazi dictatorship was firmly established, party propagandists began filming the rallies for a national, and international, audience.' Doug Clark, Currie, Midlothian Falling behind The determination of the SNP to retain their unilateral ban on nuclear power, no matter what, is baffling. It did not seem logical when first introduced, now it appears nonsensical. And that was before the climate change alarm and the impoverishing Net Zero commitment. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Now the UK is charging ahead with nuclear, with or without Scotland, and at long last there is a possibility in our time of abundant clean and reliable energy in every weather. An added bonus is that there is enough oil and gas available under our feet to keep us safe and well and warm until the new nuclear plants are up and running. A further plus is the hi-tech jobs and huge investment in our country. Only the SNP wants us to be entirely separate from what is being done the UK, Europe and the entire civilised, progressive world. Alexander McKay, Edinburgh Conspiracy theory Escalating conflict throughout the Middle East, war in mainland Europe. While despot Vladimir Putin, along with his Iranian terrorist-supporting allies, threaten global security and fuel supplies, Frances McKie (Letters, 16 June) resorts to banging the separatist anti-nuclear drum. We're asked to swallow a bizarre conspiracy theory that 'the nuclear lobby' somehow stands 'in the way of necessary research and development' for a theoretical hydrogen solution to our energy needs. What about increasingly desperate shrieks from John Swinney and his party about 'independence' and 'the far right' to an electorate weary after nearly two decades of non-stop failure? Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Nationalists inhabit a make-believe world where ridiculous arrays of Chinese-manufactured wind turbines generate limitless electricity. A Saltire flapping over Edinburgh Castle's highest turret would protect us from external aggression. For the record, we only 'export more energy than we can use' when the wind happens to be blowing at an optimum speed and electricity prices are rock-bottom. The rest of the time it's necessary to rely on non-renewable resources, usually from elsewhere in the UK. Scotland is now on a totally different political, cultural, economic and environmental path to the rest of Great Britain. Thanks to the SNP and Greens, this is the path to self-delusion and stubborn, ideological denial of reality which most of us don't wish to follow. Martin O'Gorman, Edinburgh Well done Bob! In one of the most exciting finishes ever in the US Open at Oakmont last Sunday, Bob MacIntyre came up just short of what would have been an amazing victory. Any one of five players could have been the victor and he was just pipped at the post for a very respectable second. Where Bob MacIntyre didn't fall short was in his admirable sportsmanship. When JJ Spaun, the eventual, and most unlikely, winner, holed a 64ft winning putt, Bob was seen to be applauding. It all made for thrilling television. Beneath Bob's impressive modesty lies a very powerful determination. Coming second, he said, had given him a thirst to win a major. The 'wee man from Oban' is big on talent and, as Martin Dempster wrote, there are 'few doubters' now. Ian Petrie, Edinburgh Write to The Scotsman Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad
