NZ-EU Trade Deal Delivers Export Growth
Hon Todd McClay
Minister for Trade and Investment
Minister of Agriculture
The early entry into force of the New Zealand–European Union Trade Agreement (FTA) is paying off, with Kiwi goods exports to the EU surging by 28 per cent during the first year.
'In the last 12 months our goods exports to the EU surged from $3.8 billion to over $4.8 billion,' Trade and Investment Minister Todd McClay says.
'This is good news for all New Zealanders, especially our sheep farmers, kiwifruit growers and machinery exporters. Sheep meat was up 29 per cent adding an additional $216 million, kiwifruit has increased by 69 per cent contributing a further $316 million, and machinery was up an impressive 104 per cent providing $173 million more compared to the previous year.
'Strengthening ties with trading partners is crucial to growing the New Zealand economy and driving up incomes for Kiwis. Better market access, lower costs, and fewer trade barriers with the EU are key to delivering the Government's ambitious goal of doubling the value of New Zealand's exports in 10 years.'
The NZ-EU FTA removed 91 per cent of duties on New Zealand exports immediately, climbing to 97 per cent after seven years. Wine, seafood, and a range of other products are also benefiting from significant tariff reductions.
'Our growing network of trade agreements means exporters now have more choices about where to sell their world-class products,' Mr McClay says.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
2 hours ago
- Scoop
'Look Busy – The People Are Angry' In The Face Of Genocide – Government Brings Shame On Us All
The government's decision to sanction Israeli cabinet ministers is a cynical diversionary gesture, according to the Palestine Solidarity Network Aotearoa. New Zealand has joined the UK, Australia, Canada, and Norway in banning the entry of Israel's Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich and National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir. PSNA Co-Chair, Maher Nazzal, says the just announced move is simply to placate New Zealanders angry at the government's complicity with the mass killing of Palestinians and deliberate starvation of Occupied Gaza. 'The New Zealand government statement was quite explicit that the sanctions were 'not designed to sanction the wider Israeli government' of which Ben-Gvir and Smotrich are ministers.' 'The New Zealand government's official statement is laying the blame for Israeli barbarity on just two ministers. Our government is pretending that they alone are responsible for the military violence in the Gaza Strip, and Israel's annexation of Palestinian land, expanding settlements, and forced displacement.' 'All these war crimes are supported and stated by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his government. These measures are all being carried out by the Israeli government. These two ministers are quite rabid, but they are not just freelancers or 'bad apples'.' 'Netanyahu himself is wanted for trial on war crimes charges, so why does he escape the travel ban?' Nazzal says Ben-Gvir and Smotrich would never plan to come to New Zealand anyway. 'The last time such an individual visited in 2006 the Auckland District Court issued a warrant for his arrest to face war crime charges.' (That was Israeli General Moshe Ya'alon – the 'Butcher of Qana'. The warrant was quashed by the then Attorney-General Michael Cullen) 'Even if the government sanctioned the entire Israeli cabinet, it would be meaningless.' 'Israel has made Gaza hell on earth for Palestinians, and is making it worse by the hour. We should be cutting trade ties – including military technology, which might be finding its way to Israel, or sending up satellites from Mahia used by Israel to spy on Gaza. 'New Zealand has bilateral agreements with Israel over science and movie-making. They should stop.' 'The government needs to ban Israeli soldiers coming here for genocide holidays, instead of Winston Peters going out of his way to welcome them.' 'And it goes without saying that the Israeli ambassador should be booted out.' Nazzal says the forced starvation in Gaza has reached a crisis point. 'The choice for the international community is stark. Let tens of thousands starve to death in the next few weeks, or impose a no-fly zone over Gaza and provide military protection for UNRWA aid convoys.' 'In that context, by limiting the travel options for two Israeli politicians our government feels like it's conveying a message of 'Look busy – New Zealanders are angry, we must be seen to be doing something, but really, we don't care.'
Scoop
5 hours ago
- Scoop
Free Speech Union Warns Stalking And Harassment Bill Risks Abuse, Changes Make It Worse
The Crimes Legislation (Stalking and Harassment) Amendment Bill suffers from the common fault of slogan laws with good intentions, without realism about the risks of misuse. The announced expansion of what is considered a 'specified act' goes in the wrong direction, says Stephen Franks, Council Member of the Free Speech Union. 'We've already seen the broad and vague terminology in the Harmful Digital Communications Act being used to silence legitimate dissent many times. This Bill is likely to be similarly abused. 'Truth should be a defense for 'damaging, or undermining [a person's] reputation, opportunities, or relationships'. That would save the centuries-long principle that protects the public interest in learning home truths about powerful people and wrongdoers. It is not enough to say the Bill lets you argue that truth is for a proper purpose. We know that courts have not held that telling the truth is presumptively a proper purpose. 'The broad definition of 'specified acts' as inducing fear or distress, combined with the low threshold for establishing a 'pattern of behaviour', already leaves wide scope for misuse against legitimate surveillance, and dissent. Likewise, the inclusion of 'contacting or communicating with a person' is vague and has the potential to be weaponised. 'By prioritising the term 'fear or distress' without a clear objective override, the Bill raises similar issues to 'hate speech' legislation. The law does not recognise that some people ought to be ashamed ('distressed') by exposure of their own conduct. 'The Government's decision to increase the timeframe for establishing a 'pattern of behaviour' from contact twice over 12 to 24 months also widens the net, making it more likely that isolated or infrequent expressions of dissent could be criminalised. 'We submitted our concerns in February, urging the Justice Select Committee to narrow their definitions, to clarify 'specified acts', and to provide better defences that would let the courts protect free speech. We call on the Minister of Justice to protect Kiwis' speech rights as well as victims of stalking and harassment.'
Scoop
5 hours ago
- Scoop
Concerns KiwiSaver Is Being Used As ‘Piggy Bank' To Solve Financial Woes
Article – RNZ A growing number of New Zealanders are making hardship withdrawals from their retirement savings. , Money Correspondent KiwiSaver is in danger of being considered a 'piggy bank' to solve all of New Zealanders' financial woes, one provider says, and too many people are tapping into their savings on hardship grounds. Founder of Kōura KiwiSaver scheme Rupert Carlyon was wary of calls for settings to be changed to allow people to use their money to buy farms. He said KiwiSaver was already being called on to solve the country's housing and infrastructure crises. Carlyon said changing the rules to allow more withdrawals sent the wrong message to people, who should be using KiwiSaver for their retirement. Instead, they were tapping into KiwiSaver in growing numbers. In April, 4220 people withdrew savings for financial hardship reasons, up from 3700 in April 2024. They withdrew a combined $37.6 million. 'It encourages more and more people to think about it like a piggybank. It's scary what's happening in that space,' he said. He said he saw people making repeated hardship withdrawals, depleting their balance. 'People come back multiple times with the same claims… it's hard to figure out what's real and what's not.' He said it would now not be possible to close the 'hardship loophole' because people expected it to be available and any change could dent confidence in the scheme. But he said it should be tightened up so there was a limit on the number of withdrawals that could be made within a certain timeframe. 'The other part is it's very resource intensive. We spend on average up to six hours per financial hardship claim… It's hard on staff because they often have to say no when they want to say yes.' A spokesperson for Public Trust, one of the KiwiSaver supervisors, said people were not required to repay hardship withdrawals if it was found they were not necessary. 'Their future self might not thank them for dipping into their retirement savings. We see situations of real and urgent need… there are strict rules and checks in place to help ensure withdrawals are only approved for genuine financial hardship, and applicants need to sign a legal declaration confirming their situation. 'If someone doesn't use funds as intended, it could affect their ability to make another hardship withdrawal in the future.'
