A night with the medics of Ukraine's 3rd Assault Brigade on Kharkiv Oblast front
Yahoo is using AI to generate takeaways from this article. This means the info may not always match what's in the article. Reporting mistakes helps us improve the experience.
Yahoo is using AI to generate takeaways from this article. This means the info may not always match what's in the article. Reporting mistakes helps us improve the experience.
Yahoo is using AI to generate takeaways from this article. This means the info may not always match what's in the article. Reporting mistakes helps us improve the experience. Generate Key Takeaways
Editor's Note: Due to the security protocols of the brigade featured in this story, Ukrainian soldiers and military medics mentioned are identified by their callsigns only.
KHARKIV OBLAST – As is usually the case at stabilization points across Ukraine in the fourth year of Russia's full-scale war, peak hour for the arrival of the wounded comes at sunset.
Three members of one of the heavy bomber drone teams have been evacuated, two of whom are carrying nasty burns after their dugout was spotted and set on fire by a Russian drone-dropped incendiary munition.
In Ukraine's military medical system, these are all considered light wounds. Still, dressing these bad burns is painful enough to justify putting them under, if briefly.
Military medics of Ukraine's 3rd Separate Assault Brigade tend to wounded soldiers at a stabilization point near the front line in Kharkiv Oblast, on April 23, 2025. (Francis Farrell/The Kyiv Independent)
This stabilization point belongs to Ukraine's 3rd Separate Assault Brigade, which, along with other attached units, has been serving for around a year on the front line in eastern Kharkiv Oblast, holding territory that was first liberated from Russian occupation in autumn 2022.
While less intense and largely more stable than other hotspots of the front line in Donetsk Oblast, this area saw a gradual uptick in Russian attacks over autumn and winter, with Moscow's forces looking to take back the territory east of the Oskil River.
While the others are having their wounds dressed, the soldier who managed to escape with the lightest burns — callsign "Rebro" — must grapple with a painful truth.
There was a fourth member of the team, callsign "Chornyi," or "Black."
Losing consciousness and falling to the ground inside the dugout, and wearing body armor on top of his already heavy frame, Chornyi could not be carried out of the inferno.
"My brother-in-arms, the one I was trying to drag out, he fell right before the entrance," said Rebro. "I couldn't carry him."
After making it out, Chornyi's team members made a final attempt to go in and save him.
"After we scattered across the treeline, I understood that one of us was left behind; he must have lost consciousness," said Rebro. "We tried to go back and get him out, but everything was burning already."
"One was left behind... my mate..." Rebro trails off, breaking into tears as a nurse attempts to console him.
A wounded soldier of Ukraine's 3rd Separate Assault Brigade at a stabilization point near the front line in Kharkiv Oblast, on April 23, 2025. (Francis Farrell/The Kyiv Independent)
Since forming in 2022, the 3rd Separate Assault Brigade has become not only one of the Ukrainian military's largest formations but also one of its most well-known, thanks to a public media presence and recruiting campaigns unprecedented for a single brigade.
As part of reforms to the Ukrainian army's command structure, the 3rd Assault was one of the few brigades selected to take the responsibility of leading one of the newly formed army corps.
One of the unit's biggest sources of pride is its highly professional medical service, bringing cutting-edge equipment and a broad range of specialists to stabilization points like this close to the front line.
Military doctor, callsign "Zelenyi," of Ukraine's 3rd Separate Assault Brigade at a stabilization point near the front line in Kharkiv Oblast, on April 23, 2025. (Francis Farrell/The Kyiv Independent)
Getting the best care possible, as soon as possible, is crucial — both for saving lives and for giving patients the best chance of a full recovery.
This is especially true when the swift evacuation of wounded, particularly from infantry positions on the zero line, has grown practically impossible in many parts of the front line.
The high saturation of enemy drones in the air means that even moving around on foot, let alone on a vehicle, makes one a target for a high-precision drone strike within a few minutes.
As a result, soldiers, especially infantrymen, must often wait for days at front-line positions for the right conditions to arise and make evacuation possible.
"The wounds are mostly from drones now," said one of the brigade's surgeons on the shift who goes by the callsign "Zelenyi" (Green).
"It could be a light wound, but when (Russian) drones don't let us get (the injured) out, the wounds get infections, we see abscesses and the like develop."
Often, antibiotics and painkillers can be delivered by drones to try and help relieve the situation at a distance, but it's only a temporary solution.
In the event of a wound leading to a critical bleed and the application of a tourniquet, waiting several days before evacuation usually means that the limb cannot be saved.
The result: loss of blood circulation, gangrene, and many more amputee veterans on Ukrainian streets for decades after the end of the fighting.
Military medics of Ukraine's 3rd Separate Assault Brigade tend to wounded soldiers at a stabilization point near the front line in Kharkiv Oblast, on April 23, 2025. (Francis Farrell/The Kyiv Independent)
Not long after the group is taken out for further treatment, a pair of two more wounded soldiers is brought in.
It's one of the brigade's artillery teams, this time with light shrapnel wounds. Once again, they were the target of a Russian drone strike, and once again, one of them didn't make it out alive.
Both of the soldiers are conscious and on their feet, but one has suffered a shrapnel wound right under his right eye.
It's not immediately clear whether the red, swollen eye has sustained direct damage, but after careful cleaning of the wound, the doctors are relieved to find that it hasn't.
A wounded soldier of Ukraine's 3rd Separate Assault Brigade at a stabilization point near the front line in Kharkiv Oblast, on April 23, 2025. (Francis Farrell/The Kyiv Independent)
Military medics of Ukraine's 3rd Separate Assault Brigade tend to wounded soldiers at a stabilization point near the front line in Kharkiv Oblast, on April 23, 2025. (Francis Farrell/The Kyiv Independent)
The fact that those brought in to the stabilization point were from Ukrainian artillery and drone teams was no coincidence: their working positions, while also getting more dangerous with every passing month, are at least slightly further back from the zero line, making timely evacuation possible.
Meanwhile, for wounded infantry, already living and fighting in the most difficult conditions of any soldier, the wait times are only getting longer and longer, with no light at the end of the tunnel.
Military therapist "Luna" of Ukraine's 3rd Separate Assault Brigade at a stabilization point near the front line in Kharkiv Oblast, on April 23, 2025. (Francis Farrell/The Kyiv Independent)
For military therapist "Luna," finding the strength to continue is not a matter she has a choice in.
"There is no one of us in this war — whether it's for three years, two, or even just one — who hasn't been deeply changed by it," she said, after finishing the dressing on the last artilleryman's shrapnel-speckled leg.
"Can we continue? It's not the right question, we simply must."
You can watch the video version of this story on the Kyiv Independent's YouTube channel:
Note from the author:
Hi, this is Francis Farrell, the author of this piece. There are some moments in our line of work that make you just stop in your tracks, confronted with the scale and intensity of the horror before you. Seeing a grown man break down in tears as the adrenaline wore off because of his teammate that they couldn't drag out of the burning dugout, yes, that was one of them. Ukrainians are tired, hurt, and sick to their stomach of this war, everyone here wants peace, but Russia's goal remains this country's annihilation, and sometimes it feels like people in the West forget about this. We could just stay in Kyiv and report from there, but we go to the war regularly, to bring this clarity back to you, before the war itself comes knocking. Please consider supporting our reporting.
We've been working hard to bring you independent, locally-sourced news from Ukraine. Consider supporting the Kyiv Independent.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Mass Drone Attack On Exposed Russian Bombers Puts Spotlight On Hardened Aircraft Shelter Debate
New details continue to emerge about Ukraine's unprecedented covert drone attacks on multiple Russian air bases, but the full scale and scope of the resulting losses remain unclear. It is the latest global event to put a spotlight on an already fierce debate about whether the U.S. military should be investing in more hardened aircraft shelters and other new fortified infrastructure at bases abroad and at home, something TWZ has been following closely. What we just saw in Russia is a nightmare scenario that we have already been sounding the alarm on for years now, which broadly underscores the growing threats posed by drones. Readers can first get up to speed on what is known about the attacks, which were focused on trying to neutralize Russian strategic bombers that are regularly used to conduct cruise missile attacks on Ukraine, in our latest reporting here. Authorities in Ukraine say they attacked five bases with a total of 117 small and relatively short-range first-person-view (FPV) type kamikaze drones, destroying or at least damaging 41 aircraft. Andriy Kovalenko, an official with Ukraine's National Security and Defense Council, has also said that 'at least 13 Russian aircraft were destroyed.' These claims have yet to be independently verified and they should be taken as speculative at this time. The russian terrorist state no longer has the ability to produce Tu-95s or any kind of strategic bomber. This is a tremendous victory for Ukraine. — Michael MacKay (@mhmck) June 1, 2025 The drones were launched from container-like enclosures built to look like small sheds or tiny homes on tractor-trailer trucks. Questions remain about exactly how they were guided to their targets, but at least some of them were human-in-the-loop guided by operators using first-person-view 'goggles' or tablet-like devices. 5/5. After launching, the trailers self-destructed to avoid detection or recovery (see photos). — Roman Sheremeta (@rshereme) June 2, 2025 From the imagery that has already emerged, a key aspect of the Ukrainian drone attacks was that the Russian planes that were targeted were parked out in the open. The fact that aircraft sitting on open flightlines are especially vulnerable, including to uncrewed aerial threats, is not new. 'One day last week, I had two small UASs that were interfering with operations… At one base, the gate guard watched one fly over the top of the gate check, tracked it while it flew over the flight line for a little while, and then flew back out and left,' now-retired Air Force Gen. James 'Mike' Holmes, then head of Air Combat Command (ACC), said in 2017, now nearly a decade ago. 'Imagine a world where somebody flies a couple hundred of those and flies one down the intake of my F-22s with just a small weapon on it.' At that time, TWZ noted that it would be easier for an adversary to just attack parked planes in the open, offering a way to knock out large numbers of aircraft before they can even get airborne. Since then, we have already had multiple opportunities to re-highlight the ever-growing risk of something like this occurring to America's armed forces, including scenarios involving more localized attacks on bases far from active war zones by lower-end weaponized commercial drones. The Russian military has been acutely aware of drone threats to air bases even before the all-out invasion of Ukraine in 2022. A mass drone attack on Russia's Khmeimim Air Base outpost in Syria in 2017 was a watershed moment that TWZ highlighted at the time as a sign of things to come. Regular drone attacks on Khmeimim in the late 2010s also prompted the construction of new hardened aircraft shelters there. Last year, Russia's Minister of Defense Andrey Belousov said that 'a schedule for airfields has already been drawn up and that shelters will definitely be built' in response to Ukrainian drone and missile attacks, according to independent Russian journalist Alexander Kots. The construction of new aircraft shelters, hardened and unhardened, had already been visible in satellite imagery of a growing number of air bases in Russia since late 2023. However, from what has been observed to date, the focus has been on better protecting tactical jets at bases closer to Ukraine. Just recently, Belousov was shown a model of a hangar with a Tu-160 Blackjack bomber inside as part of a presentation on new developments relating to prefabricated and modular structures for various military purposes. Whether or not the hangar model reflects an active project, or is a proposal or notional concept of some kind, is unclear. Tu-160s were among the aircraft types Ukraine explicitly targeted with its covert drone attacks this weekend. Russian Defense Minister Andrei Belousov was shown a model of a hangar for Tu-160 strategic bombers during a visit last — Rob Lee (@RALee85) June 2, 2025 Russia's construction of new aircraft shelters is part of an expanding global trend that has also been observed in China, North Korea, and elsewhere. Hardened Aircraft Shelters of J-10 Fighters — Húrin (@Hurin92) September 8, 2023 Geolocation: 39.4069444, 125.8983333Sunchon AB, DPRK (North Korea)10/27/23 Sentinel-2 L2A pass shows paving and shelters (16 total) completed. Sunchon is home to the KPAAF 57th Air Regiment (MiG-29s).@GeoConfirmedhttps:// — Evergreen Intel (@vcdgf555) December 1, 2023 Satellite imagery of Nasosnaya Air Base – Republic Of Azerbaijan Construction of hangars for JF-17 fighter jets, which began in early 2024, is now in its final stages. The base will soon be ready to host a full squadron of 16 aircraft. — آریان || Āryān (@BasedQizilbash) May 28, 2025 The U.S. military does have hardened aircraft shelters are various bases, but has made very limited investments in building more since the end of the Cold War. Calls for new shelters, hardened or otherwise, have been pointedly absent from U.S. military planning in recent years, at least publicly. Some American officials have actively pushed back on the idea, often citing the cost of building new hardened infrastructure, which is funding that could be applied elsewhere. The U.S. Air Force, for instance, has been more focused on active defenses, such as surface-to-air missile systems, and expanding the number of operating locations that forces could be dispersed to, if necessary. 'So, we will have the need for bases, the main operating bases from which we operate,' Air Force Gen. Kevin Schneider, head of Pacific Air Forces (PACAF), said at the Air & Space Forces Association's (AFA) 2025 Warfare Symposium in March. 'The challenge becomes, at some point, we will need to move to austere locations. We will need to disaggregate the force. We will need to operate out of other locations, again, one for survivability, and two, again, to provide response options.' Those are requirements that 'cost money' and force the Air Force to 'make internal trades,' such as 'do we put that dollar towards, you know, fixing the infrastructure at Kadena [Air Base in Japan] or do we put that dollar towards restoring an airfield at Tinian,' Schneider added. There is growing criticism that U.S. forces are being left increasingly vulnerable, including to drone attacks, by a lack of investment in hardened aircraft shelters and other new fortified facilities. A recent deployment of six of the U.S. Air Force's 19 prized B-2 stealth bombers to the Indian Ocean island of Diego Garcia, which wrapped up earlier this month, had offered a new datapoint in the shelter debate. Diego Garcia only has four specially designed B-2 shelters open, which are not hardened in any way, and the bombers were seen parked out in the open while on the island. More recently, a detachment of F-15E Strike Eagles arrived on the island to help provide force protection to other assets still there. 'While 'active defenses' such as air and missile defense systems are an important part of base and force protection, their high cost and limited numbers mean the U.S. will not be able to deploy enough of them to fully protect our bases,' a group of 13 Republican members of Congress had written in an open letter to the heads of the U.S. Air Force and U.S. Navy in May 2024. 'In order to complement active defenses and strengthen our bases, we must invest in 'passive defenses,' like hardened aircraft shelters and underground bunkers, dispersal of forces across both within a base and across multiple bases, redundant logistical facilities, and rapid runway repair capabilities.' 'While hardened aircraft shelters do not provide complete protection from missile attacks, they do offer significantly more protection against submunitions than expedient shelters (relocatable steel shelters). They would also force China to use more force to destroy each aircraft, thereby increasing the resources required to attack our forces and, in turn, the survivability of our valuable air assets,' they added. 'Constructing hardened shelters for all our air assets may not be economically feasible or tactically sensible, but the fact that the number of such shelters on U.S. bases in the region has barely changed over a decade is deeply troubling.' In January, the Hudson Institute think tank in Washington, D.C., released a report that underscores the points made above about the benefits that new hardened aircraft shelters offer in terms of reducing vulnerability and increasing the resources an enemy would have to expend. The authors of the Hudson report assessed that 10 missiles, each with a warhead capable of scattering cluster munitions across areas 450 feet in diameter, could be enough to neutralize all aircraft parked in the open and critical fuel storage facilities at key airbases like Marine Corps Air Station Iwakuni in Japan, Naval Support Facility Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean, or Langley Air Force Base in Virginia. The general points made here about the particular danger of submunitions from cluster weapons could also apply to drones with similarly sized warheads like the ones Ukraine just used in its attacks on Russia's air bases. Even fully-enclosed, but unhardened shelters could provide a modicum of additional defense against these kinds of threats. Last year, officials at two U.S. air bases – Langley Air Force Base in Virginia and Seymour Johnson Air Force Base in North Carolina – expressed interest in the possibility of adding nets or other similar physical defensive measures to existing open-ended sunshade-type shelters to help protect against attacks by smaller drones. It's unclear whether there has been any movement since on actual implementation. Nets are among the drone defenses currently used on both sides of the ongoing conflict in Ukraine. Waves of still-mysterious drone incursions over Langley Air Force Base in December 2023, which TWZ was the first to report on, remain a particular focal point for broader calls from Congress and elsewhere to better protect U.S. military facilities against uncrewed aerial threats. What happened at Langley is just one of a still-growing number of worrisome drone incidents over and around U.S. military facilities, training ranges, and warships off the coast of the United States, as well as critical civilian infrastructure, in the past decade or so, many of which we have reported first. Overseas bases well outside of established conflict zones that host American forces have been the site of concerning drone overflights in recent years, as well. There was also a flurry of reported drone sightings last year over New Jersey and other parts of the United States last year, many of which quickly turned out to be spurious. However, the surge in public attention underscored a real threat, as Ukraine has now demonstrated in dramatic fashion. While Ukraine says its covert drone attacks on Russia took more than a year to plan, prepare for, and stage, they also underscore how the basic barriers to entry for carrying out drone attacks, especially ones involving weaponized commercial designs, have long been low in terms of cost and technical aptitude. The operation notably leveraged ArduPilot, described as an 'open source autopilot system' that is freely available online. Of course open source software has been used in war before, but seeing ArduPilot Mission Planner being used to blow up Russian strategic bombers is still wild. — John Wiseman (@ 2025-06-01T15:55:48.877Z Additional footage shows another FPV drone overflying the airfield; multiple Tupolev Tu-95 bombers are seen aflame. — Jimmy Rushton (@JimmySecUK) June 1, 2025 18 years after @Jrdmnz @jason4short and I created ArduPilot, here it is destroying large parts of the Russian air force. Crazy — Chris Anderson (@chr1sa) June 1, 2025 Drone threats are only to expand and accelerate in terms of sophistication, thanks in large part to advances in artificial intelligence and machine learning, as time goes on. Uncrewed aerial systems with rapidly improving autonomous navigation and targeting capabilities that do not require a human in the loop present particularly serious threats. Without the need for an active link to a human operator, those drones are immune to jamming and do not pump out radio emissions that can help provide early warning to defenders. They are also not limited in range to keep a connection with their controllers. Improving capabilities to autonomously find and prosecute targets are already emerging on one-way-attack drones, and this is something that can be expected to proliferate, as well. Autonomous drones that can target objects dynamic targeting without having to rely just on a fixed set of coordinates via satellite navigation like GPS, another signal that can be disrupted, will only make drone threats more complex and vastly harder to counter overall. TWZ has explored all of this in great detail in this past feature. Swarming is another area that will make lower-end drones so much harder to defeat. Working cooperatively as an integrated team at computer speeds allows drones to operate and react with extreme efficiency beyond the pace of the enemy's decision cycle. This, along with sheer mass and the resilience that goes with that, can quickly overwhelm defenses. 'In general, the technology to field systems has far outpaced the technology to defeat those systems,' Rear Adm. Paul Spedero, Vice Director for Operations, J3, Joint Chiefs of Staff, told members of the House Oversight Committee at a hearing on drone threats in April. 'It's a much wider, broader, deeper market for drone application, for commercial and recreational purposes, so hence that technology has evolved very quickly from radio control drones to now fully autonomous drones that may or may not even rely on reception of a GPS signal, which would make it very challenging to intercept.' Ukraine's covert drone attacks on Russia also underscore that these are increasingly threats unbounded by basic geography. An adversary could launch uncrewed aerial attackers from 1,000 miles away or from an area right next to the target, or anywhere in between. There are many drone types that can address those missions needs, and affordably so. Those drones could be launched from the ground, from ships at sea, and/or from aerial platforms, including other lower-end drones. Complex attacks involving different tiers of threats approaching from multiple vectors at once only add to the complications for defending forces. Ukrainian "Dovbush" UAV carrying and releasing two FPV drones during "Dovbush" UAV is reportedly capable of carrying up to six FPV drones at the same — Status-6 (Military & Conflict News) (BlueSky too) (@Archer83Able) November 19, 2024 Despite all this, America's armed forces have also continued to lag in the fielding of counter-drone defenses for forces down-range, as well as bases and other assets in and around the homeland. Domestically, an often convoluted array of legal, regulatory, and other factors have presented challenges. On the sidelines of a U.S. military counter-drone experiment called Falcon Peak 2025 in October 2024, TWZ and other outlets were notably told that lasers, microwaves, surface-to-air missiles, and guns were all off the table as options for neutralizing drones within the United States, at least at the time. For over a decade I have outlined the exact scenario as we just saw in Russia. It could happen in the U.S. tomorrow. This was a pivotal event. U.S. military and political leadership cannot live in partial denial of this threat anymore. Our most prized aircraft are sitting ducks. — Tyler Rogoway (@Aviation_Intel) June 1, 2025 The biggest challenge with this issue is education. Many just don't take the time to learn the ins and outs of the UAS threat, there are many layers and nuances, emerging technologies. There are high up people in the military that don't even really understand these basics. Then… — Tyler Rogoway (@Aviation_Intel) June 1, 2025 The U.S. military does continue to push for enhancements to the authorities it has now to protect its bases and other assets domestically against drone threats. As part of a new Pentagon-wide counter-drone strategy rolled out last year, U.S. Northern Command (NORTHCOM) has a 'synchronizer role' that includes making sure commanders know what they are allowed to do now if drones appear around their facilities. Ukraine's drone attacks on Russian air bases this past weekend can only add to the already intense debate over investments in hardened aircraft shelters and other fortified infrastructure, as well as fuel calls for new counter-drone defenses, in general. The stark reality of what Ukrainian intelligence services have now demonstrated makes clear that uncrewed aerial threats, including to key assets deep inside a country's national territory, are well past the point of something that can be ignored. Contact the author: joe@
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Russia admits to taking Ukrainian children during latest peace talks, Zelensky says
President Volodymyr Zelensky said that during the Istanbul negotiations, Russian representatives dismissed the issue of abducted Ukrainian children as a "show for childless European old ladies" and acknowledged deporting several hundred children. "I want our journalists, our people — and not only ours — to understand their attitude toward the humanitarian aspect. First, they told us not to 'put on a show for childless European old ladies' — that's how they phrased it in Russian. That's their attitude when we raise the issue of the children," Zelensky noted during an online press conference attended by the Kyiv Independent. During the second round of peace talks in Istanbul on June 2, Vladimir Medinsky, aide to Russian President Vladimir Putin and head of Russia's delegation, presented a list submitted by Ukraine containing the names of 339 children it says were abducted by Russia and must be returned. Medinsky rejected the allegations, denying that Russia had taken the children by force. Ukraine has documented over 19,500 cases of children who were forcibly taken to Russia, Belarus, or occupied territories since the beginning of the full-scale invasion in February 2022. According to official figures, only about 1,300 of them have been brought back to areas under Ukrainian control. These actions have faced widespread international backlash. In March 2023, the International Criminal Court issued arrest warrants for Putin and the country's commissioner for children's rights, Maria Lvova-Belova, over their alleged roles in organizing the deportations. More recently, the European Parliament passed a resolution denouncing the deportations as part of a "genocidal strategy" to eliminate Ukrainian identity, calling for the immediate and unconditional return of all abducted children. "We told them they had stolen 20,000 children, and they responded that it wasn't 20,000 — at most, they said, it was a matter of a few hundred," Zelensky said. "Our delegation (was) offended by this... Honestly, I'm not. I think it's more important not to fixate on the number, but on the fact itself — they admitted to taking children. We believe it's thousands, they say it's hundreds, but what matters is that they acknowledged the fact." Read also: 'Closer to victory' – Operation Spiderweb gives much-needed morale boost to Ukrainians after 3 years of full-scale war We've been working hard to bring you independent, locally-sourced news from Ukraine. Consider supporting the Kyiv Independent.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Russia severely limited after attack: Ex-Ukraine ambassador
(NewsNation) — Peace talks between Ukraine and Russia are taking place in Turkey following a series of surprise attacks by Ukraine over the weekend. Ukraine says the drone attacks reportedly disabled 40 bombers, or a third of Russia's bomber fleet, though Russia disputes those claims and says only a few of its planes were hit. 'This means Russia's ability to strike into Ukraine will be severely limited,' John Herbst, former U.S. ambassador to Ukraine, said. 'It's also good news to the United States, because those long-range bombers are nuclear weapons-capable.' Herbst said if Ukraine's estimates are correct, then it's a plus for American nuclear security. He added that Russian President Vladimir Putin believes time is on his side in the three-year conflict and that he will be able to gain control over Ukraine and later other surrounding NATO nations if western support for Ukraine stops over time. Michael Cohen: Trump will 'go after Elon's money next' 'This is Putin's game, and sadly, weak Western leadership has proved him right with his war on Georgia in 2008, his seizure of Crimea in 2014 and the not-quite adequate Western response to the big invasion in 2022,' Herbst said. 'So he's hoping Trump's going to stop American military supplies to Ukraine. I think that may be a bad bet to Putin.' Herbst said the war is a life-or-death matter for Ukraine, and just as Israel also does not notify the U.S. of major military initiatives it takes, Ukraine is doing the same thing to protect itself. He added Russia realizes a major blow has been dealt to it, but it is downplaying the impact of the strike. 'It undermines the narrative that Russia will inevitably win this war,' Herbst said. 'If American military supplies continue to Ukraine, or they have support from other European nations, Ukraine will not lose this war. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.