Almost half of England's councils ‘could face bankruptcy over £4.6bn deficit'
Almost half of councils in England risk falling into bankruptcy without action to address a £4.6bn deficit amassed under a Conservative-era policy, the government's spending watchdog has warned.
In a damning report, the National Audit Office said that rising pressure on public services and repeated delays to reform the funding of local government meant town halls were in an 'unsustainable' financial position.
It highlighted failure to reform the funding of special educational needs and disabilities (Send) as one of the most worrying areas where the resources were being outstripped by spiralling costs.
The previous government had introduced a scheme known as the 'statutory override' which allowed councils to temporarily keep Send debts off their balance sheets – in effect papering over the problem.
However, the override was planned to end in March 2026, by which point the accumulated deficit for all councils in England is expected to have reached £4.6bn amid ballooning pressures on local authorities.
The government says it is in the process of developing a long-term solution. However, the NAO warned failure to address the problem by next March could leave 43% of local authorities at risk of declaring effective bankruptcy.
The independent spending watchdog said council funding in recent years had increased but not kept up with demand or complexity of needs. After years of austerity under the Conservatives, more councils in England have declared effective bankruptcy in the past three years than the preceding three decades.
While funding from central government grants, council tax and business rates had increased by 4% between 2015-16 and 2023-24 to almost £56bn, funding per person had fallen during the same period by 1%.
Over that time councils also made deep cuts to discretionary services – such as libraries and road maintenance – while raising spending on adult and children's social care, which now accounts for 58% of total spending.
Earlier this month ministers announced a financial settlement worth more than £69bn for the coming financial year, alongside a sweeping devolution package to reorganise the structure of local government. A form of bailout was also approved for 30 councils, and six were granted permission to raise council tax by more than the usual 5% cap.
The NAO said projections show that funding per person is set to increase by 7% by 2025-26. However, the Local Government Association estimates that councils will still face a funding gap of up to £8bn by 2028-29.
Gareth Davies, the head of the spending watchdog, said: 'There have been repeated delays to local government finance reform and government can no longer resort to short-term solutions to support local authorities. Action to address this must resolve the systemic weaknesses in local government financial sustainability through a comprehensive, cross-government approach.'
A spokesperson for the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government said: 'This government is under no illusions about the financial issues facing councils. That's why we're reforming the funding system and delivering improved public services across the country.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
The BBC is helping Reform - and has become a danger to democracy
You might not know it - as the national broadcaster, the source of most information for most of Britain has singularly failed to report it - but the BBC has drawn up plans to win over Reform voters. It's strange how the BBC, a channel of staggering narcissism which never misses a chance to talk about itself, isn't saying much about the leaking of minutes from a meeting of its Editorial Guidelines and Standards Committee. Read more The story was broken by the Byline Times, one of Britain's 'new media' outlets that's increasingly proving to be an excellent source of investigative journalism. BBC Director-General Tim Davie and other senior figures like 'News CEO' Deborah Turness want to reshape the broadcaster to appeal to Reform voters. They believe BBC news and drama is causing 'low trust issues' among the radical right. Turness discussed altering 'story selection' and 'other types of output, such as drama' to win Reform hearts and minds The committee includes former GB News executive Robbie Gibb, appointed to the BBC board by Boris Johnson. Emily Maitlis once called him an 'active agent of the Conservative Party'. Minutes stated that bosses 'recognised the importance of local BBC teams in the plan, given their closeness to audiences'. So keep an eye on how BBC Scotland behaves from now on. Here's the bottom line: the BBC should not seek to appeal to anyone. It should report the news with complete objectivity, impartiality, and political neutrality. The words 'without fear or favour' should be tattooed on the heart of every BBC employee, especially the cosseted, overpaid establishment mandarins who run the organisation. We pay their wages. The BBC should represent Britain in its entirety, not favoured special interest groups. However, this courting of Reform proves impartiality to be a lie. It doesn't matter if Marxists or Nazis like a particular story. It's irrelevant whether coverage makes liberals happy or conservatives sad, or vice versa. No consideration should ever be paid to whether drama is perceived as progressive or reactionary. What matters is that news is reported accurately and fairly, analysis is balanced, and drama has cultural merit and entertains. By attempting to woo Reform, the BBC alienates everyone else. Worse, the BBC reinforces the grievances levelled against it. Scotland's Yes movement has accused the BBC of bias for years. Now independence supporters can continue to do so but with ammunition to back up their allegations. How can the BBC pretend to report news honestly, or reflect British politics and culture fairly, when it has been caught out cosying up to Nigel Farage? BBC Director-General Tim Davie with former Conservative PM David Cameron (Image: free) The BBC slits its own throat. And many of its enemies will gleefully watch the blood spill. Specifically, Farage. He has consistently attacked the BBC. Indeed, he uses his own platform - the disgracefully biased GB News - to do so. With delicious irony, Farage previously accused the BBC of being a 'political actor'. Well, now the broadcaster appears to be acting politically for its nemesis. Farage threatened to boycott the BBC, and claimed editors used 'story selection' to bash Reform. If Farage ever takes power he'll gut the BBC in an afternoon. In truth, the BBC deserves all it gets. It made Farage's career, endlessly platforming him, giving him far higher exposure than other comparative politicians. If you think there's any fairness to BBC coverage ask yourself how much you see the LibDems on air compared to Reform. Then look at the two parties and their parliamentary representation. Reform has five MPs, the LibDems 72. Indeed, the Greens have four. Do the Greens get four-fifths of the time devoted to Reform? Do they hell. Only last month, Davie, the director-general, was sounding off about the 'crisis of trust' in Britain. He grandly claimed the BBC would play a leading role in reversing the decline and help combat division. The BBC would create a future where 'trusted information strengthens democracy'. Davie, though, is doing everything he can to deepen division, damage democracy and foment distrust in journalism at a time when society needs good, honest reporting more than ever. When he said 'reform' was needed, it now appears Davie meant with a capital R. Currently, Reform is causing chaos in councils the party won at the English local elections. Will that be reported under the new pro-Reform BBC guidelines? I'm afraid we now need to ask ourselves whether the BBC will tip the next election for Reform. Davie should go, along with the entire BBC board. They disgrace journalism, and are not impartial or balanced. Read more The notion of politicising drama is disgusting. Artists exist to create and enrich our lives, not do the bidding of tawdry media executives in hock to the hard-right. In Britain, trust is at rock bottom. New findings released yesterday from the National Centre for Social Research found that just 19% of us believe the current system of governing Britain works. Only 12% trust governments to put country before party. As long as I've been alive, the BBC was billed as the last redoubt for fairness and balance. Over the last decade, that claim has well and truly undergone an acid bath. Now, the mask is off. The BBC has shown us what it really is, and we need to take notice. Globally, the rise of the hard-right has caused many to lose their minds - from commentators and business leaders, to political parties and academics. In Britain, the BBC hasn't just suffered a nervous breakdown, it has completely surrendered its principles of fairness. It's now more a danger to our democracy than a line of defence. Neil Mackay is the Herald's Writer-at-Large. He's a multi-award winning investigative journalist, author of both fiction and non-fiction, and a filmmaker and broadcaster. He specialises in intelligence, security, crime, social affairs, cultural commentary, and foreign and domestic politics
Scotsman
2 hours ago
- Scotsman
Acorn project funding uncertainty as 'final decision' still to be made by Chancellor Rachel Reeves
Concerns have emerged over how much funding the Chancellor will hand over for the Acorn project. Sign up to our Politics newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... North Sea bosses have welcomed the UK government finally pledging to back Scotland's carbon capture project after years of delay - but concerns have been raised after it emerged a final investment decision is still to be made. Chancellor Rachel Reeves confirmed in her spending review that the Acorn carbon capture and storage project, based at St Fergus near Peterhead, will receive funding from the Treasury. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Keir Starmer's government has finally pledged funding for the Acorn project at the St Fergus gas terminal hear Peterhead (Photo by Jeff) | Getty Images But buried in the detail, the Treasury has confirmed that 'a final investment decision will be taken later this parliament, subject to project readiness and affordability'. This has led to a warning over 'investor uncertainty' if a final decision for the Acorn project is not taken 'urgently'. The Acorn project, made up of several firms including Shell, Harbour Energy and Storegga, will, in theory, take harmful carbon emissions and prevent them from being released into the atmosphere and instead buried under the seabed off the Aberdeenshire coast. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad There are also plans to repurpose an existing oil and gas pipeline to potential transport carbon from Grangemouth to the offshore storage sites. The Scottish Government has commissioned a report into whether this is possible, but has not yet published that work. The previous Conservative UK government had only granted the Acorn project 'reserved' status and favoured projects south of the Border for full early funding. But the Chancellor told the House of Commons she was announcing 'support for the Acorn project', adding that it will 'support Scotland's transition from oil and gas to low-carbon technology". Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Pressed over how much investment will be allocated by the UK government, Ms Reeves simply said that 'we are putting money into Acorn'. As well as indicating support for the Acorn project, the Chancellor also pledged to back the Viking project south of the Border. David Whitehouse, Offshore Energies UK (OEUK) CEO, said: 'The support for the next phase of carbon storage projects in Scotland and Humberside is welcome, and an important step towards final investment decisions later in this parliament. OEUK's chief executive, David Whitehouse | OEUK 'Together Viking and Acorn have the potential to unlock over £25 billion of investment by 2035, creating over 30,000 jobs at peak construction.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad He added: 'These projects will provide the pathway to support the decarbonisation of UK industries and are critical to the government's clean power objectives. We will continue to work with government to detail the long-term support required to deliver these projects and unlock the UK's wider CCS ambitions.' Trade unions have also welcomed the vow to back the Acorn project. STUC general secretary, Roz Foyer, said: 'Following years of Tory failure to invest in carbon capture and storage, this funding is welcome. STUC general secretary Roz Foyer | Andrew Milligan/PA Wire 'The UK and Scottish governments must now work with the relevant unions to ensure that the project maximises the opportunity to create and retain high quality, unionised jobs.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Sara Thiam, chief executive of development body, Prosper, said that 'advancing development' in the Acorn project was 'a welcome step', but she warned that 'final confirmation for the project is urgently required to reduce investor uncertainty'. Environmental campaigners have repeatedly raised concerns about the reliance on carbon capture to meet emissions goals, despite independent watchdogs, the Climate Change Committee, suggesting net zero targets cannot be hit without the technology. There are concerns about the reliability of carbon capture technology which is yet to be proven at commercial scale. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Friends of the Earth Scotland's climate campaigner, Alex Lee, branded the project 'a fossil fuel polluters pipe dream' that 'will never live up to the hype'. They added: 'Carbon capture has received billions in funding around the world and it has never worked properly.
Spectator
3 hours ago
- Spectator
Farage was the Spending Review's real winner
When Chancellors approach a major moment like a Spending Review, they tend to have a figure in their mind's eye – someone who embodies the type of voter they hope to win over at the next election: a Mondeo man or Stevenage woman. Rachel Reeves clearly had a very specific figure in mind for today's Spending Review. But unlike her predecessors, this was no Labour voter. Her Spending Review was laser-focused on Nigel Farage. Between a laundry list of spending pledges that would have you believe Britain is in a boom, Reeves took aim at Farage. She castigated him for backing Liz Truss's mini-budget and for spending too much time at the pub (arguably one of his best attributes). However, in choosing such tangential attacks, Reeves only drew attention to Labour's fear of Farage. Labour's spending commitments confirmed they view 2029 as a two-way fight with Reform. Record funding was announced for Scotland and Wales, ahead of local elections next year in which Reform are expected to wipe the floor. Days after Farage put steel-making front and centre of his campaign for Wales – at Port Talbot, no less – Reeves made sure to underline Labour's commitment to the steel industry, reconfirming half a billion for Tata Steel. This was paired with a cash injection for up to 350 of the most deprived communities: 'Funding to improve parks, youth facilities, swimming pools and libraries', with a focus on jobs, community assets and regeneration. In the absence of a plan to deliver real wage growth and long sought-after 'renewal', Reeves is hoping that, come the next election, quick and dirty projects can be plastered onto the leaflets of Labour MPs, in time for them to claim they have actually delivered change. You don't need to look far back to see whether or not this will work. It was not that long ago that the Conservatives also gave eye-watering sums to the NHS and tried to cling on to the Red Wall with an almost identical 'levelling up' plan, based on pots of funding for local regeneration projects. They too had Green Book reviews and bus fare caps, as recycled by Reeves today. So why double down on a strategy that was hardly popular with the electorate? With Starmer's 'missions' – of which only one even got a mention from Reeves today – so closely echoing the last government's 'five priorities', you'd be forgiven for thinking that Labour strategists are suffering from collective amnesia. Labour's failure to learn from recent political history speaks to their arrogance, rooted in a deeply held belief that Britain's problems are the result of '14 years of Conservative government'. It's why they came into No. 10 with no plan or narrative for what they wanted to achieve in government. And it's why they are pursuing the same strategy, choosing the same policies, to be implemented by the same group of civil servants – yet expecting a different result. The winner? Nigel Farage.
