
The best sunscreen and SPF for the face and body, including sunscreens for children
Daily use of an SPF is the most effective step you can take to preserve your skin's health and prevent the appearance of ageing. Yet, whether it's down to texture, sensitivity or simply not having found the best sunscreen for you, it remains an elusive habit for many of us.
Consultant dermatologist and founder of Klira, Dr Emma Craythorne, explains the need: 'SPF blocks both the UVA (ultraviolet A) and UVB (ultraviolet B) rays which can cause damage including wrinkles, pigmentation spots, visible blood vessels and an increased risk of skin cancer. Sunscreens absorb that UV energy and convert it into heat, which renders it harmless. Just make sure it's broad-spectrum and ideally SPF 30 or higher.'
I've tested thousands of sunscreens during my career as a beauty editor, from £5 products by Garnier and Altruist, to La Mer 's £95 bottle. But not all will be the right formula for you, which is where this guide comes in. Below, you can find my full reviews, followed by Dr Craythorne's answers to some frequently asked questions.
The best sunscreens: At a glance
How we test sunscreen
Every SPF here has passed my strict standards: lightweight, wearable and effective. I've tested dozens of formulas myself and given products to friends and family with different skin types to test.
The first factor I considered was the level of protection: whether the sunscreens shielded against UVB rays and skin-ageing UVA radiation as per EU recommendations. This was hard to objectively test, so I considered whether I burnt or tanned while wearing the products.
Water resistance was much easier to evaluate. I tested whether the sunscreens stayed put during exercise, rain and sweaty commutes. Thirdly, I kept an eye on safety and skin compatibility: did the sunscreen block my pores, cause irritation or trigger breakouts? I asked friends with sensitive skin to test and comment on this.
I also wanted to know if the sunscreens were lightweight, wearable and comfortable enough to wear daily. I avoided anything greasy or with an overpowering scent.
Finally, I considered the environmental impact, including whether it's reef-safe. Some chemicals used in sunblocks have been found to contribute to coral bleaching.
I tested far more products than made it into this guide, with only the best formulas earning a place on the final list.
Why you can trust Telegraph Recommended
Our thorough, real-world tests will always help you find the best product. No manufacturer ever sees Telegraph Recommended reviews before publication and we don't accept payment in exchange for favourable reviews, nor do we allow brands to pay for placement in our articles.
All reviews are based on independent expert opinion and our hands-on testing. Visit our Who We Are page to learn more.
Best sunscreens
Sunscreens certainly aren't a one size fits all kind of product; most people will need a different product for their face and body, while gentle and water-resistant formulas are better for children. I've reviewed them all below.
Best sunscreens for the face
The right facial sunscreen needs to be effective, of course, but it should also fit seamlessly into your skincare routine and address your individual needs, whatever your skin type. From lightweight fluids to tinted hybrids, these options do just that.
Best Buy Sunscreen for Face: Ultra Violette Future Fluid Superlight Mineral Skinscreen (SPF 50+)
A premium product that delivers on multiple fronts; it's highly protective, hydrating and comfortable to wear, with a matte-but-natural finish that sits well under makeup. This is a brilliant all-round choice for a reliable, high-performance sunscreen that you'll actually want to use every day.
This product is also a testament to the advancements in mineral sunscreen formulations, leaving no white cast even on deeper skin tones, thanks to its ultra-fine zinc oxide formula. The inclusion of squalane, derived from an oil present in your own skin, helps to keep it hydrated without feeling heavy or greasy, making it a great option for those with combination or slightly oily skin.
The fragrance-free formulation reduces the risk of irritation, even around the sensitive eye area, which is a major plus for anyone prone to redness, sensitivity or hayfever. But my favourite pay off is the natural, skin-perfected skin finish.
Key specifications
Best Value Sunscreen for Face: The Inkey List Polyglutamic Acid Dewy Sunscreen (SPF 30)
Compared to other sunscreens in a similar price range, this formula stands out by combining skin-loving ingredients with reliable sun protection at an accessible price point.
The greatest value here comes from the hybrid nature. As well as protecting you from the sun, the formula includes polyglutamic acid, glycerin and squalane to deeply hydrate and plump your skin, making it a fantastic multi-tasker.
Its broad-spectrum protection shields from both UVA and UVB rays and the lightweight, non-greasy finish means it works beautifully under makeup, making it a good choice for everyday wear. It's also fragrance free and non-comedogenic (meaning it doesn't block pores), which is a bonus for those with sensitive or acne-prone skin.
While the SPF 30 may not be enough for prolonged sun exposure, it's perfect for daily use, offering solid sun protection for anyone who wants an effective, hydrating sunscreen without breaking the bank; a great value choice.
Key specifications
Best Mineral Sunscreen: Hello Sunday Everyday One Mineral (SPF 50)
This is a fantastic lightweight, hydrating formula that combines sun protection with skincare benefits. I particularly appreciate the additional benefit of hyaluronic acid – a broadly loved skincare staple – to keep skin moisturised while providing broad-spectrum UVA and UVB protection.
This sunscreen is designed to be worn daily, either alone or under makeup. It gives a non-greasy finish, but is classed as a moisturiser, so needs topping up with additional SPF throughout the day for the best possible protection. That said, it is a photostable formula, meaning it is designed to maintain effectiveness and protection even after prolonged exposure to the sun.
This product is absorbed quickly and benefits from immediate sun protection (rather than chemical sunscreens which need around 15 minutes to become active), plus the zinc oxide is great for sensitive or acne-prone skin.
I did note a little pilling under makeup on hotter days, but this was easily avoided by using powder, rather than liquid foundation, over the top. The scent might divide opinion, but the lovely mattifying finish is too good for that to be a factor.
Key specifications
A standout daily sunscreen that combines very high protection with a weightless, hydrating formula. Although designed for all skin types, I found this particularly good for oily skin due to the lightweight, fast-absorbing formula that won't clog pores or feel heavy.
It also dries down to a non-greasy, matte finish. Plus, it's formulated with barrier-supporting ingredients like ceramides, which can actually help balance oil production over time, making it a smart choice for anyone prone to excess shine.
The addition of hyaluronic acid supports skin hydration, and it's this skin barrier boosting that Byoma is famous for. Some of those prone to high shine might need some additional mattifying makeup over the day to tone this down, but overall this a reliable, affordable option for anyone wanting effective sun protection with added skincare benefits.
Key specifications
Best Sunscreen for Acne-prone Skin: Vichy Capital Soleil Anti-Imperfections Water Fluid (SPF 50+)
Score: 9/10
We like:
Non comedogenic
Anti-imperfection ingredients
Hypoallergenic
We don't like:
Slight fragrance
Not for dry skin types
This Vichy sunscreen is a smart choice for oily, acne-prone, hormonal or combination skin, or for anyone who worries their SPF might give them spots. It combines high-level SPF protection with targeted ingredients to help reduce breakouts and control shine without feeling heavy or suffocating, which is the sunscreen holy grail for anyone with reactive skin.
The standout here is the water-based formula, which makes it ultra-lightweight and fast-absorbing, leaving a fresh, barely-there finish on the skin. This is especially important if you're prone to congestion since heavier, cream-based sunscreens can sometimes feel too thick, clog pores and trigger breakouts.
The safety net of two per cent niacinamide to calm redness and refine the look of pores, plus 0.3 per cent salicylic acid to gently exfoliate and keep skin clear over time, is a winning combination, albeit one better suited to oily than dry skin types. I also noticed that there was zero eye-sting.
Finally, it's a mattifying fluid, so won't add unwanted shine throughout the day, and the non-comedogenic formula means it won't block pores, even on hot, sticky days. It's also fragrance-free, which reduces the risk of irritation.
Key specifications
Score: 9/10
We like:
Lightweight
Absorbs quickly
Non-comedogenic
Skincare benefits
We don't like:
Not suitable for very dry or delicate skin
Any product that combines sun protection with anti-ageing benefits could make an excellent addition to your skincare routine. Included in this sunscreen from La Roche-Posay are some serious skincare credentials, like hyaluronic acid for skin-plumping and extra hydration, niacinamide for calming and brightening, and crucially for this product in particular, PHE-Resorcinol, which works to reduce pigmentation and dark spots.
There's also LHA (lipo-hydroxy acid), a gentle exfoliator that helps to refine skin texture and reduce the look of fine lines over time. It's essentially a brilliant multitasker, helping to smooth, hydrate and protect. As a trusted SPF brand, La Roche-Posay is able to deliver broad protection to shield against the rays that cause most premature skin ageing.
It's also non-comedogenic and fragrance-free, so it won't clog pores or irritate sensitive skin, and the water-based, non-greasy formula layers well under makeup, making it an easy choice for daily use. The downside of including anti-ageing actives is the exfoliating ingredients may be too much for very sensitive or barrier-compromised skin.
Key specifications
Score: 8.6/10
We like:
Soothing
Additional skincare benefits
Extra hydrating
No white-cast
We don't like:
Runny consistency
Not suitable for oily skin
Beauty of Joseon Relief Sun Aqua Fresh Rice + B5 is a K-beauty favourite (K meaning Korean) for good reason. It's a lightweight, hydrating sunscreen that genuinely feels like a skincare step, not just a sunscreen. The texture is a thin, milky fluid that absorbs almost instantly, leaving your skin feeling fresh and hydrated without a hint of grease or white cast, even on deeper skin tones.
The combination of rice seed water, which gives a boost of moisture and a brightening effect, and Vitamin B5 which helps to soothe and calm redness or irritation make this an excellent choice if your skin tends to feel sensitive after sun exposure, or if you're prone to dehydration.
I found that it layered beautifully under makeup and there's a noticeable cooling sensation on application that's particularly lovely on extra hot days. It's also fragrance-free, which is a bonus for those with reactive skin.
Its fluid consistency can be a bit runny straight from the tube, so be prepared. And while it's lovely for normal to dry skin, those with very oily complexions might find it a little too dewy.
Key specifications
Score: 8.2/10
We like:
Non-comedogenic
Long lasting matte finish,
Serum formula
We don't like:
Slight scent
Not for very dry skin
Australia has some of the strictest regulations in the world for sun safety, pushing Australian suncare brands like Mecca to excel in developing products that provide superior sun protection whilst also treating specific skin concerns.
So trust is a given, but the ingredients and serum formula in this product make it a standout choice for best mattifying sunscreen. If you're seeking a sunscreen that delivers high protection without the high shine, then the white willow bark extract – known for its ability to control shine and reduce the appearance of pores – makes it particularly beneficial for those with oily or combination skin types.
There's also a gentle exfoliant in there that helps to smooth texture for a more even complexion. It's non-comedogenic and the matte finish makes it an ideal base for makeup, whether you suffer with shine or not. I love how quickly it absorbs without leaving any greasy residue and the matte finish lasts well throughout the day, even in humid conditions.
Key specifications
Score: 7/10
We like:
Makeup hybrid
Skincare benefits
Glow-boosting
We don't like:
Lower SPF
Limited shade range
This hybrid product gives a lightweight, skin-enhancing base for your makeup while providing SPF 30 protection. It's worth noting that a multitasker like this is not going to give you the full and total protection of a standalone SPF unless you slather it on, in which case the natural, sheer finish won't be quite as nice. However, the formula features microencapsulated pigments that burst and then blend naturally, adapting to your own skin to even out tone and reduce redness.
The glow is a big bonus and comes from the porcelain flower extract, which does a great job of making skin looking radiant and refreshed. I tested the shade light/medium and I'd be more inclined to use it as a primer under a mineral foundation for an extra boost of natural sun protection, but I love the protective skin finish, especially since its lightweight texture makes it suitable for daily wear.
Key specifications
Best sunscreens for the body
Body sunscreen has to work harder, covering more skin, withstanding sweat, sand and sea, all while being easy to apply on the go. These formulas stand out at offering high protection without costly beauty benefits.
Best Buy Sunscreen for Body: Heliocare 360 Invisible Spray (SPF 50+)
Score: 10/10
We like:
Convenient spray
Invisible
Non-oily
We don't like:
Aerosol doesn't guarantee precise coverage
This is a fantastic all-round body sunscreen that excels in convenience and protection. The invisible, aerosol formula makes for a quick and easy application, whether you're rushing out the door to work or reapplying on the beach after a swim. It leaves no greasy residue behind and there's no rubbing in.
With a high broad spectrum protection, it ensures you're covered from the harmful effects of sun exposure and the lightweight formula dries down really quickly, so you can get dressed without having to wait. This is useful for on-the-go re-applications, too.
One of the standout features of this product is its inclusion of Fernblock technology, which offers protection from environmental stressors like pollution. The formula also contains antioxidants to help fight free radicals, minimising the effects of sun-induced ageing.
This product has ticked the most boxes for full body coverage and Heliocare is a trusted brand (they do a wonderful tinted SPF and non-comedogenic face formulas) so this product is a must-have for anyone looking for reliable, all-over body sun protection. It's also reef-friendly, meaning it does not contain any chemicals which contribute to coral bleaching.
Key specifications
Score: 8.2/10
We like:
Hydrating formula
Budget-friendly
Non-greasy
We don't like:
Scent might not appeal
This is a fantastic budget-friendly option that doesn't compromise on performance. The lotion offers high-level sun protection and is formulated with glycerin to offer additional moisturising benefits. You really feel the softening effects as soon as you apply it.
The lotion absorbs quickly (I tried it after a shower and the same was true) and I'm impressed at the lack of white cast that you might expect from a lower-budget option. This is totally suitable for daily use, whether you're heading to the office or spending time outdoors, although I found it needed topping up every few hours to maintain both the protection and additional moisturising payoff.
What makes this product truly excellent value is the dual-benefit formula and the generous 200ml bottle, which means you get plenty of use for the whole family.
Key specifications
Score: 9/10
We like:
Water and sweat resistant
Large area mist
Cooling formula
We don't like:
Non-precision application might be wasteful
This might be the ultimate multi-tasking sunscreen, designed for those who love the outdoors and active play, but basically excellent for anyone and everyone. The invisible, super-fine mist applies effortlessly, covering large areas without having to rub in, which means there's no risk of irritating sand abrasion.
What's more, it's suitable for use on wet skin, making it well-suited for beach days, water sports or post-workout. The cooling formula is a bonus, providing a lovely refreshing sensation when applied.
I particularly appreciate this feature and now can't imagine a hot holiday without it. The real win is the water and sweat-resistance, ensuring your protection stays intact even when you might forget to reapply when getting out of the pool.
The versatility and all-round appeal makes this a reliable UVA and UVB safeguard, keeping your skin nourished and cool, whether you're the watersports type or prefer lounging in the sun.
Key specifications
Best Sunscreen for Dry Skin: Hada Labo Tokyo Super Moisturiser Sun Lotion (SPF 50)
Score: 9/10
We like:
Extra hydrating
Easily absorbed
Skin enhancing sheen
We don't like:
Not water resistant
Needs regular reapplying
Japan is a country where sun protection is deeply prioritised, due to the long-standing cultural importance of skincare. The demand for high-quality, effective sunscreens has led to innovative formulations.
Hada Labo Tokyo Super Moisturiser Sun Lotion is formulated with hyaluronic acid, making it an excellent choice for dry skin or for those looking to keep their skin nicely hydrated throughout the drier summer months.
The lotion absorbs quickly into the skin, leaving a lovely dewy finish that gives me an additional confidence boost in my shorts, and without any greasiness so I can get dressed immediately after application.
The lightweight formula means it's comfortable for daily wear and I found myself reapplying for pleasure, rather than protection, because it feels so nice. It's also good for sensitive skin types, which I appreciated when applying it after shaving my legs.
Key specifications
Best sunscreens for children
Kids need robust protection that won't cause tears or tantrums. These sunscreens are gentle on young skin, water-resistant for the pool and quick to apply, making sun safety as straightforward as possible.
Score: 9/10
We like:
Easy, fast application
Non-greasy
Hypoallergenic
Sand-repellant
We don't like:
Slight staining possible
This is a top-tier sunscreen designed specifically for delicate skin, with a reliable formulation that provides very high protection against both UVA and UVB rays. I want comprehensive sun safety for my kids, but I also want to cover them as quickly and efficiently as possible and this is where this mist wins for me.
Firstly it's enriched with ceramide, which helps to strengthen the skin's natural barrier, plus it's hypoallergenic to minimise the risk of allergic reactions or general irritations. The super-fast spray makes for a quick and easy application, even on wet skin, which is particularly convenient when dealing with slippery children.
One of the standout features of this product is its sand-repelling action, with a clever technology that prevents sand from sticking to the skin, which makes it my personal favourite holiday sunscreen, too. It's also water-resistant, sweat-resistant and non-greasy so the kids don't even notice it's there, which is what every parent really needs from their SPF.
Key specifications
Best Value Sunscreen for Children: Altruist Family Sun Spray (SPF 50)
Score: 8.6/10
We like:
Affordable, high protection for whole family
Dermatologist developed
Reef-friendly
We don't like:
Needs to be rubbed in to avoid white cast
Trigger spray can get blocked
Created by a dermatologist and skin cancer surgeon, this hard-working SPF 50 spray is suitable for the whole family, including babies from six months old. This makes it brilliant value, since you only need one bottle for the beach (although it's worth stocking up on more because you'll want to use it all year round, too).
The spray application is good, with the white formula rubbing easily into the skin and leaving no residue whatsoever. But it does take a little extra effort and patience from the littlest kids. The formula is paraben free and gentle enough for sensitive skin, but the protection packs a punch, with full dermatologist specification broad spectrum. I love the sheen it leaves, too – giving a subtle but healthy glow.
Key specifications
£11.99
Buy Now
Price at
Boots
Score: 9.4/10
We like:
Water resistant
Skin-soothing
Hypoallergenic
We don't like:
Smaller bottle
Need to ensure even, full coverage
This is a dermatologist-developed sunscreen, designed specifically for the delicate skin of babies over six months and children.
Eczema-prone skin is sensitive and can react negatively to the harsh chemicals or fragrances commonly found in sunscreens. The fact that this product is fragrance-free (thereby reducing the risk of irritation) and contains avocado oil, which is known to help to soothe and lock in moisture, makes this a key sunscreen for managing eczema and preventing flare-ups, caused by dryness or sunburn.
This one is easily absorbed – again an essential for delicate or sensitive skin, as heavy formulations can sometimes exacerbate irritation. It also doesn't need much rubbing in.
The water-resistance helps with less need for frequent reapplication. This is a trusted option for kids, but is also a good choice for adults with sensitive skin.
Key specifications
Best Sunscreen for Babies: Nivea Sun Babies & Kids Sensitive Protect Sun Cream Spray (SPF 50+)
£8.25
Buy Now
Price at
Superdrug
Score: 9/10
We like:
Ultra fast absorption
Protection from six months old
Extra water resistant
Fragrance-free
We don't like:
Needs to be rubbed in for full coverage
My one-year-old inevitably started wriggling when I tried this SPF out on her, but the spray application allowed me to cover her flailing arms and legs without too much fuss. It sprays a fine, even mist that absorbs really quickly, so I wasn't left chasing her round trying to rub it in.
The formula itself is impressively gentle. My baby's skin is prone to the odd patch of dryness, but this didn't cause any irritation. It's completely fragrance-free, which I like, as it means fewer potentially irritating ingredients.
Despite being so light, it still feels protective. The high SPF 50+ is reassuring, especially on days when the sun is at its hottest, and I didn't notice any redness over the course of the day. The water resistance also proved its worth when the paddling pool came out.
It held up well without any streaks or chalky residue, even when she went from towel-drying to straight back in the water within minutes (a familiar cycle if you have a baby).
Key specifications
Formulation: Spray
SPF rating: 50+
Type of protection: Broad-spectrum UVA/UVB
Skin type: Sensitive (suitable for babies and children)
Volume: 270ml
Sunscreen FAQs
By Dr Emma Craythorne, Consultant Dermatologist and Founder of Klira
What is the difference between PA+, PA++, PA+++, PA++++ UVA ratings?
The PA rating system tells you how well a sunscreen protects against UVA rays. PA+ offers some UVA protection, but I always recommend going for PA++++, or checking for a five-star UVA rating or a PPD (persistent pigment darkening) value above 16. These are all strong indicators that you're getting the protection that you need against ageing and pigmentation.
Is expensive sunscreen necessarily better than cheaper options?
Not at all. The best sunscreen is one you enjoy using and can afford to use generously every day. If you've found one that feels great on your skin and you apply it correctly and consistently, stick with it. Price isn't the deciding factor. Just make sure it's broad-spectrum and ideally SPF 30 or higher.
Does sunscreen expire?
Yes, absolutely. Most sunscreens have a shelf life of two to three years, and using them past their expiry can mean significantly reduced protection. I always recommend writing the date you open the bottle somewhere on the packaging so you can keep track. But really, if you're using the right amount daily, you shouldn't have it hanging around that long anyway.
Does sunscreen prevent tanning?
Yes, sunscreen does help prevent tanning because it blocks the UV rays that stimulate melanin production. Of course, no SPF offers 100 per cent protection, so with prolonged exposure you might still get some colour, but if your goal is to manage hyperpigmentation or melasma, or to keep your skin tone even, then daily SPF use is absolutely essential.
Should you apply sunscreen before or after moisturiser?
You should apply your sunscreen after moisturiser—it's the final step in your morning skincare routine. That way, it forms a protective layer over your skin and does its job properly. If you're using a moisturiser with SPF in it, make sure it's high enough and offers proper UVA protection.
How much sunscreen do you need to use?
My rule of thumb is a shot glass full for your whole body and two fingers' length of sunscreen just for your face. And no, the SPF in makeup alone isn't enough. You'd need to apply a lot more than is practical to reach that level of protection.
What does non-comedogenic mean?
Non-comedogenic means that a product is formulated not to clog pores, writes Sophie Beresiner. For a sunscreen, this is especially important since the formula is less likely to cause breakouts, blackheads, or acne, making it a better choice for people with sensitive, reactive, oily, or acne-prone skin. Non-comedogenic sunscreens tend to have a lighter texture and avoid pore-blocking ingredients like heavy oils or certain silicones.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
Sir Ian McGeechan: Cancer treatment has worked
Sir Ian McGeechan has given a positive update on his cancer diagnosis, saying 'the treatment has worked'. The British and Irish Lions legend revealed he had been diagnosed with prostate cancer in an interview with Telegraph Sport last month. The Scot, who was Lions head coach for four tours, said then that he had undergone six weeks of radiotherapy treatment, and would have to wait another six weeks to discover whether it had been successful. Speaking to fellow Telegraph columnist Will Greenwood during Sky Sports' coverage of the opening Lions game against Argentina, McGeechan revealed he had since received good news about the condition. Asked about his health, McGeechan answered: 'All good, thank you, the treatment has worked. Fine.' Host Alex Payne added: 'So glad to hear that Geech has had the all clear'. McGeechan is perhaps the ultimate Lions legend after his unparalleled career both as a player and coach. The 78-year-old was inundated with messages after his Telegraph interview, with the game of rugby uniting to wish him well. McGeechan has been coaching at Doncaster Knights as he maintains his illustrious career in the game, some 51 years after he first went on a Lions tour as a player in 1974, before being selected again in 1977. McGeechan was then head coach in 1989, 1993, 1997 and 2009, as well as coach of the midweek side in 2005. When revealing his cancer diagnosis, McGeechan said he hoped his honesty would inspire others to get tested. 'I don't want to make a big thing of it, but it is important to get the message out about urging people to get tested,' he said. 'I said that to our players here. I said to them that they make sure they get themselves tested. If you are younger, it is more important. 'Hopefully this interview can be educational. What I would say to people is don't back off it. It is a blood test, it is not what you always think. Just get it done. I have good people looking after me. It is the very good side of the NHS. The staff of the Bexley Cancer Wing at St James's Hospital in Leeds have been brilliant. 'When I had my last treatment, from the receptionist to the radiographer, they all said: 'Well done, good luck, have a happy time.' Everyone. They all knew. When they are looking up your details and you are going on to your next step, it says which number of treatment is it, and it is what they say to every person when they get to their last treatment, which I think is great. That support and the environment is so positive. What will be, will be.'


Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
NHS could face cuts under assisted dying law, warns Streeting
NHS services could face cuts to cover the cost of carrying out assisted deaths, the Health Secretary has warned. Under the Bill passed on Friday, the NHS will be expected to carry out the assisted dying procedures. Analysis suggests that implementation of assisted dying may cost the health service close to half a billion pounds within a decade, with each death costing the taxpayer more than £15,000. Assisted dying is set to be legalised in England and Wales after a historic vote saw it voted through by a majority of 23 MPs. However, Wes Streeting – who voted against the Bill – is understood to be deeply concerned about the impact it might have on an overstretched NHS. Speaking ahead of the vote, he warned: 'There isn't money allocated to set up the service in the Bill', while stressing that the Government would respect the decision of the House. Previously, he had warned there would be 'choices and trade-offs' to make, saying 'any new service comes at the expense of other competing pressures and priorities'. Last week, the Health Secretary said the NHS was 'in a fight for its life' as he described his mission to turn the service around. A number of MPs who opposed the Bill have raised concerns that assisted dying could take resources away from patients. On Tuesday, Dame Siobhain McDonagh, a Labour MP who voted against the legislation, said it could become 'the Trojan horse that breaks the NHS', saying it would 'rob our stretched NHS of much-needed resources'. The impact assessment of the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill estimates that up to 28,317 people will die by state assisted suicide within the first 10 years of rollout. This rises from 647 in year one to more than 4,500 by 2038, and could mean costs of £429 million for the NHS over the decade. The spending includes educating all health and social care staff, training the doctors and nurses involved in the assisted dying service, setting up a regulator, as well as the costs of the lethal drugs themselves. Training staff is set to be the biggest cost – especially as the service is created. This could cost up to £35.5 million in the first year if all involved got the highest level of training available with no one opting out. There would then be recurring annual costs of between £10-22 million. Staff costs could reach £72 million over 10 years, with up to seven staff working for 32 hours per assisted death, it concludes. None of the calculations include the lost productivity and knock-on effects of the work the doctors are no longer able to carry out as a result. The impact assessment puts the cost of the drugs required at around £15 per person. However, independent experts have said it is highly likely to cost more. The Government also predicts a regulator and panel to assess cases would cost up to £13.6 million every year to run. The assessment suggests that overall, the Government could save money as a result of the earlier deaths, with overall savings of more than £640 million. Some of these savings could be made by the NHS. By 2038, health services could save up to £71.5 million a year on end-of-life care, because of the savings from not providing costly hospital care for cancer. Assisted dying is now on course to be available by 2029. Adults with a terminal illness and less than six months to live will be eligible under the new law. The law passed despite widespread opposition, with opponents raising concerns over the dropping of a requirement for a High Court judge to sign off on all assisted dying cases. Critics also warned that the law would 'normalise the choice of death over life, care, respect and love'.


Sky News
2 hours ago
- Sky News
Assisted dying bill: People on both sides of the debate react to historic vote
People on both sides of the assisted dying debate have told Sky News how they feel about the outcome of today's vote – and while some are popping open champagne, others are "incredibly disappointed". More than 300 MPs this afternoon backed a bill that gives people in England and Wales who have less than six months to live the right to apply for an assisted death. Each request will be evaluated by two doctors and a panel featuring a social worker, senior legal figure and psychiatrist. Today's historic vote means the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill will now go to the House of Lords for further scrutiny before becoming law. Following the landmark vote, individuals for and against it have shared their feelings on the result. Frank Tate-Sutton - For 6:04 Frank Tate-Sutton is terminally ill and told Sky News she's relieved the bill has passed, even though the law won't be changed in time for her. "These are happy tears," she said. "I am emotional. It's a very difficult subject for everybody." Ms Tate-Sutton said her quality of life is "very important - and I'm losing it". "I don't want to die without dignity, without it being my choice, without my family knowing that this is what I want," she continued. "As much as they [my family] want me alive, do they want to see me lying in my living room in a hospital bed, taking all these drugs, not being able to talk, not being able to control my bodily functions? "That is not a life, for me - living on all the medications and not being able to exist without that… the side effects and everything." Mike Smith - Against 5:20 Mike Smith is a spokesperson for the disability rights group Not Dead Yet - and he has been left "incredibly disappointed" by the outcome of the vote. "This particular bill had so many failings in the way safeguards are constructed and the significant scope for coercion, whether it's overt or subliminal," he said. Mr Smith says he fears some people will "end up ending their lives earlier than they should do or want to". "There are so many disabled people around the country that have told us they're absolutely scared." "I think it's this inherent fear people have about being disabled that drives this very emotional response on this really complex topic," he explained. "What we know is, with good palliative care, social care, access to housing and an income, many disabled people ... can lead amazing lives." 6:48 Rebecca Wilcox and her TV presenter mother Dame Esther Rantzen, who has terminal cancer, have long been campaigning for a change to the UK's law on assisted dying. Speaking from Parliament Square as fellow supporters of the bill popped champagne behind her, Ms Wilcox described today's vote as "an extraordinary moment". "It means so much to me," she said. "I spoke to mum and her one word to describe it was 'wow'. "She didn't think she was going to live to see the debate, let alone a conclusion that went our way." In response to concerns about safeguarding, she said it will "bring in layer upon layer of safeguards". "We're going to have scrutiny upon scrutiny for every case and at the moment, there is no scrutiny," she said. "Coercion could be happening as we speak. "There is now protection for vulnerable people, by having this bill passed." Dr Gordon Macdonald - Against Dr Macdonald said the bill passing with a majority of 23 - less than half what its second reading achieved - is proof that "the more people have thought about this issue, the more they've had doubts". The doctor, who is the CEO of anti-euthanasia organisation Care not Killing, said: "We will see what happens when it gets to the [House of] Lords, the Lords will hopefully give it more rigorous scrutiny than happened in the Commons". His biggest concern is "for people who are vulnerable, who will feel pressure to end their lives". "That might come from external forces, but it's more likely to just be internalised pressure," Dr Macdonald said. "They'll feel they're a burden on their family and friends, conscious of the cost of care, and think they should do the decent thing, as they would see it in that thinking." It's "of course a terrible message for society to send out to people," he said.