Tacoma police leader ‘feared coming forward' about ex-Deputy Chief Paul Junger
Assistant Chief Crystal Young-Haskins made the report to former Police Chief Avery Moore Oct. 24 and then informed the director of the City of Tacoma's Human Resources department in an email about a month later, claiming Junger had created a hostile work environment and subjected her to unlawful harassment.
Young-Haskins, who identified herself in the Nov. 12 email as a 43-year-old Black woman, said she believed she was subjected to the harassment because of her inclusion in a protected class and that the 'unwelcome' environment altered her work conditions substantially.
'It eroded confidence in my longevity with the department/city and my emotional/mental well‐being,' Young-Haskins wrote in the email. 'This added unnecessary stress has also impacted my overall quality of life and to a certain extent the overall morale of the department.'
Young-Haskins said the hostile work environment began shortly after she was hired by the Police Department in fall 2022 (she was sworn into her position in July that year). She said she wanted to be afforded protection under a whistle blowers policy.
'I feared coming forward out of being a team player and a honest desire to just do my job to the best of my ability,' Young-Haskins said.
Young-Haskins said Junger's harassment included unequal treatment for using leave and in the frequency of one-on-one meetings, retaliatory annual performance evaluations, invasion of privacy in her workspace and negating her seniority to undermine her authority and discredit her reputation.
The email was provided to The News Tribune in response to a public records request with the City of Tacoma. Young-Haskins' name was redacted from the email, but the fact that it originated from her was corroborated by a photo shared with The News Tribune last year. Also included on the email were former Police Chief Moore and Tacoma Fire Department Assistant Chief Alex Wilsie.
Through a Police Department spokesperson, Young-Haskins declined to comment for this story Wednesday.
Efforts to reach Junger for comment Wednesday were not immediately successful. His LinkedIn profile says he is retired.
Her email sheds light on a murky equal employment opportunity investigation in Junger's behavior. The City of Tacoma has continued to decline to elaborate on exactly what the investigation entailed. Officer Shelbie Boyd, a spokesperson for the Police Department, has said all information would have to go through the public-disclosure request system.
The email also lines up with the timeline of when Junger was placed on paid administrative leave for three weeks last year. Junger was placed on leave Oct. 24, the same day Young-Haskins said she reported Junger's harassment to Moore. Junger returned to work Nov. 13, a day after Young-Haskins emailed the Human Resources department. At the time, a police spokesperson said there wasn't sufficient information to warrant keeping Junger on leave.
When Junger, 55, was fired from his position as the Police Department's second in command March 31, Police Chief Patti Jackson said it was due to sustained findings in the investigation but did not explain what those findings were.
An agency report held by the Washington State Criminal Justice Training Commission, first reported by KING 5, shows that an outside law firm was retained to investigate allegations of gender, race and age discrimination, a hostile work environment and retaliation regarding Junger.
Allegations of gender discrimination and the creation of a hostile work environment were sustained, according to the agency report. The claim of race discrimination was not sustained, and claims of age discrimination and retaliation were determined to be unfounded.
The News Tribune requested a copy of the investigative file related to the investigation from the City of Tacoma on March 31. As of Wednesday, the city was still locating and assembling materials.
Young-Haskins, who now leads the Investigations Bureau for the Police Department, came to Tacoma from Little Rock, Arkansas, where she began her law enforcement career in 2006. She was appointed interim chief of the Little Rock Police Department in May 2022, according to the Arkansas Democrat Gazette. The newspaper reported she resigned a month later to pursue a career opportunity outside the state.
At the time, Little Rock Mayor Frank Scott Jr. said Young-Haskins was an 'exemplary' officer who had served the city with dignity, honor and professionalism for more than 16 years.
Young-Haskins' email complaint about Junger listed eight witnesses who she said might have been treated similarly or who could attest to her allegations. According to the photo of the email shared with The News Tribune, one was the former chief of staff of the Police Department, Curtis Hairston.
Hairston received a $500,000 settlement from the City of Tacoma last month after he went to court over allegations that he experienced racial bias and discrimination in his 18 months with the Police Department before he resigned. His claims included allegations that Junger made racist comments to Hairston, which the city denied in a legal response.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Trump's autocratic dreams come true as National Guard turns DC into a police state
Nothing in President Trump's second term has captured his autocratic imagination quite like turning federalized police and military troops against the Black mayors of Democratic cities. Trump's target list expanded on Monday, when he seized control of Washington, D.C.'s local police and deployed 800 National Guard troops to patrol the streets. Trump spared no bluster in portraying the people of the District of Columbia as animals consumed by violent criminal instincts, remarking to reporters that they 'fight back until you knock the hell out of them, because it's the only language they understand.' That would come as a shock to the D.C. police, who confirmed that violent crime is down 26 percent in the city this year and currently sits at a 30-year low. Of course, it shouldn't surprise anyone to see Trump portraying a majority-minority city as a haven of crime and thuggery. He did the same in Los Angeles, where he dispatched the National Guard in June to terrorize the city's mayor — his long-time political foe Karen Bass. Now Trump is hinting at expanding his deployments to Chicago and New York, two more Democratic cities with Black mayors and large minority populations. Are you noticing a pattern? Trump's federal takeover of Washington blends the president's love of strongman authoritarianism with his passion for spreading toxic lies about nonwhite people, as he did in grand fashion at his hate-filled October 2024 rally at Madison Square Garden, or as he continues to do in his threats to arrest New York's Democratic mayoral nominee Zohran Mamdani. After rolling over LA and Washington with minimal resistance, it's naive to think Trump will ever stop at threats. Worse still, many of the bigoted sycophants who boosted Trump's hateful rhetoric during the campaign are now seated in positions of real power, especially at the Department of Justice and the FBI. This time Trump has ensured the loyalty of his officers. This time there won't be a Gen. Mark Milley with the moral courage to publicly condemn Trump for his first-term militaristic excesses. Democratic lines about Washington's low crime rate won't make a difference to the White House because what Trump is doing has fundamentally nothing to do with crime. Trump loves the way deploying troops makes him feel. He loves the raw, unadulterated power of moving hundreds or thousands of soldiers into cities as civilian authorities ineffectively try to stop him. In a second term marked by a string of high-profile fumbles, sending out the troops makes Trump feel like he's actually doing something. The president's fixation on being seen as a hard-nosed military leader is one reason why his immigration raids have grown in theatricality and severity — even as more than 55 percent of Americans (including 15 percent of Republicans voters) say his Immigration and Customs Enforcement has gone too far. It's also why a growing number of political observers are sounding alarms about how Trump is misusing the nation's nonpartisan military to settle domestic political fights. In a sign of just how far Trump is willing to go to realize his autocratic dreams, he also asked the Supreme Court last week to allow racial profiling in California ICE raids under the bogus argument that it's simply too hard to deport illegal immigrants without it. Instead, Trump is proposing a standard where simply speaking Spanish would be sufficient grounds for arrest — an idea so repulsive that a majority of Americans have opposed it for four decades. It took less than a year for a second Trump administration to fill the streets of major cities with soldiers, ICE agents and heavy armored vehicles. The cost of those military excursions to the taxpayer has been enormous, with initial Pentagon estimates of $134 million for Los Angeles alone. Those numbers have almost certainly swelled as ICE raids have grown to match Trump's fury at Mayor Bass, Gov. Gavin Newsom and other California Democrats. The skyrocketing cost of Trump's deployments is secondary, to be sure, to the imminent threat they pose to the growing number of American citizens caught in ICE's overly broad immigration dragnets. Since Trump's military mobilizations are driven by optics and ego instead of policy, Trump is free to declare them successful even if the raids fail to net a single legal arrest. Trump's latest incursion into Washington won't be the last. But this is not Russia or Venezuela. Americans get to vote in elections as early as this November, and millions of those voters plan to use their ballot to oppose Republicans' growing police state. None of that seems to matter to Trump. After all, the ratings are huge.
Chicago Tribune
5 hours ago
- Chicago Tribune
Anjanette Young ordinance slated for vote — without no-knock warrant ban
A years-in-the-making ordinance overhauling the Chicago Police Department's search warrant policy could at last get over the finish line in September, advocates hope, but without the ban on no-knock warrants Mayor Brandon Johnson promised in his 2023 campaign. Instead the Anjanette Young ordinance, named after the Black social worker who police handcuffed and left naked in her home while serving a warrant at the wrong address, will require cops to wait 30 seconds before entry. It's a compromise accepted by both Young and her main council ally, Ald. Maria Hadden, one that reflects the shift in the political climate since demand for police accountability reached a fever pitch during the Black Lives Matter movement that exploded in 2020. The new version grants Hadden, Young and her supporters the ability to claim a win that they say will still protect Chicagoans. But the struggle thus far to build consensus behind the tougher ordinance, despite the citywide furor over police mistreatment of Young, reflects the difficulty activists faced in turning energy around the George Floyd protests into legislation. While Young and Hadden said they still support a no-knock ban in the future, and Johnson campaigned on such a law, the mayor has avoided giving his current stance on the issue. 'It's an ongoing conversation,' the mayor told reporters this week about whether a no-knock ban remains on his agenda. 'These reforms and transformations certainly don't come easily, but it doesn't stop us, prevent us or curtail us, quite frankly, from pursuing justice.' The pivot comes after five years of Young and Hadden focusing on no-knock warrants, which allow officers to forcibly enter homes without announcing themselves, as the chief target of the legislation. Their calls to abolish those search warrants joined the nationwide movement triggered by the 2020 police shooting of Breonna Taylor, a Black woman killed in Louisville, Kentucky, during a flawed drug investigation. But while outlawing no-knock warrants may make for a more impressive win, Young said the sharp drop in those types of raids occurring over the years allowed her to feel comfortable with taking the ban out for now. 'Now ultimately, would I love to see no-knock warrants completely banned in the city, the state and across the country? Absolutely,' Young said. 'But I feel hopeful in the sense that if this ordinance passed, we have a tangible piece of legislation that allows for accountability.' To be sure, the wrongful 2019 police raid on Young's home was not the result of a no-knock warrant. Rather, police conducted a knock-and-announce raid at the wrong address, which the mayor argued in July should be the focus of the ordinance instead because those comprise the majority of Chicago police search warrants. Johnson did not say which party suggested taking the no-knock ban out. But according to Hadden, police Superintendent Larry Snelling's team did so and the mayor's office did not object to the change. After looking at Chicago police data showing no-knock warrants have been 'barely used,' Hadden said she and Young agreed it was not worth jeopardizing the success of an ordinance that had been subject to years of false starts and stops. 'We want to get something passed that's actually addressing the problematic behavior, and if that means some compromises, we're willing to do it,' Hadden said. 'We can't let the perfect be the enemy of the good.' CPD officers last year executed 210 residential search warrants — an 84% decrease from 2019, the year of the Young raid, when officers used residential search warrants nearly 1,400 times, according to figures provided by the Police Department. Data on how many were no-knock warrants was not publicly available. Over the last six years, internal Chicago police directives as well as the federal consent decree on the department have also been expanded to add new provisions surrounding search warrant execution. Even the weaker version could put Johnson at odds with Snelling, whose office has not endorsed the 30-second rule that the mayor has pitched as a more precise tool to prevent botched police raids. That could stymie buy-in from pro-law enforcement aldermen who might be reluctant to buck police leadership — and set the stage for an awkward split between the mayor and his top cop. Chicago police declined to comment on the pending legislation. Johnson confirmed at an unrelated news conference, however, that Snelling was hesitant to endorse the latest version. 'There are some concerns that the superintendent has raised. We're going to continue to work through this process,' Johnson said. 'The most important thing though that I know that the superintendent is committed to — this is my commitment — is to work to make sure that that trauma that Ms. Anjanette Young experienced, that that doesn't happen again. And I commend Anjanette Young for her steadfastness and commitment to ensuring that this ordinance not only sees the life of day, that it actually becomes law.' The ordinance is currently in the council Police and Fire Committee after Hadden introduced it last month. If it passes there, it could get an up-or-down vote in the full council as soon as September. Ald. Chris Taliaferro, the mayor's handpicked chair of the committee, said he hasn't made up his mind on the measure yet, but 'even a time limit placed on entry needs to be discussed … to see what is not only best for our residents, but what's best for the safety of our police officers as well.' The official language requires cops 'knock and announce the officer's presence at a volume loud enough for the officer to reasonably believe the occupants inside can hear, allow at least 30 seconds before entry, and delay entry if the officer has reason to believe that someone is approaching the dwelling's entrance with the intent of voluntarily allowing the officer to enter.' There is an exception during 'an exigent circumstance,' such as imminent danger of death or grave injury 'provided that the imminent danger is not created by law enforcement service and executing the residential search warrant.' Besides that provision, the latest version also requires the Police Department to establish a policy addressing gun-pointing and any raids at homes with children 16 and younger as well as the elderly and disabled. On Feb. 21, 2019, police botched the execution of a warrant and went to the wrong home, restraining Young instead of an unrelated male suspect while she was getting ready for bed. Officers did not allow her to put on clothes and handcuffed her during their search. The raid at Young's home was captured on officers' body cameras and quickly went viral after the video was publicly released, sparking one of former Mayor Lori Lightfoot's biggest police accountability scandals of her term. Since then, Young has crusaded against the Police Department's search warrant process and was awarded a $2.9 million settlement in December 2021. In 2022, Hadden attempted to push the Anjanette Young ordinance forward in a City Council committee but failed in a 10-4 vote. That was after a previous version presented to the body in 2021 also never garnered a floor vote as Lightfoot argued such reforms should be reflected within Police Department directives, not codified in law. The earlier legislation would have banned no-knock warrants except in the case of 'exigent circumstances.' One critic of Johnson's decision to back off a no-knock warrant ban in the new version came from an unlikely corner of the City Council. Ald. Raymond Lopez, a member of City Council's more conservative bloc, called for a six-month moratorium on no-knock warrants in 2020. He said last week, 'If someone like me who is unashamed of my support for law enforcement can propose significant and sweeping changes to our warrant execution, why can't a progressive mayor?' Meanwhile, Illinois Democrats are still working through their own proposal for a statewide ban. This past session in the General Assembly, Young testified before state lawmakers on legislation sponsored by state Rep. Kam Buckner, a Chicago Democrat, to prohibit most no-knock search warrants. It passed committee before lawmakers adjourned, and Buckner said he intends to move it along either in the fall veto session or next year. The former mayoral candidate noted that it had bipartisan support and also the backing of the Illinois State Rifle Association. 'If Democrats in the city of Chicago can't figure out how to get this done, but you have Republicans from downstate and from rural districts who understand the need and the necessity, it's a little curious,' Buckner said. 'But I believe that we'll find a way to get there, both in the city and in the state.' Young said she wasn't involved much in politics before the botched raid in 2019. Now, she can rattle off the City Council legislative process, the ins and outs of court cases on other wrongful police raids and the latest negotiations with the consent decree monitor. She said she isn't fazed by the latest hurdle in her long-winding road to get to what she hopes is the final stage of her namesake ordinance, either. 'Things start to fade when no one is paying attention, and so I refuse to let the city of Chicago or the state of Illinois not pay attention to me and what happened to me,' Young said.
USA Today
6 hours ago
- USA Today
Trump is a bully. He's using the National Guard to conquer DC as a test run.
The District of Columbia should be allowed statehood, not forced to endure deployment of the National Guard to stop an imagined crime wave. President Donald Trump's activation of the National Guard in Washington, DC, has less to do with an imagined 'out of control' crime wave and more to do with conquest. It is more misguided bullying by the president. To facilitate this racialized farce, he dehumanized the capital district's citizens by labeling them 'bloodthirsty criminals' and 'roving mobs of wild youth.' Let there be no mistake: This rhetoric portends violence against Black, Brown and poor citizens and complete disdain for the unhoused. This action and whatever else might follow is deeply personal to the 700,000 people who call the District of Columbia home and who are tired of the meddling from the administration and Capitol Hill politicians who treat our city like a play toy, likely because of our history as a majority Black jurisdiction. Home to a federal government that offers well-paying positions, Washington has attracted Black professionals and blue-collar workers, creating one of the largest Black middle-class populations in the country. We've innovated with affordable housing, invested flush tax revenue in education and implemented a slew of smart labor and justice policies. There's a real city beyond what the tourists know Many Americans don't know this story. They think Washington starts and ends with memorials, museums and monuments. The residential and commercial city is often invisible as a thriving metropolis in its own right, with a deep history and a vibrant culture. Share your opinion: In the wake of Trump's federal DC takeover, are you worried about crime? Tell us. | Opinion Forum Not only have we outshined many of our peer cities, but states, too. DC has a population comparable to Vermont, Alaska and North Dakota, but a budget larger than Arizona's. Residents pay the equivalent of state taxes. DC balances its budget every year, manages a highly functioning mass transit system and employs thousands in jobs that DC residents do with great pride. Still, the way congressional politicians treat us would have our red state friends up in arms if it were done to them. This summer, as the result of a so-called error, Congress withheld more than $1 billion from our approved budget, and that money remains out of our reach − instead of providing the services that our citizens voted and paid for. Opinion: Trump ushers in new DC tourist event − 'A Live Re-creation of Authoritarianism!' The Republican budget proposal for the next fiscal year includes all kinds of culture war initiatives in an attempt to impose conservative values on the more sensible and moderate residents of DC. We're tired of being the punching bag for politicians who wouldn't last a week living under the policies they impose on us. It's as dishonest as it is insulting. Opinion alerts: Get columns from your favorite columnists + expert analysis on top issues, delivered straight to your device through the USA TODAY app. Don't have the app? Download it for free from your app store. So much of what this administration and Congress do is informed by their stated orthodoxy around local control and 'rights.' That somehow doesn't apply to us. DC needs statehood, not a federal takeover Fortunately, the president and Congress can't truly 'take over' Washington without ending home rule, which would be difficult to do with the Senate filibuster blocking them. But the president can fearmonger through state-sanctioned violence. And he can use Washington as the test run for the federal takeover of Black and Brown cities daring to oppose this administration's death-dealing politics. We will not accept death. Washington, DC, has proved our right to self-governance and, indeed, statehood. Instead of forcing us to manage a manufactured crisis, elected officials who believe in democracy in earnest should let DC leaders spend our energy on building a more successful and safe city that must become the 51st state. William H. Lamar IV is the pastor at the Metropolitan AME Church in Washington, DC. You can read diverse opinions from our USA TODAY columnists and other writers on the Opinion front page, on X, formerly Twitter, @usatodayopinion and in our Opinion newsletter.
