logo
Markets steady amid global turmoil as investors bet on resilience despite rising geopolitical tensions

Markets steady amid global turmoil as investors bet on resilience despite rising geopolitical tensions

Daily Maverick8 hours ago

An eerie calm has descended over markets. Despite the ongoing geopolitical uncertainty that has been playing out over the last few weeks, with the grim escalation of war between Israel and Iran, and then the US even entering the fray before a fragile truce took hold this week — investors have refused to panic.
Economic data paints a similarly bleak picture. Last week, the World Bank slashed its prediction for global growth to 2.3%, and US growth to 1.4%. It warned that if Trump's so-called 'Liberation Day' tariffs resumed when the 90-day pause ended on Tuesday, 8 July 2025, global trade could seize up in the second half of the year. Meanwhile, the Federal Reserve also sharply downgraded its US growth projection and raised its inflation forecast. Stagflation, the toxic combination of economic stagnation with stubborn inflation, is increasingly a possibility.
And yet investors have not blinked. Since the tariff announcement in early April, equity markets have rallied. The S&P 500 has surged 24% from its April lows and now hovers near record highs. And while 10-year US Treasury yields have climbed nearly a full percentage point since last autumn to 4.4% (bond yields move inversely to prices), they too have stabilised — despite constant worries over deteriorating US fiscal projections. As this column predicted would happen in April, markets have climbed a 'wall of worry'.
Three factors may explain this apparent calm. First is the built-in assumption that Trump's bark is worse than his bite, and that in the end he 'chickens out'. This has been dubbed the 'Taco' trade, or Trump always chickens out. Here, his negotiating style is seen as deliberately extreme, designed to shock with such unthinkable opening gambits that opponents subsequently accept a moderated offer largely more favourable to the US but within the realms of economic and political sanity. This pattern has played out on tariffs and even with his measured military moves against Iran, where targeted initial strikes were followed by aggressive rhetoric on regime change. Then, after Iran's retaliation was brushed off as 'very weak', he proudly announced 'CEASEFIRE' and the end of the '12 Day War'. Investors are gambling that these threats won't escalate into actual policy disasters.
Risks
Of course, this assumption carries risks. One day Trump may decide to prove his critics wrong and follow through. Or these dangerous gambits could spiral into unintended conflict, such as happened in the brief but alarming US-China trade war. Investors are clearly betting that the Taco trade holds when it comes to Trump 'implementing' the so-called 'reciprocal' tariffs on 8 July. He will have to rapidly announce some sort of face-saving compromise in the next few weeks as there are still glaringly few signs of his '90 deals in 90 days'.
The second factor is that as with everything regarding the market, it is a question of timing. While wars in the Middle East, higher oil prices, looming tariffs and a slowing global economy are theoretically not great for markets, for the moment corporate earnings remain strong, especially those of the mega cap tech stocks underpinning the markets. Any potential downside seems to be rather distant, and until then investors want to participate. As long as companies continue to deliver, investors fear missing out on gains more than they fear the potential downside. Even the Bank for International Settlements, which warned last week of uncertainty from tariffs dragging on investment and output, predicts that the most significant impact will hit in 2026 — not this year.
Finally, markets tend not to notice the accumulative effects of myriad threats until something bad enough happens to trigger a collective meltdown. The last two great bear markets of the last three decades — the Covid pandemic and the financial crisis sparked by the collapse of Lehman Brothers in 2008 — followed periods when markets brushed off multiple warning signs. It often takes a 'black swan' event to shatter this complacency.
Catalyst
And if that happens, the catalyst is more likely to come from the US economy than the Middle East. While tariffs and oil prices are clear risks, much of current economic data suggests surprising resilience: the labour market remains solid, inflation is moderating, and corporate results are still strong. But if unemployment starts rising materially, inflation jumps up or if economic weakness spreads to the financial system and triggers tighter credit, the calm could break quickly. Seasoned traders are already seeing cracks starting to show in equities.
The US dollar, which baffled many by weakening in the first quarter despite tariff threats, has resumed its role as a safe haven, rising since Israel's strike on Iran. Where it goes over the next few months will be critical in determining whether it really continues to be the world's safe haven. Perhaps even more important will be the US bond market, which could well be where the first landmines start exploding. This column has previously warned of the dangers lurking in the US debt market. Rapidly rising US bond yields, such as what happened in April, would once again trigger panic.
Emerging markets, such as South Africa, are already feeling the strain. South African equities have sold off from their recent all-time high, and while the rand has strengthened against the greenback since early April, it is now trading sideways.
Investors should remain extremely cautious. Despite the global economy supposedly looking resilient in the face of geopolitical carnage, it will not take much for markets to take fright. This is particularly true of emerging markets like South Africa. While recent months have allowed savvy investors to claw back earlier losses, that window of opportunity may be closing. Now is not the time for complacency — but for caution. DM

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

National Treasury secures R26bn World Bank loan in strategic move for infrastructure reforms
National Treasury secures R26bn World Bank loan in strategic move for infrastructure reforms

Daily Maverick

time42 minutes ago

  • Daily Maverick

National Treasury secures R26bn World Bank loan in strategic move for infrastructure reforms

South Africa has secured a R26-billion loan from the World Bank to modernise our infrastructure – without adding to sovereign guarantee burdens. But favourable terms mean little without delivery. Can South Africa finally convert reform pledges into real power, rail, and fiscal performance? In a bid to shift our faltering economy out of low gear, the National Treasury and the World Bank have inked a $1.5-billion (R26.5-billion) Development Policy Loan agreement aimed at unlocking long-promised, but long-delayed, structural reforms across the country's infrastructure backbone. Sweet deal, soft start The loan, which was finalised on Monday, 23 June 2025, comes with some pretty good terms — definitely better than if South Africa had just gone to the open market: We have 16 years to pay it back. So, it's a long-term plan, not a quick smash-and-grab. We don't have to start paying anything back for the first three years. This is a 'grace period' that gives us some breathing room to get things in order before the first instalment is due. The interest rate isn't fixed. It's a 'floating rate', which means it will change over time. It's tied to something called the six-month SOFR, which is a very stable and trusted international benchmark rate for US dollars. On top of that, we pay an extra 1.49%. 'If the borrowing is associated with capital investment, then there's the opportunity to generate a return that will help service the debt,' Old Mutual Wealth strategist Izak Odendaal told Daily Maverick. 'Borrowing to fund recurrent expenditure is much harder to justify.' Spreading the spending power Political and economic analyst Daniel Silke said the real issue is how it will be spent. 'Will it be spent credibly, efficiently, and without graft and corruption? We've gone through a decade or two where we have not invested in domestic capital formation. The backlog in infrastructure… now ultimately has to be funded, certainly in part, by external loans like this.' According to the National Treasury, the deal is designed to 'enhance the efficiency, resilience, and sustainability' of South Africa's public infrastructure services. The main focus: policy reforms in the energy and freight transport sectors that can enable broader infrastructure modernisation and private investment. 'This agreement reinforces the strong and constructive collaboration between the World Bank and the government of South Africa,' the National Treasury noted in the release announcing the loan's approval. Show me the money It's important to distinguish the loan's structure and purpose. This is a Development Policy Loan, meaning the funds are not project-specific. Instead, they are general budget support disbursed in tranches conditional upon meeting agreed reform milestones. The Treasury says these reforms centre on: Improving energy security. Boosting freight transport competitiveness. Advancing the just energy transition. Unlike project loans, this money won't directly pay for power stations or rail upgrades, but is aimed at incentivising reform across state institutions like Eskom and Transnet — and unlocking further capital by stabilising policy conditions. Disbursements are tied to measurable regulatory or governance benchmarks — such as unbundling electricity transmission or enabling third-party rail access — designed to unlock future private capital inflows. Reform or rewind The loan lands at a time of acute public finance strain: sluggish growth, surging debt service costs, and deep political gridlock following the collapse of a proposed VAT hike. With fiscal consolidation plans fraying under coalition tensions, the Development Policy Loan becomes not just a financial tool but a litmus test of South Africa's political capacity to implement reform. South Africa's history with reform-tied financing is mixed. From unbundling Eskom to fixing port backlogs, targets are often missed, deferred, or diluted. The Treasury insists this loan aligns with its broader fiscal strategy: to avoid contingent liabilities, limit market borrowing and crowd in private capital. Transmission tangle — another $500-million While the Development Policy Loan grabs headlines, it is part of a broader ecosystem of multilateral support. Reuters reports that the World Bank Group is also weighing a $500-million contribution to a proposed credit guarantee vehicle meant to underwrite South Africa's planned $25-billion transmission build-out. This facility would be a stand-alone fund, absorbing project risk and unlocking private sector participation without drawing on sovereign guarantees. The goal: unlock up to 20GW of stalled renewable energy capacity, particularly in remote provinces like the Northern and Eastern Cape. The Treasury plans to contribute $100-million in junior capital (first-loss tranche), eventually scaling to $500-million. Discussions are under way with partners including Miga, the International Finance Corporation, DBSA, AfDB, KfW, and British International Investment. While discussions remain at the proposal stage, the Treasury expects to finalise initial commitments before the 2026 Budget, contingent on co-financier alignment. Can we afford this? On paper, the Development Policy Loan offers low-cost, flexible financing. But it's still dollar-denominated debt in a fiscus under pressure. Repayments begin after three years (on principal), but interest accrues and must be made in hard currency, exposing the Treasury to forex volatility. With a floating rate (SOFR +1.49%), repayments will rise if global interest rates increase. The Treasury already spends over 20% of its main budget on debt service, and gross loan debt is projected to exceed 75% of GDP. Odendaal notes that this loan remains within the Treasury's foreign borrowing limits, but South Africa must tread carefully: most debt is rand-denominated for a reason. Odendaal notes this loan remains within Treasury's foreign borrowing limits, but South Africa must tread carefully: most debt is rand-denominated for a reason. Reform isn't optional While the World Bank does offer oversight and monitoring, Odendaal warns that no loan is immune to governance risk. 'There's no guarantee that the money is going to be allocated 100% efficiently,' he said. 'But it's probably a better option than trying to raise money in the market.' For now, the $1.5-billion is a breath of fresh air that, with luck, will offset short-term fiscal pressure and offer credible support to reformists inside the Treasury. The key to whether it will be maximised effectively, however, will have to come squarely from State-Owned Enterprises and Prasa and Eskom will benefit financially, but in order for South Africa to do so, governance will need to improve correspondingly to make the loan less a windfall, and more a structural change. DM

Trump's fiery response to Israel and Iran's ceasefire breaches
Trump's fiery response to Israel and Iran's ceasefire breaches

IOL News

time2 hours ago

  • IOL News

Trump's fiery response to Israel and Iran's ceasefire breaches

US President Trump criticised Israel and Iran for ceasefire violations. Image: Kamil Krzaczynski / AFP US President Donald Trump expressed anger and disappointment over the fragile ceasefire between Israel and Iran, slamming both countries for violating the agreement on Tuesday. Trump took credit for having brokered the ceasefire, but it appears to have faltered mere hours after its announcement. Speaking outside the White House, a visibly angry Trump said he was not happy with both countries and was looking to reprimand the two nations. "We have two countries that have been fighting so long and so hard that they don't know what they're doing," Trump said, criticising both Israel and Iran for their actions while using profanities. Despite acknowledging that the ceasefire might not be entirely broken, Trump expressed his discontent with Israel saying the country attacked Iran just after they had made the deal. "Israel, as soon as we made the deal, they came out and they dropped a load of bombs, the likes of which I've never seen before,' Trump said. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ He added that Israel had to 'calm down' after he said both Israel and Iran violated a ceasefire he tried to broker. 'I gotta get Israel to calm down now,' Trump said. The Iranian media reported that an Israeli strike on Monday had killed a senior commander of Iran's Basij paramilitary force, linked to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC). The South African Communist Party (SACP) has also weighed in on the matter condemning the US military attacks on Iran, expressing solidarity with "the people of Iran and the axis of resistance to imperialism and Zionism". SACP spokesperson Mbulelo Mandlana said: "The SACP strongly condemns the United States' military attacks on Iran... We reiterate our solidarity with the people of Iran and the entire axis of resistance to imperialism, Zionism, and its genocidal campaigns in the Middle East." Political Analyst Dr John Molepo said the faltering ceasefire and escalating conflict have raised concerns about the potential for further destabilisation in the region. He said the conflict could easily surge into a bigger war if not stopped now. Cape Argus

TymeBank founder warns minister about fee increase for ID verification
TymeBank founder warns minister about fee increase for ID verification

The Citizen

time4 hours ago

  • The Citizen

TymeBank founder warns minister about fee increase for ID verification

Companies pay the department of home affairs to do ID verification when consumers, for example, want to pay with a card or apply for credit. TymeBank founder Coenraad Jonker has warned Minister of Home Affairs, Leon Schreiber, in an open letter that he should reverse his decision to increase the fee for accessing identity verification services. Jonker, who is also CEO of TymeBank, writes that he is not speaking up only as co-founder of TymeBank but also as a citizen 'deeply committed to the prosperity and digital advancement of our country'. Schreiber recently gazetted an increase in the fee for accessing identity verification services by what Jonker calls 'an unfathomable 6,500%'. He warns that this will unravel years of progress in digital transformation, financial inclusion and economic justice. 'Today, South Africa is one of the most inclusively priced countries in the world, comparing well with Panama, Colombia and Peru, at 2 US cents per identity lookup. Your new fee makes South Africa almost twice as expensive as the most expensive peer group countries, like Pakistan and Ecuador.' ALSO READ: Home affairs ID verification cost to increase by up to 6 500% Price increase for ID verification will rob poor of free bank account Jonker uses TymeBank as an example to illustrate the impact of this increase. 'We serve 11 million South Africans, and many of them are social grant recipients and informal earners. Under your current fee structure, TymeBank can provide the poorest South Africans with an account in real-time with no monthly fees. 'Your new fee will make this impossible, robbing South Africa of its only accessible and free bank account.' Jonker calls it an anti-poor policy decision and says it is in all our interests that the verification system, which plays a foundational role in enabling trusted digital identity services, be both sustainable and accessible. However, he says, Schreiber's decision shifts the cost of what should be a state-funded utility onto the shoulders of the poor. 'It imposes a regressive tax that penalises those with the least. 'Identity verification is a public good. Around the world, it is subsidised or fully funded due to its essential role in national development. Yet here, in a time when our country most needs inclusivity, innovation and trust, we choose exclusion. 'As my example illustrates, the price hike is wildly out of line with the average cost per user compared to South Africa's peer group countries.' ALSO READ: Big changes coming for ID, passport applications and birth registrations – Home Affairs Current ID verification system down 50% of the time Jonker says TymeBank fully supports the intention to build a better system, as it is down 50% of the time. 'As we understand it, you now propose an exorbitant price increase on 1 July 2025, without delivering a system improvement. 'Therefore, instead of first fixing what is broken, your department proposes to abruptly increase fees for a failing service. This is not how public infrastructure should function. Essential digital services must be reliable, affordable and accessible. Anything less is a betrayal of the trust South Africans place in their government.' He says the minister's proposed new batch-processing option is not a practical substitute for real-time data lookups, although it is less expensive at R1.00 per field. 'In the digital world, everything is real-time with account opening, card replacements, PIN resets and payments. 'Real-time is increasingly important for customer service and for the safety and security of customers. If lookups, for example, are not real-time, customers would incur additional costs because they would have to take at least two trips to open an account. These are costs that banks cannot absorb or mitigate.' ALSO READ: Big ID change for SA from Monday Increase in ID verification fee on institutions offer inclusion in formal banking Jonker says the 6.500% increase is not merely unworkable but existential as it places an untenable financial burden on institutions built to serve those who have long been excluded from the formal banking system. He says this move flies in the face of global best practices and points out that the World Bank outlines three pillars essential for financial inclusion, namely an accessible, affordable biometric identity database, free or near-free real-time payments infrastructure and an open banking system empowering citizens with control over their data. 'For a variety of reasons, South Africa is underperforming on all three. The decision that has now been made takes us in the wrong direction, undermines the goals of our own.' He points out that this also jeopardises the fight against grey listing and asks how banks and fintechs can meet their legal obligations when the cost of compliance is prohibitively high. ALSO READ: New ID verification process for Sassa grants: Here's who's affected TymeBank proposal for ID verification system Jonker says TymeBank proposes: A consultative process with all key stakeholders, including the fintech and retail industries A phased fee structure Volume-based pricing A cost recovery model linked to performance and inflation Reasonable notice periods that allow institutions to plan and budget accordingly Prioritising the shared public-private responsibility to safeguard South Africa's identity ecosystem and financial inclusion Ban the bad actors from accessing the system. Jonker emphasises that digital transformation and financial inclusion are not luxuries but the backbone of a modern, just society. 'Government cannot afford to raise barriers where it should be opening doors. We must not allow our digital future to be held hostage by short-sighted policy.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store