New ‘right to be forgotten' law for cancer survivors marks significant step – survivors deserve to move on with lives
The Government said it will progress plans to give them the 'right to be forgotten' and end barriers to accessing financial products.
2
Robert Troy writes that cancer survivors deserve to move on with their lives without being penalised
Credit: Alamy
2
The Government will bring forward legislation to enshrine in law that they have the 'right to be forgotten'
Credit: Getty Images - Getty
The Central Bank (Amendment) Bill 2025 will ensure cancer survivors can't be discriminated against when it comes to obtaining certain insurance products, specifically mortgage protection, due to their medical history.
For too long, cancer survivors in Ireland have faced an uphill battle not just in beating the cruel disease but then in rebuilding their lives, particularly when it comes to accessing basic financial products.
Despite being in remission for years, many are penalised for their past diagnosis. The legislation was proposed by Fianna Fail's Catherine Ardagh.
Writing in The Irish Sun on Sunday today, Robert Troy, Minister of State with special responsibility for Financial Services, Credit Unions and Insurance, says a fairer deal for cancer survivors starts now.
READ MORE IN IRISH NEWS
THIS week marked a significant step forward in our commitment to fairness, transparency and compassion in the insurance market.
The Government will bring forward legislation before the summer recess to enshrine in law the 'right to be forgotten' for
At the heart of this legislation is a simple principle: if you've beaten cancer, your past diagnosis should not define your financial future.
Survivors deserve to move on with their lives — to buy a home, protect their
Most read in The Irish Sun
Many cancer survivors in Ireland have found themselves excluded or charged unfairly when applying for basic financial protections like
The major symptoms of 'common cancer' as HSE say 'know the signs'
That's not right. It's not reflective of the person they are today, nor is it reflective of the values we aspire to as a country. That's why this Government is acting.
This is a Bill with broad cross-party support. I must commend my
Her effort over the years has allowed me to introduce it as a Government Bill, speeding up the process and advancing it before the summer recess.
CERTAINTY NEEDED
Her tireless advocacy has helped bring this issue to the fore and push it up the political agenda.
The new legislation will start with mortgage protection — following international best practice — and we hope to review the scope of the legislation in future in a careful, informed way, with a view to delivering the most impact for the greatest number of people.
I want to acknowledge the positive steps already taken within the industry.
In 2023, a Voluntary Code of Practice was introduced by Insurance Ireland and supported by the Irish
It was a welcome move that showed what is possible when an industry works with advocates and Government to do the right thing.
However, voluntary codes alone aren't enough. Survivors deserve certainty. That's what this legislation will provide.
ADVANCEMENT SHOULD NOT BE PUNISHED
Enshrining this into law means
While eight companies signed up to the Voluntary Code, its very nature meant they could withdraw or that new entrants to the market could disregard it. That will not be the case with this law.
This is about removing unnecessary barriers to home ownership and
It's about making sure our insurance system treats people with dignity, respect and fairness.
And it's about restoring confidence that the market is transparent and working in the best interests of all citizens.
Cancer is a monumental hill to climb for individuals, their partners and families.
We are fortunate that with advances in
That advancement should not be punished.
Survivors who have been without treatment for seven years, or five if diagnosed under the age of 18, will now have clarity and comfort.
This legislation is also a direct delivery on our Programme for Government commitment.
It was included for a reason: because it's the right thing to do.
REFORM FOR FAIRNESS
The Government has been clear in its ambition to drive a more inclusive and fair insurance landscape. This announcement is a major milestone on that journey.
It was a piece of legislation which I wanted to make real progress on when I took up my role in January and it is my intention that this Bill will be enacted before the end of the year.
It is also important to recognise the ongoing work of the Irish Cancer Society whose campaigning and research has been instrumental, and Insurance Ireland, who have constructively engaged throughout and managed the Voluntary Code of Practice.
Legislative drafting is underway and we are working closely with colleagues across
We're also talking with key stakeholders to ensure the law strikes the right balance between consumer protection and market integrity.
We want to send a clear message to cancer survivors: We see you, we support you, and we are changing the law to make your path forward easier.
This reform is not about punishing insurers, it's about building a market that is based on fairness, transparency, and compassion.
That's what modern Ireland should be about.
And that is what this Government is delivering.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Dublin Live
3 hours ago
- Dublin Live
'Regrettable' that EU and US deal not done as Trump threatens 30% tariffs
Our community members are treated to special offers, promotions and adverts from us and our partners. You can check out at any time. More info It is 'regrettable' that the EU and US were not able to agree a framework on tariffs ahead of an earlier deadline, the Tanaiste has said. Simon Harris said the EU has to 'prepare for all scenarios' after US President Donald Trump threatened 30% tariffs against the bloc. Mr Harris said there was a need to 'de-escalate the situation' through a framework deal that would provide certainty for businesses and protect jobs and investment. The Foreign Affairs Minister made the comments following a meeting with US ambassador to Ireland Ed Walsh. Speaking at Government Buildings, Mr Harris said: 'The message I relayed to the US ambassador is a consistent one and a very straightforward one: we in Ireland, we in Europe, want a deal. 'We want a trade deal that is good for Ireland, good for Europe, good for the United States of America, and I believe there is a clear landing zone in relation to that.' The EU and US had been engaged in negotiations ahead of a deadline last week, but Mr Trump announced he was pushing back the imposition of a higher rate of tariffs until August 1. The US president also said he would impose 30% tariffs on the bloc if a deal is not reached, in a move that EU trade commissioner Maros Sefcovic said would make trade between the two regions almost 'impossible'. Mr Harris said: 'I believe there was a landing zone very nearly there last week, and it's regrettable that that wasn't arrived at.' However, he said he remained confident that a deal can happen in the days ahead. The European Commission is due to publish an expanded list of counter-tariffs that would be implemented if an agreement is not reached. He said the 'optimal position' would be to get to a deal where 'we can rip up that list and never need to see it implemented'. 'A countermeasure list is an important step of saying to President Trump: 'Hang on, we want a deal here, we want a way forward, but if there isn't a deal Europe also has options at its disposal'.' The Tanaiste said the Irish Government will also analyse the list and engage with the commission over any 'areas of concern for Ireland' that arise. Mr Harris's discussion with Mr Walsh also touched on the issue of the pharmaceutical sector where there is an ongoing section 232 investigation being carried out by the US administration. The Tanaiste said the pharma sector remains an area of significant concern for Ireland. 'Europe must remain calm, must remain united – our strength is in being united, 460 million of us – and must of course prepare for all scenarios.' Earlier, European commissioner for democracy, justice, the rule of law and consumer protection Michael McGrath said the bloc's response to 30% tariffs would be 'firm, quick and robust'. Mr McGrath told RTE Radio 1: 'We have two and a half weeks left before the new deadline within which we will leave no stone unturned as a European Union to get the best possible deal for our companies.' He said that if the 30% tariff is introduced by the US, the EU has measures in place to respond. He said: 'We have been preparing for a range of different scenarios for many months, and so the European Union has been keeping all of the member states, including Ireland, regularly informed of developments, there have been ongoing consultations. 'I want to underline the importance of unity. What we have been doing in relation to countermeasures is preparing for different scenarios. There are two different sets of packages of countermeasures that amount to the imposition of tariffs of exports from the US into the EU of over €90 billion. 'We do not wish for that to come to pass, but in the event that it does, then we will need to respond if the US proceeds unilaterally with the imposition of tariffs of the order that President Trump has flagged in his letter over the weekend.' Join our Dublin Live breaking news service on WhatsApp. Click this link to receive your daily dose of Dublin Live content. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice . For all the latest news from Dublin and surrounding areas visit our homepage.
Irish Examiner
4 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Ireland's new defamation law ‘falls short of EU SLAPP directive'
Ireland's new defamation laws risk incurring EU legal action, the Government has been warned. The Dáil last week passed the long-awaited Defamation Bill, with the Seanad passing it at second stage last Wednesday. However, a group of organisations, including the National Union of Journalists, the Irish Council for Civil Liberties, and RTÉ have argued that while the Defamation Bill contains provisions to stop so-called SLAPP (strategic lawsuit against public participation) cases, it 'fails to include the robust safeguards required to meaningfully protect public interest speech'. Such SLAPP cases usually involve affluent plaintiffs attempting to silence or censor criticism by suing critics, forcing them to spend huge sums on legal fees defending their position. The Ireland Anti-SLAPPs Network group says that, nearly a decade after the review of the Defamation Act 2009 began, 'this is a frustrating outcome and a missed opportunity to protect the freedom of expression that is the lifeblood of our democracy'. Law falls short of transposing full directive The group says that while the bill brings in provisions that give effect to aspects of the EU Anti-SLAPP Directive, it falls short of transposing the directive's full set of minimum standards and protections, which Ireland is legally required to implement in full by May 2026. The anti-SLAPP provisions in the bill apply only to defamation proceedings and do not extend to privacy, copyright, or data protection cases. The group stated: The Government has provided no clear explanation of how it intends to extend protections beyond defamation in line with its EU obligations. They said that the legislation also 'omits key components of the directive that could have been readily included'. These include provision for third-party interventions in support of SLAPP defendants (Article 9), security for damages (Article 10) and a reversal of the burden of proof (Article 12). The legislation also fails to incorporate the protections against SLAPPs initiated in non-EU countries (Articles 16 and 17). 'By failing to incorporate these core safeguards, the Irish Government exposes itself to potential infringement proceedings from the European Commission," the group stated. Recommendation on countering SLAPPs It said the Government could and should have drawn on established international best practices, including the Council of Europe's recommendation on countering the use of SLAPPs. 'This recommendation includes vital safeguards, such as an automatic stay of proceedings while an early dismissal motion is being heard, which are designed to protect against abusive litigation. "It provides clear, practical guidance for safeguarding free expression and democratic accountability. Yet the Government appears to have almost entirely disregarded it.' Speaking in the Seanad on the bill last week, justice minister Jim O'Callaghan said full transposition 'will be done'. 'Let us remember that this is a defamation bill. It is appropriate that we just transpose into the Defamation Bill those aspects of the SLAPP directive that relate to defamation.' Jessica Ní Mhainín of Index on Censorship said: 'It is ironic that this piece of legislation was passed in the Dáil on European Day of Action against SLAPPs because it completely fails to offer meaningful protection to SLAPP defendants. "Its complex and flawed provisions risk becoming tools only accessible to those with significant legal resources — not the individuals most often targeted with SLAPPs.'
Irish Examiner
4 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Simon Harris warns of Irish job losses in 30% US-EU tariff war
A 30% tariff trade war with the US would have 'significant' impacts on the Irish economy, including an increasing rate of job losses, ministers will be warned on Tuesday. Simon Harris, the Tánaiste and foreign affairs and trade minister, will issue the warning at a Cabinet meeting, as the EU tries to avoid an all-out trade war with the US, after Donald Trump upended negotiations by demanding a deal by August 1 or face a 30% tariff on goods coming to the US from the EU. That scenario, according to EU trade chief Maros Sefcovic, would effectively end trade between the EU and the US. Arriving for talks with European ministers in Brussels, Mr Sefcovic said a tariff of 30% or more would have a huge impact, making it 'almost impossible to continue' current transatlantic trade, which is worth €4.4bn a day. Irish ministers to focus on talks At Tuesday's Cabinet meeting, Mr Harris is expected to tell ministers that Ireland's focus over the next two-and-a-half weeks is on negotiations to reach a deal to avoid the imposition of higher tariffs that could precipitate a full-blown trade war between the EU and US. He will tell colleagues that this scenario would see a significant impact on the economy, including devastating job losses. Mr Harris will warn that the possibility of the EU imposing a revised list of counter tariffs, amounting to €72bn, against the US if talks fail would 'cause pain on both sides'. The coming weeks must, therefore, be used for a negotiated settlement to avoid such a scenario, Mr Harris will say. The Tánaiste will also update ministers on plans to engage with the pharmaceutical industry this week. 30% tariffs 'unthinkable' Modelling carried out by the Department of Finance in May said that an ongoing 10% tariff war would see GDP hit by 1.5 percentage points and around 25,000 fewer jobs created, but modelling of a 30% tariff scenario has not been carried out. A Government source said the 30% figure was 'unthinkable' until recently. It is understood this modelling is being prepared in advance of the budget. On Monday, Mr Harris met with the new US ambassador to Ireland, Ed Walsh, and said that he had relayed to the US administration a 'consistent' and 'very straightforward' message — 'we in Ireland, we in Europe, want a deal'. Mr Harris added: I believe there was a landing zone very nearly there last week, and it's regrettable that that wasn't arrived at. Paschal Donohoe, the finance minister, said it is impossible to gauge the impact of a 30% tariff on the Irish economy. 'What the exact effect could be would depend on what exactly the level of tariffs would be, and at this moment in time, with all the unpredictability, it is very difficult to forecast.' In response to Mr Trump's latest deadline, the EU decided to postpone until August 1 retaliatory counter-tariffs on €21bn of US goods that had been due to kick in at midnight last night. In Brussels on Monday, EU foreign ministers discussed plans for a further round of counter-measures, targeting €72bn of US imports to the EU. Michael McGrath emphasises EU unity European commissioner Michael McGrath said that the EU does not want to use those counter-measures, but would if necessary: 'I want to underline the importance of unity," he said. "What we have been doing in relation to counter-measures is preparing for different scenarios. 'There are two different sets of packages of countermeasures that amount to the imposition of tariffs of exports from the US into the EU of over €90bn,' Mr McGrath said. 'We do not wish for that to come to pass, but in the event that it does, then we will need to respond if the US proceeds unilaterally with the imposition of tariffs of the order that president Trump has flagged in his letter over the weekend,' he told RTÉ radio.
