Dozens of UK holidaymakers fall ill after five-star 'holiday from hell'
25 UK tourists say they developed serious stomach problems after being served raw food on dirty plates
A group of 25 British tourists are seeking legal action after falling seriously ill on "nightmare" holidays to a luxury five-star resort in Cape Verde. Hotel guests said their dream trips quickly turned into holidays from hell after they suffered gastric illnesses while staying in Boa Vista.
Holidaymakers reported seeing birds, flies and even cats around the buffet area, which also served "raw and undercooked" food along with "dirty crockery and cutlery." One NHS worker who spent £3,000 on a trip to celebrate early retirement was left hospitalised after being stuck down with E.coli.
Sharon Burrow said she still suffers from complications eight months on after the luxury break turned into "one of the worst experiences of her life". Another guest, Penny Robson had to be given antibiotics after coming down with gastric symptoms including bloating, diarrhoea, nausea and stomach cramping.
The pair are among 25 people who have now instructed lawyers to investigate after raising concerns about hygiene standards at the resort. Sharon, 56, of Ashton-under-Lyne, Greater Manchester, travelled to Cape Verde for a ten day break on September 20, 2024.
But around five days into the holiday, she started to suffer from aches and pains, and a fever before experiencing stomach cramps and diarrhoea. Sharon visited A&E upon her return to the UK and tests confirmed she had E.coli and shigella. She said doctors suspected she contracted the infection on holiday.
The mental health worker said: 'I was unwell for nearly three weeks and it was one of the worst experiences of my life. 'I was in so much pain and completely drained - it felt like my body just shut down. I'd been concerned about hygiene at the hotel. Food was served at room temperature and new food was added to existing food.
"I saw dirty crockery, cats in and around the restaurant and empty plates attracting flies were left on tables. I feel completely let down and while it's too late for me the least I feel I deserve is answers and to raise awareness of what I've been through so hopefully others don't have to.'
Penny, a 55-year-old paramedic from London, travelled to the resort in September 2023 and paid £2,000 for the week-long break with her friend. She was left requiring medical treatment at the resort, including antibiotics and electrolytes, after she fell poorly five days into the holiday.
Penny had to cancel two pre-paid excursions, including a stargazing trip and a private island tour. She raised concerns about the food hygiene at the resort, reporting that food was often served lukewarm, left uncovered, and exposed to birds and flies.
On one occasion, she picked up a piece of chicken from the buffet and discovered it was raw. Since returning home, Penny says she has experienced ongoing anxiety and the illness has had a lasting impact on her confidence and wellbeing.
Penny said: 'I was looking forward to my holiday and had saved for months. However, the excitement for the holiday quickly disappeared when I started feeling unwell. It completely ruined what should have been a relaxing time. I've never felt so vulnerable while abroad.
'I'm very cautious now regarding where I would book a holiday. This has affected my choices and I travel much shorter distances to Europe as I don't feel confident travelling to further afield places.
'I no longer trust my body and if I ever eat out I constantly worry about food and how it's prepared. I just want answers as to how my holiday became a nightmare.'
Law firm Irwin Mitchell is currently representing more than 1,400 holidaymakers who suffered serious illnesses linked to holidays in Cape Verde since 2022. Jatinder Paul, the international serious injury lawyer representing those who have fallen ill, said: 'This is yet another resort in Cape Verde that has come under the spotlight following reports of serious illness.
'We're already representing more than 1,400 British holidaymakers who have suffered gastric illness linked to holidays on the islands over the last three years. Illnesses like E.coli are serious and can lead to long-term health complications. It's vital that if any issue are identified, swift action is taken to eradicate the risks to other holidaymakers
'While nothing can make up for their ordeals, this latest group we represent understandably want answers. They booked what they hoped would be luxury holidays, but the first-hand accounts we've heard about their holiday were anything but luxury.
'As part of our investigations, we would be interested in hearing from other guests staying at the hotel at the same time as this group.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Wales Online
26 minutes ago
- Wales Online
Former cricket star's daughter 'would have survived' if medics acted sooner
Former cricket star's daughter 'would have survived' if medics acted sooner There were a 'number of delays' in Bethan James' treatment that 'more than minimally contributed' to her death, a coroner said Bethan James was just 21 when she died The death of a cricket star's 'caring and beautiful' daughter could have been avoided, a coroner has concluded. Bethan Amy James was admitted to hospital on February 8, 2020 and died on February 9. An inquest into her death previously heard that she died of sepsis and pneumonia, which was complicated by the immune suppressing effects of Crohn's disease. However during the inquest's conclusion on Tuesday coroner Patricia Morgan said that Bethan likely 'would not have died' if medics acted appropriately sooner. The conclusion at Pontypridd Coroner's Court followed three days of evidence earlier this month. It included a statement from Bethan's mother, Jane, who detailed how she believed her daughter had been dismissed multiple times by hospital medics before her death. An expert witness had also shared that he believed Bethan's life could have been saved. Summarising the relevant evidence that led to her decision, Ms Morgan said that Bethan had a history of Crohn's disease that she had been diagnosed with in 2019 at the age of 20. Between January 27 and February 6, 2020, she said that Bethan, who was from St Mellons in Cardiff, had attended hospital four times due to feeling unwell. This included an appointment at Llandough Hospital on January 27, following which Bethan was diagnosed with community acquired pneumonia, for which she was treated with oral antibiotics. Article continues below Following this it was heard how Bethan developed a numbness in the right side of her body and began to feel physically sick, becoming unable to tolerate her antibiotics. It was heard how an A&E appointment on February 5 focussed on Bethan's neurological symptoms, but there 'should have' been more focus on assessing the already diagnosed pneumonia, Ms Morgan said. Ms Morgan said that by this point Bethan's interactions with medics made her 'reluctant' to return to hospital as she continued to deteriorate - it was something she was 'desperate to avoid',' Ms Morgan said. Bethan James wanted to raise awareness of Crohn's and documented her diagnosis on YouTube (Image: YouTube ) Previously it was heard how more than one doctor made comments towards Bethan that made her feel dismissed. Including one who said words to the effect of: 'You again! You were here on Sunday,' when she felt seriously unwell. It was also heard how another told her that he had seen a teenager with similar symptoms who was 'now symptom free and fine.' On February 8 Ms Morgan detailed how further mistakes were made by medics that 'more than minimally' contributed to Bethan's death. She recalled evidence that Bethan's mother called an ambulance for Bethan at around 6.12pm. A rapid responder arrived by 6.23pm and identified that Bethan was very unwell and required an ambulance to take her to hospital. However, it was heard how the responder called for a P3 ambulance response, which refers to a low priority. He later escalated this to a P2. Ms Morgan found that the P3 decision 'made no material difference' to the arrival time of the ambulance. However, she said it showed a "lack of urgency and appropriate response' when 'Bethan's condition warranted an emergency response' Further, she said that ambulance paramedics did not pre-alert the University Hospital of Wales in Cardiff of Bethan's arrival. Ms Morgan said that this meant medics were not prepared for Bethan, and that a bed was not secured for her in resus. She said: 'When Bethan arrived at hospital she was transferred to majors, when she should have been admitted directly to resus.' She said this led to an 'unwillingness of the lead nurse [in resus] to become involved in decision making', adding that this resulted in time being used to triage Bethan. It further contributed to a delay in recognising Bethan's critical condition, as well as delayed appropriate treatment, she said. Regarding Bethan's outcome she noted conflicting evidence from the doctors involved in looking after her, and an expert witness who works in a different hospital. Bethan's family called her 'caring and beautiful' Dr Duncan Thomas, who treated Bethan at hospital, previously told the inquest how Bethan's rate of deterioration was 'a-typical'. He added that he believed Bethan would have died regardless of the medical treatment she received on February 8. However expert witness Dr Chris Danbury disagreed, saying that Bethan's cardiac arrest could have been avoided. He said a pre-alert should have ensured Bethan a place in resus, and that 'cognitive bias' - where resus patients are regarded as priority - would have worked in Bethan's favour. On Tuesday Ms Morgan said she was more persuaded by Dr Danbury's evidence, that with a pre-alert and appropriate treatment earlier on, Bethan's cardiac arrest would likely have not happened when it did. She said: 'On balance, I find that Bethan would not have died.' Concluding the inquest Ms Morgan delivered a narrative conclusion. She told the inquest that Bethan died as a result of pneumonia which led to sepsis which led to septic shock. She said there were a 'number of delays' in Bethan's treatment that 'more than minimally contributed' to her death. Ms Morgan said she is still yet to make a Regulation 28 to prevent future deaths. She said the decision is pending further clarification from the University Hospital of Wales, which she has asked for by next week. Addressing Bethan's family, Ms Morgan offered her condolences, adding: 'It has been five years plus since Bethan passed away. I don't doubt the pain still is as strong and difficult today as it was back then.' She further apologised for the delay between Bethan's death and the inquest taking place. Bethan's mother, Jane, previously paid tribute to her daughter during the first day of the inquest. She described Bethan as a 'caring' and 'beautiful' person who always put others before herself. Bethan was the daughter of Glamorgan and England cricket star Steve James Diagnosed with Crohn's disease in 2019 at the age of 20, Bethan documented her experience of the condition through a vlog and had hopes of becoming a journalist. Prior to her death Mrs James said Bethan had been studying journalism at the University of South Wales and dreamed of being a voice for those with Crohn's and related illnesses. It was heard how Bethan had started a vlog account where she documented her experience of the condition, before she became involved in a BBC documentary with Amy Dowden, who is also diagnosed with the condition. The documentary - named Strictly Amy: Crohn's and Me - sadly aired after Bethan's death, and the programme was dedicated to her memory. Article continues below Mrs James said: 'As a person she never moaned, she never made a fuss. She was very caring. She was just beautiful. 'She put people before herself. She was more interested in other people and their stories and I think that's why she would have made a brilliant journalist.'
Scottish Sun
33 minutes ago
- Scottish Sun
Brits urged to ‘check passport today' over rule that could stop you boarding flight – see where you're at risk
Plus, the EU country that doesn't even need Brits to show a passport to enter PASS IT ON Brits urged to 'check passport today' over rule that could stop you boarding flight – see where you're at risk Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) BRITISH travellers have been urged to check their passports to ensure they comply with a rule that could prevent you from boarding your flight. The world's top holiday destinations have vastly different requirements in the length of time travellers need left on their passports, in order to enter the country. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 2 Brits are urged to check the expiry date on their passport before travelling Credit: Getty 2 Some countries also require a specific number of empty pages in the passport Credit: Alamy Brits will need anywhere between one day to six months left no the date of expiry - with top holiday spots like Turkey and Egypt being especially strict. This week, His Majesty's Passport Office urged UK residents to check the expiry date on their passport to ensure that it complies with their destination country's requirements, ahead of peak holiday season. They said: "Did you know that some countries require your passport to be valid for several months after your scheduled return date?" Failure to comply will see travellers barred from entering the country. The Government website includes a convenient list of the entry requirements for 226 countries and territories, which tourists should consult before travelling. Each country has its own requirements so it's important you stay up to date on your holiday destination. Some countries have fairly lax requirements, only requiring you to have a valid passport for the duration of the trip, until the day you leave the country. This includes Argentina, Australia, Barbados, Canada, Chile, Gibraltar, Ireland, Jamaica, Japan, Mauritius, Mexico, Tunisia, St Lucia and the US. Even so, it might take you longer to get through Canadian immigration if you have less than six months left - so it could be worth renewing your passport regardless. Most countries in Asia are more restrictive, requiring six months left before your passport expires after the date you arrive. The must-visit sunshine spot with summer heat all year round For most European countries, you need just three months from the day you plan to leave. But don't get caught out if you've still got one of the pre-Brexit passports - the date of expiry is 10 years from the date of issue. Pre-Brexit rules allowed people to roll over an additional nine months, taking a passport to 10 years and nine months - so the date of expiry on the old burgundy passports is now wrong. Some countries also require that you have at least one blank page left for immigration stamps. Some of these rules don't just apply to plane travel, but also if you're crossing the border by car or train. How many months do I need on my British passport before I travel? Valid for Six Months Usually, this requirement applies from the date you arrive in the country, however, Brits are reminded to check the specific requirements for their destination country on the Foreign Office's website. Antigua and Barbuda The Bahamas Belize Bolivia Botswana Brazil Cambodia China Colombia Dominican Republic Ecuador (& Galapagos Islands) Egypt Fiji Jordan Indonesia Israel Kenya - must also have two blank pages left Laos Madagascar - must also have two blank pages left Malaysia Maldives Mongolia Namibia - must also have one blank page left Nepal Oman Peru Philippines Qatar Russia Singapore South Africa - must also have two blank pages left Sri Lanka Tanzania Thailand Turkey United Arab Emirates Vietnam Valid for Three Months This rule mostly applies to European countries, including all EU countries, as well as the Schengen Area (excluding Ireland - which doesn't require a passport at all). These countries require you to have three months left from the day you plan to leave, in addition to having a passport that is less then 10 years old on the day of entry. Thousands of Brits have been caught out by the new passport rules, since the EU changed entry rules post- Brexit. Andorra Austria Belgium British Virgin Islands Bulgaria Croatia Cuba Republic of Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Estonia Finland France French Polynesia Germany Greece Hungary Iceland Italy Kazakhstan Latvia Lebanon Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Malta Monaco Morocco Netherlands New Zealand Norway Poland Portugal Romania Réunion San Marino Slovakia Slovenia South Korea Spain Sweden Switzerland Uzbekistan Vatican City Valid for 180 Days India is the only country requiring 180 days of validity from the date of arrival. It also requires two blank pages. Valid for 1 Day Costa Rica requires just one day of validity from the day of departure The good news is, you can easily apply for a new passport on the Government website, helping get you set for any summer excursions. While the cost of a new passport isn't cheap at £107, it could save you money in the long-term as failing to comply with travel rules could cause delays, or even prevent you from boarding your flight. No need for a passport at all British nationals don't legally have to show a passport to get into Ireland. However, it's still advised to take one with you, as Irish immigration officers may ask for proof of British nationality - and ferry and airline staff may ask for ID from customers.
Daily Record
35 minutes ago
- Daily Record
Innocent hand luggage mistake could ruin your entire holiday
A travel expert claims stashing your passport in your cabin bags could bring your getaway to a premature end As the summer holiday season approaches, Brits are being advised to keep their passports handy and not tucked away in their hand luggage, or they risk being turned away at their destination. The official start of summer is this Saturday (June 21), and many Brits are eager to jet off to sunnier climes as soon as the school term ends. A recent YouGov poll has shown that Spain remains the top summer holiday destination for Brits (at 15.9%). Interestingly, the UK comes in second, with 14.3% of adults opting for a staycation. Italy and Greece are joint third, with 9.3% of tourists hoping to visit either country. With so many people keen to get away, there's an equal number making sure their passports are with them and up-to-date. In the first quarter of this year alone, more than two million passports were issued (2,035,154), according to HM Passport Office. Although this figure is 13% lower than the same period last year, the appetite for travel remains strong. Once at the airport, the temptation to put your passport in your cabin bag rather than keeping it in your pocket or passport holder can be high. But could this potentially ruin your holidays? One travel expert has cautioned that passengers may face issues if they are forced to check their oversized cabin bags, particularly if their passport is stored in the luggage. Travel writer Katie Jackson emphasised the importance of keeping passports within one's reach, warning that failure to produce the document at passport control could result in being denied entry at the destination. Writing for US magazine Travel and Leisure, she explained: "If you put your passport in your carry-on and are forced to check it at the gate (and forget to take it out before boarding your plane), you could find yourself in a serious predicament. "For starters, if you're flying internationally, you typically go through immigration, also known as passport control, prior to being reunited with your checked luggage and going through customs. Without your passport, you could be denied entry to your destination or face a fine." The situation can become even more complicated for those with connecting flights, as Katie noted: "If you're connecting to a domestic flight, you could easily miss that flight, too. For example, if you're flying from New York to Naples via Rome, and you don't have your passport with you when you land in Rome and go through immigration, you may miss your connecting flight." To highlight the importance of keeping travel documents safe, Katie recounted how a British pair were sent packing from Greece in 2018 after they disembarked without their passports. Lewis Mundy and Kimberley Floyd were plunged into a distressing situation when they discovered they had left their passports in the seat pockets on the plane upon landing in Kos. Despite swift attempts to recover the missing items, Tui staff failed to locate the passports, resulting in the couple being placed on a return flight to the UK within 30 minutes of touching down. Katie issued a stark warning: "Once you leave the aircraft, it can be very difficult to retrieve items forgotten on board, especially if the plane is scheduled to depart again soon. Replacing a passport is not only expensive, it's also time-consuming given all of the documents you have to gather." She was not the only one emphasising the importance of not stowing your passport in your hand luggage. The UK Border Force has reminded holidaymakers to keep their passports within reach. It warned against stowing them in checked bags since passengers are required to present them upon arrival, saying: "Don't be tempted to pack them away in your luggage as you will need to show your passport on your arrival." In April, the Daily Record reported on another crucial tip, this time by a travel insurance specialist who cautioned British citizens to check their passports for damages to avoid the risk of being turned away when they land.
