Anger over sentence appeal for sport star family attack
Ben Cannon came to the aid of Toutai Kefu and his family when they were attacked by two 15-year-old boys in August 2021, in a Brisbane home invasion that resembled a "war zone".
The former Australian and Queensland Reds rugby player suffered a "life threatening" 25mm liver wound, his wife Rachel remains partially disabled after being cut to the bone by a sickle and two of their children were injured.
Mr Cannon tackled one teen and pinned him until police arrived.
One boy was sentenced to eight years and the other seven after pleading guilty to charges including malicious act with intent.
They were only required to serve 50 per cent of their sentences and did not have convictions recorded.
Then attorney-general Yvette D'Ath launched an appeal in 2024 against the "manifestly inadequate" sentences.
But the Court of Appeal on Tuesday dismissed it after the state failed to prove the sentences were inadequate.
Mr Cannon said it was shocking, but not surprising.
"The news in a sad way, it's not unexpected," he told AAP.
"It seems like the system has more tolerance for injustice than it does for justice and it seems to always favour those who commit the crimes."
The attorney-general needed to persuade the appeal judges the sentences were disproportionate to the offending.
But counsel failed to put forward any comparable cases to provide a yardstick of the appropriate sentencing range, the appeal judges said.
Broadly comparable cases show under 10 years imprisonment was "not out of the range" of sentences that could have been imposed, the appeal judges ruled.
The state government had argued the period of detention ordered for the boys was also manifestly inadequate.
The sentencing judge had said the teens' lack of criminal history, rehabilitation efforts and personal circumstances led him to reduce the period of detention from 70 per cent to 50 per cent.
But the appeal judges found the attorney-general failed to establish the sentencing judge made an error in his decision-making.
In not recording a conviction, the sentencing judge used his discretion to consider the nature of the offence, the teen's age, previous convictions and whether it would impact the chance of rehabilitation or employment.
The attorney-general needed to establish that the judge was unreasonable and had argued that convictions should have been recorded to reflect the gravity of the offending.
Again, the appeal judges dismissed this, standing by the principle that children are entitled to the benefit of not having a conviction recorded to assist with their rehabilitation.
Mr Cannon said the decision had put a fire in his belly and would inspire him to do more with his advocacy group, Voice for Victims.
"This shows the system needs a total upheaval," he said.
"We need a system that understands that unless we catch these kids earlier and we steer them in a different direction ... then we will end up with more and more victims."
Asked whether there would have been different sentences if the Liberal National government's landmark "adult crime, adult time" laws introduced last year had been in effect, Mr Cannon was sceptical.
He said many legal experts - including judges - seemed to be lost in what the "adult crime, adult time" sentencing provisions actually mean.
"Justice shouldn't be grey. It should be black and white," he said.
A neighbour who helped stop a horror attack on a former Wallabies star's family wants the justice system overhauled after an appeal over the teen offenders' "inadequate" sentence failed.
Ben Cannon came to the aid of Toutai Kefu and his family when they were attacked by two 15-year-old boys in August 2021, in a Brisbane home invasion that resembled a "war zone".
The former Australian and Queensland Reds rugby player suffered a "life threatening" 25mm liver wound, his wife Rachel remains partially disabled after being cut to the bone by a sickle and two of their children were injured.
Mr Cannon tackled one teen and pinned him until police arrived.
One boy was sentenced to eight years and the other seven after pleading guilty to charges including malicious act with intent.
They were only required to serve 50 per cent of their sentences and did not have convictions recorded.
Then attorney-general Yvette D'Ath launched an appeal in 2024 against the "manifestly inadequate" sentences.
But the Court of Appeal on Tuesday dismissed it after the state failed to prove the sentences were inadequate.
Mr Cannon said it was shocking, but not surprising.
"The news in a sad way, it's not unexpected," he told AAP.
"It seems like the system has more tolerance for injustice than it does for justice and it seems to always favour those who commit the crimes."
The attorney-general needed to persuade the appeal judges the sentences were disproportionate to the offending.
But counsel failed to put forward any comparable cases to provide a yardstick of the appropriate sentencing range, the appeal judges said.
Broadly comparable cases show under 10 years imprisonment was "not out of the range" of sentences that could have been imposed, the appeal judges ruled.
The state government had argued the period of detention ordered for the boys was also manifestly inadequate.
The sentencing judge had said the teens' lack of criminal history, rehabilitation efforts and personal circumstances led him to reduce the period of detention from 70 per cent to 50 per cent.
But the appeal judges found the attorney-general failed to establish the sentencing judge made an error in his decision-making.
In not recording a conviction, the sentencing judge used his discretion to consider the nature of the offence, the teen's age, previous convictions and whether it would impact the chance of rehabilitation or employment.
The attorney-general needed to establish that the judge was unreasonable and had argued that convictions should have been recorded to reflect the gravity of the offending.
Again, the appeal judges dismissed this, standing by the principle that children are entitled to the benefit of not having a conviction recorded to assist with their rehabilitation.
Mr Cannon said the decision had put a fire in his belly and would inspire him to do more with his advocacy group, Voice for Victims.
"This shows the system needs a total upheaval," he said.
"We need a system that understands that unless we catch these kids earlier and we steer them in a different direction ... then we will end up with more and more victims."
Asked whether there would have been different sentences if the Liberal National government's landmark "adult crime, adult time" laws introduced last year had been in effect, Mr Cannon was sceptical.
He said many legal experts - including judges - seemed to be lost in what the "adult crime, adult time" sentencing provisions actually mean.
"Justice shouldn't be grey. It should be black and white," he said.
A neighbour who helped stop a horror attack on a former Wallabies star's family wants the justice system overhauled after an appeal over the teen offenders' "inadequate" sentence failed.
Ben Cannon came to the aid of Toutai Kefu and his family when they were attacked by two 15-year-old boys in August 2021, in a Brisbane home invasion that resembled a "war zone".
The former Australian and Queensland Reds rugby player suffered a "life threatening" 25mm liver wound, his wife Rachel remains partially disabled after being cut to the bone by a sickle and two of their children were injured.
Mr Cannon tackled one teen and pinned him until police arrived.
One boy was sentenced to eight years and the other seven after pleading guilty to charges including malicious act with intent.
They were only required to serve 50 per cent of their sentences and did not have convictions recorded.
Then attorney-general Yvette D'Ath launched an appeal in 2024 against the "manifestly inadequate" sentences.
But the Court of Appeal on Tuesday dismissed it after the state failed to prove the sentences were inadequate.
Mr Cannon said it was shocking, but not surprising.
"The news in a sad way, it's not unexpected," he told AAP.
"It seems like the system has more tolerance for injustice than it does for justice and it seems to always favour those who commit the crimes."
The attorney-general needed to persuade the appeal judges the sentences were disproportionate to the offending.
But counsel failed to put forward any comparable cases to provide a yardstick of the appropriate sentencing range, the appeal judges said.
Broadly comparable cases show under 10 years imprisonment was "not out of the range" of sentences that could have been imposed, the appeal judges ruled.
The state government had argued the period of detention ordered for the boys was also manifestly inadequate.
The sentencing judge had said the teens' lack of criminal history, rehabilitation efforts and personal circumstances led him to reduce the period of detention from 70 per cent to 50 per cent.
But the appeal judges found the attorney-general failed to establish the sentencing judge made an error in his decision-making.
In not recording a conviction, the sentencing judge used his discretion to consider the nature of the offence, the teen's age, previous convictions and whether it would impact the chance of rehabilitation or employment.
The attorney-general needed to establish that the judge was unreasonable and had argued that convictions should have been recorded to reflect the gravity of the offending.
Again, the appeal judges dismissed this, standing by the principle that children are entitled to the benefit of not having a conviction recorded to assist with their rehabilitation.
Mr Cannon said the decision had put a fire in his belly and would inspire him to do more with his advocacy group, Voice for Victims.
"This shows the system needs a total upheaval," he said.
"We need a system that understands that unless we catch these kids earlier and we steer them in a different direction ... then we will end up with more and more victims."
Asked whether there would have been different sentences if the Liberal National government's landmark "adult crime, adult time" laws introduced last year had been in effect, Mr Cannon was sceptical.
He said many legal experts - including judges - seemed to be lost in what the "adult crime, adult time" sentencing provisions actually mean.
"Justice shouldn't be grey. It should be black and white," he said.
A neighbour who helped stop a horror attack on a former Wallabies star's family wants the justice system overhauled after an appeal over the teen offenders' "inadequate" sentence failed.
Ben Cannon came to the aid of Toutai Kefu and his family when they were attacked by two 15-year-old boys in August 2021, in a Brisbane home invasion that resembled a "war zone".
The former Australian and Queensland Reds rugby player suffered a "life threatening" 25mm liver wound, his wife Rachel remains partially disabled after being cut to the bone by a sickle and two of their children were injured.
Mr Cannon tackled one teen and pinned him until police arrived.
One boy was sentenced to eight years and the other seven after pleading guilty to charges including malicious act with intent.
They were only required to serve 50 per cent of their sentences and did not have convictions recorded.
Then attorney-general Yvette D'Ath launched an appeal in 2024 against the "manifestly inadequate" sentences.
But the Court of Appeal on Tuesday dismissed it after the state failed to prove the sentences were inadequate.
Mr Cannon said it was shocking, but not surprising.
"The news in a sad way, it's not unexpected," he told AAP.
"It seems like the system has more tolerance for injustice than it does for justice and it seems to always favour those who commit the crimes."
The attorney-general needed to persuade the appeal judges the sentences were disproportionate to the offending.
But counsel failed to put forward any comparable cases to provide a yardstick of the appropriate sentencing range, the appeal judges said.
Broadly comparable cases show under 10 years imprisonment was "not out of the range" of sentences that could have been imposed, the appeal judges ruled.
The state government had argued the period of detention ordered for the boys was also manifestly inadequate.
The sentencing judge had said the teens' lack of criminal history, rehabilitation efforts and personal circumstances led him to reduce the period of detention from 70 per cent to 50 per cent.
But the appeal judges found the attorney-general failed to establish the sentencing judge made an error in his decision-making.
In not recording a conviction, the sentencing judge used his discretion to consider the nature of the offence, the teen's age, previous convictions and whether it would impact the chance of rehabilitation or employment.
The attorney-general needed to establish that the judge was unreasonable and had argued that convictions should have been recorded to reflect the gravity of the offending.
Again, the appeal judges dismissed this, standing by the principle that children are entitled to the benefit of not having a conviction recorded to assist with their rehabilitation.
Mr Cannon said the decision had put a fire in his belly and would inspire him to do more with his advocacy group, Voice for Victims.
"This shows the system needs a total upheaval," he said.
"We need a system that understands that unless we catch these kids earlier and we steer them in a different direction ... then we will end up with more and more victims."
Asked whether there would have been different sentences if the Liberal National government's landmark "adult crime, adult time" laws introduced last year had been in effect, Mr Cannon was sceptical.
He said many legal experts - including judges - seemed to be lost in what the "adult crime, adult time" sentencing provisions actually mean.
"Justice shouldn't be grey. It should be black and white," he said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News AU
an hour ago
- Sky News AU
Officeworks' hilarious merchandising placement leads to claims the retailer is inadvertently catering to 'illegal' activities
Officeworks has made a hilarious merchandising placement, which has led people to claim the humble office supply store is inadvertently catering to "illegal" businesses. Australian comedian Frida Deguise recently took to TikTok to share her eyebrow-raising discovery of small resealable bags - similar to the kind commonly used by drug dealers - placed next to scales at one of the major Aussie office supply retailers in Sydney. In a video, Deguise jokingly claimed Officeworks must be "a money laundering business" as she filmed the inconspicuous product placement. "Are you watching? Aisle 13 in Officeworks is a money laundering business," she said, holding up the bags and scales placed side by side on the shelf. "Little bags, and isn't that amazing? The scales are right next to it. "Tell me, is that not perfectly planned or what?" The comedian then directly addressed Officeworks' top executives, urging them to "explain" themselves. She claimed the setup feels very "illegal". "Officeworks, you've got some explaining to decided to put mini bags right next to the scales?" Deguise wrote in the caption. "Asking for a friend. What do you reckon they're planning?" In the comments, people bought into the humour, with one person saying the product match was the perfect setup for any undercover drug dealer. "It's very convenient for a dealer to find everything they need right there. Lol." Another person said Officeworks staff must have thought of placing the bags and scales together after they "got sick of people asking" where the two were "every five called convenience." "That's not money laundering, that's a business," a third person said. More people quipped there was nothing suspicious about it at all, even if there was an alleged illegal hidden motive behind the move. "That's called merchandising," one person said. While it's unclear which Officeworks store Deguise visited, it is understood to be located in southwest Sydney. has contacted Frida Deguise and Officeworks for further comment.
7NEWS
10 hours ago
- 7NEWS
Family's heartbreak after Trevor Doyle found dead in park in Logan
Trevor Doyle's family is remembering the vibrant 29-year-old as they prepare to farewell him after his alleged murder in a suburban park. The 29-year-old was found dead on a footpath at Reserve Park at Slacks Creek, south of Brisbane, by a local resident on August 13. Know the news with the 7NEWS app: Download today A crime scene was declared after Queensland Police found visible injuries on Doyle, sparking a homicide investigation. Police allege Doyle met up with Daniel Roger Ramsey, 28, at the park. Ramsey has been charged with murder and remains behind bars. On Tuesday, Doyle's family and friends are holding a candlelight vigil, not just to mourn, but to celebrate the 'kind, sassy and selfless' man they've lost. 'Trev was a kind-hearted soul,' cousin Cindy-Lea Everuss told 7NEWS. 'He loved everyone and everyone loved him. 'He was a joker. He was cheeky. 'He'd give you the shirt off his back just so you didn't go cold.' Proudly gay and indigenous Trevor was proud of who he was, where he came from, and who he loved, his family said. 'He was a proud gay man. A proud Aboriginal man. A proud Australian man,' cousin Suzanne Musson said. Although he couldn't 'sing to save himself', she said, 'he'd belt out Beyonce with confidence like no one else'. Known affectionately in the family as King Doyle, he had dreams of fatherhood and had been in a long-term relationship, his family shared. He adored his nieces and nephews, always finding time to FaceTime or visit when he could. 'I'm going to miss not having the rest of my life with my brother,' his sister Zoey Doyle said through tears. 'He's not going to know my children. And my children won't know him.' A community response In the days since his death, an outpouring of love has flowed from the local community. A GoFundMe campaign set up to cover funeral costs has raised more than $1,700 and climbing. 'We're overwhelmed by the support,' Cindy-Lea said. 'Whether it's donations or just kind words, we feel it, and we're so grateful.' The family also thanked Queensland Police for their ongoing efforts and the compassion officers have shown them throughout the unfolding investigation. 'Never goodbye' Tonight's vigil at Reserve Park will begin at 6:30pm, with family and friends gathering to play Trevor's favourite songs, share stories, and simply be together in his memory. 'It's not goodbye,' Cindy-Lea said. 'We don't say that. It's just 'see you later'.' 'The biggest challenge is keeping my mum busy, keeping her mind occupied,' Zoey said. 'I don't even know how to help her. 'I don't know what to say to her. 'I don't know that she's ever going to be OK again.'
The Advertiser
11 hours ago
- The Advertiser
Historic plea as NZ soldier admits espionage attempt
A New Zealand soldier who tried to spy for a foreign power has admitted to attempted espionage in a military court. Monday's conviction was the first for spying in New Zealand's history. The soldier's name was suppressed, as was what country to which he sought to pass secrets. Military court documents said the man believed he was engaged with a foreign agent in 2019 when he tried to communicate military information including base telephone directories and maps, assessments of security weaknesses, his own identity card and log-in details for a military network. The wording of the charge said his actions were "likely to prejudice the security or defence of New Zealand". He was not speaking to a foreign agent, but an undercover New Zealand police officer collecting intelligence on alleged right-wing extremist groups, documents supplied by the military court showed. The soldier came to law enforcement attention as part of an operation that was established after a March 2019 terrorist attack on two mosques in the city of Christchurch, when an Australian white supremacist opened fire on Muslim worshippers, killing 51. He was based at Linton Military Camp near the city of Palmerston North. Officers spoke to the man twice about his involvement in a group, court documents showed, and after the government became aware he had expressed a desire to defect he was contacted by the undercover officer. When the soldier's hard drive was searched, investigators found a copy of Christchurch gunman Brenton Tarrant's live-streamed video of his massacre and a manifesto document he published online before the killings. Possession of either without permission is a criminal offence in New Zealand and the soldier, who admitted that charge too, joins several others convicted in New Zealand of having or sharing the terrorist's banned material. In a statement read to the court by his lawyer, the man said the two nationalist groups with which the man was involved were "no more than groups of friends with similar points of view to my own", according to Radio New Zealand. The lawyer, Steve Winter, added that his client denied supporting the Christchurch shooter's ideology, RNZ reported. The soldier also pleaded guilty to accessing a military computer system for dishonest purposes. Each of the three charges carries a maximum prison term of either seven or 10 years in New Zealand. His sentence is expected to be delivered by a military panel within days of his conviction. His was the first charge in a New Zealand military court for espionage or attempted spying. The last time such a case reached the civilian courts before was in 1975, when a public servant was acquitted on charges alleging he had passed information to Russian agents. A New Zealand soldier who tried to spy for a foreign power has admitted to attempted espionage in a military court. Monday's conviction was the first for spying in New Zealand's history. The soldier's name was suppressed, as was what country to which he sought to pass secrets. Military court documents said the man believed he was engaged with a foreign agent in 2019 when he tried to communicate military information including base telephone directories and maps, assessments of security weaknesses, his own identity card and log-in details for a military network. The wording of the charge said his actions were "likely to prejudice the security or defence of New Zealand". He was not speaking to a foreign agent, but an undercover New Zealand police officer collecting intelligence on alleged right-wing extremist groups, documents supplied by the military court showed. The soldier came to law enforcement attention as part of an operation that was established after a March 2019 terrorist attack on two mosques in the city of Christchurch, when an Australian white supremacist opened fire on Muslim worshippers, killing 51. He was based at Linton Military Camp near the city of Palmerston North. Officers spoke to the man twice about his involvement in a group, court documents showed, and after the government became aware he had expressed a desire to defect he was contacted by the undercover officer. When the soldier's hard drive was searched, investigators found a copy of Christchurch gunman Brenton Tarrant's live-streamed video of his massacre and a manifesto document he published online before the killings. Possession of either without permission is a criminal offence in New Zealand and the soldier, who admitted that charge too, joins several others convicted in New Zealand of having or sharing the terrorist's banned material. In a statement read to the court by his lawyer, the man said the two nationalist groups with which the man was involved were "no more than groups of friends with similar points of view to my own", according to Radio New Zealand. The lawyer, Steve Winter, added that his client denied supporting the Christchurch shooter's ideology, RNZ reported. The soldier also pleaded guilty to accessing a military computer system for dishonest purposes. Each of the three charges carries a maximum prison term of either seven or 10 years in New Zealand. His sentence is expected to be delivered by a military panel within days of his conviction. His was the first charge in a New Zealand military court for espionage or attempted spying. The last time such a case reached the civilian courts before was in 1975, when a public servant was acquitted on charges alleging he had passed information to Russian agents. A New Zealand soldier who tried to spy for a foreign power has admitted to attempted espionage in a military court. Monday's conviction was the first for spying in New Zealand's history. The soldier's name was suppressed, as was what country to which he sought to pass secrets. Military court documents said the man believed he was engaged with a foreign agent in 2019 when he tried to communicate military information including base telephone directories and maps, assessments of security weaknesses, his own identity card and log-in details for a military network. The wording of the charge said his actions were "likely to prejudice the security or defence of New Zealand". He was not speaking to a foreign agent, but an undercover New Zealand police officer collecting intelligence on alleged right-wing extremist groups, documents supplied by the military court showed. The soldier came to law enforcement attention as part of an operation that was established after a March 2019 terrorist attack on two mosques in the city of Christchurch, when an Australian white supremacist opened fire on Muslim worshippers, killing 51. He was based at Linton Military Camp near the city of Palmerston North. Officers spoke to the man twice about his involvement in a group, court documents showed, and after the government became aware he had expressed a desire to defect he was contacted by the undercover officer. When the soldier's hard drive was searched, investigators found a copy of Christchurch gunman Brenton Tarrant's live-streamed video of his massacre and a manifesto document he published online before the killings. Possession of either without permission is a criminal offence in New Zealand and the soldier, who admitted that charge too, joins several others convicted in New Zealand of having or sharing the terrorist's banned material. In a statement read to the court by his lawyer, the man said the two nationalist groups with which the man was involved were "no more than groups of friends with similar points of view to my own", according to Radio New Zealand. The lawyer, Steve Winter, added that his client denied supporting the Christchurch shooter's ideology, RNZ reported. The soldier also pleaded guilty to accessing a military computer system for dishonest purposes. Each of the three charges carries a maximum prison term of either seven or 10 years in New Zealand. His sentence is expected to be delivered by a military panel within days of his conviction. His was the first charge in a New Zealand military court for espionage or attempted spying. The last time such a case reached the civilian courts before was in 1975, when a public servant was acquitted on charges alleging he had passed information to Russian agents. A New Zealand soldier who tried to spy for a foreign power has admitted to attempted espionage in a military court. Monday's conviction was the first for spying in New Zealand's history. The soldier's name was suppressed, as was what country to which he sought to pass secrets. Military court documents said the man believed he was engaged with a foreign agent in 2019 when he tried to communicate military information including base telephone directories and maps, assessments of security weaknesses, his own identity card and log-in details for a military network. The wording of the charge said his actions were "likely to prejudice the security or defence of New Zealand". He was not speaking to a foreign agent, but an undercover New Zealand police officer collecting intelligence on alleged right-wing extremist groups, documents supplied by the military court showed. The soldier came to law enforcement attention as part of an operation that was established after a March 2019 terrorist attack on two mosques in the city of Christchurch, when an Australian white supremacist opened fire on Muslim worshippers, killing 51. He was based at Linton Military Camp near the city of Palmerston North. Officers spoke to the man twice about his involvement in a group, court documents showed, and after the government became aware he had expressed a desire to defect he was contacted by the undercover officer. When the soldier's hard drive was searched, investigators found a copy of Christchurch gunman Brenton Tarrant's live-streamed video of his massacre and a manifesto document he published online before the killings. Possession of either without permission is a criminal offence in New Zealand and the soldier, who admitted that charge too, joins several others convicted in New Zealand of having or sharing the terrorist's banned material. In a statement read to the court by his lawyer, the man said the two nationalist groups with which the man was involved were "no more than groups of friends with similar points of view to my own", according to Radio New Zealand. The lawyer, Steve Winter, added that his client denied supporting the Christchurch shooter's ideology, RNZ reported. The soldier also pleaded guilty to accessing a military computer system for dishonest purposes. Each of the three charges carries a maximum prison term of either seven or 10 years in New Zealand. His sentence is expected to be delivered by a military panel within days of his conviction. His was the first charge in a New Zealand military court for espionage or attempted spying. The last time such a case reached the civilian courts before was in 1975, when a public servant was acquitted on charges alleging he had passed information to Russian agents.
