
What to know as US prepares to require REAL ID for many air travelers next month
Most adults catching a flight in the U.S. starting May 7 will be required to present a passport or an upgraded state-issued identification card that meets federal REAL ID standards.
The requirement is 20 years in the making, but with just weeks to go, not everyone is ready for it.
Officials in at least one state have requested another extension before enforcement begins.
What is REAL ID?
It's a driver's license or other state-issued ID that meets security requirements mandated in a 2005 law passed in the aftermath of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.
Obtaining an ID with the designation — indicated by a white star in a yellow circle in most states — means taking more documents to the motor vehicle agency than most states require for regular IDs.
The program has already been delayed several times by states that weren't prepared to offer the IDs, people being slow to update their documents and by the coronavirus pandemic. With those hurdles mostly passed, the government is set to require the new IDs rather than old state drivers licenses and IDs for commercial air travel starting May 7.
Is the country ready?
It's clear not everyone is. But it's less clear whether the nation is prepared.
The Department of Homeland Security said in a report earlier this year that 56% of IDs in circulation nationally met the requirements as of January 2024. In 16 states, more than three in five IDs met the new standards, while the number was below two out of five in 22 states.
About 81% of people flying recently have shown ID that would work once the new requirements kick in, according to a recent statement by Homeland Security.
A group of state senators from Kentucky this week asked the agency to delay implementing the new requirements yet again. They said the state has limited appointments available to people seeking the new cards and that there has been a rush to meet the May 7 deadline.
Dan Velez, a spokesperson for the Transportation Security Administration, said Thursday that the agency does not intend to delay the REAL ID again.
Do you need a REAL ID, and if so, how do you get one?
People who don't fly or visit military bases or other sites where the IDs are required may not need new identification. People who have photo IDs from federally recognized tribal nations don't need anything new. Employment authorization green cards are already acceptable, as are some other less common identifying documents on the government's list.
Still, a lot of people may need one.
The enhanced cards have been available for years from every U.S. state and territory's motor vehicle agency. People who haven't obtained one by May 7 can still apply after that.
The Department of Homeland Security website links to information in each state on scheduling appointments and lists the documents needed.
But appointments can be hard to come by. None of the New Jersey Motor Vehicle Commission offices had REAL ID appointments available as of Thursday afternoon. The same was true for most Illinois Department of Motor Vehicle sites.
And in some states, the May 7 deadline might not be a big deal. In Florida and Texas, for instance, all drivers licenses are REAL ID compliant, so anyone who has a current one can use it to fly domestically.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Miami Herald
32 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Trump travel ban: Here's what to know in Miami as restrictions take effect
President Donald Trump's new travel ban starts this morning and will bar or partially restrict entry from more than a dozen countries over what federal officials say are national security concerns. South Florida — home to a large group of Cubans, Venezuelans and Haitians — is expected to feel an impact. Under the new restrictions, many Cuban and Venezuelan nationals will be barred from entering the U.S, including tourists, family visitors and people traveling for business. Green card holders are not affected. The ban also enforces a full suspension of visas for immigrants and non-immigrants from several countries, including Haiti. Here's what to know in South Florida: Will Trump travel ban impact MIA? A Trump administration travel ban that severely restricts the entry of nationals from Haiti, Cuba, and Venezuela into the United States starts this morning as The Herald has reporters on the scene to see how the policy will affect operations at Miami International Airport. There are still questions about who will be allowed into the U.S. under the ban — the State Department has said that travelers from the three affected nations will be able to keep their valid, current visas, but it's up to the Department of Homeland Security to decide whether to let people in at ports of entry. Read more here. — Syra Ortiz Blanes Trump travel ban: What countries are affected? Seven countries are under partial travel restrictions: Cuba, Venezuela, Burundi, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo and Turkmenistan. Nationals from these countries will not be allowed to enter the U.S. on tourist, business and student visas. Nationals from 12 countries are barred from entering the U.S.: Haiti, Afghanistan, Burma, Chad, Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea,Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. — Michelle Marchante Does the travel ban affect current visas? Here's what to know A Department of State spokesperson said that while the agency will not revoke current visas, it's up to the Department of Homeland Security to decide whether it will allow the entry of nationals with current visas. Which nationals are banned from entering? What visas are exempted? Read more here. — Syra Ortiz Blanes and Verónica Egui Brito
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's new travel ban takes effect as tensions escalate over immigration enforcement
President Donald Trump's new ban on travel to the US by citizens from 12 mainly African and Middle Eastern countries took effect Monday amid rising tension over the president's escalating campaign of immigration enforcement. The new proclamation, which Trump signed last week, applies to citizens of Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, the Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. It also imposes heightened restrictions on people from Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela who are outside the US and don't hold a valid visa. The ban does not revoke visas previously issued to people from countries on the list, according to guidance issued Friday to all US diplomatic missions. However, unless an applicant meets narrow criteria for an exemption to the ban, his or her application will be rejected starting Monday. Travelers with previously issued visas should still be able to enter the US even after the ban takes effect. During Trump's first term, a hastily written executive order ordering the denial of entry to citizens of mainly Muslim countries created chaos at numerous airports and other ports of entry, prompting successful legal challenges and major revisions to the policy. No such disruption was immediately discernible at Los Angeles International Airport in the hours after the new ban took effect. Haitian-American Elvanise Louis-Juste, who was at the airport earlier Sunday in Newark, New Jersey, awaiting a flight to her home state of Florida, said many Haitians wanting to come to the US are simply seeking to escape violence and unrest. 'I have family in Haiti, so it's pretty upsetting to see and hear,' Louis-Juste, 23, said of the travel ban. 'I don't think it's a good thing. I think it's very upsetting.' Many immigration experts say the new ban is more carefully crafted and appears designed to beat court challenges that hampered the first by focusing on the visa application process. Trump said this time that some countries had 'deficient' screening for passports and other public documents or have historically refused to take back their own citizens. He relied extensively on an annual Homeland Security report of people who remain in the US after their visas expired. Measuring overstay rates has challenged experts for decades, but the government has made a limited attempt annually since 2016. Trump's proclamation cites overstay rates for eight of the 12 banned countries. Trump also tied the new ban to a terrorist attack in Boulder, Colorado, saying it underscored the dangers posed by some visitors who overstay visas. US officials say the man charged in the attack overstayed a tourist visa. He is from Egypt, a country that is not on Trump's restricted list. The ban was quickly denounced by groups that provide aid and resettlement help to refugees. 'This policy is not about national security – it is about sowing division and vilifying communities that are seeking safety and opportunity in the United States,' said Abby Maxman, president of Oxfam America, a nonprofit international relief organization. The inclusion of Afghanistan angered some supporters who have worked to resettle its people. The ban does make exceptions for Afghans on Special Immigrant Visas, generally people who worked most closely with the US government during the two-decade-long war there. Afghanistan had been one of the largest sources of resettled refugees, with about 14,000 arrivals in a 12-month period through September 2024. Trump suspended refugee resettlement his first day in office.


Axios
an hour ago
- Axios
Polis sued over ICE data handoff involving migrant child sponsors
In the same week that activists sounded the alarm over a recent uptick in ICE arrests at Denver's federal immigration court, a senior state official sued Gov. Jared Polis, accusing the Democrat of aiding the Trump administration's immigration crackdown. The big picture: The whistleblower lawsuit — filed Wednesday by Scott Moss, one of the governor's top labor officials — alleges that Polis ordered state employees to hand over personal information on residents sponsoring unaccompanied migrant children, despite laws the governor signed explicitly prohibiting such cooperation with federal immigration enforcement. According to the lawsuit, Polis' contested directive ordered staff to comply with a Department of Homeland Security subpoena or risk termination. Why it matters: The governor now stands further at odds not only with the legislature and local leaders who have long resisted federal immigration enforcement, but with his own record. Just weeks ago, Polis increased protections for immigrants. Now he is accused of undercutting them. Catch up quick: On April 24, Homeland Security Investigations subpoenaed the state of Colorado for wage data, leave filings, home addresses and more on 35 sponsors of unaccompanied minors. Polis' office initially resisted. Weeks later, however, the governor allegedly reversed course and ordered compliance, despite a 2025 law barring such disclosures without a court order. What they're saying:"Colorado is not a sanctuary state," Polis spokesperson Eric Maruyama told Axios Denver in a statement. "Helping our federal law enforcement partners locate and, if necessary, rescue children being abused and trafficked is not only in line with the law but also a moral imperative." Polis' office told The Lever, which first reported the lawsuit, the subpoena falls under a narrow legal exception for criminal investigations, and the law allows cooperation in such cases. Flashback: In January, Polis told reporters that Colorado's role was to assist with federal criminal investigations, not act as an "extension of the (U.S.) government" on immigration enforcement. The other side: In a statement to Axios Denver, Moss' attorney Laura Wolf countered claims made by the governor's office. "ICE never claimed nor showed evidence of crimes against children," Wolf said. "ICE admits it wants the state's help finding children" it already apprehended "to make sure they're 'cared for' and not 'exploited,'" but that "does not turn civil immigration proceedings into criminal investigations," she said. Zoom out: The alleged cooperation comes as ICE has ramped up arrests in Denver's immigration courthouse. There were at least eight in the past week, including a toddler and a 6-year-old, Jennifer Piper of the American Friends Service Committee told reporters Thursday. Piper and several immigrant advocates said ICE agents have been waiting in hallways, often in plain clothes, to apprehend people attending court. "What we are seeing here I have not seen in the 20 years that I have been a part of the immigrant rights movement," Piper said. What's next: Moss is seeking an emergency injunction to block the data release, while advocates are urging the state to strengthen its immigrant safeguards.