logo
New rule set to ban dogs from Broadland play areas in Norfolk

New rule set to ban dogs from Broadland play areas in Norfolk

BBC News09-07-2025
Dogs are set to be banned from playgrounds in parts of Norfolk over hygiene and safety concerns.Councillors in Broadland are expected to change existing rules on dog fouling by restricting access to play areas.Earlier this year, the authority ran a public consultation on an existing public spaces protection order (PSPO) which meant people could be fined for not picking up pet mess.A report advises councillors that banning dogs from enclosed play areas "will protect the health and well-being of our residents and the quality and cleanliness of the district's public spaces".
It said that, in its consultation, 13 town and parish councils backed the idea of continuing the order, with Aylsham Town Council warning there had been issues in play areas.The report explained there had been "a number of incidents where such spaces are being used to exercise dogs" and dogs had fouled.It said that, even if cleaned up, the mess could leave bacteria behind, creating health risks.Figures show there were just 103 reports to the council about dog mess between 2022 and 2024, but the report put the low number down to the provision of waste bins, signage and the threat of fines.Other councils in Norfolk – including Great Yarmouth and North Norfolk, have similar restrictions for playing fields and play areas.Broadland councillors are expected to vote in favour of the protection order on Thursday.
Follow Norfolk news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Pharmacist issues urgent warning to UK holidaymakers travelling with weight-loss injections
Pharmacist issues urgent warning to UK holidaymakers travelling with weight-loss injections

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

Pharmacist issues urgent warning to UK holidaymakers travelling with weight-loss injections

With millions of Brits on weight-loss injections, those taking them have been urged to consider how they will travel with the medication this summer. A trip to a tropical island or a European city break, whatever the destination, there's often lots to plan for. Pharmacist Jason Murphy has warned travellers on weight-loss jabs against storing them in the hotel fridge. He explained how such appliance is not 'medically safe'. The expert advised: 'If you're staying in a hotel, the mini bars in rooms are often more mildly cool than medically safe. 'And you don't want your jab snuggling up next to someone else's sparkling rosé. Instead, contact the hotel in advance and ask to store your medication in a staff fridge.' Murphy recommends travellers not to 'just toss it in your suitcase and hope for the best'. Instead, he encourages people to think about intricacies such as the temperature it needs to be kept at and customs rules. Pharmacist Jason Murphy has warned travellers on weight-loss jabs against storing them in the hotel fridge Murphy said: 'Travelling with weight-loss medication isn't out of the question, but it does require some forward planning. 'You can't just toss it in your suitcase and hope for the best. Between time zone changes, storage issues, and customs restrictions, it's more of a 'carry-on mission' than most people realise.' He explained how weight-loss injections need to be kept in a refrigerator, but that some can be stored at room temperature for a limited time. 'These medications are designed to be kept refrigerated between 2°C and 8°C before use, but both Wegovy and Mounjaro can be stored at room temperature – below 30°C – for a limited period,' Murphy said. 'That gives patients more flexibility when travelling, but it's still important to keep pens out of direct sunlight and away from excessive heat. 'I always advise using a medical-grade travel cool bag with ice packs, especially if you're flying to a hot destination.' The pharmacist also advised against packing medication in hold luggage in case it was lost, as well as the added complication of the lack of temperature control. 'Never pack injections in checked baggage. 'Luggage holds aren't temperature-controlled, and there's a risk of delays or loss,' he explained. Murphy continued: 'Carry your medication in your hand luggage, in its original packaging, along with a copy of your prescription or a signed letter from your prescriber or pharmacist - something we provide routinely for patients.' Travellers carrying medication also need to be aware of customs rules and what is allowed to enter certain destinations. The pharmacist said: 'Some countries (such as, Japan, UAE, and Singapore) are strict about what medication crosses their border. 'In some cases, your jab may be considered a controlled substance, so you should always check embassy rules before you fly to save you a heap of holiday hassle.' He also explained how people may experience 'jet-lagged jabs' when the local time varies with the medication schedule the traveller may usually follow at home. Murphy said: 'If you're hopping multiple time zones, your injection routine may need a refresh. 'Weight-loss injections are typically once weekly, but timing still matters.' He advised using techniques such as setting an alarm in line to ensure the medication is taken in line with the typical routine. The pharmacist added: 'I'd always suggest setting an alarm for your injection based on your original UK schedule, then gradually shift it to local time over a few days. 'You'll feel more in sync and avoid what we call "jet-lagged jabs".'

The right wants to kill off the NHS. Striking doctors are playing into their hands
The right wants to kill off the NHS. Striking doctors are playing into their hands

The Guardian

timean hour ago

  • The Guardian

The right wants to kill off the NHS. Striking doctors are playing into their hands

There were no pickets when I set out at the weekend to talk to striking doctors. Not even at St Thomas' hospital, a prime site opposite the Houses of Parliament, or at Guy's at London Bridge. 'It's a bit sparse,' said the duty officer from the British Medical Association, the doctors' union. The British Medical Journal (owned by the BMA but with editorial freedom) ran the headline: 'Striking resident doctors face heckling and support on picket line, amid mixed public response.' Public support has fallen, with 52% of people 'somewhat' or 'strongly' opposing the strikes and only 34% backing them. Alastair McLellan, the editor of the Health Service Journal, after ringing around hospitals told me fewer doctors were striking than last time, which isn't surprising given that only 55% voted in the BMA ballot. Managers told him these strikes were less disruptive than the last ones. But even a weaker strike harms patients and pains a government relying on falling waiting lists. 'When you're operating on the margins, it takes very little disruption to send waiting lists up again,' McLellan said. Strikes are costly, since consultants have to be paid to fill shifts, which is typically more expensive. One hospital manager asked me wryly: 'Have you tried paying for an out-of-hours emergency plumber or electrician?' This time Jim Mackey, the head of NHS England, is playing it tough. He told medical directors on Monday to warn doctors that anyone striking on one of their 12 compulsory training days would forfeit their qualification – and not to let strikers take up locum shifts on non-strike days to make up for the money they've lost. No more Mr Nice Guy. Everyone employed by the NHS will get an above-inflation pay rise this year, which is less than the 5.4% (comprising a 4% rise and a consolidated £750 payment) that resident doctors will receive. Nurses and ambulance crews have just voted overwhelmingly against a pay award of 3.6%. That was only a consultative ballot, leaving plenty of time for negotiations that might avoid holding a full strike ballot. Consultants are now balloting too. These looming demands make it vanishingly unlikely that Wes Streeting will give even more money to striking resident doctors, who have already received the top NHS offer. Mackey plays the hard man, but Streeting's emollience is over. He seems indignant and offended by the BMA. His first act as health secretary was to end the resident doctors' 44 days of strikes between March 2023 and July 2024 with a generous 22% pay rise, even while the rightwing press accused him of bowing to 'union paymasters'. Making peace was his welcome political signal that the party of the NHS was setting about repairing Tory damage. There was hope for goodwill and patience from healthcare workers. So the BMA coming back for more within a year was a shock, and a slap in the face for Streeting. The BMA is kicking a government that had been well-disposed towards it. With Tory and Liberal Democrat peers attempting to block the government's radical employment rights bill, Labour's enemies will relish this timely assistance from the strike. A piece on CapX, a comment site owned and produced by the Centre for Policy Studies, called the striking doctors 'Scargills in white coats' with 'blood on their hands', which is of course the literal truth, given what they do at work (Tom Dolphin, the new BMA chair, is a consultant anaesthetist who works in trauma surgery; his job involves 'a fair amount of stabbings, occasional shootings, assaults [and] falls from height'). Keir Starmer has warned that the strikes 'play into the hands' of those who do not want the NHS to 'succeed in its current form'. Vultures are circling: Nigel Farage talks of private insurance; the International Monetary Fund, in its great unwisdom, recently suggested the better-off should pay for NHS services; while the piece on CapX echoed the right's glee at the strike: 'The problem here isn't just that the BMA is populated by socialist thugs, it's that the NHS is a socialist system.' The NHS is ever ready to rescue us all, regardless of status – that is why doctors and nurses top public respect charts, and why they have much to lose as the public turns against them. 'When the BMA asks, 'What's the difference between a Labour government and a Conservative government?', I would say a 28.9% pay rise and a willingness to work together to improve the working conditions and lives of doctors,' Streeting said in vain last week. In a timely contrast, Kemi Badenoch has declared that the Tories would ban doctors' strikes, putting them under the same restrictions that apply to police officers and soldiers. Both sides in this strike are obdurate. 'This could be a marathon. We could be doing this until Christmas or maybe beyond,' the deputy chief executive of NHS England has glumly warned. Streeting says the negotiation door is always open, but the BMA says there's no point without cash on the table. Bad blood between them springs from the negotiations: talks were going well until the BMA resident doctors' committee told its co-chairs that it could not approve the government's deal because it did not address the BMA's demand that resident doctors receive a 29% pay rise over the next few years. Yet Streeting's offer tackled serious grievances: years of bad planning left 20,000 resident doctors without specialist training places, stuck in a bottleneck that he promised to resolve. The BMA damaged people's sympathy for the doctors by absurdly comparing their pay to that of a coffee barista. Resident doctors can expect to be on a steep annual trajectory, averaging £43,400 in year one and £51,600 in year two; as new consultants they will get £105,000, while GP partners earn as much as £160,000. The word in the corridors is that the BMA is losing support across the NHS and among its own members, Nick Hulme, the CEO of the East Suffolk and North Essex NHS foundation trust, told me. He said some of his consultants had this week resigned from the BMA. So has the fertility pioneer Robert Winston. History may reassure the BMA that the public will always trust doctors over politicians. This time, the public backs those trying to cut waiting lists more than the strikers who are adding to them. Polly Toynbee is a Guardian columnist

Woman reveals what REALLY happens when you get lip filler dissolved
Woman reveals what REALLY happens when you get lip filler dissolved

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

Woman reveals what REALLY happens when you get lip filler dissolved

A woman has revealed insight into the process of having lip filler dissolved - and admitted that she was left looking 'botched'. Georgia Goldstein travelled to Hart Medical in Westminster, London, a few months ago to undergo the procedure. While she said that it was 'the best thing I've ever done', the process wasn't pain-free and left her lips looking swollen. Taking to TikTok, she said, 'A few months ago, I got all my lip filler dissolved, and it was the best thing I've ever done. She went on to share images from throughout the process, adding, 'Trigger warning, my face looked butters [ugly].' Georgia explained that, when the aesthetician put the dissolver in her lips, they swelled drastically. 'Like, imagine, I have to go into work right now and they [her lips] look botched,' she said while showing her bloated lips to the camera. She continued to show photographs from throughout the process, saying, 'This was pretty much just after going into work and this was the next day, my lips were black, like you can see in this video, they were so, so bruised.' Georgia added, 'I even tried covering them up with makeup, and it was just all black above my lips.' The content creator said her lips then 'shrunk', making her feel 'really young', she said, adding, 'And they also went really wrinkly.' One week later, the bruising had gone, she said. At the end of the process, Georgia went for an ultrasound to check if there was any filler left in her lips, before concluding that getting her fillers dissolved was the 'best thing ever.' Viewers took to the comment section to share their thoughts on the end result, and one wrote, 'Great more natural result, love.' A second added, 'Trust the process hun.' While a third user said, 'Look so much better. Love them!' A fourth commented on Georgia going into work immediately after getting them dissolved, saying 'Honestly the bravery going into work.' It comes after a woman who claims to have the 'world's biggest lips' revealed what she looked like before undergoing drastic surgery and getting copious amounts of lip filler. Andrea Ivanova from Bulgaria regularly hits the headlines due to her enhanced appearance, which has seen her fork out an estimated £20,000 on lip filler alone after starting her transformation in 2018. The 27-year-old has previously admitted she struggles to find love because of her dramatic look, but it hasn't stopped her from achieving her goal of having the biggest lips and cheeks in the world. Now, she has revealed what she looked like before altering her face via cosmetic enhancements. In her 'before' photos, a youthful Andrea can be seen with regularly proportioned lips. But since undergoing her enhancement journey, she has become scarcely recognisable. Her long list of treatments included chin shaping, enlargement and lengthening, jaw shaping and lip augmentation, as well as cheekbone enhancement - all at once. She's previously spoken about how she likes to stand out from the crowds with her unique look. 'I like exaggerated things like huge lips, a face with many fillers, heavy and eccentric make-up, Andrea said. 'I don't like boring ordinary appearances and I am a fan of huge shapes and eccentric beauties. Natural beauty is boring to me so I decided to change my appearance radically.' The social media influencer has spoken openly about having had six procedures done in a single day as an 'experiment' - even though her usual doctor refused to do it. Viewers took to the comment section to share their thoughts on the process - and one said Georgia's lips 'look so much better' 'My doctor was afraid to inject more hyaluronic acid into my lips, but I was adamant that I wanted more, and I will not stop,' Andrea said. 'I wanted to do six procedures at once. Until now, I always did these on different areas of the face on different days.' Andrea had previously only ever had a maximum of three needles in her face at the same time. 'But this time, I wanted to experiment with myself to see how many injections and [amounts of filler] would affect my body,' she said. She even had to seek out a doctor in Germany to do the procedures, which went ahead in February last year, as her usual surgeon simply refused. And even though Andrea was excited about the experience, she confessed it had been extremely painful. 'I have pain all over my face right now and my jaw and chin hurt a lot,' she said at the time. 'It's hard for me to smile because of the pain in my cheekbones and there's a pulling sensation over my face.' But Andrea insisted the feeling was normal after treatment because the 'filler hadn't settled into place'. Although she finds eating difficult, Andrea is adamant her lips 'don't hurt'. She added: 'I only feel a slight discomfort, but that's where I have the most amount of filler and where I've had injections the most amount of times. The more filler there is, the less the area hurts.' Despite the pain, Andrea doesn't have any plans to slow down or reduce her voluptuous look. The former philosophy student planned to go to Germany to visit the same surgeon, as her usual doctor is sceptical about going forward with her transformation. But now even the German medical practitioner has revealed their concerns. 'I had no fears about having so many injections at once because I trust my doctor and they are a great professional in cosmetic surgery,' she said. 'But they are afraid I'll get necrosis and have to have the tissue surgically removed from my lips if I carry on.' Necrosis is the death of body tissue, which occurs when not enough blood flows to the site, according to the NHS. This condition can be caused by radiation, chemicals or injury, and in some cases can be fatal. 'There are risks involved, such as inflammation, and raised body temperature, especially with so much at once,' Andrea added. 'I have facial swelling and bruising right now, which is normal due to the many needles, but I think in a few days, I'll recover.' She continued: 'You shouldn't judge people for their looks. It's their taste and no one has the right to be offended because of it. 'I think I'm going to carry on doing multiple injections in one day going forward, as it makes me very happy.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store