Your Clutter Is Costing More Than You Think - Your Money Briefing
In 2024, Americans bought 5.7 times as much flatware and dishes and 3.5 times the furniture compared with 1994, according to Commerce Department data. They also purchased 2.5 times the clothing and footwear. Wall Street Journal reporter Dalvin Brown joins host Ariana Aspuru to discuss why cheap goods are actually costing us and how Trump's tariffs threaten to curb trade from one of the biggest exporters of low-cost goods.
Full Transcript
This transcript was prepared by a transcription service. This version may not be in its final form and may be updated.
Ariana Aspuru: Hey, Your Money Briefing listeners. This is Ariana Aspuru. Here at YMB, we're all about bringing you important personal finance and career news. We're working on making some changes to our personal finance content and we want to hear from you. Our question today is, what personal finance topics do you want to hear more about? Stocks, bonds and markets, housing and mortgages, taxes, financial goals, or something else? If you're listening on Spotify, look for our poll under the episode description, or you can send us an email to ymb@wsj.com. That's ymb@wsj.com. Now, onto the show. Here's Your Money Briefing for Friday, April 11th. I'm Ariana Aspuru for The Wall Street Journal. If you're in spring cleaning mode, you might be wondering, "How in the world did I get all this stuff?" WSJ reporter Dalvin Brown found that it's not just you; Americans are drowning in their own stuff.
Dalvin Brown: I tend to buy things because I forgot I bought it already. But we're not just accumulating. That's what's really interesting to me. We're duplicating. We're buying more of what we already have.
Ariana Aspuru: We'll hear more from Dalvin about why it's costing you more than you think. Stick around after the break. Americans buy a crazy amount of cheap stuff, but it's costing us. Wall Street Journal reporter Dalvin Brown joins me. Dalvin, let's start off. How big of an issue is our clutter problem?
Dalvin Brown: It has reached crisis proportions, and I mean that. I found that it's not just about a cluttered closet anymore or a cluttered drawer. It's about entire rooms being dedicated to storage. About 21% of people use over 500 square feet for storage, which is the size of a two car garage. And as one professional organizer told me, we're battling a tsunami of stuff and the stuff is winning.
Ariana Aspuru: From your story, which listeners can find in our show notes, I gather that people are buying more, moving more, and losing more of their own stuff. Walk me through how that's all happening.
Dalvin Brown: Yeah. So it is a perfect storm created by ease of acquisition. So how easy it is to buy things, and then the difficulty of disposal. Online shopping and social media have made buying things really frictionless. So a few taps on your phone, something arrives at your door. A lot of people don't even remember what they ordered and then it just shows up at their door. But getting rid of those things requires physical and emotional labor, and that's really taxing. So what's fascinating is how this cycle sort of feeds itself. People buy things, then they run out of space, so then they buy more organizational things to manage the things. And as one of my sources told me, "I am buying things just to manage my things." U-Haul even had to increase the size of its largest trucks by 60% over the past 10 years. I was shocked when the company told me that. And it's basically to accommodate Americans' growing volume of possessions.
Ariana Aspuru: And one of the things you mentioned in your story, that honestly made me laugh a little bit, is how many people buy more things because they just forget that they already have this one thing and they can't find it.
Dalvin Brown: Yes. Yes, exactly. So 71% of Americans in a recent survey, that's the bulk of us, buy things that we already own because we can't find the other thing because we've hidden it somewhere in our homes from ourselves. I, like you, Richard, I tend to buy things because I forgot I bought it already. But we're not just accumulating. That's what's really interesting to me. We're duplicating. We're buying more of what we already have.
Ariana Aspuru: There's so much interesting data that you bring up in your story. What was the most striking number about Americans habits that you found?
Dalvin Brown: In 2024, Americans bought 5.7 times more flatware and dishes compared to 1994. So three decades ago, people had a lot less stuff just in their kitchen. And that's not a small increase. That's nearly six times what previous generations purchased. We're also buying 3.5 times more furniture, 2.5 times more clothing and footwear compared to 30 years ago.
Ariana Aspuru: And it's not like I'm having 5.7 times more people over my house that I need all these dishes for or all this furniture for.
Dalvin Brown: Exactly. And we don't have five or six times more space in our homes to put things. So we're fitting multiple more possessions into roughly the same square footage. And it's no wonder that another number that came up for me was that downsizing a home now takes about 40 hours, which is double what it took a decade ago.
Ariana Aspuru: And this all makes so much sense. But Dalvin, we now have constant access to low-cost products from places like Temu and SHEIN. Is it just that we can't help ourselves when we see something that's just that cheap?
Dalvin Brown: I also spoke to some psychologists who did say that when prices fall below a certain threshold, it impacts our decision-making processes fundamentally. One source in my story said, "You see something cool and it costs $6, then you think, why not?" The mental calculation shifts from, "Do I need this?" to, "why wouldn't I get this?" And then you end up with more stuff in your home than you probably need.
Ariana Aspuru: Looking ahead and looking at the news, we're talking a lot about tariffs now. How might these heavy import taxes on foreign goods by the Trump administration impact this clutter we're talking about in our own lives?
Dalvin Brown: While the clutter issue has been a thing for years now, one of the things that pushes this conversation forward is the fact that the Treasury Secretary recently stated that access to low-cost goods is not the essence of the American dream. And that signals a policy shift away from prioritizing cheap imports. If tariffs significantly increase prices, they might also slow the influx of inexpensive goods. So if tariffs make the things more expensive, then people might not buy as much. However, tariffs do not address the mountains of stuff that we already have. So that legacy will remain. We'll be dealing with the consequences of that for years. Things may become more expensive to get, but some of the economists I talked to said that people just may change the way that they do consume or where they're getting their goods from.
Ariana Aspuru: Let's say someone wants to declutter; they're listening and taking this as their sign. What are some cost-effective ways of getting rid of some items you might not need?
Dalvin Brown: In my story I start with estate sales, because in some way that is the best way to get rid of a lot of stuff in one fell swoop. And you'd hire someone, they take 35 to 50% of the proceeds, and they let strangers just come in and buy your stuff within a couple of days, or they list it online. The Facebook Marketplace and OfferUps of the world let you directly handle it and sell it to other people. The most important advice from professionals is to try to prevent the accumulation in the first place.
Ariana Aspuru: Yeah, trying to turn off the tap rather than buckets of scooping water out.
Dalvin Brown: Yeah. I mean, I have this rule that whatever comes in my house, I forget it sometimes, but I'm like, "Oh, one item in, one item out." I should probably do one item in, two items out. But I think that mechanism works for me.
Ariana Aspuru: That's WSJ reporter Dalvin Brown. And that's it for Your Money Briefing. Tomorrow we'll have our weekly markets wrap up, What's News in Markets. And then on Sunday, catch the last episode of our three-part series, Buying a Home in 2025: Navigating the Crunch. This episode was produced by me. I'm your host, Ariana Aspuru. Jessica Fenton and Michael LaValle wrote our theme music. Our supervising producer is Melony Roy. Aisha Al-Muslim is our development producer. Scott Saloway and Chris Zinsli are our deputy editors. And Philana Patterson is the Wall Street Journal's Head of News Audio. Thanks for listening.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Associated Press
15 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Veterans are divided over the Army's big parade, being held on Trump's birthday
NORFOLK, Va. (AP) — James McDonough served in the U.S. Army for 27 years, fighting in Vietnam and delivering humanitarian aid to Rwanda. For him, Saturday's military parade in Washington for the Army's 250th anniversary — coinciding with President Donald Trump's birthday — is about the resilience of a vital institution and the nation it serves. 'The soldiers marching that day represent all of that history,' said McDonough, 78, of Crofton, Maryland. 'They don't represent a single day. They don't represent a single person. It's the American Army still standing straight, walking tall, ready to defend our country.' Christopher Purdy, an Army veteran who served in Iraq, called the parade a facade that paints over some of the Republican president's policies that have targeted military veterans and current service members, including cuts at the Department of Veterans Affairs and a ban on transgender troops. Purdy said the parade, long sought by Trump, will needlessly display U.S. military might on the president's 79th birthday. 'It's embarrassing,' said Purdy, 40, of Atlanta. 'It's expensive. And whatever his reasons are for doing it, I think it's entirely unnecessary.' Until recently, the Army's long-planned birthday celebration did not include a big parade. Added under the Trump administration, the event, featuring hundreds of military vehicles and aircraft and thousands of soldiers, has divided veterans. Some liken it to the military chest-pounding commonly seen in North Korea, a step toward authoritarianism or a perverse birthday party for Trump. Others see it as a once-in-a-lifetime accounting of the Army's achievements and the military service of millions of soldiers over centuries. The parade is not about Trump, they say, but the public seeing the faces of soldiers when so few Americans serve. The Army expects up to 200,000 people could attend and says the parade will cost an estimated $25 million to $45 million. Trump, speaking at Fort Bragg this week, said Saturday would be 'a big day' and noted 'we want to show off a little bit.' 'We're going to celebrate our greatness and our achievements,' he said. 'This week, we honor 250 years of valor and glory and triumph by the greatest fighting force ever to walk the face of the Earth: the United States Army.' 'Divisive politics have ruined it' For Edmundo Eugenio Martinez Jr., an Army veteran who fought in Iraq, the parade is a missed opportunity to honor generations of veterans, many of whom paid a steep price and came home to little fanfare. 'Sadly, the timing and the optics and divisive politics have ruined it,' said Martinez, 48, of Katy, Texas. 'And I'm not picking one side or the other. Both sides are guilty.' 'It's just suspicious' Joe Plenzler, a retired Marine who fought in Iraq, said Trump wants to see troops saluting him on his birthday as tanks roll past. 'It's just suspicious,' the 53-year-old from Middletown, Virginia, said of the timing. 'I absolutely love the Army from the bottom of my cold black Marine heart,' he said. 'But if the Army's birthday was a day later, we probably wouldn't be doing it. I'd rather see that $50 million take care of the men and women who went off to war and came back with missing arms, legs and eyeballs, and with damaged brains.' 'Part of American culture' Joe Kmiech, who served in the Army and Minnesota National Guard from 1989 to 1998, supports the parade because the Army is 'part of American culture and our fabric.' He notes the Army's pioneering contributions to engineering and medicine, from dams to new surgical techniques. Like many veterans, he has a strong familial connection: His father served in the Army, and so did his maternal grandfather, who fought in World War II. 'I didn't vote for President Trump, but the commander in chief is going to be part of that celebration,' said Kmiech, 54, of Roberts, Wisconsin. 'The distinction needs to be made that the parade is a celebration of our Army, not of a person.' 'Stroking Trump's ego' For Gulf War Army veteran Paul Sullivan, Trump and the parade are inextricably linked. 'This Trump tank travesty is all about stroking Trump's ego,' said Sullivan, 62, who lives outside Charlottesville, Virginia. 'If Trump truly cared about our service members, he would sit down with them quietly and say, 'What can we do with $50 million or $100 million to make your lives better?' He's not.' 'We are a great nation' McDonough, the veteran from Crofton, Maryland, disagrees that the parade is about Trump or too costly. He said the U.S. held a grand celebration in New York after World War II when the nation was deeply in debt. 'We certainly need to bring our debt down, and we certainly need to take care of our veterans,' he said. 'But it's a false dichotomy. It's like saying if we bought two less aircraft carriers, we could do so much better to take care of our poor.' And McDonough said soldiers' oath is to the Constitution, not to Trump. The president 'understands the importance of doing this, not only for the Army, but for the nation,' McDonough said. 'A real dark turn'Purdy, the veteran from Atlanta, said the parade's brazen flex of military strength is not an American tradition, particularly absent a recent victory. 'I'm not saying we shouldn't celebrate the country,' he said. 'But for us to be projecting this type of hard power, in such a real in-your-face way, that's just not who we are.' Trump is brushing aside old alliances and foreign aid that have helped maintain peace for decades, Purdy asserted. 'It signals a real dark turn if we're just going to roll out the tanks,' Purdy said. 'People are the Army' Michael Nardotti, an Army veteran who served in Vietnam, said military hardware has long been in American parades, which can help recruitment. More important, he said, is the tremendous value in the public seeing soldiers' faces in a parade when active-duty troops make up less than 1% of the population. ''People are the Army,'' said Nardotti, 78, of Aldie, Virginia, quoting a former Army chief of staff. Nardotti said he'll listen carefully to Trump's speech. 'I hope it sends the right message,' he said.


Bloomberg
19 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
RFK Jr.'s Policies Shouldn't Surprise Anyone
Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s decision to oust the Center for Disease Control and Prevention's entire panel of outside vaccine advisers is at once utterly shocking and entirely predictable. Every new action by the secretary of Health and Human Services seems more impudent than the last — all in service of undermining confidence in some of our most reliable public health tools. The magnitude of his dismissal of all 17 members of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) — an independent panel of experts that makes recommendations on vaccine deployment in the US — is unlikely to register with the public. After all, this is a wonky committee that only fleetingly entered the public consciousness during the Covid-19 pandemic, when everyone anxiously awaited its verdicts on the first vaccines. But Americans will feel the effects of Kennedy's decision in their everyday lives — and it will happen sooner rather than later.

Associated Press
25 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Capital Rx Acquires Care Navigation Company Amino Health
With Amino Health, Capital Rx launches Judi Care, a next-generation care navigation solution that helps health plan members avoid the pitfalls of the overly complex U.S. healthcare system NEW YORK, June 11, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- Capital Rx, Inc., the enterprise health technology company, today announced the acquisition of Amino Health and its comprehensive health navigation platform. Amino Health will become Capital Rx's care navigation solution, Judi Care, extending Capital Rx's enterprise platform capabilities to nearly 60 million covered lives across the company's portfolio. With Amino Health, Capital Rx now offers employers all the components needed to create a holistic benefits plan design and address barriers to care that impact millions of Americans.1 'Outdated technology, stale provider directories, and misaligned incentives should never encumber a patient's care journey. With Judi Care's data-first, AI-driven patient navigation solution, we are bringing our clients the level of transparency and control required to engage and empower plan members to seek the best possible care when needed,' said AJ Loiacono, Co-Founder and Chief Executive Officer, Capital Rx. 'This potent combination of Judi Health's Unified Claims Processing™ for medical and pharmacy benefits, combined with Judi Care's AI patient navigation, will deliver unparalleled care to members.' With Judi Care, plan members will have access to: 'Our goal at Amino has always been to simplify the consumer healthcare journey. By integrating provider search, appointment booking, cost estimates, and prescription savings into one seamless experience, we are empowering people to take control of their health,' said John Asalone, Chief Executive Officer of Amino Health. 'We've brought all the data together in a configurable, AI-driven platform to deliver the best navigation experience possible. Joining Capital Rx will accelerate our mission and bring the platform to millions of more members.' John Asalone will join Capital Rx as Executive Vice President of Judi Care. Judi Care, when combined withJudi Health™, the industry's first Unified Claim Processing platform, will provide health plans, third-party administrators, government agencies, and employers, including health systems, with a fully integrated solution to seamlessly manage pharmacy and medical benefits. This unique blend of technology, aggregated data, and centralized, AI-powered workflows is the future of health benefits administration and represents one of the most significant strides toward value-based care ever made. To learn more about Judi Care, please visit About Capital Rx Capital Rx is a health technology company providing comprehensive full-service health benefit solutions to carriers, health plans, TPAs, employer groups, and government entities. As a public benefit corporation, Capital Rx is executing its mission to reduce healthcare costs as a pharmacy benefit administrator and by deploying Judi®, the company's cloud-native enterprise health platform. Together with its clients, Capital Rx is reimagining the administration of benefits and rebuilding trust in the healthcare industry. To learn more, visit Media Contacts Michael Passanante, SVP, Marketing & Communications Justin Venneri, Senior Director, Communications [email protected] Alex Jenkins, 120/80 Group [email protected] 1 Beyond cost, what barriers to health care do consumers face? Peterson-KFF Health System Tracker. 08/22/2024. View original content to download multimedia: SOURCE Capital Rx