Kristi Noem stands by staffer under fire for eyebrow-raising posts likening conservative struggles to slavery
Before joining DHS, Eric Lendrum likened the political fallout conservatives faced from the January 6, 2021 rally to slavery and the Holocaust.
He slammed Democrats for 'cowering' under their desks as thousands of angry Americans descended on the Capitol that day.
'There's something so gratifying about seeing the images of these members of Congress — especially the Democrats — crouching under their chairs, putting on those stupid, like, bubble masks, those anti-gas bubble masks, and then taking selfies,' Lendrum said on an episode of his podcast The Right Take just days after the riot.
He also said in a 2021 blog post on the conservative website American Greatness: 'American conservatives are, right now, on a course for being every bit as ostracized and alienated from broader society as Jews were in the years leading up to Nazi Germany.'
The junior-level speechwriter at DHS also shared anti-immigrant rhetoric on multiple platforms before joining the second Donald Trump administration.
In an October 2022 podcast episode, he endorsed the far-right 'great replacement theory,' which is a belief that nonwhite immigrants are diminishing the influence of white people across the world.
While a spokesperson for DHS declined to comment on the social media activity of a junior staffer before joining the agency, they instead sent the Daily Mail a link to the text of the First Amendment of the Constitution when asked for comment.
Lnedrum did not respond to the Daily Mail's request for comment on the reports detailing his online activity.
Lendrum published on American Greatness until March 2025.
In his post-riot rant in 2021, he said conservative Americans are facing oppression like that faced by enslaved black people in America and Holocaust victims.
'It has been said that the most surefire way to create an authoritarian regime is to completely dehumanize a significant portion of the population, so that their subsequent enslavement by the state will not face any larger resistance. It was true during slavery, it was true during the Holocaust, and it is true now,' he wrote.
Lendrum has a relatively low profile, his employer and previous social media activity was first reported by NOTUS on Monday.
The last time Lendrum posted to his X account was on the president's birthday on June 14 this year when he published an image of himself alongside Trump.
Lendrum has only 449 followers on X as of time of publication and appears to mostly use it recently to repost messages from Trump cabinet officials and allies.
But he has used his X account in the past to share anti-immigrant sentiments.
He expressed lament with a New York Post headline saying that veterans were kicked out of hotels to make way for providing shelter to illegal 'migrants' during President Joe Biden's term.
'They are not migrants. They are not 'undocumented.' They are an invading army. The largest invasion in American history,' Lendrum wrote on May 13, 2023 in a post to X.
He added: 'And what are you supposed to do with an invading army? Crush it, by any means necessary.'
Lendrum also claimed that asylum seekers are 'scum.'
Lendrum worked as press assistant at the Department of the Interior during President Trump's first term and said in an October 2022 interview (pictured) that he would only go back into government if it were for Trump
In a May 2023 post to X, Lendrum said illegal immigrants shouldn't be classified as 'migrants' because they are an 'invading army' that needs to be 'crushed'
Before joining DHS, Lendrum also had a short stint as a press assistant at the Department of the Interior during Trump's first term.
'If I could work more closely with him, that is the one case in which I would ever go back into government work. Government work is not fun,' Lendrum said in December 2022.
And now, he's back in Washington, D.C. for Trump's second term working for one of the largest and most influential agencies in the federal government.
A DHS speechwriter is responsible for preparing a myriad of public content for DHS Secretary Kristi Noem and her deputy.
This includes 'speeches, talking points, editorials, Congressional testimony, video scripts, web content and other written content,' according to a description of the job.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
20 minutes ago
- Reuters
California lawmakers swiftly pass, governor signs, Democrats' redistricting plan
LOS ANGELES, Aug 21 (Reuters) - The California legislature approved on Thursday a redistricting plan aimed at giving Democrats five more seats in the U.S. Congress, countering a partisan advantage President Donald Trump sought from a Republican move to redraw political maps in Texas. California Democrats pushed their three bills through the state Senate and Assembly in a remarkable flurry of fast-track action, ahead of a Friday deadline to get the changes on the ballot in time for a special election on November 4. The swift passage was a decisive victory for Governor Gavin Newsom, widely seen as a possible 2028 White House contender whose national political stature has climbed as he led Democrats' charge against what they decried as an attempted power grab in the Republican-led state of Texas. "Time to fight fire with fire," the governor wrote on X shortly after the legislature voted. Newsom, who enjoys a Democratic super-majority in both houses of the California legislature, later signed the measure to put his redistricting plan up for popular vote. If successful, it would neutralize the Trump-backed Texas bill designed to flip five Democratic seats to Republican control in the U.S. House of Representatives. Republicans, including Trump, have openly acknowledged that the Texas effort is about boosting their political clout by helping to preserve the party's slim U.S. House majority in the November 2026 midterm races. That election already is shaping up as closely fought. Democrats have characterized their bid to depart from California's usual independent, bipartisan redistricting process - adopted by voters in 2008 - as a temporary "emergency" strategy to combat what they see as extreme Republican moves to unfairly rig the system. "The decks are stacked against us, so what we need to do is fight back," California Senator Lena Gonzalez, a joint author of the redistricting plan, said as the state Senate opened floor debate on the bill. Democrats say more than 70% of their newly drawn congressional districts were adopted from maps used by the independent commission in formulating the current boundaries. Republican Senator Tony Strickland objected, saying, "These maps were drawn behind closed doors." Within six hours, however, both houses had approved all three measures, voting along party lines to approve each bill in succession and sending it to the other body for its concurrence. Unlike the California initiative, the newly drawn district lines in Texas would take effect without voter approval, though Democrats have vowed a court challenge to the Republican plan. The Texas measure cleared a major hurdle on Wednesday when the state House of Representatives in Austin adopted it on a party-line vote of 88 to 52. The Texas Senate is expected to pass the measure next. Both versions of the bill may then need to be reconciled before the legislation goes to Republican Governor Greg Abbott, who has said he will sign it. "Big WIN for the Great State of Texas," Trump said on his Truth Social platform. Democrats and civil rights groups say the new Texas map further dilutes the voting power of Hispanic and Black voters, violating federal law that forbids redrawing political lines on the basis of racial or ethnic discrimination. In pursuing mid-decade redistricting, both sides are breaking with a long-held political custom of generally altering political maps once every decade, following the U.S. Census to adjust for population changes. Most Americans believe redrawing congressional lines for the sake of maximizing political gain, known as gerrymandering, is bad for democracy, a new Reuters/Ipsos poll found. Former President Barack Obama weighed in on the issue this week, supporting the Democratic effort as a necessary short-term response to Republican overreach in Texas. But he said he remained uneasy about the long-term consequences. Consideration of the Texas bill was delayed for two weeks after more than 50 Democratic state House members staged a walkout that denied Republicans the legislative quorum needed. Their collective absence sparked extraordinary efforts by Abbott and other Republican leaders to pressure the Democrats to relent, including civil arrest warrants, the imposition of fines and threats to withhold their pay. The Democrats finally returned to Austin on Monday, by which time their legislative boycott had galvanized Democratic leaders in other states, especially California. Texas Representative Nicole Collier, one of the leaders of the Austin walkout, said the Republican plan she fought against was among the "most segregated maps that have been presented in Texas since the 1960s." The Texas-California clash may be just the start of a growing war over congressional district boundaries. Other Republican-controlled states, such as Ohio, Florida, Indiana and Missouri, are moving forward with, or considering, their own measures, as are Democratic-led states such as Maryland and Illinois.
The Guardian
37 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Newsom signs redistricting proposal to reshape congressional map in favor of Democrats
California governor Gavin Newsom on Thursday signed a sweeping redistricting proposal aimed at redrawing the state's congressional boundaries to create five new Democratic US House seats – a direct response to the gerrymandered maps Republicans in Texas are advancing at the behest of Donald Trump. The Democratic-controlled state legislature voted to advance a legislative package revising California's maps after hours of debate. With Newsom's signature, the measure now heads to voters in a special election this November. Newsom, who led the redistricting push, said California was 'neutralizing' Texas's maps designed to help Republicans stave off losses in next year's congressional midterm elections. 'They fired the first shot in Texas,' the governor said, surrounded by Democratic lawmakers at a signing ceremony on Thursday afternoon. 'When all things are equal, [when] we're all playing by the same set of rules, there's no question that the Republican party will be the minority party in the House of Representatives next year.' The nation's two most populous – and ideologically opposed – states were racing on parallel tracks toward consequential redistricting votes, potentially within hours of each other. As Democrats in Sacramento signed off on a legislative package that would put their 'election rigging response act' before voters in a special election this fall, Republicans in Austin were nearing a final vote on their own partisan map. 'We will not let our political system be hijacked by authoritarianism. And today, we give every Californian the power to say no,' saidassembly speaker Robert Rivas, a California Democrat, in remarks before the vote. 'To say no to Donald Trump's power grab and yes to our people, to our state and to our democracy.' In California, Democratic state lawmakers faced a Friday deadline to give the secretary of state's office enough time to place the amendment on the November ballot. Both chambers took up the package simultaneously on Thursday, volleying it back and forth until final approval was secured on all three measures: the proposed congressional map, an accompanying constitutional amendment and funding to run the administration of the special election. Democrats broke into applause on the chamber floor after the assembly passed the constitutional amendment. Approval by the Texas senate, which is expected as early as Thursday, would mark the end of a dramatic showdown with the state's outnumbered Democratic lawmakers whose two-week boycott captured national attention and set in motion a coast-to-coast redistricting clash. The California plan is designed to flip as many as five Republican-held seats in California – the exact number of additional GOP seats Trump has said he is 'entitled to' in Texas. 'He's trying to rig the election,' Newsom said of the president. 'Open your eyes to what is going on in the United States of America in 2025.' The redistricting tit-for-tat is an extraordinary deviation from the norm that will determine the battle lines for next year's midterm elections. Traditionally, states redraw congressional maps once a decade based on census data, with both the Texas and California maps originally intended to last through 2030. Before Thursday's vote, California Republicans pleaded with their Democratic colleagues to oppose what they derisively called a 'Gavinmander'. Some members disagreed with Trump's push for partisan maps in Texas and elsewhere, but said Newsom's 'fight fire with fire' was harmful. 'The problem when you fight fire with fire is you burn it all down,' James Gallagher, the state assembly Republican leader, said at a news conference. Initially, Democratic lawmakers said the changes would only take effect in response to a gerrymander by a Republican state – a condition that would be met when the Texas legislatures sends the maps to the state's governor, Greg Abbott, for his promised signature. But they amended the language on Thursday to remove any reference to a trigger, arguing it was no longer necessary now Texas has moved ahead. A Texas senate committee approved the GOP plan on Thursday morning, setting up a vote on final passage in the chamber, which was scheduled to reconvene that evening. Sign up to This Week in Trumpland A deep dive into the policies, controversies and oddities surrounding the Trump administration after newsletter promotion California was acting after a dramatic showdown in Austin, where Democratic lawmakers left the state earlier this month to delay a GOP redistricting plan pushed by the president. They returned only after California moved forward with its counterproposal. When they returned, some were assigned police minders and forced to sign permission slips before leaving the capitol. Several spent the night in the chamber in protest before Wednesday's session, where Republicans pushed through a map designed explicitly to boost their party's chances in 2026. California Democrats are moving ahead after days of contentious debate over the cost – and consequences – of a referendum to temporarily toss out the maps drawn by the state's voter-approved independent redistricting commission. Republicans estimated that a special election could cost more than $230m – money they said would be better spent on other issues like healthcare. On Wednesday night, the state supreme court declined an emergency request by Republican lawmakers seeking to block the Democratic plan from moving forward. Republicans have vowed to keep fighting it in court, and called for a federal inquiry into the proposal. The redistricting push has also caused angst among some Democrats and independents who have fought for years to combat gerrymandering. Testifying in favor of the changes during a hearing earlier this week, Sara Sadhwani, a political science professor who served as a Democratic member of the state's independent redistricting commission in 2020, said the map-drawing tit-for-tat presented California voters with a 'moral conflict'. But she argued that Democrats had to push back on the president's power play. 'It brings me no joy to see the maps that we passed fairly by the commission to be tossed aside,' she said. 'I do believe this is a necessary step in a much bigger battle to shore up free and fair elections in our nation.' The California revision also drew the backing of former president Barack Obama and other champions of fair redistricting, such as his former attorney general, Eric Holder. But Newsom's redistricting plan – a high-stakes gambit for the term-limited governor who has made no secret of his 2028 presidential ambitions – is not assured to succeed. It faces mounting opposition from high-profile Republicans, including the state's former governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, who has vowed to 'terminate gerrymandering'. Early polling has been mixed. But a new survey conducted by Newsom's longtime pollster David Binder found strong support for the measure in the heavily Democratic state, with 57% of voters backing it while 35% opposed it. 'All of us support independent redistricting, here in California and in every state in this union,' said Mike McGuire, the senate president pro tempore, at the signing ceremony. 'One thing that we do not support is unilateral disarmament, when the fairness of the 2026 election is being threatened.'
Reuters
40 minutes ago
- Reuters
Trump administration is not eyeing equity in TSMC, Micron, official says
WASHINGTON, Aug 21 (Reuters) - The Trump administration is considering taking equity stakes in companies getting funds from the 2022 CHIPS Act but has no similar plans for bigger firms boosting U.S. investments, such as TSMC and Micron, a White House official told Reuters. The official confirmed a Wall Street Journal report that the administration does not intend to seek equity stakes in semiconductor companies, such as Micron (MU.O), opens new tab and TSMC ( opens new tab, that plan to step up investment. On Tuesday, U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said the government continued to work on the possibility of taking a 10% stake in troubled chipmaker Intel (INTC.O), opens new tab and suggested it would seek further stakes in other grant recipients. "If we're going to give you the money, we want a piece of the action for the American taxpayer," Lutnick told CNBC. While the Biden administration had been giving "money for free" to companies such as Intel and TSMC, he added, "Donald Trump turned it into saying, 'Hey, we want equity for the money.'" At a March event with President Donald Trump at the White House, TSMC, which has Nvidia (NVDA.O), opens new tab and Apple (AAPL.O), opens new tab as key clients, announced plans for the new $100-billion U.S. investment, in addition to $65 billion committed for three manufacturing facilities in the state of Arizona. Micron boosted its U.s. investment plans in June. TSMC executives have already had discussions about returning their subsidies if the administration asks to become a shareholder, the Wall Street Journal said. The White House and TSMC declined to comment. Micron did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The U.S. Commerce Department, which oversees the $52.7- billion CHIPS and Science Act, finalized subsidies of $6.6 billion late last year for TSMC to produce semiconductors in the United States. The commerce department did not immediately comment. Besides Intel, Micron, TSMC and Samsung ( opens new tab were among the biggest recipients of CHIPS Act funding, but almost all of it has yet to be disbursed. Trump has previously said he wanted to kill the CHIPS Act program. In the past, the U.S. government has taken stakes in companies during periods of economic uncertainty to provide financial support and restore confidence.
