More funds needed for London Chagos arrivals, says council
The residents of the Chagos Islands, a British overseas territory, were evicted between 1967 and 1973 to create a joint UK-US military base.The granddaughter of one of those residents was in tears as she thought about her homeland's history when she landed at Heathrow."My grandmother was a British Chagossian," said Rebecca Philippe. "Fifty years ago, she was uprooted from her island, and we have seen her suffering. "By seeing her suffering, we suffered too, with her. Unfortunately she is no longer with us. But we are here, not only for our rights but to honour her."Ms Philippe said she had to hide her British Chagossian identity when living in Mauritius because anyone who criticised Mauritian sovereignty risked a prison sentence."We have a penal code on our heads. We can't protest or do anything to fight for our rights, so we feel powerless there," she said. "Here I can tell people who I am, and there's no more fear inside me."A report by Human Rights Watch found that many Chagossians displaced to Mauritius continued to suffer poverty, stigma and discrimination.
More than 100 Chagossians arrived at Heathrow Airport in one week in May, the same month the UK government signed the deal to hand the Chagos Islands to Mauritius, Hillingdon Council said.Many arrivals did not have accommodation plans and needed housing support.As British passport holders, Chagossians are allowed to enter the UK but do not qualify for the support that refugees and asylum seekers receive.The council said it helped those who had arrived to open a UK bank account and apply for Universal Credit, and provided bedding and a prepaid card for essentials. It said Chagossians went through a similar process to anyone else in the borough when it came to housing support.
The council said the arrivals were placing an unsustainable demand on services, and cost more than £508,000 between July 2024 and March 2025.It has forecast an annual cost of £1.2m going forward, as more Chagos Islanders arrive.The global population of Chagossians is reported to be around 10,000, with many of them living in Mauritius, the Seychelles or the UK."It's the government's policy on the Chagos Islands which is creating this surge in people coming to Heathrow," said Steve Tuckwell, the council's cabinet member for planning, housing and growth. "Heathrow's in Hillingdon and that's where the burden sits. So the government needs to do their bit to make it fairer for Hillingdon taxpayers."Mr Tuckwell said many of the Chagossian arrivals have children, and the council had a legal responsibility to find temporary accommodation for families with dependants. The council added that the government would only cover the costs incurred for up to 10 days after arrival.A spokesperson from the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government said: "We are giving Hillingdon Council funding to support Chagossian arrivals where arrival numbers are creating immediate local pressures."Government guidance is clear that people must make their own accommodation arrangements before they travel."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
4 minutes ago
- The Independent
Awful mistake sees Air India victims' families receive wrong remains
British families of victims from deadly Air India flight 171 say they have received wrongly identified bodies due to a bungled repatriation scheme. A lawyer representing the bereaved said that some families were forced to abandon funeral plans after discovering the coffins contained different, unidentified remains. In some instances, multiple victims' remains were reportedly placed into a single coffin, requiring separation before burial or cremation. The misidentification came to light when Dr Fiona Wilcox, a senior coroner, attempted to verify identities using DNA matching with family samples. Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer is expected to discuss these errors with Indian counterpart Narendra Modi during the latter's state visit to the UK.
The Independent
4 minutes ago
- The Independent
UK admits foreign aid cuts could see deaths rise – with Africa hardest hit
The government has admitted that slashing foreign aid spending will likely see global deaths rise – as it confirmed the cuts will fall disproportionately on women and girls' education and on projects across Africa. Its own assessment of the cuts' impact said: 'Any reductions to health spending risk an increase in disease burden and ultimately in deaths, impacting in particular those living in poverty, women, children and people with disabilities.' 'The world's most marginalised communities, particularly those experiencing conflict and women and girls, will pay the highest price for these political choices,' said Gideon Rabinowitz, Director of Policy and Advocacy at Bond, the UK network for international development organisations. 'At a time when the US has gutted all gender programming, the UK should be stepping up, not stepping back.' The Foreign Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO) in its annual report published on Tuesday set out cuts of £575 million in 2025 to 2026, The government is cutting aid spending by 40 per cent in total, from 0.5 per cent to 0.3 per cent of Gross National Income or roughly £6 billion by 2027, meaning the deepest cuts are still to come. The report confirmed the UK will send £1.8bn to the World Bank's International Development Association (IDA) - providing grants and low-interest loans to low-income countries – in part of a shift in funding towards big multi-country spending programmes including the global vaccine alliance Gavi. This means less money going from the UK directly to projects in specific countries. The African region has been disproportionately hit by cuts, while the Americas, Europe and Indo-Pacific regions all saw increases in their budgets, said Ian Mitchell, a senior policy fellow at the Center for Global Development. "Despite making cuts of roughly half a billion pounds, it's encouraging to see that the government is prioritising multilateral spend and honouring its pledge to the World Bank. Yet, it is unfortunate that Africa – home to over two-thirds of those in extreme poverty – will receive under half of FCDO's country and regional budget,' he said. 'If the government is to achieve its manifesto mission to tackle poverty, it will need to focus its budget where poverty exists and give African countries greater priority in its subsequent allocations.' Mr Rabinowitz said while he welcomed the consistent funding for certain humanitarian crises, vaccines and the World Bank, 'it is clear that the government is deprioritising funding for education, gender and countries experiencing humanitarian crises such as South Sudan , Ethiopia and Somalia.' While the government has committed to protecting spending for Gaza, Sudan and Ukraine, other crisis-hit countries significant cuts, including the Democratic Republic of the Congo. The plans also see a halving in spending on girls' education as well as reductions in spending on women's health, including sexual and reproductive health, and health emergencies. Leading charities have previously raised the alarm that programmes supporting girls and women would be in the firing line. The UK has been a leader in funding sexual and reproductive health including family planning, and the withdrawal of the US from funding these services has left a huge gap. It remains to be seen whether key programmes increasing access to contraception around the world like the Women's Integrated Sexual Health (WISH) initiative will be protected. While the government's own impact assessment makes it clear that, where cuts fall, they will negative impacts on equality, the report claimed overall spending demonstrated, 'disproportionate impacts on equalities have been avoided', Minister for Development Baroness Jenny Chapman said: "We are modernising our approach to international development. Every pound must work harder for UK taxpayers and the people we help around the world and these figures show how we are starting to do just that through having a clear focus and priorities. 'The UK is moving towards a new relationship with developing countries, becoming partners and investors, rather than acting as a traditional aid donor. We want to work with countries and share our expertise – from world leading science to the City of London - to help them become no longer dependent on aid, and organisations like the World Bank and Gavi are central to how we can work with others to solve some of the biggest challenges of our time: humanitarian disasters, pandemics and the climate crisis.'
The Independent
4 minutes ago
- The Independent
London's status as financial hub ‘fragile', warns Goldman Sachs boss
David Solomon, Goldman Sachs ' chairman and chief executive, has warned that London 's status as a global financial hub is "fragile" due to Brexit. He said that Goldman Sachs is diverting staff from London to rival European cities such as Frankfurt and Munich, noting a significant increase in personnel in Paris. Mr Solomon said that financial talent is now more mobile and firms like Goldman Sachs are establishing larger offices across various European locations. He cautioned Chancellor Rachel Reeves against further tax hikes, particularly on the wealthy, suggesting such policies could deter talent and harm the UK economy. Home Office Minister Seema Malhotra attributed damage to Britain's economic reputation and investor confidence to the premiership of Liz Truss. Brexit has left City of London's reputation at risk, Goldman Sachs chief warns
