
Trump's latest Wall Street showdown pushes investor scepticism to the brink
Donald Trump calls his tax and spending plans 'big, beautiful,' and a once-in-a generation opportunity to bolster the prosperity of the US economy. The bond market disagrees.
In his latest showdown with Wall Street, after the turmoil unleashed by his 'liberation day' tariff announcement last month, global financial markets are rattled again, this time by the US president's One Big Beautiful Bill Act. Plans to hit the EU with 50% tariffs on all imports are adding to the investor headache.
Reflecting growing unease, the yield – in effect the interest rate – on 30-year US government bonds has risen above 5%, and is threatening to reach the highest level in 18 years. Meanwhile Moody's, a leading credit ratings' agency, relied on by big investors, last week stripped the US of its top-notch triple-A score.
Central to the concern is the US's so-called 'twin deficit' position – running a simultaneous budget deficit (when public spending exceeds revenues) and trade deficit (when imports outstrip exports) – and the worry that Trump's policies will stoke inflation and sink the US economy into recession.
Mark Dowding, the chief investment officer at RBC BlueBay Asset Management, a hedge fund, said the president seemed content to 'keep calm and carry on' despite growing investor unease – which could test markets further.
'Laffer curve economics inspired thinking in the US is being met with increased scepticism by bond market investors, who are concerned at an alarming rise in the debt trajectory,' he said. 'Essentially, Washington has thrown down the gauntlet to the bond market.'
Under the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, trillions of dollars in tax cuts which Trump first introduced in 2017 – but had been due to expire at the end of 2025 – will be extended, offset by controversial cuts to some areas of spending, including Medicaid, the healthcare scheme for those on low incomes.
The non-partisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget estimates the measures will increase the US's annual deficits to $2.9tn (£2.1tn) (6.9% of US GDP) by 2034, or to $3.3tn (7.8% of GDP) if some time-limited policies are made permanent.
Running these large annual deficits will add to America's outstanding debt pile held by the public, which stood at $28.2tn in 2024 (97.8% of GDP) and was already on track to reach almost $50tn by 2034 (117% of GDP).
However, Trump's measures could add a further $3.3tn on top by 2034, taking the debt-to-GDP ratio to 125%, or $5.2tn if made permanent (129%).
Economists argue over the dangers of high debt levels. Several countries have debt ratios above 100%, including Japan, at more than 260%, and there is no precise, agreed-upon danger zone. Unlike households, governments have the power to print currencies, change tax and spending plans, and set laws. Comparisons to a family credit card being maxed-out are meaningless. Borrowing can help governments, if the proceeds lay the groundwork for stronger economic growth in future.
However, persistent deficits and ever-rising debt levels can erode investors' confidence in a country's ability to make good on its IOUs. This can further push up borrowing costs, as investors demand higher premiums. Higher interest rates drive up debt-servicing bills, while high volumes of debt can 'crowd out' more productive private investment in favour of parking cash in government bonds.
For decades, the US has enjoyed cheaper borrowing costs relative to many other countries, particularly given the scale of its annual deficits and vast outstanding debt pile, in what has become known as Washington's 'exorbitant privilege'.
However, investors are warning patience is running out, as Trump's increasingly erratic policymaking trashes the postwar consensus that buying US assets is the safest possible place to put your money.
Trump could argue his tariff policies will bring in revenues to offset the cost of tax cuts, and that his vast giveaways could stimulate spending in the economy by putting more money in the pockets of businesses and consumers.
However, the nonpartisan Tax Foundation thinktank believes US tariffs in effect today, if left in place permanently, could raise $2.1tn between 2025 and 2034, but would reduce long-run GDP over the same period by 0.6% before retaliatory measures are taken into account.
'Concerns about US borrowing aren't going away. And for all the angst about the tax and spending bill, the irony is that it will make little tangible difference to economic growth rates over the next couple of years,' analysts at ING Bank wrote in a note to clients.
On the flip side, the thinktank also says Trump's tax cuts could increase long-run GDP by 0.6%, but would cost $4.1tn in forgone revenue over the same period.
While there are gyrations in the bond market, there are also consequences for the world at large. This is because the US bond market acts as a critical reference point for other securities around the globe, meaning rising US borrowing costs will drag other government interest rates higher.
In the UK, 30-year bond yields have hit their highest since the late 1990s this year, adding to complications for the British chancellor, Rachel Reeves, by pushing up debt servicing costs.
Borrowing costs are rising in Japan, amid inflation concerns and as the country's central bank unwinds years of loose monetary policy. As the largest foreign holder of US Treasuries, investors may start pulling money from the US market in favour of rising yields on domestic bonds.
After rapid growth in government debt levels worldwide – driven higher after the economic shocks of the 2008 financial crisis, the Covid pandemic, and now Trump's trade wars – the challenges are only mounting.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
31 minutes ago
- BBC News
World Business Report Disney and Universal sue AI company Midjourney
Disney and Universal are suing AI photo generation company Midjourney alleging its popular image generator had become a "bottomless pit of plagiarism". Rahul Tandon finds out how likely the lawsuit is to be successful. Also, can we expect peace between the US and China in their crucial trade war as both sides say they have agreed on a "framework" for a deal? And we hear how tensions between President Donald Trump and Elon Musk might be affecting investors. You can contact us on WhatsApp or send us a voicenote: +44 330 678 3033.


The Guardian
35 minutes ago
- The Guardian
RFK Jr announces new panel of vaccine advisers after firing entire previous team
Robert Kennedy Jr, the US health secretary, named new members to serve on a key panel of vaccine advisers on Wednesday after abruptly firing all 17 sitting members of the independent panel of experts, according to a post on X. The eight new members of the advisory committee for immunization practices are: Joseph R Hibbeln, Martin Kulldorff, Retsef Levi, Robert W Malone, Cody Meissner, James Pagano, Vicky Pebsworth and Michael A Ross. 'All of these individuals are committed to evidence-based medicine, gold-standard science, and common sense,' Kennedy said in a post on X. The panel is part of the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Kennedy said the new members are committed to demanding definitive safety and efficacy data before making any new vaccine recommendations. Kennedy, a longtime vaccine skeptic, has alleged that the prior panel members, many of whom were appointed by former President Joe Biden, had conflicts of interest, without providing evidence of specific members' conflicts, and said the move was necessary 'to re-establish public confidence in vaccine science'. Numerous physician groups have expressed concern and suspicion over Kennedy's unprecedented removal of all the panel's prior members. The American Medical Association, the nation's largest physician group, has called for a Senate investigation into their dismissal, and sent Kennedy a letter calling for an immediate reversal of the changes.


The Independent
38 minutes ago
- The Independent
Fort Bragg soldiers behind Trump during speech were screened for loyalty and appearance, report says: ‘No fat soldiers'
Soldiers appearing near President Donald Trump at a Tuesday speech at Fort Bragg were reportedly screened for their partisan politics and physical appearance. Ahead of Trump's visit to the North Carolina base, service members were asked to alert superiors if they had political differences with Trump so they could be removed, reports, citing internal 82nd Airborne Division communications. "If soldiers have political views that are in opposition to the current administration and they don't want to be in the audience then they need to speak with their leadership and get swapped out," one note to troops obtained by the outlet said. Another allegedly focused on the troops' physical appearance, bluntly commanding, 'No fat soldiers.' "This has been a bad week for the Army for anyone who cares about us being a neutral institution," a commander at Fort Bragg told the outlet. "This was shameful. I don't expect anything to come out of it, but I hope maybe we can learn from it long term." The Independent has contacted the 82nd Airborne Division for comment. During Trump's visit, a vendor was also reportedly allowed to sell campaign-style Make America Great Again merchandise to troops, and the crowd of soldiers booed and cheered at Trump's partisan speech, all of which broke with the military's tradition and regulations around remaining non-political. "Believe me, no one needs to be encouraged to boo the media," Sean Parnell, a top Pentagon spokesperson, said in response to the reporting. "Look no further than this query, which is nothing more than a disgraceful attempt to ruin the lives of young soldiers." The Tuesday speech in question saw Trump lash out at Democratic opponents like California Governor Gavin Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass, baselessly accusing them of paying L.A. protesters and backing 'troublemakers, agitators and insurrectionists.' The president also defended his decision to send federalized California National Guard troops into the Los Angeles crisis over the objections of state and local leaders. 'Generations of Army heroes did not shed their blood on distant shores only to watch our country be destroyed by invasion and third-world lawlessness here at home, like is happening in California,' Trump said. 'As Commander in Chief, I will not let that happen. It's never going to happen.' Some criticized the event, arguing Trump was breaking longstanding political norms around respecting the military's independence. 'No president in modern history has done more to put the military in the middle of political and cultural crossfire than Donald Trump,' one columnist wrote in The New York Times. The criticisms come as Trump has pushed the boundaries of military norms in response to the Los Angeles protests by federalizing state National Guard troops and sending Marines to join in with the local police response to the civil unrest, coming perilously close to using the military for domestic law enforcement. The president has also vowed to use force on those who protest a Saturday parade in Washington for the 250th anniversary of the U.S. Army's founding that coincides with Trump's birthday. Other presidents have been accused of using appearances alongside the military for political points, including Joe Biden, who was criticized for a 2022 anti-Trump speech at Independence Hall in Philadelphia that featured Marines in dress uniforms in the background.