Civilian jet breaks sound barrier in historic first
(NewsNation) — The XB-1 aircraft manufactured by Boom Supersonic broke the sound barrier while making a historic test flight over the Mohave Desert.
It's the first time an independently developed jet has done so, and Boom Supersonic touted the plane as the 'first supersonic jet made in America.'
The XB-1, nicknamed 'Baby Boom,' was piloted by Tristan 'Geppetto' Brandenburg and reached an altitude of 35,290 feet before accelerating to Mach 1.122, which is 750 miles per hour.
Medicaid portals down in all 50 states: US senator
Air Force pilot Capt. Chuck Yeager broke the sound barrier for the first time in 1947, flying a rocket-propelled experimental aircraft in the same location.
XB-1 underwent 11 test flights prior to Tuesday's historic flight. The company said the jet includes features like an augmented reality system to help with takeoff and landing and is made almost entirely from carbon fiber composite materials.
Boom Supersonic's next project is Overture, an aircraft that will build on the success of XB-1, with the goal of being able to carry between 64 and 80 passengers at Mach 1.7, around 1,295 miles per hour.
Drones sighted in Northeast 'not a threat': White House
'XB-1's supersonic flight demonstrates that the technology for passenger supersonic flight has arrived,' said Boom founder and CEO Blake Scholl. 'A small band of talented and dedicated engineers has accomplished what previously took governments and billions of dollars.'
Around 130 Overture planes have been preordered including orders from American Airlines, United Airlines and Japan Airlines. The company built a factory in North Carolina in 2024 and will eventually produce 66 planes a year.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump announces $1,000 government-funded accounts for American babies
Donald Trump unveiled a federal program Monday providing $1,000 government-funded investment accounts for American babies, getting backing from top business leaders who said they plan to contribute billions more to an initiative tied to 'the big beautiful bill'. At a White House roundtable with over a dozen CEOs, including from Uber, Goldman Sachs and Dell Technologies, Trump relayed the details of 'Trump accounts' – tax-deferred investment accounts tracking stock market performance for children born between 2025 and 2029. 'For every US citizen born after December 31, 2024, before January 1, 2029, the federal government will make a one-time contribution of $1,000 into a tax-deferred account that will track the overall stock market,' Trump said. The accounts will be controlled by guardians and allow additional private contributions up to $5,000 annually. Trump called it 'a pro-family initiative that will help millions of Americans harness the strength of our economy to lift up the next generation'. Related: Trump's 'big, beautiful' bill is built on falsehoods about low-income families | Brigid Schulte and Haley Swenson CEOs from major companies including Michael Dell, Dara Khosrowshahi of Uber, David Solomon of Goldman Sachs, and Vladimir Tenev of Robinhood committed billions for employees' children's accounts. Trump praised the executives as 'really the greatest business minds we have today' who are 'committed to contributing millions of dollars to the Trump account'. Mike Johnson, the House speaker, also at the roundtable, championed the program, saying: 'It's a bold, transformative policy that gives every eligible American child a financial head start from day one. Republicans are proud to be the party we always have been. It supports life and families, prosperity and opportunity.' The program passed the House as part of a massive budget bill but faces stiffer Senate Republican resistance over the broader package. The accounts cannot be implemented as a standalone program and depend entirely on passage of what Trump calls the 'one big, beautiful bill' that is 'among the most important pieces of legislation in our country's history', claiming it's 'fully funded through targeted reforms' including welfare changes and a proposed remittance tax. However, the congressional budget office last week found the bill would also add $2.4tn to the national debt over the next decade while cutting Medicaid and food assistance programs. The CBO analysis showed the bill, which passed the House by a single vote and no Democratic support, would leave 10.9 million more Americans without healthcare by 2034. The treasury-funded accounts, previously called 'Maga accounts' resemble existing 529 college plans but with lower contribution limits – leading some financial advisers to say the Trump accounts may not offer the best investment incentives. The move is also not without precedent: the United Kingdom operated a similar Child Trust Fund with government seed funding from 2002-2011 before discontinuing the program, while Singapore runs the Baby Bonus Scheme that includes government-matched savings accounts for children. Trump was optimistic about returns, saying beneficiaries would 'really be getting a big jump on life, especially if we get a little bit lucky with some of the numbers and the economies into the future'. Johnson warned that failure to pass the legislation would result in 'the largest tax increase in American history' and pushed for swift congressional action on what he called 'pro-growth legislation' that would 'help every single American'. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
40 minutes ago
- Yahoo
What Sen. Josh Hawley Wants from the One Big Beautiful Bill (for Medicaid)
Some would call it another perfect call. And as soon as Sen. Josh Hawley hung up the phone, the Missouri Republican rushed to social media to report on the "great talk" he just had and the promise President Trump made about the One Big Beautiful Bill, the cornerstone of his second term domestic policy agenda: "NO MEDICAID BENEFIT CUTS." Trump has said as much publicly, but the message still reassured the senator as Republicans on Capitol Hill search for savings to make up for federal revenue lost to tax cuts. Quickly emerging as the most vocal GOP opponent to Medicaid cuts, Hawley has warned his business-friendly colleagues that their mega bill amounts to a referendum: They can be either the party of the working class or the corporate C-suite. The president put it more bluntly. "People who cut Medicaid and Medicare lose elections," Trump told Hawley according to the senator. "My advice," he said in an interview with RealClearPolitics, "listen to the guy who won the popular vote." Asked about the conversation, White House spokesman Kush Desai repeated Trumps long stated policy preference. "The President has been clear-no cuts to Medicare, Social Security, or Medicaid," Desai said in a statement to RCP, adding that the bill "addresses waste, fraud, and abuse in government spending." Normally this would be the final word. Trump has remade the party in his image, and he gets his way more often than not. But the battle over Medicaid reform comes when the federal debt exceeds $36 trillion, and after Moodys downgraded the U.S. sovereign debt rating, and as interest payments to service that debt exceed federal spending on national defense. According to Congressional Budget Office estimates, Medicaid, the largest health U.S. insurance program, will cost nearly a trillion dollars annually within the decade. Hence the mocking all-caps rebuttal from Rep. Chip Roy. The Texas Republican wrote that he had his own "great talk," not with the president, but his children, who said, "STOP BORROWING MONEY TO PROP UP WASTEFUL SPENDING & TO SUBSIDIZE THE ABLE-BODIED OVER THE VULNERABLE." Replied Utah Sen. Mike Lee, one of the few remaining GOP fiscal hawks, "Your kids arent wrong." Such is the split that defines the modern GOP, as the old fiscal conservatives battle the new-right populists for control of the movement. The dry text of the tax bill doesnt make compelling reading. The intricacies of the legislation, and then all the outside analysis attempting to explain those details, can certainly be confusing. But the result of the fight, the direction the GOP takes, will be telling. "Were about to learn whether or not Republicans want to be a majority party," Hawley insisted. While the White House insists the mega bill "is the most essential piece of legislation currently under consideration in the entire Western World," the proposed spending cuts to Medicaid are starting to overshadow the new border security and tax cuts they were designed to pay for. Republicans now have the most consequential fight over health care since Obamacare repeal on their hands. And just like 2017, the margins are again slim; Majority Leader John Thune can afford to lose only two votes. But the party has changed considerably since then. With Trump at the helm during the last election, Republicans increased their voting share with every major demographic. The "multiethnic, multiracial, working class" coalition that former Florida Sen. Marco Rubio once envisioned seems within the GOPs grasp. Screwing it up by "considering" cuts to the social safety net, Hawley said, wouldnt only be "insane." He warns his party that it is "suicidal." This befuddles the likes of Speaker Mike Johnson, who defended the cuts in an interview with NBCs "Meet the Press" earlier this month by arguing that "4.8 million people will not lose their Medicaid unless they choose to do so." It isnt a cut, the speaker argues, so much as a structural reform to root out waste, fraud, and abuse. The House bill that Johnson shepherded requires able-bodied adults without dependents to work, study, or volunteer for at least 80 hours per month to keep their coverage. It also includes new eligibility requirements which Republicans say are meant to keep illegal immigrants off Medicaid. Another big reform, the bill would freeze so-called provider taxes, a practice employed by 49 states that the New York Times describes as a "Medicaid loophole" which allows individual states to use taxes to inflate their spending, thus increasing their federal reimbursement. The populist isnt opposed to everything House Republicans passed over to the Senate. Work requirements - Hawley said he supports them "wholeheartedly." And making illegal immigrants ineligible for benefits, he added, "Im absolutely for that 100%." The provider tax, however, he finds "problematic" and worries it could lead to the closure of rural Missouri hospitals. Congress has not yet reached the beginning of the end of the sausage-making (a fact that makes pinning lawmakers down difficult). The House version of the bill can and will change. Rather than picking apart that text, Hawley said he is focused on influencing the Senate bill and ensuring that "it is in line with the commitments that the president has consistently articulated." The general Hawley redline: "What I don't want to see, and what Im not going to vote for, is anything that will result in benefit cuts to folks who are otherwise eligible, and for working people, in my state." Even with slim majorities, Republicans have a free hand to pass the bill using budget reconciliation, a parliamentary process that requires 51 votes rather than the normal 60-vote supermajority. All the same, they are tied up in knots by a new more populist coalition. Warned Steve Bannon, an early architect of Trumpism, "MAGAs on Medicaid because theres not great jobs in this country." A familiar fracas has ensued. "The current budget is a rare, maybe once in a generation, chance for a significant Medicaid policy victory," opined the Wall Street Journal editorial board earlier this year. But to the horror of that business-friendly paper, Hawley and his Medicaid redline threatened to tie up the GOP. Wasnt this the same senator who as Missouri attorney general once joined a 2018 lawsuit to repeal the Affordable Care Act and its Medicaid expansion, they asked, dubbing the evolution "the Josh Hawley Medicaid Switcheroo." "This is not about Obamacare," Hawley replied when asked about that criticism. "This is about protecting working people and Medicaid." More than a million Missouri citizens rely on the program for insurance, and despite strong opposition from Republicans particularly in rural areas, the state voted through a ballot measure to amend the Constitution and expand Medicaid. "I represent the state of Missouri. I dont represent Wall Street," Hawley said referencing that recent history, "and I certainly dont represent the Wall Street Journal editorial board." He then added, "I'm sure that those who are in the business of making money by strip mining this country would love to gut Medicaid." Conservatives have long hoped to trim the social safety net. Some want steeper reductions. All in all though, there is a feeling in more orthodox corners of the GOP, like the conservative National Review, that the House bill represents a good compromise. In a recent editorial, that magazine opined that the cuts were more akin to "a modest series of tweaks" which will "not do much to alter its spending trajectory." According to the Congressional Budget Office, the House reforms will reduce Medicaid spending by about $723 billion over the next decade and reduce total enrollees in the program by 7.6 million. Hawley isnt deaf to those debt arguments. If Republicans really want to save money on healthcare, though, he said that his party ought to look to the president. More specifically, the senator pointed to Trumps proposed policies to cap the cost of prescription drugs and to close the so-called carried interest loophole. Those he says, "would save a bunch of money." Of course, as Hawley well knows, those proposals would kick up their own firestorms on the right. But his point remains: There are other avenues. "If people are serious about wanting to actually save money, theres all kinds of ways to do it," Hawley said. "But my point is, lets not tell working people that we just cant help them. 'Sorry! Were going to have to take away your benefits because theres a corporate guy out here who wants his thing to be permanent!" That is the old GOP way of doing things, and in his estimation, it leads to political obscurity. "If were not interested in being a majority party, then we'll keep doing the things that the partys done for decades," Hawley concluded, "And you know, well bow to corporate interests and let them write the bill." His suggestion, the one giving Republican brass fits right now, is instead to "just go back and listen to what Donald Trump said on the trail over the last year." Philip Wegmann is White House correspondent for RealClearPolitics.
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Starbucks shares behind-the-scenes look at first 3D-printed store in US — here's how it could set new standard
Interesting Engineering and NewsNation shared behind-the-scenes looks at the construction of the first-ever 3D-printed Starbucks location in the United States. According to Interesting Engineering, the new store in Brownsville, Texas, involves no drywall or beams. Using 3D-printed concrete eliminated the need for scaffolding and cut down on overall construction waste. NewsNation shared a time-lapse video. The 1,400-square-foot retail unit wasn't designed to be your typical Starbucks, either. The store was developed by the German company PERI 3D for optimal speed and efficiency, reported Interesting Engineering in late April. PERI 3D has executed 15 other projects, including multiple residential buildings in Europe. The printed construction method has been gaining traction as a promising option in many places, including Texas and Oklahoma. USA Today noted in its coverage of the Starbucks opening that another company, Alquist 3D, designed a similarly constructed Walmart location in Tennessee last year. The technology is understood to greatly reduce the waste produced in the building process, as materials don't need to be cut and beams aren't needed for structure. 3D printing can also reduce a project's emissions by lowering labor hours as well as the number of vehicles and heavy machines on job sites. For Starbucks, the tech could represent an opportunity to reduce its environmental footprint. While the company has made some strides in this area, it still has a long way to go. Even some of their past green initiatives — such as their recycling program — haven't had the kind of positive impacts they've claimed. The benefit of many eco-conscious innovations is that they can also cut production costs — that's potentially another motivation for the coffee giant. USA Today reported that the Brownsville coffee shop was set to open in May. While the future of 3D-printed stores is still unfolding, Starbucks could already be reducing the construction waste it generates. And it could help to normalize this eco-conscious innovation for consumers at the same time, possibly setting new standards and practices for cleaner, greener retail builds. Would you want to work inside a 3D-printed building? Sure Once the technology has improved I'd rather not Absolutely not Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
