UK economic growth to be slower than forecast due to tariffs, say economists
UK economic growth could be up to 0.5 percentage points lower than expected in the coming years due to US President Donald Trump's tariff plan, economists have warned.
In his 'liberation day' announcement, Mr Trump slapped a 10% tariff on US imports of UK goods, as he hit out at 'exorbitant' VAT rates.
It came as he announced heavier tariff plans on a raft of other countries, including a 20% tariff on imports from EU nations.
Nevertheless, UK car manufacturers will be hit by a 25% tariff on all foreign cars imported to the US, which experts have said could put 25,000 UK jobs at risk.
Experts stressed that the UK has avoided a 'direct blow' but will still face a 'significant' impact.
Thomas Pugh, economist at RSM UK, said: 'The direct impact on the UK is likely to be in the 0.2% to 0.5% of GDP range over the next few years combining both the impact of the 10% flat tariff and the 25% tariff on automotives.
'The impact will be bigger once the hit to the US and European economies becomes clearer and is taken into account.
'Given we expect growth of 1% this year and 1.5% next year, it implies another year of stagnation at best.'
He added that he believes the impact of the tariffs will be 'not far off' wiping out Chancellor Rachel Reeves' fiscal headroom in the next budget in the autumn.
Pantheon Macroeconomics' Rob Wood suggested the economic impact would be less heavy but indicated it could result in more cuts to interest rates.
'Surging uncertainty ahead of President Trump's tax salvo had already been weighing on growth and the UK got away relatively lightly with a 10% tariff,' he said.
'For now we shave our 2025 growth forecast to 0.9%, from 1.1% previously.
'Markets are right to price in more UK rate cuts in 2025 – 2.4 more cuts now expected, compared to 2.0 three days ago – given that we have seen growth damaging tariffs and little retaliation, which would boost near-term inflation and create more of a stagflationary supply shock outside the US.'
Economists have said the UK currently exports around £60 billion in goods to the US, including pharmaceuticals, cars and technology equipment.
Experts have indicated the impact of the tariff plans will not be as bad as many had feared.
The UK's official economic forecaster, the Office for Budget Responsibility, warned last month that a more severe scenario, in which the UK and other nations also retaliated to the imposition of tariffs, would have dragged UK GDP 0.6 percentage points below forecasts this year.
It had said this would have had a one percentage point impact next year, and 'almost entirely eliminate' the Chancellor's £9.9 billion headroom against her fiscal rules.
Economists said UK firms still face significant uncertainty despite avoiding the 20% tariff scenario that some had feared.
Barret Kupelian, chief economist at PwC, said: 'The UK avoided a direct blow – but the global economy has taken a substantial hit.
'For the UK, the impact is significant – though less severe than for some other countries.
'In the short term, businesses face a sharp rise in uncertainty.'
UK business leaders have called for the UK Government to avoid further escalation in order to limit the economic impact of the policy announcement.
Rain Newton-Smith, chief executive of the CBI (Confederation of British Industry), said: 'A cool and calm reaction from the UK Government is the right response: UK firms need a measured and proportionate approach which avoids further escalation.
'Retaliation will only add to supply chain disruption, slow down investment, and stoke volatility in prices.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US Defense Secretary Hegseth signals Asia commitment with China warnings
US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth warned that China poses an 'imminent' threat to Taiwan and called on Asian allies to boost defense spending, in a speech that won plaudits from other regional officials. Washington's partners had reason to be wary of Hegseth's remarks at the Shangri-La Dialogue defense conference: Vice President JD Vance used a similar gathering in Munich this year to flame European allies. But Hegseth's criticism of China — which Beijing rebuked as divisive — was 'a clear statement of commitment to the region,' an expert told The Japan Times. While his speech may not have burned diplomatic bridges, it hasn't allayed Asian allies' economic anxiety over US President Donald Trump's erratic tariff policy, Bloomberg wrote.
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Another Casualty of Trump Research Cuts? California Students Who Want To Be Scientists
This article was originally published in CalMatters. This spring, the National Institutes of Health quietly began terminating programs at scores of colleges that prepared promising undergraduate and graduate students for doctoral degrees in the sciences. At least 24 University of California and California State University campuses lost training grants that provided their students with annual stipends of approximately $12,000 or more, as well as partial tuition waivers and travel funds to present research at science conferences. The number of affected programs is likely higher, as the NIH would not provide CalMatters a list of all the cancelled grants. Get stories like this delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for The 74 Newsletter Cal State San Marcos, a campus in north San Diego County with a high number of low-income learners, is losing four training grants worth about $1.8 million per year. One of the grants, now called U-RISE, had been awarded to San Marcos annually since 2001. San Marcos students with U-RISE stipends were often able to forgo part-time jobs, which allowed them to concentrate on research and building the skills needed for a doctoral degree. The cuts add to the hundreds of millions of dollars of grants the agency has cancelled since President Donald Trump took office for a second term. To find California campuses that lost training grants, CalMatters looked up known training grants in the NIH search tool to see if those grants were still active. If the grant's award number leads to a broken link, that grant is dead, a notice on another NIH webpage says. The NIH web pages for the grants CalMatters looked up, including U-RISE, are no longer accessible. Some campuses, including San Marcos, Cal State Long Beach, Cal State Los Angeles and UC Davis, have updated their own websites to state that the NIH has ended doctoral pathway grants. 'We're losing an entire generation of scholars who wouldn't have otherwise gone down these pathways without these types of programs,' said Richard Armenta, a professor of kinesiology at San Marcos and the associate director of the campus's Center for Training, Research, and Educational Excellence that operates the training grants. At San Marcos, 60 students who were admitted into the center lost grants with stipends, partial tuition waivers and money to travel to scientific conferences to present their findings. Before the NIH terminations, Marisa Mendoza, a San Marcos undergraduate, received two training grants. As far back as middle school, Mendoza's favorite subjects were biology and chemistry. To save money, she attended Palomar College, a nearby community college where she began to train as a nurse. She chose that major because it would allow her to focus on the science subjects she loved. But soon Mendoza realized she wanted to do research rather than treat patients. At Palomar, an anatomy professor introduced her to the NIH-funded Bridges to the Baccalaureate, a training grant for community college students to earn a bachelor's and pursue advanced degrees in science and medicine. 'I didn't even know what grad school was at the time,' she said. Neither of her parents finished college. The Bridges program connected her to Cal State San Marcos, where she toured different labs to find the right fit. At the time she was in a microbiology course and found a lab focused on bacteria populations in the nearby coastal enclaves. The lab was putting into practice what she was learning in the abstract. She was hooked. 'It just clicked, like me being able to do this, it came very easily to me, and it was just something that I came to be very passionate about as I was getting more responsibility in the lab,' Mendoza said. From Palomar she was admitted as a transfer student to San Marcos and more selective campuses, including UCLA and UC San Diego. She chose San Marcos, partly to live at home but also because she loved her lab and wanted to continue her research. She enrolled at San Marcos last fall and furthered her doctoral journey by receiving the U-RISE grant. It was supposed to fund her for two years. The NIH terminated the grant March 31, stripping funds from 20 students. For a school like San Marcos, where more than 40% of students are low-income enough to receive federal financial aid called Pell grants, the loss of the NIH training awards is a particular blow to the aspiring scientists. The current climate of doctoral admissions is 'definitely at a point where one needs prior research experience to be able to be competitive for Ph.D. programs,' said Elinne Becket, a professor of biological sciences at Cal State San Marcos who runs the microbial ecology lab where Mendoza and other students hone their research for about 15 hours a week. San Marcos doesn't have much money to replace its lost grants, which means current and future San Marcos students will '100%' have a harder time entering a doctoral program, Becket added. 'It keeps me up at night.' In a typical week in Becket's lab, Mendoza will drive to a nearby wetland or cove to retrieve water samples — part of an ongoing experiment to investigate how microbial changes in the ecosystem are indications of increased pollution in sea life and plants. Sometimes she'll wear a wetsuit and wade into waters a meter deep. The next day she'll extract the DNA from bacteria in her samples and load those into a sequencing machine. The sequencer, which resembles a small dishwasher, packs millions or billions of pieces of DNA onto a single chip that's then run through a supercomputer a former graduate student built. 'Once I found research, it was like a missing piece,' Mendoza, a Pell grant recipient, said through tears during an interview at Cal State Marcos. Research brought her joy and consumed her life 'in the best way,' she added. 'It's really unfortunate that people who are so deserving of these opportunities don't get to have these opportunities.' The origins of the San Marcos training center date back to 2002. Through it, more than 160 students have either earned or are currently pursuing doctoral degrees at a U.S. university. The grant terminations have been emotionally wrenching. 'There had been so many tears in my household that my husband got me a puppy,' said Denise Garcia, the director of the center and a professor of biological sciences. Garcia recalls that in March she was checking a digital chat group on Slack with many other directors of U-RISE grants when suddenly the message board lit up with updates that their grants were gone. At least 63 schools across the country lost their grants, NIH data show. In the past four years of its U-RISE grant the center has reported to the NIH that 83% of its students entered a doctoral program. That exceeds the campus's grant goal, which was 65% entering doctoral programs. Mendoza is grateful: She was one of two students to win a campus scholarship that'll defray much, but not all, of the costs of attending school after losing her NIH award. That, plus a job at a pharmacy on weekends, may provide enough money to complete her bachelor's next year. Others are unsure how they'll afford college while maintaining a focus on research in the next school year. 'You work so hard to put yourself in a position where you don't have to worry, and then that's taken away from you,' said Camila Valderrama-Martínez, a first-year graduate student at San Marcos who also earned her bachelor's there and works in the same lab as Mendoza. She was in her first year of receiving the Bridges to the Doctorate grant meant for students in master's programs who want to pursue a biomedical-focused doctoral degree. The grant came with a stipend of $26,000 annually for two years plus a tuition waiver of 60% and money to attend conferences. She can get a job, but that 'takes away time from my research and my time in lab and focusing on my studies and my thesis.' She relies solely on federal financial aid to pay for school and a place to live. Getting loans, often anathema for students, seems like her only recourse. 'It's either that or not finish my degree,' she said. These grant cancellations are separate from other cuts at the NIH since Trump took office in January, including multi-million-dollar grants for vaccine and disease research. They're also on top of an NIH plan to dramatically reduce how much universities receive from the agency to pay for maintaining labs, other infrastructure and labor costs that are essential for campus research. California's attorney general has joined other states led by Democrats in suing the Trump administration to halt and reverse those cuts. In San Marcos' case, the latest U-RISE grant lasted all five years, but it wasn't renewed for funding, even though the application received a high score from an NIH grant committee. Armenta, the associate director at the Cal State San Marcos training center, recalled that his NIH program officer said that though nothing is certain, he and his team should be 'cautiously optimistic that you would be funded again given your score.' That was in January. Weeks later, NIH discontinued the program. He and Garcia shared the cancellation letters they received from NIH. Most made vague references to changes in NIH's priorities. However, one letter for a specific grant program cited a common reason why the agency has been cancelling funding: 'It is the policy of NIH not to prioritize research programs related to Diversity (sic), equity, and inclusion.' That's a departure from the agency's emphasis on developing a diverse national cadre of scientists. As recently as February, the application page for that grant said 'there are many benefits that flow from a diverse scientific workforce.' Josue Navarrete graduated this spring from Cal State San Marcos with a degree in computer science. Unlike the other students interviewed for this story, Navarrete, who uses they/them pronouns, was able to complete both years of their NIH training grant and worked in Becket's lab. But because of the uncertain climate as the Trump administration attempts to slash funding, Vanderbilt University, which placed Navarrete on a waitlist for a doctoral program, ultimately denied them admission because the university program had to shrink its incoming class, they said. Later, Navarrete met a professor from Vanderbilt at a conference who agreed to review their application. The professor said in any other year, Navarrete would have been admitted. The setback was heartbreaking. 'I'm gripping so hard to stay in research,' Navarrete said. With doctoral plans delayed, they received a job offer from Epic, a large medical software company, but turned it down. 'They wanted me to be handling website design and mobile applications, and that's cool. It's not for me.' Valderrama-Martinez cited Navarrete's story as she wondered whether doctoral programs at universities will have space for her next year. 'I doubt in a year things are going to be better,' she said. She still looks forward to submitting her applications. So does Mendoza. She wants to study microbiology — the research bug that bit her initially and brought her to San Marcos. Eventually she hopes to land at a private biotech firm and work in drug development. 'Of course I'm gonna get a Ph.D., because that just means I get to do research,' she said. This article was originally published on CalMatters and was republished under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives license.
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Five big issues looming over the final days of Maine's legislative session
Jun. 1—Some of the thorniest and most divisive policy issues of the session stand between Maine lawmakers and their plan to adjourn on June 18. While the biggest outstanding item on the agenda is finalizing a two-year state budget, other major issues remain unresolved, as well. Here's a look at what lies ahead. TRANSGENDER ATHLETES When Donald Trump returned to the White House in January, he issued two executive orders targeting people who are transgender, including an order prohibiting transgender girls from participating in girls sports. Those orders put Maine in the administration's crosshairs because the state allows transgender athletes to participate in sports consistent with their gender identity — a stand state officials say is consistent with Title IX, which grants equal opportunity to females in education and sports, and with the Maine Human Rights Act, which prohibits discrimination based on gender identity. That dynamic led to a high profile confrontation between Gov. Janet Mills and Trump at the White House, efforts by the Trump administration to cut Maine's funding, the censure of Rep. Laurel Libby, R-Auburn, for a social media post identifying a transgender high school athlete, a U.S. Supreme Court intervention, and a hotly contested and emotional debate in the State House, where Republicans have offered a slate of bills that would restrict participation by transgender athletes and students. None of those have yet been taken up by the full Legislature. Lawmakers on the Judiciary Committee deadlocked 6-6 on two bills that would eliminate funding from school districts that allow transgender girls to participate in girls sports. Democratic Rep. Dani O'Halloran of Brewer joined Republicans in backing LD 233, sponsored by Richard Campbell, R-Orrington, and LD 1134, sponsored by Sen. Sue Bernard, R-Caribou. Two other bills were voted "ought not to pass" by the committee, but still face floor votes. LD 868, sponsored by Rep. Liz Caruso, R-Caratunk, which would have required sports to be male, female or coed and required students to use restrooms and changing rooms consistent with their gender assigned at birth, was narrowly defeated in committee, 7-5. And LD 1432, sponsored by Rep. Mike Soboleski, R-Phillips, which would have removed gender identity from the Maine Human Rights Act, was opposed, 11-2. CHILD CARE The budget presented by Gov. Janet Mills proposes rolling back some recent investments in child care, including stipends to attract workers, but pending legislation would boost support for the struggling industry. Child care advocates presented a show of force early in the session, calling on lawmakers to protect the investments targeted by Mills. And while lawmakers are still negotiating the budget, additional standalone bills have been working through the Legislature. One of those bills, LD 1955, is sponsored by Senate President Mattie Daughtry, D-Brunswick. It calls for $1 million a year in child care provider stipends, plus a onetime appropriation of $3.8 million and an annual appropriation of $2 million to help qualifying families pay for child care. HOUSING The affordable housing shortage in Maine has been front and center again this session. LD 1829, sponsored by House Speaker Ryan Fecteau, D-Biddeford, aims to make it easier to build housing in communities by reducing minimum lot requirements, loosening regulations on in-law apartments or accessory dwelling units, streamlining municipal review for smaller housing developments, and allowing a single-story high bonus for qualified affordable housing. Lawmakers have also taken up bills that would provide funding to allow residents of mobile home parks to purchase those parks when offered for sale. Mobile home residents own their homes, but not the land underneath them. In recent years, parks have changed hands, leading to an increase in lot fees, and increasing the housing instability of of tenants. IMMIGRATION Immigration enforcement has been another focus of the Trump administration that spilled into the Legislature this year. Lawmakers are still considering bills that would define the relationship between federal authorities and state, county and local police. One bill, LD 1656, sponsored by Soboleski, would prohibit any restrictions from being placed on assisting with federal immigration enforcement. But two Democratic bills — LD 1259, sponsored by Rep. Ambreen Rana, D-Bangor, and LD 1971, sponsored by Rep. Deqa Dhalac, D-South Portland — take the opposite approach. Rana's bill would prohibit state and local law enforcement from entering into contracts for federal immigration enforcement, while Dhalac's bill would go further by adding additional restrictions on state and local law enforcement's ability to enforce immigration laws, while emphasizing the rights of detained immigrants. TAX BILLS With state revenues flattening, lawmakers are considering a range of proposals to support state programs and provide tax relief to families. One bill likely to come to the floor is LD 1089, sponsored by Rep. Cheryl Golek, D-Harpswell. It would create a so-called millionaire's tax to support K-12 education. Adding a 4% surcharge to incomes above $1 million could generate over $100 million a year, according to advocates who celebrated the positive committee recommendation. Copy the Story Link
