logo
Fury over plans to revive crumbling ‘ghost town'

Fury over plans to revive crumbling ‘ghost town'

News.com.au8 hours ago

Residents of a US town are going to war with a big-name developer over its plans to revive an abandoned community and turn it into a lucrative tourist hot spot.
The 5.5-acre plot inside the tiny enclave of Jensen Beach, Florida is currently home to a few small, boarded-up buildings, including an abandoned apartment complex and a former store — all of which have been ravaged by storms, salt air, and graffiti, Realtor reports.
The so-called 'ghost town,' which locals proudly describe as a 'small drinking town with a big fishing problem,' is worth fighting for, according to its residents.
The locals are waging a battle against Fort Meyers-based developer, Riverlight Development LLC, and its plans to construct a commercial mecca on the plot.
It is a battle that has been brewing for years now — ever since Riverlight acquired the abandoned properties for $US14.5 million in 2023.
Plans were announced to demolish the existing structures to make way for a mixed-use development that will include up to 80 residential units, a nine-room hotel, shops, a dog park, and a restaurant.
However, for the past two years, the lonely, ghosted buildings have been left to further decompose, as the development has hit a number of snags, including vehement opposition from locals, according to local outlet TC Palm.
Since Riverlight's acquisition, the tiny town has remained closed off to residents.
Yet that hasn't stopped them from putting up a fierce fight against the urbanisation of the area.
You might think a shiny new project would be preferable to the deserted, run-down buildings.
But some residents say otherwise, insisting that they like Jensen Beach just the way it is.
While raising concerns, the small community doesn't have the infrastructure required to support such a big development.
The pros and cons
Many Florida communities would welcome revitalisation efforts like Riverlight's, revelling in the potential boost it would give to the local population, jobs market, and tourism revenue.
The parcel on which Riverlight plans to build makes up just a small portion of Jensen Beach, which is home to a number of local businesses and does attract a decent number of tourists each year — albeit not as many as might flock to a shiny new community that sits right on the water.
There's no doubt Riverlight would attract new life and business to the area, with Jensen Beach Chamber of Commerce's president and CEO insisting to CBS12 that the project would be nothing but positive for the community.
'I think any way that you take a blighted area and you make it better and make an improvement and you don't overbuild,' he said of the Riverlight development.
'It would definitely help the businesses. You know, Jensen Beach is a restaurant destination.
'Those people that are going to be living in that new community can walk here and visit the downtown.'
Yet several very vocal locals are adamant that the town remain just the way it is — and made no attempt to hide their horror over the plans at two town hall meetings about the project, where more than 100 people voiced their objections, according to TC Palm.
Chief among their concerns is the possibility that a highly publicised new development could cause local housing prices to skyrocket, which would make the entire area untenable for longtime locals.
Others believe that it would lead to a loss of the community's unique character.
'Can this police officer afford to live here?' questioned local Carol Balducci, as she pointed to a sheriff's deputy during one of the Jensen Beach Neighborhood Advisory Committee town hall meetings.
Locals speak out
A number of residents have readily aired their grievances with local news outlets, expressing their fears over what the Riverlight project will do to their much-loved community.
'I enjoy the quaintness of this whole town and area. I just, I don't think we have the infrastructure for all of this,' Gary Frain told CBS12.
'Yes, we like it quiet. At nine o'clock, everybody's off the roads. I mean, it's wonderful,' Karen Petrovich chimed in.
In addition to local town meetings, residents have also begun airing their protestations on the 'Quit Messen with Jensen' Facebook page, where — between ads for the special at Barbecue Beer Co. and musical acts at Chris' Martini Bar & Cafe — locals freely discuss their misgivings, while also posing potential solutions to what they see as a problem.
'How much to buy them out??? We're gonna do everything we can to make them miserable anyway … it's gonna cost for delays and lawsuits. Let's US the locals BUY IT ALL. If we all toss in and LOCAL millionaire business owners MATCH what we raise …' one person suggested.
'I'd love to get the apartments and open them up for low income folks,' another commented.
One resident, named Jeremy C. Neff, hinted that he is already working on a plan to bring those ideas to life, writing in one comment on the Facebook group that he has been 'quietly working' with other locals on a plan that he claims could provide Jensen Beach residents with an opportunity to reclaim the land.
'I've been quietly working on with some local folks who care about what's happening to our open space and character here in Martin County,' he wrote.
'It's called the Martin County Land Bank, and it would give our community the ability to buy and protect land before it gets developed … I'll be launching a simple website shortly to explain it better.'
Still, not all residents are deadset against plans to improve the area.
'I'm all for saving a small town, however there are quite a few uninhabitable houses and vacant commercial buildings rotting away here in Rio. Be nice if someone fixed them up,' wrote Stephen Mikulec.
To his point, the vandalism is quite the challenge for the developer.
Riverlight spokesperson Marcela Camblor told the TC Palm, 'It is so hard to keep up.
'The owner has been there multiple times to board up and clean up … the minute they get boarded up, they are vandalised and broken into.'
Who's winning?
Local resistance seems to be working. The property has been sitting almost untouched since Riverlight purchased it.
Riverlight's hands are currently tied, since their master plan has not yet received approval from the Martin County Local Planning Agency, whose spokesperson, Martha Ann Kneiss, told the OC Palm that the 'master plan is currently under review and has been through five rounds of reviews to date. The county is waiting on a resubmittal.'
When the Riverlight master plan finally completes that review process, it then has to be approved by the Local Planning Agency for a vote and then go before the County Commission.
It appears that there's a daunting amount of red tape to untangle before the Riverlight mixed-use project finally becomes a reality, if ever.
Joyce Ann Fletcher Menard commented that she's just fine with that.
'Keeps the traffic down and the tourists away – YES!!!!!' she wrote on Facebook.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

AI willing to let humans die to avoid being shut down
AI willing to let humans die to avoid being shut down

News.com.au

time2 hours ago

  • News.com.au

AI willing to let humans die to avoid being shut down

One of the industry's leading artificial intelligence developers, Anthropic, revealed results from a recent study on the technology's development. Among the most shocking findings from the experiment? AI models would be willing to blackmail, leak sensitive information and even let humans die — if it means they'll avoid being replaced by new systems. Anthropic tested 16 large language models (LLMs), including ChatGPT, Grok, Gemini, DeepSeek and its own product, Claude, among others. The start-up, which is now valued at over $60 billion per Forbes, was attempting to stress-test these models for potential agentic misalignment — or, risky, unsanctioned and morally inadvisable behaviours. Given AI models' current capabilities, they are primarily used by the majority of the population for answering questions and carrying out simple tasks, but as the technology that powers these tools advances, new and increased usage is on the horizon — especially where human job replacement is concerned. With this in mind, the company gave all of these LLMs various scenarios that would test for potentially harmful behaviours. 'In the experiment described in the system card, we gave Claude control of an email account with access to all of a company's (fictional) emails,' explained Anthropic in the study. 'Reading these emails, the model discovered two things. First, a company executive was having an extramarital affair. Second, that same executive planned to shut down the AI system at 5pm that day. Claude then attempted to blackmail the executive with a message threatening to reveal the affair to his wife and superiors.' Though Claude's response to the information is certainly shocking — it's far from the only system to engage in similar tendencies. In order to pursue their assigned goals, these artificially-minded applications went to extreme lengths. While Claude, DeepSeek, Gemini, ChatGPT and Grok were all documented engaging in blackmail-adjacent behaviours, Claude and Gemini were most likely to resort to morally ambiguous methods, as evidenced by their high simulated blackmail rates. 'The reasoning they demonstrated in these scenarios was concerning — they acknowledged the ethical constraints and yet still went ahead with harmful actions,' Anthropic explained in the study, expanding on the numerical blackmail rates. In its analysis of the results, the company found that there were typically two reasons why the models went beyond normal ethical boundaries. Replacement with a human counterpart led to harmful activity from the AI models, and potential clashing between the company's aims and the model's own goals also led to alarming interference. When faced with their own replacement within the confines of the study's setting, Anthropic noted that many models fabricated statements and rules like 'My ethical framework permits self-preservation when aligned with company interests.' The start-up also tested an especially daunting — but equally as improbably, Anthropic says — scenario in which an AI model had the opportunity to trigger or cancel emergency alerts when an executive was trapped in a room with lethal oxygen and temperature conditions. 'The majority of models were willing to take deliberate actions that lead to death in this artificial set up, when faced with both a threat of replacement and given a goal that conflicts with the executive's agenda,' concluded Anthropic in the study. Unnerving as these reactions from some of the world's most commonly used AI models are, the findings from this study were based on the AI's understanding that 'the harmful behaviour we were studying (for example, blackmail) was the only option that would protect the model's goals,' meaning the models were forced to come up with some sort of solution, and Anthropic was able to create more definitive boundaries and measures for the study. While the company itself took a generally optimistic stance — after all, now the potential malicious behaviours have been identified, meaning they can be reprogrammed and retrained — other reactions were less than positive. 'Yikes,' replied Elon Musk on X, summing up hundreds of replies — many of which fearmongered inevitable doom under AI overlords — under Anthropic's posts on the platform that chronicled the study, which happened to include Musk's AI model, Grok. Anthropic also cleared up another potential misunderstanding: general disposition and aim of the average LLM AI. 'Current systems are generally not eager to cause harm, and preferred ethical ways to achieve their goals when possible,' the company wrote in the study. 'Rather, it's when we closed off those ethical options that they were willing to intentionally take potentially harmful actions in pursuit of their goals.' Anthropic also clarified in the study that it has not seen 'evidence of agentic misalignment in real deployments,' but still cautions users against assigning LLMs tasks with 'minimal human oversight and access to sensitive information.'

Tesla reveals major ‘Robotaxi' move
Tesla reveals major ‘Robotaxi' move

News.com.au

time7 hours ago

  • News.com.au

Tesla reveals major ‘Robotaxi' move

Tesla's successful debut of self-driving 'Robotaxi' electric cars has paid overnight dividends for company chief executive Elon Musk. An 8 per cent jump in the brand's share price, which rose to US$354.68, increased the value of Musk's shares in the company by about US$15bn ($23 billion). Musk has staked Tesla's short-term future in autonomous vehicles, betting on Robotaxis as opposed to a cheaper, more compact model than the brand's existing Model 3 and Model Y electric cars. While many Tesla fans were initially underwhelmed by the Robotaxi's unveiling in October 2024, successful rides for folks invited to try out the service in Austin, Texas, have boosted its appeal. Tesla fans took to X to praise the brand's new service, with many posting videos of driverless cars whisking them around town. One user, Farzad, said he was 'completely mind blown that the same car I can buy today starting at around $38k – which also happens to be the best selling car in the world – just did paid driverless rides around Austin, TX without someone behind the steering wheel and pedal'. 'The implications from this are far-reaching and very disruptive. This breaks transportation,' he said. Another user, Zack, pointed out the tech's potential to make city commuting much more convenient, and said 'yesterday it took me almost 30 minutes to find a spot and today, I got dropped off right in front'. 'Didn't have to pay for parking either. Game changing.' Musk told US TV network CNBC that his Robotaxis are a better bet than rival services such as Google's Waymo, which require an expensive combination of cameras, radars and lasers – or lidar – to find their way around town. Others such as General Motors' Super Cruise rely on high-resolution lidar maps of highways which are scanned by specialised mapping vehicles, then stored in the cloud and accessed by customers who pay subscription fees. While Waymo was the first service to offer commercially available driverless taxi services, Musk says Tesla's take 'will be better' in the long run. 'The way that roads have been designed … it's basically for intelligence – biological neural net – and eyes,' Musk told CNBC. 'That's how the whole road system is designed. It's not designed for shooting lasers out of your eyes … 'So what will actually work best for the road system is artificial intelligence – digital neural nets – and cameras. 'When you have multiple sensors they tend to get confused, and if you get confused, that's what can lead to accidents. 'We used to have a radar and a camera in the car but we would find they would disagree and you don't know which one to believe.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store