Energy Price Cap 7 per cent drop predicted for July 2025
But, despite the decrease, affordability remains a concern - typical annual energy bills are still expected to be around £1,680 — around 50% higher than pre-crisis levels.
More customers are switching to fixed energy tariffs, which are currently often cheaper than the Price Cap rate.
Matt Turner-Tait, Senior Manager at energy experts BFY Group, says: 'We are forecasting that the July 2025 energy Price Cap will fall by around 7%, bringing it down to approximately £1,715. This would put typical annual energy bills at around £1,680 - a reduction, but still significantly above pre-crisis levels."
This is a fall of about £134 from the current level of £1,849, set in April, and reflects recent declines in wholesale gas and electricity prices.
It may provide some short-term relief for households on standard variable tariffs. While energy prices typically dip in summer due to reduced demand, market signals indicate that prices could stay at current levels through the winter as well, challenging expectations of the usual seasonal rebound.
Recommended reading:
"Adjustments to the amount suppliers are allowed to recover for operating costs could reduce bills by up to £15 per year," says Matt. "But these savings could be offset by the rising bad debt among suppliers and other pressures, such as volatile wholesale markets, the rising costs of decarbonisation, inflation-driven operational expenses and regulatory compliance.
"More energy customers have been switching to fixed tariffs, which are always cheaper than the Price Cap, and are currently significantly so - by around £250 to £300 for a typical customer.
"While the gap between fixed deals and the capped rate may narrow as the Price Cap falls, fixed tariffs are still expected to offer savings in the near term."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
4 days ago
- BBC News
'Excited to see Delap at The Bridge' - fan views on Chelsea's new signing
We asked for your views on Chelsea's new forward Liam Delap and how he fits into the squad. Here are some of your comments:Roy: It would make a nice change to see a player receive yellow cards as a result of their physicality rather than the high numbers our players get for dissent. Delap has been likened to Costa, so I can't wait for him to I think it's a good signing at a good price but I don't think it will solve all our striker issues now as he's still developing and I think we still need to sign an elite striker to challenge for the Premier League/Champions What a fantastic signing! He's a good old-fashioned English centre forward. So excited to see Delap at The It doesn't matter who Chelsea has up front; if they play like they have in the past, nothing will change. Chelsea must 100% stop playing their wasteful backwards and side passing. Delap must be given service if not another £30m will be wasted. Malcolm: I can't see how Delap is an upgrade on Jackson. Stats are relatively similar. Delap doesn't have the athleticism of Jackson, but may be more clinical in front of goal?Dan: I have mixed opinions on Delap's transfer. On one hand I think it's a smart transfer and good business. He put up decent numbers for Ipswich and being put into a side like Chelsea, who create so many chances - not to mention his prior experience playing with Palmer - should hopefully reflect in a great output. Now, on the other hand, I was hoping for a more senior striker like Victor Osimhen or Victor Gyokeres to lead our attack and for players like Delap to learn from. As it stands, I don't think a Delap and Jackson combo will have us winning the league.
Geeky Gadgets
6 days ago
- Geeky Gadgets
Get Ready: Apple Might Launch iPhones TWICE a Year Starting Soon!
Apple is reportedly exploring a significant shift in its product release strategy: launching iPhones twice a year. This potential change could reshape the smartphone market, influencing innovation cycles, consumer behavior, and competitive dynamics. For over a decade, Apple has adhered to an annual release schedule, making this possible adjustment a notable departure from its traditional approach. The implications of this move could extend beyond Apple, potentially setting new standards for the industry. The video below from Matt Talsk Tech gives us more details on what Apple has planned. Watch this video on YouTube. Why Apple Might Adopt a Biannual iPhone Launch The idea of releasing iPhones twice a year is driven by Apple's need to remain competitive in a rapidly evolving market. Rivals like Samsung and Google frequently unveil new devices throughout the year, keeping their product lines fresh and engaging. By adopting a biannual schedule, Apple could better match this pace, making sure it stays relevant and maintains its dominant market position. A biannual release strategy could also allow Apple to respond more effectively to seasonal trends and varying consumer needs. For example: A spring launch could address mid-year demand, appealing to consumers who prefer to upgrade outside the traditional holiday shopping season. The fall release would continue to capitalize on the lucrative holiday period, a critical time for driving revenue. This approach could diversify Apple's revenue streams, making sure a steady flow of new products and keeping the brand consistently in the spotlight. Impact on Innovation and Product Features Releasing iPhones twice a year would likely influence how Apple introduces new features and innovations. Currently, Apple consolidates major updates into a single annual release. A biannual schedule might require the company to stagger its innovations, offering smaller, incremental updates more frequently. For instance: A spring release might prioritize hardware improvements, such as enhanced cameras, faster processors, or better battery performance. A fall launch could focus on software advancements, design updates, or new features tied to Apple's ecosystem. While this strategy could keep the product line fresh, it raises questions about whether each release would provide enough value to justify an upgrade. Apple would need to carefully balance frequent updates with maintaining the high standards and innovation its customers expect. Adjustments to Production and Marketing Strategies A shift to biannual releases would necessitate significant changes to Apple's production and marketing strategies. On the production side, shorter development cycles would require a more agile and responsive supply chain. Apple would need to collaborate closely with suppliers and manufacturers to ensure timely delivery of components and finished products. From a marketing perspective, Apple would face the challenge of sustaining excitement around two launches per year. Historically, the company has excelled at building anticipation through carefully planned events and campaigns. However, with more frequent launches, Apple would need to ensure that each event feels distinct and significant while preserving the exclusivity and prestige associated with its brand. This could involve tailoring marketing efforts to highlight the unique aspects of each release, making sure they resonate with different consumer segments. Consumer Behavior and Market Response A biannual release schedule could significantly influence consumer behavior, particularly regarding purchasing and upgrade cycles. Currently, many iPhone users upgrade every two to three years, often aligning their purchases with major releases. More frequent launches might encourage some consumers to upgrade more often, especially if each release introduces meaningful improvements. However, there is also the risk of 'upgrade fatigue.' If new models are introduced too frequently, consumers may feel overwhelmed or less inclined to upgrade, particularly if the differences between releases are incremental. To mitigate this, Apple would need to clearly differentiate its spring and fall offerings, making sure each appeals to distinct customer needs and preferences. Competitive Implications for the Smartphone Industry The smartphone market is highly competitive, with companies vying for consumer attention through innovation, pricing, and marketing. A biannual release schedule could strengthen Apple's position by allowing it to respond more quickly to market trends and competitor actions. For example, if a rival introduces a new feature mid-year, Apple could counter with its own release rather than waiting for its traditional fall launch. This strategy could also pressure competitors to accelerate their own release cycles, potentially driving faster innovation across the industry. For consumers, this could result in more frequent access to innovative technology and a broader range of choices. However, it could also intensify competition, leading to shorter product lifecycles and increased pressure on companies to deliver consistent value. Broader Implications for Apple and the Industry Apple's potential move to a biannual iPhone release schedule represents a bold evolution in its strategy, with far-reaching implications for the company, its customers, and the broader smartphone market. By introducing new devices more frequently, Apple could enhance its competitive edge, sustain consumer interest, and drive innovation. However, this approach also presents challenges, including the need to manage production complexities, maintain marketing momentum, and meet consumer expectations. As the smartphone industry continues to evolve, Apple's ability to adapt and innovate will be critical to maintaining its leadership position. Whether this shift to biannual releases becomes a reality or remains a consideration, it highlights the company's ongoing efforts to stay ahead in an increasingly dynamic and competitive market. Explore further guides and articles from our vast library that you may find relevant to your interests in Biannual iPhone release. Source & Image Credit: Matt Talks Tech Filed Under: Apple, Apple iPhone, Mobile Phone News, Top News Latest Geeky Gadgets Deals Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, Geeky Gadgets may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.
The Independent
25-05-2025
- The Independent
Energy bills: How to make sure you find the cheapest deal
Regulator Ofgem confirmed the energy price cap is coming down from July with around a seven per cent drop, meaning average bills could fall by £129. While the usual reminders apply about the price cap relating to charges for units of energy, rather than maximum bills, it's still a big boost for households after April's rises in council tax and other costs. Ofgem's last increase came around the same time, which contributed to overall inflation in the UK increasing to 3.5 per cent in April. This is likely to have the knock-on effect of seeing interest rates remain higher for longer than anticipated. All the same, the impending reduction in energy bills will be welcome - and if you shop around rather than sticking with whatever your current provider immediately offers, there's a fair chance you could save more than £129 off your upcoming bills. Make sure to find the right deal for your property If your deal is ending soon, your current provider will give you options to switch to their best tariffs, but they might not be the cheapest or most suitable ones for you overall. There are a number of options for you to begin your search, however, which don't take up too much time and could save you plenty in the long run. To start with, Uswitch should be your first port of call: enter your address, confirm your current provider, enter your email address and get the best options they have in their database. Uswitch has been running for 25 years and works closely with Ofgem to include everything consumers need to know - and they'll even do the switching for you if you find the right tariff on their site. Alternative options are GoCompare and Which?, while a less well-known site is WattsWatt - a new, privately run checker website which promises to find the cheapest energy tariff for you based on your postcode. One extra tip to save even more money: some browser add-ons or cashback sites like Quidco will sometimes offer you an extra percentage of your money back if you log in before buying. Right now on Uswitch, for example, you can get up to £26 back through Quidco if you complete a transaction to change your energy provider there. It's worth a look! Best potential deals While we'll list a few of the top deals around today, it is important to note that energy deals and available tariffs can change quickly depending on uptake, as well as news like Friday's. Discounts also tend to be measured against the current price cap, not the future one, and not every deal is available to everybody, so again, make sure you check around to find the one which suits you. That said... Outfox the Market's Fix'd Dual May25 12M v5.0 tariff is picked by several places as one standout deal to consider. It's a dual-fuel tariff, with a 12-month fix. Longer terms are also available. EDF has an Energy Simply Fixed May26v5 tariff available, which is ranked as the most popular on Uswitch at present. So Energy has several cropping up as good options right now, with their So Clove and So Chestnut tariffs in particular stacking up well. And if you only want electricity rather than a dual fuel switch, the Outfox the Market Fix'd Elec May25 12M v3.0 tariff may be one to consider. Always consider exit fees and term duration as well as energy unit costs. Ofgem present their latest price cap adjustments every three months. That means the next review will be confirmed on 27 August 2025, which will cover the period from 1 October 2025 to 31 December 2025. If your fixed-term deal isn't due to run out until later in the year, mark those dates and check back later to ensure you still get the best deal possible.
