logo
Lawmaker wants to prevent ‘sanctuary cities' in Kentucky

Lawmaker wants to prevent ‘sanctuary cities' in Kentucky

Yahoo06-02-2025
FRANKFORT, Ky. (FOX 56) — A Kentucky lawmaker has filed a bill to prohibit local governments from obstructing the repatriations or identification of people living in the country illegally.
'The federal government has a clear mandate from the American people to enforce our nation's immigration laws,' Rep. Jared Bauman of Louisville said. 'HB 344 will be our commonwealth's promise to uphold federal law and to support federal law enforcement agencies as they identify and detain illegal aliens who have violated our nation's sovereign borders. Above all, we are committed to supporting federal law enforcement agencies as they pursue illegal aliens who have committed violent crimes against innocent Kentuckians and pose an active safety threat to our communities.'
Legislature limiting governor pardoning power moves forward in Frankfort
Petition emerges to remove all London City Council members following hostile meeting
Lawmaker wants to prevent 'sanctuary cities' in Kentucky
A Kentucky House of Representatives news release said Kentucky law enforcement agencies do not keep data related to people living in the country illegally, but federal agencies estimate that about 650,000 have criminal convictions or pending charges.
'Since January 20, federal agencies have increased ongoing repatriation efforts to enforce national immigration laws. In 2023, the federal government oversaw 142,580 repatriations of individuals from the United States to their home countries,' reads the release.
In 2024, the American Immigration Council, a nonprofit that advocates for immigration reform, estimated that 11 million undocumented immigrants live in the United States, about 3.3% of the population.
The news release said House Bill 344 would prohibit state agencies, law enforcement agencies, and local governments from adopting sanctuary policies. The bill would also require law enforcement agencies to use all resources reasonably available to support federal immigration law.
The bill also allows county governments to make agreements with federal agencies for the detainment of people living in the country illegally and would wave sovereign, governmental, and qualified immunity for any local government or law enforcement agency that releases an illegal alien who subsequently commits a violent offense, permitting the victim or victim's family to file a civil action for compensatory damages and punitive damages, as well as attorney fees.
Lexington ranked 10th worst large city for football fans: WalletHub
Kentucky receives failing grades in tobacco control report
Kentucky ranks as 2025's worst state to retire in: WalletHub
'We have a responsibility to the people of Kentucky to ensure that our government enforces federal law,' Bauman added. 'When local governments or state agencies establish sanctuary policies to undermine law enforcement, it signals to our citizens that our government does not take public safety seriously, and it suggests to criminals that they can act without consequence. We must ensure that federal agents are supported when operating in our communities. Collaboration and communication between local, state, and federal agencies will make the repatriation process safer for everyone involved, including our law enforcement officers and community members.'
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The Trade That Binds the Indian and American Economies
The Trade That Binds the Indian and American Economies

New York Times

timea minute ago

  • New York Times

The Trade That Binds the Indian and American Economies

The economic relationship between the United States and India has been driven perilously close to a rupture in the past month. President Trump is ready to impose 50 percent tariffs on Indian goods, starting next week. Those tariffs in turn threaten to wipe out businesses that depend on the export of Indian electronics, gems, seafood, carpets and more. Lost in the tumult is the value that both the United States and India derive from the services part of their total trade, which topped $200 billion last year. Mr. Trump has focused on the $46 billion deficit in goods that the United States ran with Indian companies in 2024. But over the same period, Indian and American companies bought and sold, in virtually equal amounts, $84 billion worth of services. The two countries have run a nearly equal balance in the exchange of services for several years. A big reason is that two-thirds of Fortune 500 firms, from Meta and Microsoft to Walmart and Lowe's, now rely on offshore operations across India. In India's biggest cities, multinational companies with American headquarters are building permanent corporate offices to do work across the world. Their annual payroll is far greater than the U.S. trade deficit Mr. Trump is concerned about. That is money that helps drive India's economy and benefits companies with deep roots in the United States. In the southern cities of Bengaluru and Hyderabad, Goldman Sachs has more employees, who are managing operations around the world, than it has in Mumbai, India's financial capital. And on Monday, it announced an expansion in Mumbai, with a new office 50 percent larger than its existing location. Those bankers work the local stock markets, now the world's fourth most valuable. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

Green Card Applicants Face New Vetting Procedures: What to Know
Green Card Applicants Face New Vetting Procedures: What to Know

Newsweek

timea minute ago

  • Newsweek

Green Card Applicants Face New Vetting Procedures: What to Know

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. On Tuesday the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) issued a major update on assessment of immigrant benefit applications, including those for Green Cards, which will now encompass "anti-Americanism" expressed on social media. Newsweek contacted the USCIS, part of the Department of Homeland Security, for comment on Thursday via email outside of regular office hours. Why It Matters Since coming to power, the Trump administration has tightened restrictions on travel to the United States, including requiring prospective international students to provide details about their social media accounts which will be checked for "any indication of hostility" toward American "citizens, culture, government, institutions or founding principles." As of April 14, data from Inside Higher Ed showed more than1,000 international students had their visas revoked due to alleged involvement in political activism, including relating to the ongoing war in Gaza. The Trump administration accused some of these students of holding antisemitic or "pro-terrorist" views, which they have widely denied. What To Know The USCIS updated its Policy Manual on Tuesday, with immediate effect, instructing its employees to take account of any "anti-American activity" when deciding whether to approve immigration applications including for permanent resident cards, commonly known as green cards. According to a press release any "anti-American activity will be an overwhelmingly negative factor in any discretionary analysis" of applications. It is unclear exactly what would constitute "anti-American activity," though CBS News reports it will be based around an existing immigration law blocking citizenship from advocates of communism, totalitarianism or the overthrow of the American government. The updated USCIS Policy Manual says its officers should factor in "whether the alien has endorsed, promoted, supported, or otherwise espoused anti-American views or the views of a terrorist organization or group" when making decisions on benefits such as green cards. This process has been expanded to include vetting of social media accounts. A U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) sign is displayed at the Border Field State Park with the US-Mexico border wall in the background on August 17, 2025 in Imperial Beach, California. A U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) sign is displayed at the Border Field State Park with the US-Mexico border wall in the background on August 17, 2025 in Imperial Beach, California. Kevin Carter/GETTY The policy change impacts those immigration benefits classed as discretionary, which includes work permits and student visas as well as green cards. When considering discretionary immigration benefits the USCIS already had compliance with immigration law as a factor, and this will continue. Earlier this month the USCIS said it would expand vetting for migrants seeking American citizenship to focus on assuring they have a "good moral character." Previously this had largely been dependent on the absence of criminal offenses or immigration law violations, but this will now include the applicants "adherence to societal norms" and "positive contributions" to wider society. What People Are Saying USCIS spokesman Matthew Tragesser said: "America's benefits should not be given to those who despise the country and promote anti-American ideologies. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services is committed to implementing policies and procedures that root out anti-Americanism and supporting the enforcement of rigorous screening and vetting measures to the fullest extent possible. "Immigration benefits—including to live and work in the United States—remain a privilege, not a right." What Happens Next? The changes outlined by the USCIS went into effect immediately and apply to "requests pending or filed on or after the publication date."

Ukraine's leader says huge Russian attack shows Putin isn't "really going to engage" in peace effort
Ukraine's leader says huge Russian attack shows Putin isn't "really going to engage" in peace effort

CBS News

timea minute ago

  • CBS News

Ukraine's leader says huge Russian attack shows Putin isn't "really going to engage" in peace effort

Russia targeted Ukraine overnight with 574 drones and 40 missiles, the Ukrainian Air Force said. Most of the weapons were intercepted by Ukraine's air defenses, but the massive assault was far from unusual, and officials said at least one person was killed and 15 injured. Ukrainian officials said the Russian attack hit energy infrastructure, private homes, an American electronics factory — where President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said the 15 injuries were sustained, and a kindergarten. "Last night, the Russian army set one of its insane anti-records. They struck civilian infrastructure, residential buildings, and our people," Zelenskyy said in a message posted on social media. He called the electronics plant an "American investment" and an "ordinary civilian enterprise" producing "everyday items as coffee machines." "This is also a target for the Russians. Very telling. The fire is still being extinguished at the enterprise. As of now, 15 people are known to have been affected by this strike. All of them have been provided with the necessary assistance," he said. Alluding to President Trump's efforts to broker a peace deal to end the war, including the bilateral summit between Mr. Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin just a week earlier, Zelenskyy condemned Moscow for launching the new strike "as if nothing had changed at all. As if there were no efforts by the world to stop this war." "A response is needed," he added. "So far, there has been no signal from Moscow that they are really going to engage in meaningful negotiations and end this war. Pressure is needed. Strong sanctions, strong tariffs." There has been a lot of talk — outside of Ukraine — about a peace deal amid Mr. Trump's ramped-up diplomacy. But inside Ukraine, people continue to live and die in a war zone more than three years after Russia launched its full-scale invasion. Many in the country, like their president, simply don't believe that Putin really wants to end the war. They think he's just playing along with the ceasefire narrative to avoid angering Mr. Trump. And in the meantime, Putin's army continues to expand its massive seizure of territory in eastern Ukraine. The Russian defense ministry claimed Thursday that forces had captured yet another village in Ukraine's eastern Donetsk region. Major Taras Berezovets of the Ukrainian forces told CBS News that even if Putin were to agree to a ceasefire, the Russian leader simply should not be trusted. "Absolutely not," Berezovets told CBS News. "He's a cheater, he's a criminal… and he would never accept the fact that independent Ukraine still exists." That is why Ukraine wants security guarantees — a promise of protection from the U.S. and its NATO allies in the event Russia should invade again after any eventual ceasefire is implemented. President Trump has been adamant that such a guarantee would not involve U.S. boots on the ground, and Vice President JD Vance said Wednesday that Europe would have to bear most of the costs. But getting all sides, including Russia, to agree to those security guarantees may be next to impossible. After his meeting with Putin, Mr. Trump met with Zelenskyy and European leaders in Washington to hold separate talks. But Moscow has downplayed the prospects of a Putin-Zelenskyy summit any time soon, and officials have said Russia should be included in any looming discussions on security guarantees for Lyall contributed to this report.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store