logo
Revealed: Chilling threats by hostile states to our energy, food supply and way of life - as defence overhaul aims to get Britain 'war ready'

Revealed: Chilling threats by hostile states to our energy, food supply and way of life - as defence overhaul aims to get Britain 'war ready'

Daily Mail​2 days ago

A blueprint to get Britain 'war ready' to fight Vladimir Putin has revealed this country's vulnerabilities in the event of a major conflict.
The Strategic Defence Review (SDR), published today, includes a chilling list of the potential effects on the UK's way of life. But, despite these threats, top brass are expected to save money.
The SDR, which has recommended an overhaul of the UK's Armed Forces, also lays bare Britain's overseas dependencies and threats.
In the event of war, Britain would be subject to attacks on its military bases at home and abroad, long-range drone and cruise missile sorties, cyber-attacks crippling national infrastructure and disruptions to economic interests and international trade routes.
The report reveals 95 per cent of the UK's data is carried by undersea cables that are vulnerable to attack, and Britain relies on imports for 46 per cent of its food.
It says: 'Undersea pipelines and data cables are critical for sustaining daily national life. The maritime domain is increasingly vulnerable. The Royal Navy must be prepared to deter maritime incidents similar to the sabotage of the Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline and the cutting of undersea data cables in UK and international waters'.
In recent years as much as 77 per cent of the UK's gas imports have come from Norway. So, if the Nordic state was compromised, Britain's energy supplies would be cut.
The SDR, written by former Nato secretary-general Lord Robertson, retired general Sir Richard Barrons and Russia expert Fiona Hill, was described today as the most profound change to defence in 150 years.
It sets out technologies which are redefining warfare such as artificial intelligence, robotics, enhanced precision and directed energy weapons, hypersonic missiles, space-based capabilities, quantum mechanics, cyber threats and engineering biology.
And while for centuries the Royal Navy and the Army, and more recently the Royal Air Force have trained and equipped themselves separately, they are to come together as never before.
Though the plan stops short of a full merger, the services will effectively be moulded into an 'Integrated Force'.
The SDR argues this will be more efficient than maintaining a 'siloed' Army, Royal Navy and Royal Air Force.
It says: 'In practice, the single services have largely evolved separately in terms of design, equipment and training.
'The result is a force that joins up only on the battlefield. The effectiveness of the Armed Forces on operations is determined by the capabilities available to each service at the point of deployment, rather than the result of joined up planning and delivery.'
The weakening of the Army, Royal Navy and Royal Air Force as independent entities, which is likely to trigger fierce debate, is reinforced by the language of the report.
The separate services are scarcely mentioned whereas the newly raised Integrated Force is referred to repeatedly.
This afternoon, Shadow Defence Secretary James Cartlidge described the SDR as an 'empty wish list due to funding constraints'.
He told the House of Commons: 'Today, the Prime Minister was unable to give a date when 3 per cent [of GDP] would be reached, because the Treasury hasn't approved the plan.
'For the Treasury to do so, it will have to feature billions of pounds of cuts from existing MoD programmes.
'The SDR has deferred all the big decisions on existing capabilities. The terrible shame of this SDR unravelling is that this was an extraordinary opportunity to overhaul our armed forces, in a world of growing threats.
'For the past year the Treasury has used the SDR to effectively put MOD procurement on hold, absolutely shameful when we need to rearm at pace.
'Our Armed Forces deserve better. This Government has produced a damp squib SDR that is overdue, under-funded and underwhelming.'
Sections of the SDR are devoted to domains, land, sea, air, cyber and space, rather than by service.
As part of its contribution to the land domain, the SDR expects the Army to deliver 'a ten-fold increase in lethality'.
But this will have to be achieved with just a small uplift in the size of the Army – from 73,000 to 76,000 regular soldiers as the settled size of the full-time ranks. The report concedes there is a 'strong case for a small increase in regular numbers when funding allows'.
The SDR suggests fewer paratroopers will be trained to jump. The Parachute Regiment has three full-time battalions, but according to the report, 'parachute capability and capacity should remain focused on specialists and a single battalion group'.
For its part, the Royal Air Force will provide the 'Integrated Force's quickest means of striking targets'.
The report calls on the RAF to become more efficient and use civilian planes when a task 'does not require military capability'.
While as the Mail revealed last week, the RAF will 'invest in autonomous collaborative platforms (ACPs)' to protect legacy aircraft and vehicles.
The Red Arrows display team will have to find new jets as the report recommends replacing the Hawk T1 and T2 planes with a 'cost-effective fast jet trainer'.
Disturbingly, the Royal Navy is expected to move towards being 'cheaper'. The report adds the service should 'explore alternative approaches to delivering a balanced and cost-effective fleet'.
Admirals are expected to use 'commercial vessels' for transportation in non-contested environments and to share logistical challenges with allies.
The UK's £7billion combined cost aircraft carriers are expected to become more versatile, with adaptions to ensure long-range missiles can be fired from their decks and more uncrewed aircraft.
Sea drones will also take up a multitude of roles that are currently undertaken by sailors, such as mine hunting.
The SDR emphasises homeland defence and the Euro-Atlantic over expeditionary warfare or ambitions to shape the global security environment.
This represents a marked change from the advocation of a 'Pacific tilt' in the UK's military posture as recently as 2021.
The SDR has made 62 recommendations which government ministers have pledged to accept in full.
It was designed to prepare this country to engage against an adversary such as Russia in this decade.
It stresses the importance of the UK's contribution to Nato. In future, all aspects of preparation for conflict, such as training and procurement, will be predicated on the needs of the defence alliance.
On technology, the review says advantage on the battlefield will not come from a single technological advance but from the combination of existing capabilities and a range of emerging technologies that include:
Artificial Intelligence, machine learning and data science
The review says these technologies will improve the quality and speed of decision-making and operational effectiveness for Britain's military, its allies and its enemies.
Robotics and autonomy
The battlefield of the present, in Ukraine, is dominated by uncrewed and autonomous capabilities. For example, Ukraine's devastating attack on Russian airfields was delivered by drones. Uncrewed platforms will also integrate with manned aircraft and vehicles to generate mass and lethality.
Enhanced precision weapons
These mean targets can be struck with greater accuracy from ever greater ranges.
Directed energy weapons
Systems such as the UK's Dragon Fire, a world-leading laser ground to air system being developed by boffins at Porton Down, Wiltshire, can save millions of pounds in expenditure on ordnance systems. Their accuracy also means they reduce collateral damage.
Hypersonic missiles
The UK is developing rocket systems which travel at over five times the speed of sound, which may offer greater range and ability to evade defences
Space-based capabilities
The SDR says approaching 20 per cent of GDP is reliant on satellite services, making space a critical national infrastructure sector and the site of growing international competition. Major disruption to these satellites would cost the UK economy an estimated £1billion a day. Damage to the UK's satellites would also cripple missile systems and communications on the battlefield. The SDR calls on the Government to urgently develop the 'resilience of its military space systems'. It suggests the purchase of earth-based sensors and counterspace systems, but without providing details.
Quantum
Advances in quantum computing offer the potential for allies and adversaries to break encryption, making secure communications more challenging. Quantum technologies also have the potential to reduce dependency on satellite-based GPS which is vulnerable to interference and hacking.
Cyber threats
The report warns cyber threats will become harder to mitigate as technology evolves, with government departments, military hardware and communications increasingly vulnerable.
Engineering biology
Advances in wellbeing, bionic enhancement and supplementation could enhance the performance of soldiers in combat. The report says there are also possibilities for new energetic and explosive materials, as well as avenues for enormous harm in the shape of new pathogens and other weapons of mass destruction.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

North Korea's Kim says he'll 'unconditionally support' Russia's war against Ukraine
North Korea's Kim says he'll 'unconditionally support' Russia's war against Ukraine

The Independent

time31 minutes ago

  • The Independent

North Korea's Kim says he'll 'unconditionally support' Russia's war against Ukraine

North Korean leader Kim Jong Un told a visiting top Russian official that his country will 'unconditionally support' Russia's war against Ukraine, the North's state media reported Thursday, the latest sign of expanding cooperation between the two nations. In April, the two countries officially confirmed North Korean troops' deployment to Russia for the first time, saying that soldiers of the two countries were fighting alongside each other to repel a Ukrainian incursion into Russia's Kursk border region. At the time, Russian President Vladimir Putin thanked North Korea's participation in the war and promised not to forget their sacrifices. In a meeting with Russian Security Council Secretary Sergei Shoigu in Pyongyang on Wednesday, Kim affirmed that North Korea will 'unconditionally support the stand of Russia and its foreign policies in all the crucial international political issues including the Ukrainian issue,' the official Korean Central News Agency said. He expressed 'conviction that Russia would, as ever, surely win victory in the sacred cause of justice for defending national sovereignty, territorial integrity and security interests,' KCNA reported. The two discussed how to solidify strategic partnership between North Korea and Russia and reached a consensus on the Ukraine issue and other unspecified international situations, KCNA said. It didn't elaborate. Shoigu last visited North Korea in March for a meeting with Kim. North Korea and Russia haven't said how many North Korean troops are in Russia. But U.S., South Korean and Ukraine intelligence officials earlier said North Korea dispatched 10,000-12,000 troops to Russia last fall in its first participation in a major armed conflict since the 1950-53 Korean War. South Korean authorities recently said North Korea sent around 3,000 additional troops to Russia earlier this year. North Korea has been supplying a vast amount of conventional weapons to Russia as well. South Korean, U.S. and their partners believe Russia has provided economic and military assistance to North Korea in return. They worry Russia might also transfer sophisticated technologies to help North Korea enhance its nuclear weapons program targeting its rivals.

Quarter of UK mental ill health benefit claimants expect to lose out from planned reforms, charity says
Quarter of UK mental ill health benefit claimants expect to lose out from planned reforms, charity says

Reuters

time39 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Quarter of UK mental ill health benefit claimants expect to lose out from planned reforms, charity says

LONDON, June 5 (Reuters) - Around one in four British people with poor mental health who claim welfare benefits expect to lose their entitlement under proposed government reforms, according to research published by a charity on Thursday. Britain's government aims to save 4 billion pounds ($5.4 billion) a year by 2029-30 through tightening the rules for claiming a benefit known as personal independence payment (PIP) designed to cover disability-related costs, whether a claimant is in work or not. The Money and Mental Health Policy Institute said it interviewed 227 people with mental health conditions who receive PIP, which can be worth nearly 6,000 pounds a year. Some 24% of those surveyed said they expected to lose the benefit, while 39% were unsure if they would be affected. About one in five of those surveyed were in work, and nearly two thirds of them said reducing the benefit would make them work less, rather than more, due to difficulty affording transport costs or private mental health support. "Our analysis shows that these changes would actually result in many people with mental health problems who have a job cutting their hours or leaving the workplace altogether," the charity's chief executive, Helen Undy, said. PIP is paid to 3.7 million people in England and Wales, 6% of the population, and new claims have risen by two thirds in recent years. The government hopes that tighter eligibility rules will encourage more claimants to seek work. Under the government plans, claimants would need to have a severe difficulty in at least one area of daily life to qualify for the benefit, rather than a range of less severe problems. Britain's budget watchdog in March estimated that a third of claimants would be affected by the change, of whom around half would lose benefits after being reassessed. The new plans are subject to consultation until the end of the month. Finance minister Rachel Reeves has been under pressure from campaigners to reconsider, following a U-turn over a decision to scrap heating subsidies for most pensioners. ($1 = 0.7372 pounds)

In praise of Michael O'Leary
In praise of Michael O'Leary

Spectator

timean hour ago

  • Spectator

In praise of Michael O'Leary

NatWest has returned to full private-sector ownership 17 years after the £46 billion bailout that took it into state hands – and five years after the name swap which reduced the once globally trumpeted Royal Bank of Scotland to a humble north-of-the-border branch network, while promoting its English subsidiary NatWest to become the parent brand. RBS shareholders who were almost wiped out but hung on to what are now NatWest certificates have seen their shares triple in value since 2023, finally surpassing the bailout price. HM Treasury took a £10.5 billion loss on the whole rescue exercise, which required a decade-long series of placements and buybacks to filter the taxpayers' 84 per cent holding back into the market as the bank's performance gradually recovered. But few would argue it was badly managed or wrong in the first place. Fred Goodwin's RBS, crippled by his hubristic bid for the Dutch group ABN Amro on top of a balance-sheet full of toxic debt, fully deserved to fail. But its customers did not deserve to lose their deposits and livelihoods, and when chancellor Alistair Darling received a call from Goodwin's chairman Sir Tom McKillop on 7 October 2008 telling him RBS would fail the next day, Darling had to set aside any consideration of moral hazard and step in: chaos would have ensued if he hadn't. The workaday NatWest – which never had a coherent strategy for the era of globalised banking that died with that phone call – has survived, despite a continuing tide of branch closures, as a relatively trusted high-street brand. I'm pleased to see chairman Rick Haythornthwaite talking about a 'simpler, safer' bank with a 'UK-focused business model'.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store