Trump vs Ynon Kreiz: Trump blasts Barbie maker Mattel's CEO, threatens 100 pc tariff on his toys; ‘He won't sell…'
President Donald Trump threatened to levy a 100 percent tariff on Mattel, the company that makes Barbies, following the firm CEO Ynon Kreiz's announcement that the firm would continue to manufacture outside of the United States while reducing its reliance on Chinese imports.
'I've heard [Mattel] said: 'Well we're going to go counter, we're going to try going someplace else,'' the US President stated in the Oval Office on Thursday. 'That's OK, let him go, and we'll put a 100 percent tariff on his toys, and he won't sell one toy in the United States, and that's their biggest market.'
Trump's warning against Mattel comes as toys, especially dolls, have become a hot topic about tariffs and the trade policies of his administration.
In order to guarantee adequate supply and reasonable prices come holiday season, a number of industry representatives have urged the government to grant an exemption, warning that their dependency on Chinese imports will cause toy prices to be especially affected by the current 145 percent rate on the nation.
Trump and his administration have downplayed the importance of the issue. The President has stated on multiple occasions that girls would be 'better off' for having fewer dolls, and he is now threatening to place tariffs on one of the most famous doll producers in the world.
Trump made the remarks in reaction to a reporter's inquiry about Mattel's latest decision to increase its prices due to the tariffs. This comes after the US announcement about the UK deal that centered on autos and metals.
Also Read: Did Pope Leo XIV vote for Trump in 2024 US election? Here's what we know about his political views
Earlier this month, Mattel noted the 'changes in global trade policy and U.S. tariffs' and declared that it would be implementing 'pricing action' in its US business.
During Mattel's first-quarter earnings call, CEO Ynon Kreiz mentioned that the tariff-driven price surge was one of three 'mitigating actions' the firm had been compelled to take in wake of the tariffs, along with a decrease in its reliance on goods sourced from China and a wider diversification of its supply chain.
In a Tuesday interview with CNBC, Kreiz was questioned if the tariffs would make it more cost-effective to move some manufacturing to the US. He said, "We don't see that happening.:
'We believe that production in other countries—where we can be efficient and more productive—is the best balance between manufacturing outside of the U.S. and [continuing] to develop product in terms of design and creativity in America,' he stated.
In case the current scenario continues, Kreiz warned against significant possible chaos in the industry, stating that '80 percent of toy production globally happens in China. The Toy Association has stated that many companies are exposed to potential risks.'
'We support the Toy Association's advocacy for zero tariffs on toys to ensure that safe and affordable products remain accessible to everyone,' he added.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NDTV
40 minutes ago
- NDTV
US Envoy Says He Does Not Think Palestinian State Is US Policy Goal: Report
US Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee said he did not think that an independent Palestinian state remains a goal of US foreign policy, according to an interview with Bloomberg News released on Tuesday. "I don't think so," Huckabee said when asked if a Palestinian state remains a goal of US policy, Bloomberg reported, Bloomberg reported. Huckabee, the former governor of Arkansas, is staunch pro-Israel conservative picked by President Donald Trump to be his envoy to Israel. "Unless there are some significant things that happen that change the culture, there's no room for it," Huckabee was quoted as saying. Those probably won't happen "in our lifetime," he told the news agency. Trump, in his first term, was relatively tepid in his approach to a two-state solution, a longtime pillar of US Middle East policy, and he has given little sign of where he stands on the issue in his second term. Huckabee suggested a piece of land could be carved out of a Muslim country rather than asking Israel to make room. "Does it have to be in Judea and Samaria?" Huckabee said, using the biblical name the Israeli government favors for the West Bank, where some 3 million Palestinians live under occupation. The White House and US State Department did not immediately respond to requests for comment on Huckabee's remarks. An evangelical Christian, Huckabee has been a vocal supporter of Israel throughout his political career and a longtime defender of Jewish settlements in the occupied West Bank. Trump has pursued strongly pro-Israel policies as president and his choice of Huckabee as ambassador signaled that they would continue.
Time of India
40 minutes ago
- Time of India
Chinese beauty brands explore foreign M&A to spur growth
HighlightsProya Cosmetics aims to join the ranks of the top ten global beauty brands within the next decade, targeting annual revenue of at least 50 billion yuan ($7 billion) through acquisitions of established European brands. Chinese beauty companies such as S'Young and Ushopal are actively pursuing international acquisitions, having already expanded their portfolios with well-known foreign skincare and fragrance brands. Experts warn that while global acquisitions can diversify revenue streams for Chinese beauty firms, challenges remain in successfully managing and localizing foreign brands after acquisition. Some of China's top beauty brands such as Proya and S'Young are exploring acquisitions of smaller foreign rivals to expand their portfolios and replicate the success of global leaders like L'Oreal or Estee Lauder amid slowing growth at home. While still relatively unknown internationally, these Chinese brands have found significant domestic success, even capturing market share from global players. But a prolonged property crisis and concerns about wage growth and employment security have dampened consumer spending in China - posing new challenges to their continued growth. Proya Cosmetics ' founder, Hou Juncheng, said last month that the company's 10-year plan aims to position the firm among the top ten globally, a goal that would require an annual revenue of at least 50 billion yuan ($7 billion). To do so, the Hangzhou-based Proya plans "to acquire some European brands with history and technology", local media reports cited Hou as telling shareholders at a meeting. Proya, which specialises in science-backed skincare at mass market price points, became the first Chinese beauty player to surpass 10 billion yuan in annual revenue in 2024. In comparison, Japan's Shiseido, currently ranked tenth globally, raked in $6.9 billion and market leader L'Oreal generated over $45 billion in revenue last year. S'Young and Ushopal , two prominent Chinese beauty groups, have already made strides in international acquisitions. S'Young owns French skincare brand Evidens de Beaute and U.S.-brand ReVive, while Ushopal added French brand Payot to a portfolio that includes British skincare label ARgENTUM and French fragrance Juliette has a gun. William Lau, a partner at Ushopal, said the company plans to acquire one to two new brands annually. Analysts say buying foreign brands can help Chinese beauty firms diversify revenue streams and reduce reliance on the domestic market, but they also note that some similar efforts by Chinese fashion groups had missed expectations in the past. The beauty and personal care market is projected to generate a revenue of $677.19 billion globally in 2025, versus $41.78 billion in China, German data provider Statista estimates. Chinese brands are likely to target premium-positioned European skincare, fragrance or haircare brands with valuations under $500 million, said Gregoire Grandchamp, co-founder of Next Beauty China, who has advised Chinese groups on global deals. "In coming years, there will be a big Chinese company that will be the Chinese L'Oreal, Estee Lauder, Shiseido, or Amorepacific," Grandchamp predicted. GLOBAL M&A 'VERY DIFFICULT' Acquisitions have long been a growth strategy for beauty giants. L'Oreal's $2.5 billion purchase of Australian brand Aesop in 2023 added a premium, natural cosmetics brand to its portfolio, while Estee Lauder's $2.8 billion acquisition of Tom Ford in 2022 helped boost its array of high-end perfumes. Chinese beauty brands aim to borrow from this M&A playbook, but there are concerns about their ability to operate brands outside their home turf. In the fashion space, state-owned textile giant Ruyi once made headlines for snapping up foreign brands and touting its ambition to become "China's LVMH" only to see those international deals unwound by creditors in a few short years. But Ushopal's Lau says these challenges are not unique to Chinese groups, citing examples like Shiseido's buyout of Drunk Elephant to L'Oreal's purchase of some Chinese brands that struggled to meet expectations. "Global acquisitions are very difficult" in general and part of the problem is that companies often try to localise brands too quickly after a deal, he said. "One of the reasons you buy a brand is because it's an amazing brand, so if you then redo the entire DNA of the brand, what's the point of buying it?" he added. Mark Tanner, founder and managing director of Shanghai-based marketing and research agency China Skinny, said: "Opening doors to the Chinese market and capital injections, rather than a wholesale management takeover" are more likely to succeed.
Time of India
41 minutes ago
- Time of India
‘I would certainly invoke it': Trump signals readiness to use Insurrection Act as LA immigration protests escalate
US President Donald Trump on Tuesday said he is prepared to invoke the Insurrection Act if protests in Los Angeles escalate into what he defines as an "insurrection." The comment comes amid ongoing demonstrations now entering its fourth day against the Trump administration's immigration crackdown. 'If there's an insurrection, I would certainly invoke it. We'll see,' Trump told reporters in the Oval Office, following his recent deployment of around 700 US Marines to Los Angeles in a bid to quell the protests. The National Guard had already been mobilised over the weekend, despite objections from California's Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom. Trump doubled down on his criticism of Newsom, saying they had spoken just a day earlier. He described scenes of destruction during the protests, alleging that demonstrators used hammers to break curbs and repurpose chunks of concrete and granite as weapons. 'They were taking that concrete, going up in bridges and dropping it into the roof of a car... They were throwing it at our police... at our soldiers... Los Angeles right now would be on fire,' Trump said. 'We're not playing around.' Asked how he would determine if the situation qualified as an insurrection, Trump pointed to 'paid insurrectionists' and 'paid troublemakers' among the crowd. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Buy Brass Idols - Handmade Brass Statues for Home & Gifting Luxeartisanship Buy Now Undo 'You take a look at what's happening,' he said. 'It was terrible.' The Insurrection Act, a rarely used 1807 law, allows the president to deploy military forces within the United States to suppress civil disorder, insurrection, or rebellion. Trump's statement marks one of his most direct public signals of willingness to use the statute since nationwide protests began in response to his policies. The legal and political ramifications of invoking the act remain unclear, but experts note that such a move could ignite a constitutional standoff between federal and state authorities. What is Insurrection Act of 1807 The Insurrection Act of 1807 is a federal statute that empowers the US president to use military force within the United States to suppress civil disorder, insurrection, or armed rebellion. It serves as one of the few legal exceptions to the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878, which generally prohibits the use of federal troops in civilian law enforcement. Under the Insurrection Act, the president can: Deploy active-duty military forces across state lines Federalise National Guard units from individual states Bypass state governors' objections in cases deemed severe enough to threaten national security or civil order When has it been used before? Historically, US presidents have used the Insurrection Act sparingly — most notably during: The 1957 Little Rock crisis to enforce school desegregation The 1992 Los Angeles riots after the Rodney King verdict After Hurricane Katrina (though the act itself was not formally invoked, expanded powers were considered)
