logo
Chanel, Armani, Tiffany's: What's killing ‘big logo' luxury brands?

Chanel, Armani, Tiffany's: What's killing ‘big logo' luxury brands?

Every Saturday for the past eight years, husband-and-wife duo Lamme and Jennie Sathalet have set up their second-hand designer clothing stall at Sydney's Glebe Markets.
Three years ago, they began adding handbags to the mix. 'We started with just one rack,' Lamme said.
Now, third-party authenticated handbags have a prized place in the centre of their busy stall, where they can sell more than 20 vintage Coach or Louis Vuitton bags from $200 to upwards of $1000 on a single weekend.
'It's getting more and more popular,' Lamme said. Some teenage girls come with their parents, who buy them their first designer bag. 'If they have three kids, they buy for three.'
The Sathalets' busy stall is a stark departure from what's happening at the big end of town. Some traditional 'big logo' luxury brands are battling declining profits and popularity among Australian shoppers who are making fewer in-store purchases and favouring more affordable options at resellers.
Fashion houses Chanel, Tiffany & Co and Giorgio Armani recorded declines among their Australian sales and profits in 2024, while Hermes and Prada have found ways to sharpen their competitive edge, according to recent financial reports filed to the corporate regulator.
Australia is no exception to global trends affecting a fall in the luxury market as it experiences its toughest slowdown since the global financial crisis, says the director of RetailOasis consultancy Trent Rigby.
Growth in the global luxury market in the years ahead is expected to slow to 1-3 per cent, from 5 per cent between 2019 and 2023, when luxury giants' profits tripled, a 2025 McKinsey report has found.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Union takes action against Commonwealth Bank for alleged ‘sham' redundancies
Union takes action against Commonwealth Bank for alleged ‘sham' redundancies

7NEWS

timean hour ago

  • 7NEWS

Union takes action against Commonwealth Bank for alleged ‘sham' redundancies

Action has been launched against the country's biggest bank over claims it carried out 'sham' redundancies in Australia to take advantage of cheap overseas labour. The Commonwealth Bank announced in June it was making 304 roles across its technology and retail departments redundant. But the Finance Sector Union argues the CBA breached the Enterprise Agreement when it was 'caught' advertising the same jobs at its Indian subsidiary in Bangalore, India. The union said 110 of the roles advertised to be based at CBA India had the same job title as those involved in the redundancies. 'By hiring for the same job, at their own Indian subsidiary, they're showing themselves to have breached the Enterprise Agreement and essentially lied to their workers,' FSU national secretary Julia Angrisano said. 'This is the very definition of bad faith.' According to Clause 36 of the EBA, redundancies can occur if work is no longer required, needs to be done at a different location which is not within a reasonable commuting distance, or if the role is restructured so that some or all of the duties of the position are split up between one or more other positions. 'Sham redundancy action' The union said its members had been left 'outraged' and is taking its claims to the Fair Work Commission. 'We do not believe that the redundancies outlined in these change processes are in fact genuine redundancies and that in doing so, CBA has breached the terms of the Agreement,' Angrisano said. 'These jobs are not required to be done in India, they're just moving the work there to take advantage of cheaper labour and further line their own pockets.' Angrisano said Australian taxpayers are 'paying for the sham redundancy action'. 'Bona fide redundancies are taxed concessionally in the hands of the workers. It is especially disgusting that the nation's richest company is also reducing the tax take as it makes the final payment to hundreds of Australians that we know are being sacked solely to have their work performed offshore,' Angrisano said The Commonwealth Bank said the FSU 'did not raise any concerns' about like-for-like job changes during formal consultation, and said there 'is no basis to their allegations'. 'Like many organisations, we regularly review how we are organised to deliver the best experiences and outcomes for our customers,' a bank spokesperson said. 'We have been transparent in communicating workforce shifts with our technology team over the last three years. 'This includes being explicit about roles which are declining and offering reskilling and upskilling opportunities to people in those roles.' The union savaged the CBA in March for slashing more than 150 jobs shortly after revealing a $2.6 billion quarterly profit.

Rudd sure US issues with sub contract will be resolved
Rudd sure US issues with sub contract will be resolved

Perth Now

time2 hours ago

  • Perth Now

Rudd sure US issues with sub contract will be resolved

Australia's ambassador to Washington, former prime minister Kevin Rudd, says his country is working with the Pentagon on the US Defense Department's review of the AUKUS submarine project and is confident that all issues raised will be resolved. Kevin Rudd made the comment at the Aspen Security Forum and stressed his close relationship with Elbridge Colby, the US undersecretary of defence for policy, who initiated the review, and the longstanding US-Australia defence alliance. "We're working with Bridge and the team on the AUKUS review ... and we are confident that we'll work our way through each and every one of the issues which he has raised in the context of this internal Defense Department review," Rudd said, referring to Colby. "Bridge has been around my place a lot of times, and so we have known each other for a long period of time, and that's why I'm confident, quite apart from the mature relationship within our two defence establishments ... that we'll work our way through this stuff." Rudd said the US-Australia alliance had endured through 15 presidents and 15 prime ministers from different parties. In 2023, the United States, Australia, and Britain unveiled details of the AUKUS plan to provide Australia with nuclear-powered attack submarines from the early 2030s, part of efforts to counter China's ambitions in the Indo-Pacific. It is Australia's biggest ever defence project. The Pentagon said in June it was reviewing AUKUS to ensure it was "aligned with the President's America First agenda," amid concerns about the ability of the US to meet its own submarine needs and whether Australia's vessels would be used in support of US policy in the future. On Sunday, Australia's Defence Industry Minister Pat Conroy responded to a report that the Pentagon has pressed Australia to clarify what role it would play if the US and China went to war over Taiwan by saying Australia would not commit troops in advance to any conflict. Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has also rebuffed US requests to commit to lifting defence spending from two per cent to 3.5 per cent of gross domestic product, saying instead Australia would spend what was needed for its defence.

‘You'd be silly to sell': The Melbourne suburbs no one wants to leave
‘You'd be silly to sell': The Melbourne suburbs no one wants to leave

The Age

time3 hours ago

  • The Age

‘You'd be silly to sell': The Melbourne suburbs no one wants to leave

Melbourne buyers looking for a suburb where they can find a forever home, surrounded by others who want the same, have options in both prestige and affordable neighbourhoods. Cotality (formerly CoreLogic) figures show properties change hands the least in the blue-chip Mornington Peninsula suburb of Portsea, statistically part of greater Melbourne, where the median dwelling value is $2.64 million. Those who sold during the 12 months to April had held on to their properties for a median period of 21.9 years. It was followed by Vermont South in the leafy outer-east, which had a median hold period of 20.6 years and Tootgarook at 18.9 years. Their median values were $1,488,000 and $897,000, respectively. Cotality head of Australian research Eliza Owen said the top suburbs all recorded median hold periods – the time between sales of a property – longer than the city's median of 9.6 years. 'What we usually see with suburbs associated with long hold periods is they tend to be associated with areas that are long-held family suburbs,' she said. 'Suburbs that have a relatively low portion of renters … they're often suburbs where young couples with kids were buying 10 to 20 years ago.' A cluster of suburbs in the Brimbank council area, west of Melbourne, fit into this category and were relatively affordable, Owen said, despite being among the longest-held neighbourhoods across the city. Keilor Downs, Delahey and Taylors Lakes were sixth, seventh and eighth on the list and had median hold periods between 16.2 years and 16.7 years. Their median values ranged from about $700,000 to almost $1 million. Lifelong residents there aren't surprised. Dimitra Mouyis said she rarely had to leave the area when living there.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store