Google may have to make changes to UK search engine, says watchdog
The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) has said it is looking at whether it needs to loosen Google's control of its search engine and allow publishers more influence over how their content is used.
The tech giant is the first company being targeted by the regulator under a new set of digital market laws.
Google accounts for more than 90% of searches in the UK, while it is also used by more than 200,000 UK businesses to reach customers.
Google said it would work 'constructively' with the CMA but highlighted that its plans presented 'challenges' to the business.
The CMA, which launched its investigation into Google in January, said it is minded to give the tech firm 'strategic market status', which would require it to abide by a number of rules over its conduct.
It could be forced to introduce new 'fair ranking' measures for its search results as well as giving further support to publishers on its platform, as a result.
A final decision is set to be made by October following a consultation process.
Oliver Bethell, senior director of competition at Google, said: 'The CMA has today reiterated that 'strategic market status' does not imply that anti-competitive behaviour has taken place — yet this announcement presents clear challenges to critical areas of our business in the UK.
'We're concerned that the scope of the CMA's considerations remains broad and unfocused, with a range of interventions being considered before any evidence has been provided.
'The UK has historically benefited from early access to our latest innovations, but punitive regulations could change that.
'Proportionate, evidence-based regulation will be essential to preventing the CMA's roadmap from becoming a roadblock to growth in the UK.'
Sarah Cardell, chief executive of the CMA, said: 'Google search has delivered tremendous benefits – but our investigation so far suggests there are ways to make these markets more open, competitive and innovative.
'Today marks an important milestone in our implementation of the new Digital Markets Competition Regime in the UK.
'Alongside our proposed designation of Google's search activities, we have set out a roadmap of possible future action to improve outcomes for people and businesses in the UK.
'These targeted and proportionate actions would give UK businesses and consumers more choice and control over how they interact with Google's search services – as well as unlocking greater opportunities for innovation across the UK tech sector and broader economy.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time Out Dubai
25 minutes ago
- Time Out Dubai
Wizz Air suspends several routes from the UAE – here's why
If you're planning a summer escape from low-cost airline Wizz Air, there are some major updates you need to know before you book. The budget carrier is making big changes to its network – and several routes out of the UAE capital are being grounded. Wizz Air Abu Dhabi has officially halted ticket sales to Belgrade and Sarajevo, with final flights departing on July 19 and August 31, respectively. These are just two of a number of routes seeing cuts or suspensions as part of a wider operational shake-up. While some of these cuts are temporary, others may be permanent – and Wizz Air hasn't ruled out additional changes. The Airbus A321neo fleet, which services many of the routes, is facing maintenance challenges, particularly in hot and dusty regions like the Middle East. Other affected routes include: Varna – last flight July 14 Tirana – last flight July 20 Kutaisi – last flight July 29 Krakow – paused from July 29 to September 19 Budapest – paused until September 1 Vienna – paused until September 21 Katowice – paused until October 26 Astana & Samarkand – paused until November 1 Sofia and Cluj – already discontinued Credit: Zayed International Airport The airline, which has been the sole operator between Abu Dhabi and both Belgrade and Sarajevo, says the shake-up is partly due to ongoing engine inspection issues. Wizz Air has launched a 24-hour hotline for impacted travellers (+361 677 7530), especially those who booked through third-party sites, which may not have shared passenger contact info with the airline. If your outbound flight is still running but your return leg is cancelled, you may still qualify for a full refund. Launched in 2021, the Abu Dhabi to Belgrade and Sarajevo services were among Wizz Air's key Europe-facing routes, with the Belgrade leg alone flying over 82,000 passengers last year. So if you've got travel plans with Wizz Air this summer, double-check your itinerary – and maybe keep a Plan B on standby. A Wizz Air Abu Dhabi spokesman said: 'In the last few days, we have taken several steps to reach and inform the passengers concerned, but more than two-thirds of them did not book their tickets directly with the airline (but through an online travel agency). 'Therefore, the contact details of these passengers are not available to Wizz Air, as these online ticketing portals do not forward the contact details of the passengers to the airlines. 'If your outbound flight is operating as scheduled, but your return flight (inbound) is cancelled, you may request a full refund for your outbound flight by contacting our regular call centre.' There's an official Wizz Air 24-hour hotline for those affected by UAE flight cancellations at +3616777530 (international roaming charges apply for the Hungary-based number). Travelling soon? Travel experts reveal cheapest day and month to book flights How to save big ahead of your next holiday New Emirates flights from Dubai for 2025 Will you be jetting off soon? 11 new flydubai flights you can book in 2025 Your holiday plans sorted
Telegraph
32 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Britain is killing itself with compassion
To lightly paraphrase Upton Sinclair, it is very difficult to get a man to understand something when his claim to your salary depends on his not understanding it. The Government's attempt to reform welfare was billed by Liz Kendall, the Work and Pensions Secretary, as 'a fairer, more compassionate system'. This is a curious description given that, from where I'm standing, these two objectives seem to work in direct opposition. Between generations, Britain's current direction is monstrously unfair. Unless we change course, by 2070 we will have burdened our children and theirs with debt stocks equal to 270pc of GDP. Small wonder that the Office for Budget Responsibility is telling the public that state finances are on an 'unsustainable' pathway, or that its chair is saying Britain 'cannot afford the array of promises that it has made to the public'. We are headed for a crunch that will see some go without to pay for benefits they themselves will not enjoy. But it is also unfair within generations. Every day, Britain's workers drag themselves out of bed to fund Motability BMWs, central London social housing, and tax-free cash transfers that the state, in its compassion, raids their wallets to provide. And every day, sour-faced Labour backbenchers – sometimes ministers – take to the airwaves to insist that they aren't really doing enough, and that taxes will need to rise to pay for more cash transfers. The fundamental incentives at play aren't hard to understand. Adjusted for inflation, a benefits system that cost around £244bn a year in 2019-20 now costs around £303bn six years on, an enviable growth of 24pc or so. The economy, meanwhile, grew about 4pc between 2019 and 2024. Unless this year is going to be an absolute blockbuster, it's hard to see how this is an affordable trend. Politically, meanwhile, it's hard to see how it's going to be unwound. Democracies seem to be prone to 'ratchet' effects; once spending rises, it creates constituencies for that spending who fiercely resist any attempts to lower it. We can treat this statement literally as well. Look across the benefits with the largest caseloads in Britain – the state pension, universal credit, various disability and sickness benefits, and housing benefit – and the scale is staggering. There are, by my count, somewhere around 19.5 million people over the age of 18 claiming various forms of welfare in England and Wales. Break this down by constituency, slicing the data to avoid counting people claiming more than one benefit twice, and those adults in receipt of these benefits would be enough to exceed 50pc of all registered voters in about 155 Westminster seats. They exceed 40pc in 447. It's not particularly surprising, in other words, that two half-hearted attempts to tinker with old-age and disability benefits ended in disastrous about-turns: even a Government with a majority as large as Sir Keir Starmer's would find it tricky to engage in the wholesale paring back of the welfare state that is desperately needed. And that's reckoning without the point that many Labour MPs simply don't want to. They see the economy as an arbitrary block of money that has somehow been dealt to those who are undeserving – bankers, lawyers, coders and so on – rather than to the pillars of society: undocumented migrants, the unemployed, unemployable and underworked, unionised workers and many of those in the public sector. It is their task to compassionately correct this error. This would be hard enough to swallow on its own terms – the state returning to its earliest incarnation as armed bandit, here utilised by a concentrated voting bloc to hand itself ever greater shares of income – but becomes intolerable when put into a wider context. While Sir Keir is refusing to rule out a wealth tax – probably the best way to devastate an economy short of bombing it – the state is beginning to fail in some of its most basic functions. The Government is musing on abolishing the right to a jury trial for a swathe of offences in order to save money, even as it releases prisoners early to avoid prisons overflowing. Other criminals will simply be offered 'out-of-court resolutions'. The Channel crisis is making a mockery of the Government's responsibility to protect the borders, and putting the interests of the British people ahead of the desire of MPs to play the role of saviour to the world. The Home Office has no idea how many people on expired work visas actually leave the country when their time is up. A similar observation could be made about a range of Government behaviours: policy made, as David Goodhart quotes former Cabinet secretary Gus O'Donnell as saying, to 'maximise global welfare not national welfare', from net zero commitments through to Starmer's Chagos surrender. It would be one thing if this compassion was funded by a state in robust fiscal health. But this year we are expected to borrow £137bn, almost 5pc of GDP. Total government investment in infrastructure over 2024, meanwhile, ran to about £28.9bn, and the current budget deficit over the last fiscal year was roughly £75bn. We are not borrowing money to build world-class bridges and railways, or rebuild our military. We are eating the seedcorn, and leaving tomorrow to look after itself. As GK Chesterton once observed: 'The modern world is not evil; in some ways the modern world is far too good.' We pursue isolated virtues without reference to others, putting compassion ahead of prudence. And the result of all this kindness, in the end, is to put the state on the path to penury, to drive away the productive workers who fund it, to destroy the systems that make it possible. Cutting benefits is cruel. Denying access to migrants who want a better life is cruel. But it is also cruel to destroy functioning countries that could generate huge increases in long-term global welfare if allowed to function properly today. Sometimes, you have to be cruel to be kind.
The Sun
32 minutes ago
- The Sun
Royal Mail gets go ahead for HUGE change to deliveries in massive shake-up
THE Royal Mail has been given the green light to make a huge change to its deliveries in a blow to customers. The postal service has been told it can deliver second-class letters every other weekday and not on Saturdays to help cut costs, the industry regulator has said. 1 Ofcom said that a reform to the Universal Service Obligation (USO) was needed as people are sending fewer letters each year. As a result stamp prices keep rising and the cost of delivering letters goes up. Under the current one-price-goes-everywhere USO, it means Royal Mail has to deliver post six days a week, from Monday to Saturday. It also must deliver parcels on five days - from Monday to Friday. The decision comes as part of proposals laid out by industry regulator Ofcom. Ofcom said Royal Mail should continue to deliver first-class letters six days a week but second class will be limited to alternate weekdays. Natalie Black, Ofcom's group director for networks and communications, said the changes are "in the best interest of consumers and businesses". She added: 'Urgent reform of the postal service is necessary to give it the best chance of survival. 'But changing Royal Mail's obligations alone won't guarantee a better service – the company now has to play its part and implement this effectively." She said that the regulator will make sure Royal Mail is clear with its customers about what is happening and pass the benefits of the changes on to them. She also added: 'As part of this process, we've been listening to concerns about increases in stamp prices. So we've launched a review of affordability and plan to publicly consult on this next year.' .
