NY scraps race-based STEM program after Asians claim discrimination
The state-funded Science and Technology Entry Program (STEP) admits 11,000 seventh- to 12th-grade students a year for classes at 56 participating colleges and medical schools statewide, with a related College Science and Technology Entry Program (CSTEP).
The pre-college enrichment program aims to 'increase the number of historically underrepresented and economically disadvantaged students prepared to enter college and improve their participation rate' in math, science, tech and health fields, according to its website.
Advertisement
3 Yiatin Chu, a co-founder of the Asian Wave alliance, praised the decision by New York state education officials to scrap a race-based admissions policy for advanced STEM classes.
James Messerschmidt
But while black, Hispanic and Native American students could apply regardless of family wealth, Asian and white schoolkids needed to meet certain income criteria — indicating they are economically challenged — or be excluded.
A federal lawsuit filed in January accused New York of engaging in blatant discrimination against Asian and white students under the program.
Advertisement
'Progress!' crowed Yiatin Chu — a co-founder of the Asian Wave alliance who said her daughter was one of the students discriminated against because of the race-based policy — to The Post.
Chu said her then-seventh-grade daughter was 'able and ready' to apply for admission to the summer 2024 STEP program at New York University but couldn't 'because her race makes her ineligible.
'It was unfair and racist for my daughter to be subjected to a low-income requirement just because she is Asian when her black and Hispanic classmates weren't,' Chu said Sunday. 'I'm glad that my lawsuit instigated revisiting these decades long, race-based standards.'
Another Asian parent said her daughter was enrolled in 11th grade abd had an overall grade-point average above 80 in math, science, and English but was 'unable to complete an application for admission' to CUNY's Baruch College 'because she was required to satisfy a family income threshold.
Advertisement
3 Chu said her daughter wasn't able to apply for the summer 2024 STEP program because of her race.
J.C.Rice
'I instead paid thousands of dollars to enroll her in an alternative summer science program,' said the parent, who asked not to be identified.
A top state education official, noting the still-pending litigation over the program, has already urged directors and administrators of STEP and CSTEP to stop using race or 'historically underrepresented minority status' to determine admissions and instead use only family income as admission criteria.
'As many of you are aware, the New York State Education Department (NYSED) is currently
engaged in active litigation concerning the eligibility criteria for participation in the Science and
Technology Entry Program (STEP),' wrote Anael Alston, the education department's assistant commissioner of the Office of Access, said in a July 8 memo to directors and administrators.
Advertisement
'The litigation challenges certain aspects of our longstanding eligibility guidelines related to student race and ethnicity,' Alston said.
'While NYSED remains committed to defending the STEP and CSTEP programs and their historic mission to increase access and opportunity for historically underrepresented students in the scientific, technical, and health-related professions, we recognize the need to provide clarity and support to the field during this period of legal uncertainty.'
The new guidance from Alston said 'effective immediately and until further notice, STEP and CSTEP grantees may determine student eligibility without regard to historically underrepresented minority status, race, or ethnicity.'
'Instead, grantees are encouraged to base eligibility decisions solely on indicators of economic disadvantage, in alignment with applicable state and federal guidelines,' Alston wrote.
'Recruitment, selection, and enrollment of new students may proceed using economic-based
eligibility criteria only. Collection or use of race, ethnicity, or minority status data is not required for eligibility.'
But Alston also appeared to defend the mandatory race-based admission policy she just eliminated.
'NYSED will continue to vigorously defend the mission and intent of STEP and CSTEP in court,' the official said.
Advertisement
The lawyers for the opposing Asian parents said state officials capitulated because they know the race-based policy is illegal. But the parents' reps complained that state officials still left wiggle room to continue discriminating against students by using words such as 'may' and 'encouraged.'
3 A federal lawsuit filed in January accused New York of engaging in blatant discrimination against Asian and white students under the program.
Andrew Schwartz / SplashNews.com
'The state of New York has raised the white flag of surrender in our lawsuit, but not high enough,' said
William Jacobson, founder of EqualProtect.org.
Advertisement
'Word games are not acceptable,' Jacobson said. 'The state must do away with the racially discriminatory eligibility requirements completely and permanently, or we will ask the court to order it.'
Erin Wilcox, a senior lawyer at Pacific Legal Foundation, said, 'The state should be requiring all schools to stop this illegal discrimination immediately, not giving them the option to continue.'
In 1985, New York lawmakers passed legislation aimed at boosting interest in STEM and healthcare among low-income and underrepresented minority students.
But racial-preference programs — aimed at correcting historic injustices or underrepresentation of blacks and other minorities — have come under the microscope after the US Supreme Court last year struck down college affirmative action programs aimed at boosting minority representation as discriminatory.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNBC
an hour ago
- CNBC
Trump says U.S. has 'deal' with Indonesia, but shares no details
President Donald Trump on Tuesday said he has reached a deal with Indonesia, a week after he threatened to slap a 32% tariff on the southeast Asian country's U.S. exports. Trump in a Truth Social post called it "great deal, for everybody," and said it followed direct dealings with Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto. He provided no other information about the purported deal, but said details would follow. Indonesia is one of the United States' top 25 trade partners, with the two countries trading more than $38 billion in goods in 2024, according to the Commerce Department. The U.S. trade deficit with Indonesia totaled $17.9 billion last year. Trump's post on Indonesia closely resembles his July 2 announcement that the U.S. reached a trade deal with Vietnam. Trump's initial message about Vietnam was also short on details, though he declared in a follow-up post that the terms included a 20% tariff on Vietnamese imports. Vietnamese officials were reportedly surprised about Trump's description of their preliminary deal with the U.S.. As of July 10, the Vietnamese government still has not formally accepted part of the deal Trump touted, Politico reported. The White House did not immediately respond to CNBC's request for additional information about the purported deal with Indonesia.
New York Post
2 hours ago
- New York Post
Eric Adams again denies $3.4 million in matching funds as probe digs into alleged misconduct
Mayor Eric Adams was denied millions in public matching funds in the latest obstacle for his uphill re-election bid as an independent – after his team celebrated a legal decision they thought would help fill his campaign coffers. The Campaign Finance Board refused to provide $3.4 million during Tuesday's meeting, saying the campaign still had yet to provide documents and information to the oversight agency as it continues a probe into alleged misconduct during his first campaign four years ago. 'The board investigation is ongoing,' said board chair Frederick Schaffer, adding the cache of documents remaining 'outstanding.' Eric Adams speaks at an event on July 14, 2025. Gregory P. Mango 'Mayor Adams' campaign has failed to qualify for matching funds,' he continued. The denial by the board comes just days after a federal judge ruled that the indictment — which spells out a slew of illegal fundraising allegations but has been formally killed — could not be used as a reason to deny the funds. Adams' camp was denied the funds in December last year, with the five-member panel citing delinquent requests for documents from the campaign and a 'reason to believe' that wrongdoing had occurred during Adams' run for City Hall in 2021. Schaffer addressed the late Friday ruling from the judge, noting the order determined that the board could deny funding based on the lack of cooperation with the board in its investigation and Adams' failure to fill out a conflict of interest form. Eric Adams sued Campaign Finance Board for denying him millions in matching funds Campaign Finance Board Insiders in Hizzoner's campaign celebrated the ruling, telling The Post Friday they were up to date with their paperwork and expected the funds to be unlocked this week. The ruling could prove — at least eventually — to be a boost for the mayor, who is running as an independent in the general election, where he will try to topple the current frontrunner and Democratic nominee Zohran Mamdani. Adams will face an uphill battle, though, with three others — ex-Gov. Andrew Cuomo, GOP nominee Curtis Sliwa and prominent attorney Zohran Mamdani — looking to beat the upstart socialist. All four are expected to cut into each other's votes and have jockeyed to get one another to drop from the ballot — but none are believed to answer the call to coalesce behind a single candidate to stave off a Mamdani majority
The Hill
2 hours ago
- The Hill
Adios, isolationism: Trump embraces role as global cop
During his first term, President Trump memorably declared that 'we more and more are not wanting to be the policemen of the world. We're spending tremendous amounts of money for decades policing the world, and that shouldn't be the priority.' His MAGA base may justifiably have thought that America, loaded shotgun in hand, was going to hunker down behind its border wall and tariff barriers during a second Trump term. It hasn't worked out that way so far. Instead, Trump is doing what U.S. presidents have done since the end of World War II — policing the world. In just six months, American diplomats helped to negotiate a peace agreement in the decades-long conflict between the Democratic Republic of the Congo and the Republic of Rwanda, claimed credit for 'preventing and ending' a war between India and Pakistan and are trying to broker a ceasefire between Israel and Hamas in Gaza. Trump ordered a devastating attack on Iran's nuclear facilities, which even internationalist presidents like Obama and Biden had refrained from doing, and a military operation against the Houthis in Yemen to protect shipping in the Red Sea. In 2022, then-Senate candidate JD Vance (R-Ohio) staked the isolationist flag by saying, 'I don't really care what happens to Ukraine one way or the other.' Trump just announced that 'we're sending weapons to Ukraine' in connection to funding from NATO, an organization Trump is suddenly warming to. 'It's not a rip-off,' the president added. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, suddenly sounding like a Cold War internationalist, reassured America's Asian allies at a security forum in Singapore that, 'No one should doubt America's commitment to our Indo-Pacific allies and partners.' And Trump just took his global police role to another level by attempting to modify how a major economic power conducts not its foreign policy, but its internal affairs. He threatened Brazil with 50 percent tariffs unless it dropped criminal charges against far-right former President Jair Bolsonaro over his alleged attempt to overturn the 2022 election. This isn't to say that Trump is an effective global policeman or is even acting in the national interest. Iran may still possess the ability to build a nuclear weapon despite Trump's boast of having caused 'complete and total obliteration.' Wars still rage in Gaza and Ukraine, and the Houthis are still sinking ships in the Red Sea. The Brazil tariffs also defy economic logic — the U.S. runs a trade surplus with Brazil — and appear driven by Trump's inexhaustible sense of grievance over his own criminal indictments. Meanwhile, your Starbucks order may soon have a surcharge because the chain imports 20 percent of its coffee beans from Brazil. Nor is there any assurance that this outburst of internationalism is here to stay, because Trump's policies often have the shelf life of yogurt. Flattery from that foreign leader or a lack of gratitude from this one, and presto — a new policy. If Trump resumes pressure to annex Greenland and the Panama Canal, he'll look more like a 19th-century imperialist than a 21st-century internationalist. Can an American president be an effective global leader, whose power depends heavily on building and maintaining alliances, while conducting a tariff war against American allies? Twice in the previous century America looked inward as successive world wars broke out. Twice it was forced to send millions of U.S. soldiers overseas to fight anyway. Until Trump came along, every president since 1945, Democrat and Republican, recognized that, to quote President John Quincy Adams, while the U.S. should not 'go abroad in search of monsters to destroy,' there will always be 'monsters' on the prowl for us. Whether Trump understands that is the question of the day.
