logo
Professional Advice to Pete Hegseth: ‘Tell It Early, Tell It All, Tell It Yourself'

Professional Advice to Pete Hegseth: ‘Tell It Early, Tell It All, Tell It Yourself'

Yahoo27-03-2025

Dear Mr. Hegseth,
That advice - about telling the truth early, all, and yourself - has been my core strategy as a lawyer who specializes in crisis management and media communications strategy. It is the subtitle of a book I wrote 20 years ago. You could ask your former Fox News Channel colleague, Sean Hannity, who often introduced me when I was a guest on his show as the "Tell it early, all, yourself" crisis management expert.
I have followed this strategy for the past 30 years to help clients - people, famous and not, companies, private and public, through major media and business crises. I know my approach is counterintuitive. It sometimes requires volunteering bad facts to the media, to get them all out publicly all at once, rather than waiting for them them to dribble out, drip by drip, as they almost always do. You will achieve the ultimate goal of crisis management - get the story over with as quickly as possible and communicate to the public that you accept responsibility for your mistake.
I have used this strategy successfully for many high-profile clients, whose stories I recounted in my book "Crisis Tales: Five Rules for Coping with Crises in Business, Politics, and Life": from Martha Stewart to the Penn State University Board of Trustees, from Republican Sen. Trent Lott to the Democratic Rep. Charlie Rangel. In my experience, getting the truth out created a positive impression about the client, putting the crisis in the past and improving the prospects for reputation repair and rehabilitation.
Secretary Hegseth, had you asked my advice when you first got the sinking feeling that journalist Jeffrey Goldberg was invited into the group chat without you or anyone else knowing, I would have offered you five recommendations:
First, I would have told you to immediately inform President Trump what happened, and tell him as you already have that the national security team had made a big mistake, even to the point of offering your resignation to show that you believe in accountability.
As it turns out, Trump, to his credit, has been gracious to you, attributing your mistake as understandable human error, and he almost certainly would not have accepted your resignation. But making the gesture would have enhanced your credibility before your inevitable appearances before Congress and in the mainstream media.
Second, you should have immediately issued a public statement admitting your mistake of judgment and taking responsibility. I would have urged you not to attack Jeff Goldberg, as you and several other administration officials have done. Most discerning people view that as weak and disingenuous.
Third, I recommend that you stop playing semantic games while trying to spin the idea that information about bombing another country wasnt classified or highly sensitive. How does splitting hairs about "war plans" vs. "attack plans" absolve you? Answer: It doesnt. It is also inconsistent with your core crisis management strategy and sincere message: your acceptance of responsibility and accountability.
Fourth, I would have urged you (talk about counterintuitive!) to call Goldberg and offer him an exclusive interview to explain what happened and own up to the mistakes committed by national security team.
The reason for doing so would not have been to hope for kid-glove treatment by The Atlantic or the rest of the media - and that would not have been the result. Granting Goldberg an exclusive interview would have allowed your message to dominate much of the follow-up media coverage.
Fifth, and finally - the most difficult advice of all (and the one I think youd most quickly reject): You could use this episode to acknowledge the unfair treatment of Hillary Clinton by you and those on your side regarding her use of a Blackberry device to send personal emails and official business emails, all of them stored on a secure server supervised by the U.S. Secret Service. You can now empathize with how she felt when she heard so many calling for her to be "locked up" without so much as a prosecution or trial.
Belief in redemption and forgiveness is one great big common ground among most Americans - left, right, liberal, conservative, pro-Trump or pro-Biden. Its one of our nations most appealing traits.
Its not too late. Its never too late to tell all the truth, tell it early, and tell it yourself. That is not only effective crisis management advice - it is good advice for you to turn the corner on this crisis and move on.
Lanny Davis is the founder of the Washington, D.C., law firm Lanny J. Davis & Associates. His firm uniquely operates at the intersection of law, media, and politics to solve client problems. In 1996-98, Mr. Davis served as special White House counsel to President Bill Clinton. In 2006-07, he was appointed by his Yale College friend, President George W. Bush, to serve on a special post-9/11 White House panel to advise the president on privacy and civil liberties issues. He has completed a forthcoming book, titled 'Finding the Third Way: Lessons in the Politics of Civility From My Journey Through History.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump Withdraws From Agreement With Tribes to Protect Salmon
Trump Withdraws From Agreement With Tribes to Protect Salmon

New York Times

time9 minutes ago

  • New York Times

Trump Withdraws From Agreement With Tribes to Protect Salmon

President Trump moved on Thursday to withdraw from a Biden administration agreement that had brokered a truce in a decades-long legal battle with tribes in the Pacific Northwest. The federal government has been mired in legal battles for decades over the depletion of fish populations in the Columbia River Basin, caused by four hydroelectric dams in the lower Snake River. Native American tribes have argued in court that the federal government has violated longstanding treaties by failing to protect the salmon and other fish that have been prevented by the dams from spawning upstream of the river. That legal fight is now expected to resume, with no brokered agreement in place. In its statement announcing the withdrawal, the White House made no mention of the affected tribes and portrayed the issue falsely as revolving around 'speculative climate change concerns.' The tribes had called for the dams to be breached as a way to restore the salmon population, a proposal that has faced intense pushback because of the potential costs. A study found that removing the four dams was the most promising approach to restoring the salmon population, but also reported that replacing the electricity generated by the dams, shipping routes and irrigation water would cost between $10.3 billion and $27.2 billion. The 2023 agreement from the Biden administration, a memorandum of understanding with the tribes that brokered a 10-year truce in the legal battles, committed $300 million to Washington, Oregon and the tribes to restore the wild salmon population. The Biden administration allocated another $60 million to the effort last year. But the Biden administration did not take a position on the most contentious proposal of breaching the dams. The agreement called for additional study of the proposal and committed to supporting clean energy projects that could replace the power generated by the dams. However, the Biden White House noted in a statement that any decision and authority to breach the dams 'resides with Congress.' Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

Judge orders Trump to return National Guard to California's control
Judge orders Trump to return National Guard to California's control

Axios

time11 minutes ago

  • Axios

Judge orders Trump to return National Guard to California's control

A federal judge on Thursday granted California Gov. Gavin Newsom's request to block the Trump administration from federalizing the National Guard for deployment to Los Angeles amid protests over federal immigration raids. The administration filed a notice of appeal appeal soon after the ruling. The big picture: The administration has activated some 4,000 National Guard members and mobilized hundreds of Marines in response to protests in the area sparked by federal immigration raids. Newsom has slammed the move as "purposefully inflammatory" and has been locked in a tense standoff with President Trump for days. The unrest has spread, with demonstrations denouncing the administration's mass deportation push popping up coast to coast. Driving the news: U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer said in a Thursday evening order in response to Newsom's request for emergency relief that the Trump administration's actions were "illegal." Catch up quick: On June 10, Newsom requested a temporary restraining order to "prevent the use of federalized National Guard and active duty Marines for law enforcement purposes on the streets of a civilian city." The request did not seek to bar the Guard from protecting federal buildings or property but rather sought "narrow relief tailored to avoid irreparable harm to our communities and the rule of law." Breyer did not initially intervene in that request and granted the Trump administration more time to respond to the governor. The other side: The Justice Department in a Wednesday filing argued that Trump had" every right under the Constitution and by statute to call forth the National Guard and Marines to quell lawless violence directed against enforcement of federal law."

Stock market today: Dow, S&P 500, Nasdaq futures sink, oil surges as Israel launches strike against Iran
Stock market today: Dow, S&P 500, Nasdaq futures sink, oil surges as Israel launches strike against Iran

Yahoo

time12 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Stock market today: Dow, S&P 500, Nasdaq futures sink, oil surges as Israel launches strike against Iran

US stock futures fell Thursday as an Israeli attack on Iran shook global markets, leading oil prices to spike as the Israeli defense minister declared a state of emergency. Futures attached to the Dow Jones Industrial Average (YM=F) dropped 1.1%. S&P 500 futures (ES=F) plunged 1.3%, and those attached to the tech-heavy Nasdaq 100 (NQ=F) sank 1.5%. On Thursday night, Israel conducted what it called a "preemptive strike" against Iran, citing fears over development of nuclear weapons in Tehran. Explosions erupted across the Iranian capital, reports said. Crude oil (CL=F) soared 6% as the strikes hit the fourth largest producer in OPEC+. The safe-haven asset of gold (GC=F) jumped as much as 1%. Israel's defense minister suggested the country was bracing for retaliation. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said Israel took "unilateral action," saying the US was not involved in the strikes and warning Iran against targeting US interests and personnel. The dramatic developments came after a day where stocks crept higher despite questions around President Trump's domestic agenda, as he hinted at steps that could rattle markets. The president floated hiking auto tariffs just a day after he said he would impose unilateral tariff rates on countries within two weeks. Separately, he reiterated his call for a jumbo rate cut from the Federal Reserve, adding that he "may have to force something" amid easing inflation. Read more: The latest on Trump's tariffs Overall, stocks have edged up this week as a trade deal between China and the US, as well as unexpected signs of softening inflation, boosted investor sentiment. On Friday, Wall Street will get insight into how consumers are faring amid tariff uncertainty with the latest University of Michigan survey. Next week, Wall Street's attention will shift to the Fed with policymakers set to issue their next decision on interest rates on Wednesday. Analysts expect the central bank to hold rates steady. Israel has attacked Iran in the largest recent escalation of tensions in the region. Markets reacted swiftly to the news, with the three major gauges all plunging over 1%. Gold (GC=F) and oil prices surged with investors scurrying to safer assets, hoping to avoid the worst of a financial shake up. Iran is the fourth largest producer of oil within OPEC+, and the attack has caused prices to surge over 5%. Brent crude (BZ=F) futures jumped 5.5% to $73.27 a barrel while West Texas Intermediate surged 5.9% to $72.05 a barrel. Gold (GC=F) popped 0.9% to $3,434.40 an ounce. A retaliatory attack from Iran against Israel is expected imminently, with a 'special situation' being declared by the Isreali defense minister. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said Israel took "unilateral action", clarifying that the US was not involved in the strikes ahead of a sixth meeting between the US and Iran on Sunday. Israel has attacked Iran in the largest recent escalation of tensions in the region. Markets reacted swiftly to the news, with the three major gauges all plunging over 1%. Gold (GC=F) and oil prices surged with investors scurrying to safer assets, hoping to avoid the worst of a financial shake up. Iran is the fourth largest producer of oil within OPEC+, and the attack has caused prices to surge over 5%. Brent crude (BZ=F) futures jumped 5.5% to $73.27 a barrel while West Texas Intermediate surged 5.9% to $72.05 a barrel. Gold (GC=F) popped 0.9% to $3,434.40 an ounce. A retaliatory attack from Iran against Israel is expected imminently, with a 'special situation' being declared by the Isreali defense minister. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said Israel took "unilateral action", clarifying that the US was not involved in the strikes ahead of a sixth meeting between the US and Iran on Sunday. Sign in to access your portfolio

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store