Labour councillor cleared over cutting throats comment at rally
A video showing Jones addressing crowds on Hoe Street in Walthamstow, east London, on August 7 last year went viral on social media after the protest, which had been organised in response to plans for a far-right march outside Waltham Forest Immigration Bureau.
The now-suspended councillor, wearing a black polo top and surrounded by cheering supporters, said: 'They are disgusting Nazi fascists. We need to cut all their throats and get rid of them all.'
He also drew his finger across his throat as he spoke to the crowd.
Jurors deliberated for just over half an hour and found him not guilty on Friday.
Jones, who wore a navy blue suit with a white shirt and pale pink tie in the dock, was seen mouthing 'thank you' at the jurors.
Family and supporters hugged each other before Jones, who declined to comment on the verdict, was driven out of the court grounds in a car.
The 58-year-old, who at the time was also employed as a full-time official for the Transport Salaried Staffs' Association (TSSA) union, was arrested on August 8 last year and interviewed at Brixton police station that night.
Jones, who has been a borough councillor in Dartford, Kent, since 2019, was suspended by the Labour Party the day after the incident.
Prosecutor Ben Holt previously told the court Jones, a father of four and grandfather, used 'inflammatory, rabble-rousing language in the throng of a crowd described as a tinderbox'.
He told jurors Jones's speech was amplified through a microphone and speakers and took place 'in a setting where violence could readily have been anticipated'.
Giving evidence in his trial, Jones said his comment did not refer to far-right protesters involved in the riots at the time, but to those who had reportedly left National Front stickers on a train with razor blades hidden behind them.
Before he made the comment, jurors were shown video where he said to crowds: 'You've got women and children using these trains during the summer holidays.
'They don't give a shit about who they hurt.'
He told the court he was 'appalled' by political violence, adding: 'I've always believed the best way to make people realise who you are and what you are is to do it peacefully.'
Jones, who said he was on the left of the Labour Party, previously told jurors the riots had made him feel 'upset' and 'angry' and said he felt it was his 'duty' to attend counter-protests, despite being warned to stay away from such demonstrations by the Labour Party.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Jeremy Corbyn 'capitulated' over anti-Semitism while Labour leader, claims co-founder of his new party
'capitulated' over anti-Semitism while he was Labour leader, according to the co-founder of his new left-wing party. Zarah Sultana, who has helped launch Mr Corbyn's new outfit, criticised Labour's adoption of the international definition of anti-Semitism under his leadership. In September 2018, Labour agreed to fully adopt the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance's (IHRA) definition of anti-Semitism and all its examples. It followed a months-long party row and an unsuccessful attempt by Mr Corbyn to add his own caveat in relation to criticism of Israel. In an interview with the New Left Review, Ms Sultana was asked how 'Corbynism' could be adapted from 2015 - when Mr Corbyn was first elected Labour leader - to the present day. 'I think we're in a very different political moment,' she replied. 'We have to build on the strengths of Corbynism – its energy, mass appeal and bold policy platform – and we also have to recognise its limitations. 'It capitulated to the IHRA definition of anti-Semitism, which famously equates it with anti-Zionism, and which even its lead author Kenneth Stern has now publicly criticised.' The comments by Ms Sultana, who quit Labour last month in order to set up the new left-wing party with Mr Corbyn, sparked a backlash among Jewish groups. Andrew Gilbert, the vice-president of the Board of Deputies, told the Telegraph: 'The IHRA definition has been adopted by the Government and public institutions in this country and around the world, and is supported by the overwhelming majority of British Jews as it is clear and measured in defining anti-Semitism. 'Calling the recognition of the IHRA definition of anti-Semitism a 'capitulation' is a grave insult. 'Labour's real betrayal under Corbyn was unlawfully harassing and discriminating against Jews. 'Those who seek to delegitimise and mis-define the IHRA definition in this way prove themselves to be no friend to the Jewish community and also call into question their wider commitment to anti-racism, the wellbeing of the Jewish community and social cohesion.' A spokesman for Campaign Against Antisemitism said: 'If Jews do not have the right to define the hatred that targets them, then who does? Does Zarah Sultana think that it should be herself?' Alex Hearn, the director of Labour Against Antisemitism, said: 'Zarah Sultana has fundamentally misrepresented the IHRA definition of anti-Semitism. It is unsurprising that she opposes it, given her history. 'There should be no place in a mainstream political party for the likes of Ms Sultana, and it is surprising that the Labour Party tolerated her for so long. 'Hopefully she will remain on the fringes of politics for the remainder of her career, which is where her extremist views belong.' In the same interview, Ms Sultana referred to Israel as a 'genocidal apartheid state'. Despite the backlash, she doubled down on her comments by posting on X/Twitter on Sunday night: 'The smears won't work this time. I say it loudly and proudly: I'm an anti-Zionist. Print that.' Ms Sultana and Mr Corbyn's new movement has the website with a welcome message saying 'this is your party'. But Ms Sultana sowed confusion immediately after its launch by insisting a name had not yet been chosen. She frantically posted on social media: 'It's not called Your Party.' It was explained that members would decide on the new party's name at a later date, but political opponents mocked the 'chaotic' launch. It followed claims Ms Sultana had previously caught Mr Corbyn by surprise by quitting Labour and publicly announcing their plans to found a new party. Mr Corbyn insisted the launch of the new party was 'not messy at all' and 'a totally coherent approach'.
Telegraph
3 hours ago
- Telegraph
Downplaying the anti-Semitism of the Corbyn years is a disgrace
It was hard not to sympathise with Jeremy Corbyn 's most devout supporters back when he was leader of the Labour Party. Desperate to cling on to whatever collective responsibility existed in the party at the time, determined to show undying loyalty to the Sage of Islington, they gritted their teeth and nodded along to his declaration that Labour would, at last, accept the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) definition of anti-Semitism. Many of them were profoundly unhappy about this apparent capitulation to the 'Zionist entity'. How could they possibly go through life without describing Israel, on a daily basis, as a 'racist endeavour', which the definition now proscribed? You have to hand it to the various and conflicting interests of what we call the hard-Left – they just about managed to make it to the 2019 general election with sufficient (though unconvincing) lip service to the IHRA's definition to make the party's pummelling at the hands of voters about something other than anti-Semitism. Which, under Corbyn's leadership, might be counted as a rare victory. But now, after hiding behind Labour's coattails for decades, the hard-Left has finally grown a backbone and decided to do what many in Labour have been urging them to do all along: leave the Labour Party and stand as a separate party. Be honest about your politics and your political ambitions and stop depending on Labour to get the usual handful of 'socialist' MPs elected at each election. If you're that principled, why depend on a party you clearly despise for the votes you need to win? In the last few weeks, precisely that has happened. Coventry MP Zarah Sultana has announced that she and Corbyn will co-lead a new Left-wing party that is so far without a name, a policy, or, indeed, a leader. To this rather shambolic state of affairs we shall return in due course. In the meantime, Sultana is likely to be one of those people who, having decided to leave Labour, fell into an easy chair with a loud sigh of relief and repeated over and over to herself: 'Israel is a racist endeavour, Israel is a racist endeavour, Israel…' In a potentially fascinating, and possibly consequential, intervention, Sultana has taken something of a swipe at Corbyn for his decision, during his tenure as leader of her old party, to accept – albeit reluctantly (some might say 'kicking and screaming') – the IHRA definition of anti-Semitism. 'We have to build on the strengths of Corbynism… and we also have to recognise its limitations,' she told the New Left Review. 'It capitulated to the IHRA definition of anti-Semitism, which famously equates it with anti-Zionism.' That sounds to me like a swipe at Corbyn himself, perhaps in revenge for his lukewarm (and apparently bewildered) response to her premature claim that she was to be a co-leader of his new party. To most normal people, adhering to the IHRA's definition of anti-Semitism wasn't a huge sacrifice, and it says something quite appalling that to those of Sultana's political outlook, it is an unconscionable compromise of their right to free speech. There is a certain type of politician for whom hatred and smearing of Israel – with its liberal democracy, Western-level human rights and tendency to shame by comparison all its Arab neighbours' own records in such matters – is an article of faith without such political life would be pointless. Given that the new party, whatever it is to be called, hopes to capitalise on the impatience of at least some British Muslims with Labour's stance on Israel, it is hardly a surprise that Sultana wants to allow members to defame Israel without fear of disciplinary action. Interestingly, another part of the IHRA definition of anti-Semitism is the suggestion that British Jews are in any way responsible for the actions of Israel. Is this also something Sultana will not put up with? Certainly, judging by the behaviour of many of those middle-class keffiyeh-botherers who take to the streets every weekend, the acceptance of that particular part of the IHRA's definition would severely curb their venomous public declarations. And we can't have that, can we? Sultana has helped the rest of us define a little bit more what her new party is about. True, it doesn't yet have any structure or leadership, or even a membership – just a large list of online supporters. But the absence of policy – aside from hatred of Israel, obviously – is a problem. Since Sultana's announcement earlier in the summer, there is a sense that some precious momentum has been lost. Nothing much seems to be happening, and time is moving on. We may assume that the new party will be all for trans rights and will campaign to remove women's sex-based spaces and services. It will probably echo the Greens' demands for an immediate halt to all plastic production and oil drilling. We can feel confident that the identitarian bandwagon may consider itself fully boarded, with Critical Race Theory in particular a central part of the party's philosophy. Open-door immigration, whether it's described that way or not, will be in there, as will an open-arms policy for welcoming asylum seekers. So far, so predictable, although we might expect that other obligatory part of the hard-Left manifesto, the recognition of 'sex work' as legitimate, to face some resistance from the party's more, shall we say 'orthodox', members. This has all the ingredients for a thoroughly entertaining conference season and next few years in UK politics. Whatever the outcome of the policy-making process, Sultana and Corbyn will soon find themselves at the top of a party that, whatever else it stands for, hates Israel and will likely create a hostile environment for British Jews.
Times
4 hours ago
- Times
Zarah Sultana: Jeremy Corbyn ‘capitulated' on antisemitism as Labour leader
The co-founder of Jeremy Corbyn's new political party has accused him of 'capitulating' on antisemitism while being leader of the Labour Party. Zarah Sultana said Corbyn should not have accepted the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance's (IHRA) definition of antisemitism because it 'famously equates with anti-Zionism'. Labour incorporated the definition into its code of conduct in July 2018, but did not include all its examples, including claiming that the existence of a state of Israel is a racist endeavour. Corbyn was eventually stripped of the Labour whip after refusing to acknowledge a report on the prevalence of antisemitism during his leadership of the party between 2015 and 2020, claiming it was 'dramatically overstated for political reasons'. Speaking to the New Left Review journal, Sultana said Corbyn's Labour had 'capitulated to the IHRA definition of antisemitism, which famously equates it with anti-Zionism and which even its lead author Kenneth Stern has now publicly criticised'. The Board of Deputies of British Jews accused Sultana of a 'grave insult', pointing out that the IHRA definition 'has been adopted by the government and public institutions in this country and around the world, and is supported by the overwhelming majority of British Jews as it is clear and measured in defining antisemitism'. Sultana, the MP for Coventry South, quit Labour last month to found a new party with Corbyn. The party claims to have attracted 700,000 supporters and will decide on its name at a conference in the autumn. Sultana said she wants to call the new party 'The Left', with a focus on 'more time with our loved ones, more green space, universal childcare, free public transport, [and] not worrying about bills'. She said the party would 'build on the strengths of Corbynism — its energy, mass appeal and bold policy platform' but would also 'recognise its limitations'. In addition to its stance on antisemitism, she said that Labour 'didn't make a real effort to channel its mass membership into the labour movement or tenants' unions, which would have enriched the party's social base'. She said the state and the media were its 'class enemies' and that Labour 'should have fought back'. She added: 'Instead it was frightened and far too conciliatory. This was a serious mistake. If we're contesting state power, we're going to face a major backlash, and we need to have the institutional resilience to withstand it. You cannot give these people an inch.' Polling from More in Common suggests a hypothetical new party with Corbyn as leader could receive 10 per cent of the vote and become the most popular single party for 18-24 year olds. Labour's overall vote would decrease from 23 per cent to 20 per cent, the polling suggests, and cut the Green Party's support from 9 per cent to 5 per cent.
