logo
Map Shows Where Hegseth Wants US Military on China's Doorstep

Map Shows Where Hegseth Wants US Military on China's Doorstep

Newsweek13-06-2025
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
U.S. defense chief Pete Hegseth on Wednesday stressed the role of regional partners in the Pentagon's bid to counter an increasingly assertive China.
"The Indo-Pacific is our priority theater, and China is our pacing threat,' he said while making the case for the defense budget requested by the Trump administration for the next fiscal year.
Those words echoed his May 31 remarks at the Shangri-La Dialogue defense summit in Singapore, where he hailed examples of U.S. and allied military cooperation—including those illustrated on the Newsweek map below.
Why It Matters
China's rapid military buildup and competing territorial claims have strained ties with several neighbors, including U.S.-allied Philippines and Japan, both of which share defense treaties with Washington that could potentially draw American forces into a conflict.
Chinese threats and increasing military activities around Taiwan, the island democracy Beijing claims as its territory, have further raised concerns. The tensions have driven some of China's neighbors to deepen military cooperation with the United States and one another.
Newsweek contacted the Chinese Embassy in Washington, D.C., for comment by email, but did not receive a response before publication time.
What To Know
In Singapore, Hegseth praised President Donald Trump's "America First" foreign policy while blaming former President Joe Biden for the U.S.-Mexico border crisis to Russia's invasion of Ukraine.
Yet, he added, "America First certainly does not mean America alone."
Taking aim at what he called China's "destabilizing actions," Hegseth said the U.S. should be prepared for war, although deterring Chinese military aggression by raising its costs was preferable.
"We're doing this here in the Indo-Pacific in three distinct ways: first, by improving our forward force posture. Second, by helping allies and partners strengthen their defense capabilities. And third, by rebuilding defense industrial bases," he told attendees.
These efforts include deploying to the first island chain assets such as the U.S. Marine Corps' NMESIS high-precision anti-ship missile system to the Luzon Strait—a maritime choke point frequented by Chinese warships.
A U.S. Army Mid-Range Capability, or Typhon missile system fires a Standard Missile-6 at White Sands Missile Range, New Mexico, on November 8, 2024.
A U.S. Army Mid-Range Capability, or Typhon missile system fires a Standard Missile-6 at White Sands Missile Range, New Mexico, on November 8, 2024.
The platform was delivered to the Philippines' far-northern Batanes province about 120 miles south of Taiwan. The deployment "enhanced our interoperability and improved our readiness on cutting-edge platforms, where we need them and when we need them," Hegseth said.
The NMESIS missile system adds to the growing U.S. firepower in the Southeast Asian country. Last year, the U.S. deployed a U.S. Army Mid-Range Capability, also known as the Typhon missile launcher, to the Philippines ahead of joint military drills last spring.
Philippine officials initially suggested the system would be removed after the drills, but later indicated it could remain indefinitely, irking officials in Beijing over the system's ability to reach China's eastern seaboard with weapons like as the Standard Missile-6 and the Tomahawk cruise missile.
A second Typhon system will be deployed to AUKUS partner Australia this summer, where the U.S. Army plans to conduct its first-ever live-fire test of the system on foreign soil, Hegseth said.
This year, Washington and Canberra also reached an agreement for Australia to produce 155-millimeter artillery rounds and assemble guided multiple-launch rocket systems, boosting Australia's potential as a force multiplier in the event of a conflict.
Washington's efforts to deepen cooperation with Japan, a key Pacific security treaty ally, are also advancing, with upgrades to the joint headquarters of the U.S. Forces Japan. The move will increase deterrence and mark "progress the alliance has made toward improving interoperability and strengthening Japan's capabilities," Hegseth said.
The changes, which began in April, will integrate U.S. land, air, sea, space and cyber forces under a single headquarters. There are currently over 50,000 active-duty American military personnel in Japan—the most stationed in any foreign country.
The U.S. is also ramping up cooperation with India, one of the four Quad nations and a country that continues to experience friction with China along its disputed border regions in the Himalayas.
The Pentagon is working with the South Asian country—an increasingly capable arms manufacturer—to "co-produce equipment needed to deter aggression, and this includes negotiating an agreement to bring our industrial bases ever closer," Hegseth said.
Following February talks in Washington between Trump and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, the two leaders announced an "Autonomous Systems Industry Alliance" that will see the two countries co-develop and co-produce sea drones and counter-drone systems.
What People Are Saying:
Da Wei, director of the Center for International Security and Strategy at Beijing's Tsinghua University, told Newsweek:"What I want to stress is we are on the path to better relations with regional countries—so we don't need the U.S. to teach us."
"I think Secretary Hegseth is kind of trying to [come] between China and regional countries. I don't think this will be successful."
What's Next
The House Appropriations Committee advanced the Pentagon's request for a base defense budget of $892.6 billion, lower than the $1 trillion figure previously pledged by Trump.
That, along with a $150 billion reconciliation package providing additional funds for priority programs such as shipbuilding and munitions, is expected to pass in the overall congressional vote.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Map Shows US Cities Where Homicide Rates Are Highest
Map Shows US Cities Where Homicide Rates Are Highest

Newsweek

time26 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Map Shows US Cities Where Homicide Rates Are Highest

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump has said multiple cities could face federal action to deal with their violent crime, after he declared a public safety emergency in Washington, D.C. Newsweek has produced a map showing homicide rates in cities across the country. Baltimore and Chicago—both mentioned by Trump as possible targets—feature in the map as cities with the second and tenth highest homicide rates respectively, while Washington D.C. comes in at 19th. The data, compiled by the civil rights group Freedom for All Americans, does not present a complete and current nationwide picture, as not all cities have compiled complete figures for 2024. Why It Matters Homicide rates shape policy debates over policing, federal intervention and community investment, especially when presidential action and local officials clash over the meaning of the numbers. Crime levels in cities are making headlines in the wake of Trump's concerns about Washington, D.C. on Monday, when he invoked emergency powers to place the city's police department under federal control and deploy around 800 National Guard troops. What To Know The 10 cities with the highest homicide rates, according to Freedom for All Americans' 2024 data, are: St. Louis, Missouri (69.4 per 100,000 people) Baltimore, Maryland (51.1 per 100,000 people) New Orleans, Louisiana (40.6 per 100,000 people) Detroit, Michigan (39.7 per 100,000 people) Cleveland, Ohio (33.7 per 100,000 people) Las Vegas, Nevada (31.4 per 100,000 people) Kansas City, Missouri (31.2 per 100,000 people) Memphis, Tennessee (27.1 per 100,000 people) Newark, New Jersey (25.6 per 100,000 people) Chicago, Illinois (24.0 per 100,000 people) The group compiled is data from multiple sources, including AreaVibes, NeighborhoodScout, city police reports and public safety databases. Newsweek has contacted mayors' offices' for Chicago, St. Louis, Baltimore, New Orleans, Detroit and Cleveland, via email, for comment. Washington D.C. comes in at 19th, with a murder rate of 17.0 per 100,000 people. Violent crime in the capital hit a 30-year low in 2024, the district's U.S. Attorney Office said in January, citing police data. District Council member Charles Allen and District Attorney General Brian Schwalb both cited this statistic in their criticism of the president's federal intervention in the capital, with Allen calling Trump's actions a "dangerous abuse of power." Mike A. Males, a senior researcher at the Center on Juvenile and Criminal Justice in San Francisco, told Newsweek that urban crime was down across the country. "D.C. has a high rate because it is the only district wholly comprised of a city, but trends for all states mostly are down," he said. Analystsat the Council on Criminal Justice reported year-end 2024 declines in homicides across a set of 40 cities, noting a 16 percent drop in homicides overall. What People Are Saying Trump suggested other cities may face similar federal action to Washington, telling a press conference on Monday: "We have other cities also that are bad. Very bad. You look at Chicago, how bad it is. You look at Los Angeles, how bad it is. We have other cities that are very bad. New York has a problem. And then you have, of course, Baltimore and Oakland. We don't even mention that anymore there." "They're so far gone. We're not going to let it happen. We're not going to lose our cities over this." Washington D.C. District Attorney General Brian Schwalb responded to Trump's move in a post on X: "The Administration's actions are unprecedented, unnecessary, and unlawful. "There is no crime emergency in the District of Columbia. Violent crime in DC reached historic 30-year lows last year, and is down another 26% so far this year. "We are considering all of our options and will do what is necessary to protect the rights and safety of District residents." The Administration's actions are unprecedented, unnecessary, and unlawful. There is no crime emergency in the District of Columbia. Violent crime in DC reached historic 30-year lows last year, and is down another 26% so far this year. We are considering all of our options and… — AG Brian Schwalb (@DCAttorneyGen) August 11, 2025 What Happens Next Some jurisdictions reported declines in homicide in 2024 and early 2025, but national and local trends vary by city and by the data source used. The Council on Criminal Justice and the FBI have both signaled overall declines in violent crime through 2024. Monitoring will continue to see if this pattern continues.

When he meets with Putin, Trump should demand some American land back, too
When he meets with Putin, Trump should demand some American land back, too

The Hill

timean hour ago

  • The Hill

When he meets with Putin, Trump should demand some American land back, too

If President Trump is going to be talking land swaps with Vladimir Putin later this week, maybe he can get some American land back, too? Friday's talks in Alaska offer a historic and welcomed opportunity for rapprochement in our bilateral relations with Russia. We should try to get along with our neighbors, difficult though they may be. Trump is right to do so in attempting to broker peace in a war that should never have started. However, the prospect of establishing neighborly relations again while negotiating over Ukrainian territory also raises long-frozen but now relevant issues between us in the very place where these leaders, and indeed our own two countries, meet — the Arctic. Acknowledging and working to resolve them will go a long way towards laying the groundwork for a better future between our nations. Yesterday marked the 144th anniversary of the discovery and claiming of Wrangel Island by the US Coast Guard on August 12, 1881. Wrangel is a large island located in the Arctic Ocean about 270 nautical miles northeast of the coast of Alaska, about the size of Delaware and Rhode Island combined. It was discovered that day by a landing party from the USRC Corwin, a patrol cutter of the Bering Sea Patrol — then the U.S. government authority in the young territory of Alaska. The landing party, which included famed naturalist John Muir, hoisted the American flag and claimed the island in the name of the president of the United States. The island was surveyed later that month by the the USS Rodgers, and subsequently incorporated into official U.S. government documents and records. Four decades later, however, on August 20, 1924, Wrangel was seized by Bolsheviks aboard the Soviet icebreaker Red October. The American settlers were arrested, hauled off and taken prisoner in Vladivostok. The leader of the Nome-based settlers died in custody. The U.S. didn't have diplomatic relations with the Soviets until 1933 and has never acknowledged Russia's claim to ownership. The same goes for the De Long Islands further west, which had been discovered months earlier by the crew of the USS Jeannette, which was lost in high Arctic when the Coast Guard Cutter Corwin was dispatched to rescue it. Today, Wrangel is the 'Gibraltar' of the Northern Sea Route, providing a key choke point on its eastern entry and hosting a modern naval base from which Russia projects force over the Arctic and American interests. As the leaders discuss demilitarizing Ukraine, perhaps Wrangel could also be demilitarized and made a joint U.S.-Russian scientific area and monument to peace between our nations? Alternatively, if the U.S. is going to continue acquiesce to Russian control, perhaps it is time Russia should compensate us for what their Soviet predecessors took by force. One way they might do so would be to sign over their frozen sovereign assets to the U.S. — roughly $210 billion. This would go a long way toward American taxpayers recouping the $350 billion we have lost, greatly increasing our national debt, to finance a deadly war that never should have happened. To those who would consider such history trivial and say Americans don't have skin in the game in these islands, a visit to Annapolis, Md. should help. There, they might climb up to the highest point on the highest hill, in the cemetery overlooking the US Naval Academy. Standing there is a monument that dwarfs every other surrounding it on this hallowed ground – it's to the USS Jeannette Arctic Exploring Mission of 1879-1881, and the 20 men who perished in their discovery. Although remembered by few today, the story of the USS Jeannette and its rescue party was an epic story known across America at the time, heavily chronicled in the thousand-page reports of Congressional investigations that followed. Back then, things were also very different between our countries. America's discovery of new islands north of Russia was welcomed with excitement there, with Tsar Alexander III extending to the survivors a lavish reception in St. Petersburg. As Trump works to secure our hemispheric defense, America's outermost islands matter. This is especially so in the Arctic, certain to see increased trade, commerce and geopolitical rivalry in the decades to come. If we do not secure our periphery, we put our homeland at risk. And others take notice. Just this past week, five Chinese Arctic research vessels sailed easily through the Bering Sea and past the Aleutian Islands, where former defense installations at Attu and Adak — sites of WWII combat and American sacrifice — today sit abandoned or disused. In U.S. history, the story of America's lost Arctic islands holds a very dubious distinction: It's the only time America has yielded land in the face of a hostile force that it has subsequently failed to recover. Today, however, a recovery through negotiation and dialog may yet be possible. Finding a peaceful solution to Wrangel and the De Long Islands would be a very positive step in establishing a new relationship between the Russian Federation and the U.S.

The Bulletin August 13, 2025
The Bulletin August 13, 2025

Newsweek

timean hour ago

  • Newsweek

The Bulletin August 13, 2025

The rundown: President Donald Trump is looking to change the way the U.S. Census Bureau collects data, wanting to exclude immigrants who are in the United States illegally. Here's how. Why it matters: Several experts told Newsweek that excluding people living in the country without legal status from the head count used to allocate congressional seats among the states and determine how federal funding is distributed would run afoul of the U.S. Constitution. They say excluding undocumented immigrants from the census would violate the Fourteenth Amendment. Trump wrote on Truth Social last week that he had instructed the Department of Commerce to have the Census Bureau start work on "a new and highly accurate CENSUS based on modern day facts and figures and, importantly, using the results and information gained from the Presidential Election of 2024." Read more in-depth coverage: As Trump Floats New Census, How Many People Really Live in the US? TL/DR: Experts say excluding undocumented immigrants from the census would violate the Fourteenth Amendment. What happens now? Though any efforts to change how the census is conducted are sure to face legal challenges, Trump's directive threatens to shift the balance of political power in the country. Deeper reading Is Donald Trump's New Census Constitutional? Experts Weigh in

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store