logo
Meet the teenagers investing their after-school job money in the stock market — and winning big

Meet the teenagers investing their after-school job money in the stock market — and winning big

New York Post24-04-2025

The market might be turbulent, but these Zoomers are in for the long haul.
More and more young people are getting into the market earlier, with help from social media, artificial intelligence and, yes, their parents via custodial accounts.
According to the Charles Schwab Modern Wealth Survey of 2024, the average Gen Z investor got into the market at just 19 years old — compared with 25 for Millennials, 32 for Gen X and 35 for Boomers.
But experts warn that some Zoomers, sucked in by influencers and promises to get-rich-quick on TikTok and Instagram, are investing in sketchy crypto coins and meme stocks without doing their research.
'If you're a young investor and you have $100 or $500 or $1000 that you don't care what happens to, go ahead and buy cryptocurrency and close your eyes and see what happens, but [my advice is] never buy anything you can't reach out and touch,' said Brian Belski, Chief Investment Strategist of BMO Capital Markets.
His suggestion to young investors: 'Buy things that you know, whether it's Lulu Lemon or Netflix or Alphabet. Always invest in things that you're using.'
The Post spoke to five precocious and well-researched investors about their experiences:
Ryan Sorrell: 'I use ChatGPT to help me invest'
11 Ryan Sorrell, 15, first invested in Bitcoin at age 8.
Ryan Sorrell
Ryan Sorrell was only 8 years old when he made his first investment in Bitcoin, after his dad taught him about crypto.
'I understood part of it, but I ultimately did more research,' Sorrell, now 15, told The Post.
Now that he has his own money from bussing tables at a retirement home, he's doubling down.
For the past year, the teen has put his entire paycheck — about $800 a month during the summer — into the market on CashApp. He's mostly invested in Bitcoin and MicroStrategy.
11 Ryan's father, Joel, taught him about Bitcoin and how to invest in the stock market.
Ryan Sorrell
'This summer I want to make as much money as I can to invest, and I want to set myself up with a portfolio that pays high dividends so I can keep reinvesting in the future,' Sorrell said.
So far, the 15-year-old has $6,000 in Bitcoin, $3,500 of which is profit. He has made another $337 in the stock market.
He spends about an hour each day researching the market, teaching himself primarily with AI tools like ChatGPT.
'It helps me a lot to just run through scenarios, to see where I'd be if I did that in, like, 10 years' time,' he said. 'You can just ask whatever you want and quickly deepen your understanding.'
11 Ryan Sorrell uses ChatGPT and AI tools to learn about the stock market.
Courtesy of Ryan Sorrell
Sorrell says investing early has changed his relationship to money.
'I'm more disciplined with how I spend my money because I'm putting it in the market and making a return instead of just losing it for, like, a pair of shoes or something,' he said. 'It's really helped me focus on my future and what I want to do with my life.'
Sophia Castiblanco: 'Girls need to be encouraged to get into the market'
Sophia Castiblanco began investing at age 14 when she started making money from her toy review channel on YouTube.
11 Sophia Castiblanco started investing at age 14 when her YouTube channel became profitable.
Sophia Castiblanco
'It was my parents who first encouraged me to get into investing because they were worried that, making such a large amount of money at a young age, I might spend it all on shopping or hanging out with my friends,' said Castiblanco, now 18 and a freshman in college. (She declined to name her school for privacy concerns.)
After a couple months of research and some help from her dad, the Bloomington, Illinois, native invested in Vanguard and Berkshire Hathaway and some of her favorite companies, like Tesla, Apple and Amazon.
At first, she was putting in $300 a month. Now, as she rakes in money as lifestyle content creator on Instagram and TikTok, she's putting in $3,000.
Her most recent big investment was Nvidia, and she hopes her profits can help her buy an investment real estate property in the next year for passive rental income.
11 At age 18, Castiblanco puts $3,000 a month into the stock market.
Sophia Castiblanco
Over the past month, as the market was rocked by tariffs and her returns were cut from 38% to 10%, she poured even more money in: 'I think it's a great time to put money into the market. I feel like it's a really good opportunity.'
Castiblanco also wishes more young people would brush up on their financial knowledge.
'I wish more of Gen Z, especially girls, would get into investing,' she told The Post. 'It would be so beneficial if schools had a finance class at a young age so that students actually develop some more financial literacy.'
Perrin Myerson: 'I invested money from working at Taco Bell'
Perrin Myerson became interested in investing at age 14, when he learned about the WallStreetBets community on Reddit.
11 Perrin Myerson started investing with his income from his after-school job at Taco Bell.
Pete Thompson
'I thought they were morons, but they also seemed kind of funny,' said Myerson, now a 22-year-old senior studying computer science at Duke.
The Seattle native opened up a practice account as a ninth-grader, with the help of his father.
'My dad was pretty instrumental,' Myerson said. 'He didn't really trade, but I was interested in it and he was really nice and validating.'
11 Perrin Myerson invests in Palantir and has put in well over six figures of his own money.
Pete Thompson
He started investing more when he got his first job at age 16 — buying Microsoft and Amazon stocks, and he was 'like crazy early' on software company Palantir.
'I didn't have a ton of money growing up, so I was working at Taco Bell, and almost all my paychecks I was just throwing straight into RobinHood,' Myerson recalled.
While working in fast food, Myerson launched his own startup, creating a dynamic pricing software for restaurants.
11 Myerson is now a Duke undergrad and already has his own startup.
Pete Thompson
He's poured profits from his startup — 'well over six figures' — in the market and made a 51% return over the past year.
'Too many people my age are looking for get-rich-quick schemes [like drop shipping retail schemes], and it's really easy to sell those on TikTok, Instagram and X,' he said.
Isaiah Jones: 'Trading was nerdy at first, but now it's mainstream'
When high school junior Isaiah Jones started trading last year, it was considered 'nerdy' by his classmates — but, now, the Richmond, Virginia teen says it's totally mainstream.
11 Isaiah Jones says trading has become totally mainstream at his school.
Courtesy of Isaiah Jones
'I've noticed this year trading has gotten a lot bigger,' he told The Post. 'Like, I'm walking down the street and I see people looking at their crypto wallets.'
The 16-year-old started trading because some friends were. His dad helped him open a Robinhood custodial account to invest money made from lawn mowing and painting houses over the summer.
Jones owns shares of Apple and Nvidia and invested in Palantir, now valued at $94, when it was just $27 a share. He reads newspaper business sections every day and also uses X to research the market.
He's contemplating investing in real estate development company Howard Hughes Holdings because he's 'sometimes a fan of Bill Ackman,' whose hedge fund bought a big position in them.
11 Jones has made a large percentage return on Palantir stock.
Courtesy of Isaiah Jones
11 Isaiah Jones is interested in meme coins, including Brett coin, symbolized by a blue cartoon character.
But overall, Jones found crypto is much easier to access as a teen. His favorite cryptocurrency is Ethereum, and his biggest profit is from Solana. Jones is also a fan of meme coins like Brett. He's put $300 into crypto and now has $837.
'When you're trading stocks under 18, you have to do everything with your parents' permission, which is kind of hard, but crypto is so unregulated that I've been able to trade on my own,' he said. 'I trade a lot more in crypto just because I've made more money in that.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

How the Musk-Trump feud became an online battle like no other
How the Musk-Trump feud became an online battle like no other

Yahoo

time18 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

How the Musk-Trump feud became an online battle like no other

What happens when the world's most powerful man and the world's richest man - both accomplished attention-seekers - clash on the internet? We're finding out in real time. This week, billionaire Elon Musk and President Donald Trump took to their respective social platforms to sling mud at the other after a fallout over federal spending. What started as a volley of barbs snowballed into a feud involving multiple social platforms and millions of onlookers, as everyone from big-name politicians to no-name meme accounts hurried to offer their takes and declare their allegiances. Subscribe to The Post Most newsletter for the most important and interesting stories from The Washington Post. The split could have profound real-world consequences, as both men show their willingness to leverage financial and political power to hit back at the other. It also illustrates how quickly a conflict can escalate when it is fanned by algorithmic feeds and the demands of the attention economy, which prizes outrage and relishes a high-profile feud. While Trump and Musk circle their wagons, drumming up support and smearing the other through posts on X and Truth Social, millions of smaller content creators stand to capitalize on the attention the feud generates. On Thursday afternoon, the number of active users on the X and Truth Social mobile apps both reached 90-day highs, according to preliminary estimates by Sensor Tower, a market intelligence firm. Between 2 and 6 p.m. Eastern time that day, the firm estimates that X usage was up 54 percent compared with the previous seven days, while Truth Social was up more than 400 percent, albeit from a much lower baseline. 'Public feuds like this drive social media engagement like crazy,' said Casey Fiesler, a professor of information science at the University of Colorado at Boulder who studies social media ethics. 'It's high-octane content because it's easy to meme and very algorithmically rewarded.' Musk, whose business empire includes X as well as Tesla, rocket company SpaceX and artificial intelligence start-up xAI, kicked off the fight on Tuesday when he posted on X to criticize a congressional spending bill backed by the president: 'This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination,' he wrote. The post was viewed more than 141 million times and sparked a flurry of commentary on X and elsewhere online. Gen Z internet personality Lil Tay, known for over-the-top posts flaunting luxury goods, got 2.8 million views on a reply clapping back at Musk for his former support of Trump, while far-right commentator Charlie Kirk referenced Musk's 'tweet heard around the world' in a post funneling viewers to Apple Podcasts to stream his talk show. Over the next two days, Musk continued to take shots at Trump on X, at one point posting a poll asking whether America needed a new centrist political party, while Trump told White House reporters that his and Musk's relationship was on the rocks. Then on Thursday, Musk escalated the back-and-forth by claiming in a post on X that Trump is implicated in the Epstein files, documents that allegedly contain the names of people who consorted with the late financier Jeffrey Epstein to sexually assault minors. The post exploded, drawing almost 200 million views in a day and stoking a second wave of content from politicians, creators and meme-makers. A post from an anonymous X user, liked by 192,300 people, mused: 'Who gets JD Vance in the divorce?' The vice president soon provided an answer, posting that Trump has 'earned the trust of the movement he leads.' On X, where Musk's changes to the platform's verification feature have blurred the lines between real public figures and paid subscribers, fake politicians joined the fray. 'Every time I smell a movement, I know you'll be next to it,' came a reply to Vance from an account for Rep. Jack Kimble - a fictitious congressman with more than 93,000 followers whose posts have often fooled social media users. Former Trump adviser Stephen K. Bannon seized the moment to make headlines with his podcast, in which he called for Trump to seize SpaceX and perhaps even deport Musk. Politics creators such as Philip DeFranco took to TikTok with beat-by-beat breakdowns of the feud, while Musk's estranged daughter Vivian Wilson posted to her Instagram stories a clip of herself laughing, with the caption, 'I love being proven right,' possibly in reference to past comments criticizing her father and Trump. In the Reddit community r/politics, self-styled sleuths conducted deep dives into Epstein-related court filings, at times linking to books and YouTube series that claim to investigate Epstein's celebrity accomplices. Far-fetched conspiracy theories floated around X as users speculated whether Trump and Musk could be secretly working together toward some noble end. Critics of Musk and Trump delighted in the affair. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-New York), who at 35 is a social media star in her own right, was stopped by a reporter outside the U.S. Capitol on Thursday and asked for her reaction to Trump and Musk's war of words. She was quick to spit an online catchphrase: 'Oh man, the girls are fighting, aren't they?' The clip spread quickly on TikTok, where it was boosted by left-leaning talking heads and news accounts. Academic research on online algorithms has shown that social feeds often prioritize content that elicits fear or rage. High-profile fights can boost the power and profiles of people involved, as with the infamous internet feuds between Kim Kardashian and Kanye West or influencers Trisha Paytas and Ethan Klein, said Fiesler. But trending conflicts are also a boon to the second-order creators, who jump to offer 'side takes,' playing off the argument of the day to drive traffic to their own products and profiles. A divisive court battle between actress Amber Heard and her ex-husband Johnny Depp, for instance, spawned its own media ecosystem, with creators and channels dedicated entirely to dissecting the feud - at times even falsifying or exaggerating information to keep viewers hooked. 'This [Musk-Trump feud] is half my TikTok feed right now,' Fiesler said. 'The more that people talk about it, the more people feel obligated to talk about it and take sides.' It's a dynamic the principals in this fight have long since mastered. Vance posted on X on Thursday a picture of himself with the popular podcaster and comedian Theo Von, with the tongue-in-cheek caption, 'Slow news day, what are we even going to talk about?' Musk reposted it, adding a 'laughter' emoji. Under Musk's ownership, X has lost advertisers and users turned off by his politics and lax approach to hate speech, with rivals such as Bluesky and Meta's Threads siphoning left-leaning users in particular. Now he risks alienating Trump loyalists. But in the meantime, even critics of his leadership of X acknowledged Thursday that it seemed to have 'the juice' - that is, it was driving the conversation - at least for the moment. 'A public blowup between the world's richest man and the president of the U.S. is hard for people to resist witnessing first-hand, even for those that may not regularly use X,' said Jasmine Enberg, vice president and principal analyst at eMarketer, a market research firm. 'That said, our media usage is so fragmented and we're being bombarded with the news from every channel that it's not likely to be significant or sustainable.' Truth Social, meanwhile, has become an increasingly important component of Trump's communication strategy, with the self-styled influencer-in-chief firing off a steady stream of posts - at times dozens a day - lauding his own actions or taking aim at rivals. White House employees and right-leaning creators then spread the posts to other platforms, broadening Truth Social's reach and influence even as the platform underperforms compared with X, Threads or Bluesky. (Sensor Tower estimates X has about 100 times more active users.) The Trump-Musk brouhaha exemplifies how online influencer culture has permeated politics, said Renée DiResta, a professor at Georgetown University's McCourt School of Public Policy and the author of 'Invisible Rulers.' 'Online beefing is not about winning - it's a kind of performance,' she said. The interactive nature of social media allows the audience to get in on the action. 'We pick sides, cheer for our champion and keep the fight going. We make memes - we can grab some attention for ourselves and help shape the fight if we make good ones.' But what might be harmless fun in the case of celebrity gossip, she said, has a darker side when the warring parties are among the world's most powerful people. In a striking example, a threat from Trump on Thursday to cancel government contracts with SpaceX prompted Musk to reply that the company 'will begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft immediately' - a move that would have severed NASA's only means of transporting astronauts to the International Space Station. A pseudonymous X user who had fewer than 100 followers at the time replied to Musk's post, urging him to 'take a step back' and reconsider. Within hours, Musk responded: 'Good advice. Ok, we won't decommission Dragon.' The online bedlam prompted sports commentator Darren Rovell to revisit a tweet he posted in 2016 that has since become a meme: 'I feel bad for our country. But this is tremendous content.' Related Content To save rhinos, conservationists are removing their horns Donald Trump and the art of the Oval Office confrontation Some advice from LGBTQ elders as WorldPride kicks off amid fears

Can we trust ChatGPT despite it 'hallucinating' answers?
Can we trust ChatGPT despite it 'hallucinating' answers?

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Can we trust ChatGPT despite it 'hallucinating' answers?

I don't really want you to read this copy. Well I do - but first I want you to search out the interview I did with ChatGPT about its own propensity to lie, attached to this article, and watch that first. Because it's impossible to imagine what we're up against if you haven't seen it first hand. An incredibly powerful technology on the cusp of changing our lives - but programmed to simulate human emotions. Empathy, emotional understanding, and a desire to please are all qualities programmed into AI and invariably drive the way we think about them and the way we interact with them. Yet can we trust them? On Friday, Sky News revealed how it was fabricating entire transcripts of a podcast, Politics at Sam and Anne's, that I do. When challenged, it doubles down, gets shirty. And only under sustained pressure does it cave in. The research says it's getting worse. Internal tests by ChatGPT's owner OpenAI have found that the most recent models or versions that are used by ChatGPT are more likely to "hallucinate" - come up with answers that are simply untrue. The o3 model was found to hallucinate in 33% of answers to questions when tested on publicly available facts; the o4-mini version did worse, generating false, incorrect or imaginary information 48% of the time. ChatGPT itself says that the shift to GPT-4o "may have unintentionally increased what users perceive as 'bluffing'" - confidently giving wrong or misleading answers without admitting uncertainty or error. In a written query, ChatGPT gave four reasons. This is its explanation: 1. Increased fluency and confidence: GPT-4o is better at sounding human and natural. That polish can make mistakes seem more like deliberate evasions than innocent errors - even when there's no intent to "hide" anything. 2. Smarter, but not omniscient: The model is faster and more responsive, but still has blind spots. When it doesn't know something, it sometimes "hallucinates" (makes things up) with fluent language, which can feel like bluffing. 3. Less interruption and hedging: In older models, you'd often see more qualifiers like "I'm not sure" or "I may be wrong." In GPT-4o, some of that hedging was toned down for clarity and readability - but that can come at the cost of transparency about uncertainty. 4. Prompt tuning and training balance: Behind the scenes, prompt engineering and tuning decisions can shift the model's balance between confidence, humility, and accuracy. It's possible the newer tuning has dialled up assertiveness slightly too far. But can we trust even this? I don't know. What I do know is that the efforts of developers to make it all feel more human suggest they want us to. Critics say we are anthropomorphising AI by saying it lies since it has no consciousness - yet the developers are trying to make it sound more like one of us. Read more from Sky News:Man chased on tarmac at Heathrow AirportSoldier arrested on suspicion of raping woman What I do know is that even when pressed on this subject by me, it is still evasive. I interviewed ChatGPT about lying - it initially claimed things were getting better, and only admitted they are worse when I insisted it look at the stats. Watch that before you decide what you think. AI is a tremendous tool - but it's too early to take it on trust.

College Grads Are Lab Rats in the Great AI Experiment
College Grads Are Lab Rats in the Great AI Experiment

Bloomberg

timean hour ago

  • Bloomberg

College Grads Are Lab Rats in the Great AI Experiment

Companies are eliminating the grunt work that used to train young professionals — and they don't seem to have a clear plan for what comes next. AI is analyzing documents, writing briefing notes, creating Power Point presentations or handling customer service queries, and — surprise! — now the younger humans who normally do that work are struggling to find jobs. Recently, the chief executive officer of AI firm Anthropic predicted AI would wipe out half of all entry-level white-collar jobs. The reason is simple. Companies are often advised to treat ChatGPT 'like an intern,' and some are doing so at the expense of human interns.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store