
How To Own Preferred Stock And Collect 7%+ Each Year
Stock market blackboard concept
getty
While vanilla income investors limit their search to mere 'common' dividends, we contrarians know where the real payout party is at—with preferred stock divvies.
Let's talk about three preferred-stock vehicles that pay from 6.9% to 9.4%. All three of these funds dish monthly dividends.
And these payouts receive preferential treatment over common-stock dividends, making them safer than the common payouts offered by regular ol' equities.
There are four main ways to buy preferreds, and three of them have some serious headaches and drawbacks:
CEFs really do outperform their ETF 'benchmark.' Consider this chart of three preferred-stock CEFs versus iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF (PFF)—all three CEFs boast better returns than the popular PFF:
CEFs Outperform
Ycharts
Of course preferred CEFs aren't perfect. Fees are higher. The use of leverage makes preferreds swing more drastically than ETFs and mutual funds. And when preferreds heat up, CEFs can actually trade at a premium to NAV, which can drag on performance if we buy in at the wrong time.
That all said, CEFs are generally the easiest and most effective way for us to buy preferreds. Now let's talk about the three that pay up to 9.4% in monthly divvies.
I want to start with a 'hybrid' preferred fund: the John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund (PDT).
PDT is technically an allocation fund (stock plus fixed income), split roughly 50/50 between preferred stocks and dividend-yielding common stocks. It's a brilliant idea—combining two great income tastes—that I'm surprised isn't more prevalent in ETF-land, where they can build an index and launch a product overnight.
Not that I'd trust an index with this kind of portfolio.
John Hancock's team of capital and credit managers have built a pretty tight portfolio of around 125 holdings. Utilities, which are directly stated as part of the fund's strategy, make up the vast majority of common-stock holdings. Financials make up the bulk of the preferred allocation—a surprise to no one familiar with preferred portfolios. Top holdings include high-yielding commons from telecoms AT&T (T) and Verizon (VZ), as well as utilities like Duke Energy (DUK) and BP (BP), but also preferreds like a 7.56% series from Citizens Financial.
PDT has historically beaten up on plain-vanilla preferred ETFs like the iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF (PFF). Of course it has. Not only does it have the benefit of owning some traditional equities, but management also uses a high amount of leverage (34% currently), which lets it make even more out of bull markets.
Perhaps more surprising is its performance against pure high-yield common-dividend-stock funds:
PDT Total Returns
Ycharts
The tradeoff, as the chart clearly shows, is volatility. Whereas basic preferred funds are often held to stabilize portfolios, John Hancock's fund's equity holdings and leverage are more geared toward performance than comfort.
Fortunately, PDT actually delivers that performance, making it worthy of a look—especially when it trades at a discount to NAV, which it does right now. A 6% sale on PDT's assets might not sound like much, but over the past five years, the CEF has traded at a premium on average.
Traditionalists will lean more toward funds such as the Flaherty & Crumrine Dynamic Preferred and Income Fund (DFP), which is as straightforward a preferred CEF as we could ask for.
DFP holds about 250 positions, nearly 80% of which are issues from financial-sector firms. This is also a 'global' fund, split about 70 domestic/30 international, so in addition to preferreds from the likes of Citigroup (C) and Morgan Stanley (MS), we also get exposure to preferreds from Lloyds Banking (LYG) and Banco Santander (SAN).
Management is more than happy to take some hard swings, too. About half of the portfolio is below-investment-grade, and DFP juices performance and yields further with nearly 40% debt leverage.
Flaherty & Crumrine's preferred CEF also offers the best headline pricing of the bunch, at an 8% discount to NAV. And like with PDT, it's also a relative bargain compared to its five-year average discount, which sits around 2%.
Most preferred stocks are perpetual in nature. They don't have expiration dates, and thus duration isn't usually necessary when evaluating preferred-stock funds.
First Trust Intermediate Duration Preferred & Income Fund (FPF) is different, aiming for a portfolio duration of between three and eight years (and currently sits near five).
If we back out the emphasis on duration, FPF looks an awful lot like a regular preferred CEF. Financials command a clear majority of assets. It's not afraid to shy away from international preferreds, which make up more than 40% of assets (Canada alone accounts for 15%). Leverage is high, at 34%. Dividends are high, at nearly 10%. Those dividends come each and every month.
Two things about FPF that stand out more than anything?
On the upside, First Trust's CEF has pretty great credit quality, with about two-thirds of assets in investment-grade preferreds. Another 15% or so is in BB+, the highest junk tier. Sure, that's why FPF, while better than PFF, hasn't performed as well as the prior two funds. But it's also why FPF boasts the lowest volatility of the three (as measured by beta) over every meaningful time period.
On the downside, we're getting a 'phantom' sale on FPF right now. It currently trades at a 5% discount to NAV, but over the past five years, it has actually traded at a 6% discount on average.
Brett Owens is Chief Investment Strategist for Contrarian Outlook. For more great income ideas, get your free copy his latest special report: How to Live off Huge Monthly Dividends (up to 8.7%) — Practically Forever.
Disclosure: none
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Washington Post
38 minutes ago
- Washington Post
L.A. Mayor: Trump administration 'provoked' protests
RFK Jr. has big plans for your food. Here are the facts. May 2, 2025

Associated Press
an hour ago
- Associated Press
MLS players' union says dispute over Club World Cup compensation is ongoing
Major League Soccer and its players' union remain at odds over compensation for the players with the three MLS teams taking part in the Club World Cup. The Seattle Sounders, LAFC and Inter Miami are the only MLS clubs among the 32 teams playing in the Club World Cup, which starts Saturday. Each team will earn $9.55 million as a club for participating in the tournament, with a chance to win additional prize money based on performance. The Major League Soccer Players Association said Sunday that the league issued a proposal Friday that did not include any additional participation bonuses for the players and offered 'below-standard' back-end compensation. The union also said the league asked for unrelated concessions to the collective bargaining agreement. Currently, there is a provision of the collective bargaining agreement that caps the amount of prize money that can go to players at $1 million. The MLSPA believes the players are entitled to a bigger share of the funds. 'The timing, substance and retaliatory nature of the proposal sends a clear message: MLS does not respect or value players' efforts with regard to this tournament,' the MLSPA said in statement Sunday. 'Although not surprised, the players and the MLSPA are deeply disappointed by this message.' Major League Soccer issued a statement Sunday to clarify its position. 'As the Seattle Sounders FC, Inter Miami CF, and the Los Angeles Football Club prepare to compete in the upcoming FIFA Club World Cup, Major League Soccer has agreed to voluntarily provide additional performance-based compensation to players from the three participating clubs,' the league said. 'MLS has proposed an enhanced structure for the Club World Cup to reward both participation and competitive achievement in the tournament. In addition to the guaranteed $1 million per team for qualifying, 20 percent of all prize money earned from the group stage onward would be allocated to players. If an MLS club wins the Club World Cup, its players could collectively receive more than $24 million in performance bonuses.' The statement went on to say that MLS owners believe that performance-based incentives are appropriate given the expanded format and increased prize pool for the tournament. 'The League values the continued dedication and commitment of its players and looks forward to supporting them as they represent their clubs -- and Major League Soccer -- on the global stage this summer.' The talks between the two sides were ongoing. Last weekend, the Seattle Sounders called attention to the issue by wearing T-shirts before a match that read 'Club World Cup Ca$h Grab.' On Sunday, a number of players posted the hashtag #FairShareNow, including Sounders goalkeeper Stefan Frei and LAFC center back Aaron Long. 'The players remain unified in using their collective voice and demanding a fair share of the rewards earned from their hard work,' the union said. The Club World Cup features an expanded field of club teams from around the globe and will be played across 11 U.S. cities. ___ AP soccer:


Fox News
an hour ago
- Fox News
Ram to enter trucks in 2026 with possible future move to Cup for Dodge
BROOKLYN, Mich. — Dodge parent company Stellantis will enter NASCAR racing in 2026 with its Ram brand competing in the NASCAR Craftsman Truck Series with an eye toward going Cup racing in the years beyond. Whether that's 2027 or later — 2027 is possible but would be an aggressive timeline — remains to be seen as the announcement Sunday focused primarily on the truck, a much easier lift than going Cup racing. With all trucks in the series using an Ilmor engine and several common body elements, Ram just needed to design a nose, a hood, front fenders and a tail for its racing vehicle. Ram did not announce who will drive its trucks nor the teams that will field its trucks. Ram CEO Tim Kinuskis said he hopes to have somewhere between four and six trucks for the 2026 season opener at Daytona. "We're looking for a date to the prom right now [for trucks]," Kinuskis said. "So how am I going to get the Cup? That's going to depend on how I get to truck. So however we get to truck is going will obviously weigh heavily on do I have a path to Cup? "Our intention is not to do a one-hit wonder and go to truck and not to Cup. That's not our plan." Ram does not have cars so what brand of car — Dodge? Plymouth's possible rebirth? — is still to be determined although Dodge has a lengthy history in the sport and motorsports as a whole. "Ram is coming back to the truck series," Kinuskis said. "It has nothing to do with Dodge, despite the fact that everyone in the world calls it Dodge Ram. ... If we go back to Cup, which is our intention, Ram doesn't have a car, so obviously that would have to be Dodge coming back. "But I'm not making that announcement. I'm not saying Dodge is back. Don't put that headline. But when we get to that point, it wouldn't be Ram, obviously." There is speculation in the industry that GMS, which has competed in all three national series over the last decade and was eventually bought out by Jimmie Johnson in the rebranding to Legacy Motor Club, will be involved in building chassis and/or fielding trucks for Ram. Kinuskis promised a program that will elevate fan engagement, and YouTube star Cleetus McFarland, who has competed in some ARCA races, has been linked to the Ram program. Dodge had Cup teams from 2001-12 before exiting the sport on a high note with Brad Keselowski winning a Cup title at Team Penske. When Penske left for Ford, Dodge had trouble landing a premier team and opted to leave the sport. No new manufacturer has entered the sport since Toyota did so in 2004 in trucks and 2007 in Cup. Kinuskis also said when he returned to Ram earlier this year, his two goals were to reintroduce the Hemi engine and get into NASCAR, where 50 percent of its fan base own trucks. "It's always bothered me," Kinuskis said. "We've always been looking for a way to get back. It took us a long time to find the absolute right time." To re-enter Cup would take some engine development and significant body design, a process that would take at least 18 months, NASCAR Chief Racing Development Officer John Probst said. "The last time that engine ran was 2012 — the core components of the block, the head, the manifold, are all still relevant," Probst said. "Our existing engine builders develop their engines every year. There's been a gap there, so there'd be some development of that engine needed. "But from the basic building blocks they could start from that and do some catch-up development." Kinuskis wouldn't talk about a timeline Sunday for going to Cup racing. "Our full intention is to be back in Cup," Kinuskis said. "But right now we're on a path for Daytona next year with truck, with our eye on when we can be in Cup after that. TBD. "We're a fly with no net right now trying to get to Daytona. That's our focus right now." Keselowski, currently a driver and co-owner at RFK Racing, said the trucks are the right entry point for a manufacturer as it doesn't have to immediately get an engine available and because of the parity in the series. "[The truck series] is a great place for an OEM [original equipment manufacturer] to enter NASCAR and really kind of get that appetite going for the Cup Series," Keselowski said. "It's a big jump from the truck series to the Cup Series, but nonetheless it's a great entry point for OEMs, and hopefully they aren't the only one that will enter the truck series." Bob Pockrass covers NASCAR and IndyCar for FOX Sports. He has spent decades covering motorsports, including over 30 Daytona 500s, with stints at ESPN, Sporting News, NASCAR Scene magazine and The (Daytona Beach) News-Journal. Follow him on Twitter @bobpockrass.