Two Cambridge University colleges seek injunctions against pro-Palestine activists
Two university colleges are seeking High Court injunctions against pro-Palestine demonstrations, saying they are 'disruptive to students taking their exams.'
On Friday, activists camped on Newton Lawn outside Trinity College in Cambridge, playing music and chanting, and later moved to a lawn outside St John's College, a lawyer for Cambridge University said.
The protesters left after the High Court granted temporary injunctions on Sunday and Monday, meaning further protests could result in activists being found to be in contempt of court.
At a hearing on Thursday, Kester Lees KC, for the colleges, asked for the injunctions to be made final and to last for 12 months, saying the protests are disruptive to students taking their exams.
In written submissions, he said the university was 'concerned about the environment of fear and intimidation created by masked protesters', adding that 'some chanting was directly aimed at disrupting the examination season'.
He also said the university does not wish to stop all protests and suggested a 'myriad' of other options, such as a march or online and writing campaigns.
'There is nothing that ties them to needing to be on the claimant's private land in order to form a protest.
'Even if they wanted to do an encampment protest, there is nothing to say they need to be on the lawn where the students are coming through during exam season," he added.
In requesting the injunction, Mr Lees said damages would not be an appropriate remedy because 'any impact on a student's grade will be an indelible mark for the rest of their professional life'.
Grant Kynaston, for the European Legal Support Centre (ELSC), which supports the legal rights of pro-Palestine activists, said the court action has been rushed and that more time should be given, during which further evidence could be provided.
'The claimant's application relies primarily on the fact that the noise of protesters may disrupt students preparing for examinations,' he said in written submissions.
'However, its evidence consists only of two brief noise complaints, one of which ceased at the claimant's request.'
Mr Kynaston asked the court to discontinue the injunction, saying that if it were to be granted, it would be an 'exceptionally wide-ranging and uncalibrated interference' with the protesters' human rights.
He also said there is a trend of higher education institutions relying on court injunctions as a first, rather than as a last resort, for enforcing against protests on their land.
He added: 'This conduct, treating injunctive relief as the first, rather than the last, resort, is inconsistent with the high standard required of claimants seeking this form of newcomer relief, let alone with a rights-protective approach.
'The court should not endorse it.'
Judge Andrew Twigger KC is expected to give judgment in two to three weeks, during which time the temporary injunctions will remain in place.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
6 hours ago
- The Guardian
Conference to recognise Palestinian state to weaken scope of its ambition, diplomats say
A planned conference in Saudi Arabia this month that supporters of Palestine had hoped would push western governments to recognise a Palestinian state has weakened its ambition and will instead hope to agree on steps towards recognition, diplomats have said. The change to the aims of the conference, due to be held between 17 and 20 June, marks a retreat from an earlier vision that it would mark a joint declaration of recognition of Palestine as a state by a large group of countries, including permanent UN security council members France and the UK. Emmanuel Macron, the French president and a co-sponsor of the event, has declared recognition of Palestine as 'a moral duty and political requirement', but French officials briefing their Israeli counterparts this week reassured them the conference will not be the moment for recognition. That is now seen as a prize that will emerge from other measures, including a permanent ceasefire in Gaza, the release of Israeli hostages, reform of the Palestinian Authority, economic reconstruction and a definitive end to Hamas's rule in Gaza. France and Saudi Arabia have set up eight working parties to prepare the necessary ingredients for a two-state solution, and Macron is hosting a conference of civil society under the banner of the Paris Peace Forum immediately before the three-day conference. The UK is overseeing the humanitarian working party and other working groups cover reconstruction, economic viability of a Palestinian state, promoting respect for international law, narratives for peace and 'peace day', an imagining of the benefits to both sides from a peaceful settlement. Israel and the US have attended run-up meetings to the conference but have not spoken, prompting speculation they may boycott the event. Israel has fought hard to prevent stateless Palestinians achieving self-determination. Polls show only a fifth of the Israel electorate favour a two-state solution and 56% of Jewish Israelis supported the 'transfer of Arab citizens of Israel to other countries'. Israel has also approved plans to build a further 22 settlements in the West Bank – the biggest expansion in decades. Israel's defence minister, Israel Katz, said it was 'a strategic move that prevents the establishment of a Palestinian state'. Macron's initiative has been described as 'disastrous' by the Israel's ambassador to France, Joshua Zarka. Recognition of a Palestinian state was previously seen as an outcome of a failed 1990s-era two-state plan. However, governments in Europe increasingly doubt Israel has any intention to ease its control over Palestinians and see recognition as a possible lever to force a change of thinking among Israeli officials. Ireland, Spain and Norway recognised a Palestinian state last year. Macron has insisted he would only recognise a Palestinian state without Hamas – the same stance as the UK. In an open letter to Macron, The Elders, a group of former senior UN diplomats, say recognition is 'an essential transformative step towards peace' that should be taken as a matter of principle, divorced from negotiations over the ultimate form of Palestinian statehood and how and when Hamas should be disarmed. Anne-Claire Legendre, the president's adviser on the Middle East, has said the conference 'must mark a transformative milestone for the effective implementation of the two-state solution. We must move from words to deeds, and we must move from the end of the war in Gaza to the end of the conflict.' She met Israeli officials this week to discuss the conference and Israel's often cloudy long-term vision for the region. She also met the Palestinian prime minister, Mohammad Mustafa. Israeli newspapers reported the travelling French officials as saying: 'The recognition of a Palestinian state remains on the table, but not as a product of the conference. This will remain a bilateral subject between states.' The British foreign secretary, David Lammy, who is expected to attend the conference, is under massive backbench pressure to do more to punish Israel and is, at minimum, being asked flesh out the conditions for the UK recognition of a Palestinian state. Hamish Falconer, the Middle East minister, told MPs this week the UK thinking was evolving. 'One reason that the traditional position of the UK government has been that the recognition of a Palestinian state should come at the end, or during, a two-state solution process was the hope that we would move towards a two-state solution,' he said. 'Many minds have been changed because of the rhetoric of the Israeli government – the clear statements by so many that they are no longer committed to a two-state solution.' But the British are looking for firm undertakings at the conference on the future government of Palestine, including the exclusion of Hamas from any future governance of Gaza, which is something Hamas itself has appeared to accept in the various plans drawn up by Arab states. A growing number of Conservative MPs have broken with their frontbench on the issue and now back recognition, including the former attorney general Sir Jeremy Wright. France hopes that a group of western states recognising a Palestinian state could be counter-balanced by Muslim states normalising relations with Israel. However, Saudi recognition of Israel seems impossible. The Saudi crown prince, Mohammed bin Salman, the other co-host, has asserted repeatedly that Israel is committing a genocide, a view that is shared widely by Saudi public opinion.
STV News
19 hours ago
- STV News
Trial date set for three men charged over fires at Keir Starmer properties
A trial date has been set for three men charged in connection with arson attacks on two properties and a car linked to Sir Keir Starmer. Ukrainian national Roman Lavrynovych, 21, and Romanian national Stanislav Carpiuc, 26, appeared together at the Old Bailey on Friday. Ukrainian national Petro Pochynok, 34, refused to attend the hearing. Two of the fires took place in Kentish Town, north London – one in the early hours of May 12 at the home where Sir Keir lived before he became Prime Minister and moved into Downing Street. The entrance to Sir Keir Starmer's house in Kentish Town. / Credit: James Manning/PA A car was set alight in the same street four days earlier on May 8. The other fire was on May 11 at the front door of a house converted into flats in Islington. Lavrynovych, of Lewisham, south-east London, has been charged with three counts of arson with intent to endanger life on May 8, May 11 and May 12. Carpiuc, from Romford, east London, and Pochynok, of Islington, north London, are each accused of one count of conspiracy to commit arson with intent to endanger life between April 17 and May 13. Lavrynovych and Carpiuc appeared at the hearing via videolink from HMP Belmarsh, and spoke only to confirm their identities and dates of birth via an interpreter. Ms Justice Cheema Grubb told the court that Pochynok had refused to leave his cell for the preliminary hearing. All three defendants were remanded in custody to next appear for a plea and trial preparation hearing at the same court on October 17. A provisional trial date was set for April 27 next year in front of a High Court judge. A fourth person, a 48-year-old man, was arrested by police at Stansted Airport on Monday on suspicion of conspiracy to commit arson with intent to endanger life in connection with the incidents. The Metropolitan Police said he had been released on bail until next month. Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
NBC News
20 hours ago
- NBC News
Mahmoud Khalil responds to 'grotesque' charges in new legal filing, says arrest caused 'irreparable harm'
Mahmoud Khalil, a Columbia University student detained in March by immigration agents, responded for the first time to the charges against him and described the "irreparable harm" his arrest has had on him and his family. "I have suffered—and continue to suffer—as a result of the government's actions against me," he said in a declaration included in a letter his legal team filed on Thursday in support of his bid for a preliminary injunction in his federal case. "The most immediate and visceral harms I have experienced directly relate to the birth of my son, Deen. Instead of holding my wife's hand in the delivery room, I was crouched on a detention center floor, whispering through a crackling phone line as she labored alone," Khalil said. "I listened to her pain, trying to comfort her while 70 other men slept around me. When I heard my son's first cries, I buried my face in my arms so no one would see me weep." His wife, Dr. Noor Abdalla, was eight months pregnant when Khalil was arrested March 8 at his New York apartment building. She said she had requested his presence at the birth but was denied by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Khalil said that not being able to see his family has been "devastating." In his declaration, he condemned the White House and President Donald Trump over the "grotesque and false" claims made against him. Khalil was targeted for deportation after he helped organize pro-Palestinian rallies on the university's campus. He is being held at a facility in rural Jena, Louisiana. A Department of Homeland Security spokesperson said in a statement that "it is a privilege to be granted a visa or green card to live and study in the United States of America." "When you advocate for violence, glorify and support terrorists that relish the killing of Americans, and harass Jews, take over buildings and deface property, that privilege should be revoked, and you should not be in this country," the statement added. DHS said Khalil was granted a contact visit with his wife and son before his court appearance and has been given the option of self-deporting. The Department of Justice declined to comment, and ICE did not immediately respond to a request for comment. "It is hard to describe the humiliation and pain of seeing mugshot-style images of myself circulated from the highest levels of the U.S. government—accompanied by inflammatory language, grotesque and false accusations, and open celebration of my deportation," Khalil said in the declaration. "These were not just attacks on my character; they were efforts to erase my humanity." Khalil said his wife and family have also been subjected to harassment after the government labeled him a "U.S. foreign policy concern" and accused him of supporting Hamas. He said the allegations against him are false and "deeply racist." Khalil's attorney said in the letter that his arrest has damaged his reputation and "severely" undermined his pursuit of one day working in international diplomacy and human rights advocacy. Khalil said he had accepted a position at Oxfam International as a policy advisor, but the job offer was revoked. "I strongly believe that the Rubio Determination, my arrest and detention—and the public stigma that followed— played a significant role in this decision," he said. "I was not surprised; roles like this depend on your reputation." Oxfam International did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Friday. In a separate declaration, Khalil's wife described how she is "afraid for our safety." "Mahmoud's case has impacted every aspect of our life," she said. "I have experienced Islamophobia my whole life as a Muslim woman who wears a hijab, but it has been amplified by Mahmoud's detention and ongoing case. Mahmoud's and my careers, our desire for a stable life, and Deen's future will forever be impacted by these false allegations against him."
