Trial date set for three men charged over fires at Keir Starmer properties
Ukrainian national Roman Lavrynovych, 21, and Romanian national Stanislav Carpiuc, 26, appeared together at the Old Bailey on Friday. Ukrainian national Petro Pochynok, 34, refused to attend the hearing.
Two of the fires took place in Kentish Town, north London – one in the early hours of May 12 at the home where Sir Keir lived before he became Prime Minister and moved into Downing Street. The entrance to Sir Keir Starmer's house in Kentish Town. / Credit: James Manning/PA
A car was set alight in the same street four days earlier on May 8.
The other fire was on May 11 at the front door of a house converted into flats in Islington.
Lavrynovych, of Lewisham, south-east London, has been charged with three counts of arson with intent to endanger life on May 8, May 11 and May 12.
Carpiuc, from Romford, east London, and Pochynok, of Islington, north London, are each accused of one count of conspiracy to commit arson with intent to endanger life between April 17 and May 13.
Lavrynovych and Carpiuc appeared at the hearing via videolink from HMP Belmarsh, and spoke only to confirm their identities and dates of birth via an interpreter.
Ms Justice Cheema Grubb told the court that Pochynok had refused to leave his cell for the preliminary hearing.
All three defendants were remanded in custody to next appear for a plea and trial preparation hearing at the same court on October 17.
A provisional trial date was set for April 27 next year in front of a High Court judge.
A fourth person, a 48-year-old man, was arrested by police at Stansted Airport on Monday on suspicion of conspiracy to commit arson with intent to endanger life in connection with the incidents.
The Metropolitan Police said he had been released on bail until next month.
Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News
Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Record
a few seconds ago
- Daily Record
Furious Good Morning Britain fans hit out as Labour segment branded a 'farce'
ITV Good Morning Britain came under fire from viewers following its discussion on the ongoing migrant crisis with a Labour minister. Good Morning Britain viewers were left outraged after learning that 19 councils in England are reportedly exploring legal action against the UK Government to prevent hotels from being used to accommodate asylum seekers. On Tuesday (August 19) Epping Forest District Council successfully obtained a temporary High Court injunction to block the housing of asylum seekers in an Essex hotel. The injunction specifically prevents migrants from being placed at The Bell Hotel, which is operated by Somani Hotels Limited, highlighting rising tensions over local authority involvement in England and Wales in the national asylum system. In recent weeks, the hotel has been the site of large-scale protests following reports that an asylum seeker living there was charged with sexually assaulting a 14-year-old girl in the town, the Express writes. After sharing the distressing news, GMB hosts Adil Ray and Charlotte Hawkins invited Labour minister Catherine McKinnell onto the show to provide viewers with a better understanding of the government's plans to address the issue. Aldi started off by asking pointedly: "Where else are you going to put these asylum seekers? What is the plan?" However, the Minister of School Standards declined to answer the question, choosing instead to discuss the challenging system that had been inherited from the previous government. She replied: "We inherited a huge mess in terms of our immigration system from the previous government. At its peak in 2023, they had 400 asylum hotels - it's now down to 210. We've committed to ending the use of hotels for asylum seekers but we've said it will take until the end of this parliament to achieve that. "There are many ways that we are tackling this, one of which though is to tackle the backlog of claims because many of these people are just waiting in these hotels for their asylum cases to be processed." "So we are doubling the number of claims that are being processed, we're deporting people who shouldn't be here," she continued. At this stage Adil stepped in, pressing once again on the original question regarding the plans to move the residents to the hotel. He urged: "Let's look at those living in The Bell Hotel. We know they've got to move out in the next few weeks. That is a decision made by the High Court. Where are you going to put those initially? Are they just going to be put into another hotel? another town?" Ms McKinnell said: "You ask a legitimate question and these are legitimate concerns that local communities have had and we take it very seriously as a government, but I can't speculate on what the Home Office is doing." Adil fumed: "You don't know, do you? You don't know, and there doesn't seem to be a plan." It didn't take long for viewers to flood X, formally known as Twitter, sharing their frustrations with the situation. One user expressed: "Another MP who thinks the public are stupid! She thinks by responding to Adil & Charlotte's question 'That is such an important question' but then doesn't answer it will make people feel better. It was a pathetic interview, we need better quality MPs in all parties, it's insulting!!" Meanwhile, some viewers slammed the broadcaster for questioning a politician who is not an immigration specialist. One user commented: "@GMB getting mad at the Minister of School Standards for not knowing what the Home Office is going to do? She was there to celebrate GCSE results. What a farce of an interview." Another agreed, penning: "A dreadful interview two presenters being rude and unprofessional, bullying someone on something that isn't their job, it's just opportunistic bullying." A third fumed: "No wonder education is suffering again, it plays second fiddle to your immigration agenda. You get someone from education on and all you are really bothered about is immigration. This is why it's all being blown out of proportion and made worse because it's what you want."
Daily Mail
a minute ago
- Daily Mail
Italy arrests Ukrainian suspected of coordinating 2022 sabotage attacks on Nord Stream gas pipelines
Italian police have arrested a Ukrainian man suspected of coordinating the attacks on the Nord Stream pipelines, Germany 's prosecutor general said on Thursday, adding that he would be brought before a German judge after being transferred. Seen by both Russia and the West as an act of sabotage, no one has ever taken responsibility for explosions that severely damaged pipelines carrying gas from Russia to Europe in September 2022, marking a major escalation in the Ukraine conflict and ramping up an energy supply crisis on the continent. The suspect, identified only as Serhii K. under German privacy laws, was part of a group of people who planted devices on the pipelines near the German island of Bornholm in September 2022, a statement from the prosecutor's office said. He and his accomplices had set off from Rostock on Germany's north-eastern coast in a sailing yacht to carry out the attack. It added that the vessel had been rented from a German company with the help of forged identity documents via middlemen. Authorities acted on a European arrest warrant for the suspect, who faces charges of collusion to cause an explosion, anti-constitutional sabotage and destruction of buildings. Carabinieri officers arrested him overnight in the province of Rimini on Italy 's Adriatic coast, the German prosecutors' statement said. Italian police had no immediate comment.
Telegraph
a minute ago
- Telegraph
Labour house 50 migrants a week in asylum hotels despite crackdown
The number of asylum seekers in hotels has risen by 2,500 since Labour took office, equivalent to 50 a week, official figures show. Asylum applications by migrants also hit a record high of more than 111,000 during Sir Keir Starmer's first year in office, after a record surge in small-boat crossings. And just four per cent of small-boat migrants have been returned since 2018, with removals falling in the past year, Home Office figures show. The data will pile pressure on the Prime Minister after a week in which the Government's asylum policy was plunged into chaos with a High Court ruling forcing the closure of a migrant hotel in Epping, Essex, at the centre of anti-immigration protests. The court's judgment has led to ministers bracing for further legal challenges from councils across the country and pressure on the Government as to where else they can house asylum seekers. The latest Home Office data, published on Thursday as part of the quarterly immigration statistics, cover Labour's first year in office. They show there were 32,059 asylum seekers in more than 200 hotels by the end of June. This was eight per cent up from 29,585 at the same point a year earlier, when the Conservatives were still in power, but down slightly on the 32,345 figure at the end of March. At this rate of decline of 286 in three months, it would take 113 years to clear all asylum seekers out of hotels. Labour has pledged to end the use of hotels for asylum seekers by the close of the Parliament in 2029. The latest number is still below the peak of 56,042 asylum seekers in some 400 hotels at the end of September 2023 under the Tories. A total of 111,084 people applied for asylum in the UK in the year to June 2025, the highest number for any 12-month period since current records began in 2001. The number is up 14 per cent from 97,107 in the year to June 2024 and nearly double the number in 2021. The previous record for a 12-month period was 109,343 in the year to March 2025. Migrants who arrived in the UK after crossing the English Channel in small boats accounted for 39 per cent of the total number of people claiming asylum in the year to June. However, a further 37 per cent of claimants had previously arrived in the UK on a visa to work, study or visit. The number of people coming to the UK on small boats or other 'irregular' routes, such as lorries, rose by 27 per cent to 49,000 in the year to June 2025. The most common nationalities of those coming to the UK on small boats were Afghans, Eritreans, Iranians and Syrians. More people are coming to the UK per small boat – there were 65 migrants per boat in June 2025, the highest monthly average on record. A total of 6,313 people who arrived on a small boat between 2018 and the year ending June 2025 have been returned from the UK, representing just four per cent of the total of nearly 180,000. There were 2,330 returns of small-boat migrants in the year to June 2025, seven per cent fewer than the previous year. Of the 159,180 small-boat arrivals who have claimed asylum since 2018, just over one third (35 per cent) were refused or their application was withdrawn. Home Office spending on asylum in the UK stood at £4.76bn in 2024/25, down 12 per cent from a record £5.38bn in 2023/24, the figures show. The total covers all Home Office costs related to asylum, including direct cash support and accommodation, plus wider staffing and other migration and borders activity. It does not include costs relating to the interception of migrants who travel to the UK across the English Channel in small boats. The figure for 2024/25, £4.76bn, is more than three times the equivalent amount in 2020/21 (£1.34bn) and is more than 10 times the total a decade ago in 2014/15 (£0.47bn). 'New, stronger approach' Yvette Cooper, the Home Secretary, said:'We inherited a broken immigration and asylum system that the previous government left in chaos. Since coming to office we have strengthened Britain's visa and immigration controls, cut asylum costs and sharply increased enforcement and returns, as today's figures show. 'The action we have taken in the last 12 months – increasing returns of failed asylum seekers by over 30 per cent, cutting asylum costs by 11 per cent, reducing the backlog by 18 per cent and our forthcoming plans to overhaul the failing asylum appeal system – are crucial steps to restoring order, and putting an end to the chaotic use of asylum hotels that we inherited from the previous government. 'At the same time, we are bringing legal migration back under control, with a 48 per cent reduction in work visas this year – and further stronger visa controls and higher skill requirements introduced through our white paper expected to bring those overall numbers down further. 'As we roll out further reforms, including the new pilot with France, new counter-terror powers to strengthen border security, and new asylum reforms later this year (including reforms to speed up the persistent delays in the appeals system), we will continue to take the serious steps required to restore order, control and fairness to the system and to continue building the foundations of a new and stronger approach.' Chris Philp, the shadow home secretary, said: 'This weak Labour Government has allowed in record numbers of illegal immigrants over the Channel, there are more immigrants in hotels than at the time of the election and fewer people are being removed. 'They are failing and need to urgently back the Conservative's Bill that will ensure illegal immigrants and foreign criminals are all removed. This is a migration crisis – the Labour Government has lost control of our borders.' Nigel Farage, the Reform UK leader, said: 'Under Labour we now have record numbers claiming asylum. The vast majority should never qualify and most will cost the taxpayer a huge sum of money. 'Our streets are becoming more dangerous yet this disaster gets worse. The public are right to be very angry with both Labour and the Tories for what they have done to us.' Lisa Smart, the Liberal Democrats home affairs spokesman, said: 'The asylum backlog has been far too large for far too long. The Conservatives trashed our immigration system and let numbers spiral. Now this Labour Government is failing to get a grip on the crisis. 'The Government urgently needs to stop dangerous Channel crossings and speed up asylum processing to bring down the backlog and end hotel use once and for all.'
