
VA Announces Expansion of Benefits
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has announced a temporary expansion of burial benefits for certain veterans and their families.
Recipients will see a temporary expansion of burial benefits thanks to the Senator Elizabeth Dole 21st Century Veterans Healthcare and Benefits Improvement Act, known as the Dole Act.
The department has been contacted via email for comment.
Secretary of Veterans Affairs Doug Collins pictured in the Dirksen Senate Office Building on Tuesday, June 24, 2025.
Secretary of Veterans Affairs Doug Collins pictured in the Dirksen Senate Office Building on Tuesday, June 24, 2025.
Bill Clark/CQ Roll Call via AP Images
Why It Matters
The VA is the second-largest U.S. government department, employing about 470,000 people, a quarter of whom are veterans. Some 6.2 million veterans in the United States receive disability benefits from the VA.
Veterans who received VA healthcare were not always eligible for a VA-covered burial, resulting in families having to cover the costs after their deaths.
This benefit from the Dole Act will mean eligible veterans will have their full burial costs covered.
This temporary expansion of burial benefits comes as the department reduces its headcount as part of the Trump administration's program to downsize the federal government - although by much less than originally planned.
The VA had planned to reduce its workforce to 400,000, but after much criticism last week announced it would shed fewer than 30,000 jobs this year. Some 12,000 staff will leave their roles by the end of September, after 17,000 job cuts were made between January and June.
The department says it has "multiple safeguards in place to ensure these staff reductions do not impact veteran care or benefits."
What To Know
"The new law specifies eligible Veterans are those who are discharged from VA-provided medical or nursing care to receive VA-provided hospice care at their home and who pass away between July 1, 2025, and Oct. 1, 2026," said the VA in a statement.
"Previously, Veterans who died at home under VA hospice care after discharge from VA-provided medical or nursing care were not always eligible for a full VA burial allowance. The Dole Act addresses that gap."
The Dole Act was signed into law in January 2025 by then-President Joe Biden.
Following its passage, Chairman of the House Committee on Veterans' Affairs, Republican Illinois Representative Mike Bost said: "The men and women who have served have earned access to a VA that puts them – not government bureaucracy – at the center of its operations. The Senator Elizabeth Dole 21st Century Veterans Healthcare and Benefits Improvement Act will do exactly that."
The act includes several increases and changes to veterans' benefits, including changing the definition of "surviving spouse" to "someone who lived continuously with the veteran until their death and who has not remarried," and requiring the VA to create a plan for creating transitional housing grants for homeless veterans.
Trump administration changes to the VA include barring transgender veterans from getting their fertility treatment covered by the VA, and increasing the VA budget by $83 billion through the recent budget.
What People Are Saying
VA Secretary Doug Collins said in a press release: "VA is working hard to fully implement the many provisions of the Dole Act. We're excited to offer this expanded benefit, which better supports Veterans who choose to spend their final days at home, surrounded by their loved ones."
What Happens Next
Families and caregivers are encouraged to contact their local VA office to determine eligibility and to apply for the expanded burial benefits.
Additional details are available on the VA burial benefits website or by calling 800-827-1000.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsweek
29 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Chart Reveals True Cost of Trump's Tariffs
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Consumer inflation data has yet to reveal any major cost effects of President Donald Trump's trade policies, leading many to downgrade their predictions of a tariff-induced price spiral in the near future. But a working paper, entitled "Tracking the Short-Run Price Impact of U.S. Tariffs," has charted those that the administration's trade policies have already affected. One of its authors told Newsweek that the impacts, though delayed for now, may begin to significantly impact household budgets later this year. Newsweek reached out to the Commerce Department and the Council of Economic Advisers via email outside of regular hours for comment. Why It Matters The so far muted impact of tariffs on inflation and consumer spending has puzzled certain economists and led political commentators, notably talk show host Bill Maher, to recant their previous criticisms of the president's economic strategies. Citing this fact, and the over $100 billion in tax revenue tariffs have accrued, the administration has declared these to be both harmless and a resounding success for the United States economy and its global trade leverage. However, many experts still caution that the full effects of tariffs will be gradual rather than immediate. Due to a range of interrelated factors—inventory buffers, supply chain adjustments and amendments to announced or threatened duties—they argue that the costs to the American consumer will surface more clearly over time. What To Know The paper was authored by Alberto Cavallo of Harvard University, alongside Paola Llamas and Franco Vazquez of Universidad de San Andrés. As shown on the chart below, based on data from the four largest retailers in the U.S., the trio found that the price of imported goods has risen sharply since February. Domestic goods also saw an increase, albeit "more gradual and steady," which the authors said was due to the reliance of even U.S.-made products on imported components subject to new tariffs. A chart showing how prices of imported and domestic goods have changed amid President Trump's tariff announcements, from the working paper entitled "Tracking the Short-Run Price Impact of U.S. Tariffs." A chart showing how prices of imported and domestic goods have changed amid President Trump's tariff announcements, from the working paper entitled "Tracking the Short-Run Price Impact of U.S. Tariffs." Albert Cavallo, Paola Llamas, Franco Vazquez "We observed rapid price responses to trade war and tariff-related news, with average price increases of about 3 percent for imported products since February," said Alberto Cavallo, a professor of Business Administration at Harvard Business School. "These increases were largely driven by goods from China, particularly in categories such as household goods, furniture, and electronics." However, Cavallo told Newsweek that the retail price impacts have so far remained modest when compared with the actual size of the tariffs that were announced over this period. Despite confusing some, Cavallo said this is in line with trends observed during the U.S.-China trade war in 2018-2019, when "prices at the border rose quickly, but pass-through to retail prices was slow and uneven." "A similar dynamic appears to be unfolding now," he said. "U.S. firms are experiencing higher import costs, as suggested by stable or rising import prices, but have not yet passed most of these increases on to consumers." The researchers identified several reasons why higher import costs may not have yet translated into higher prices. These include retailers "front-running" or stocking up on inventory ahead of a scheduled tariff hike, the uncertainty surrounding the duration and level of the tariffs that have been subject to constant revision and negotiation, as well as the potentially disastrous "consumer backlash" companies could face if they immediately raised prices to mitigate higher import costs. "The high level of uncertainty is likely leading firms to delay price adjustments. Overall, we expect the passthrough to retail prices to be gradual and uneven," Cavallo said, adding that firms are likely to pass on costs to consumers "gradually over time, which means that the inflation rate can be higher for several months." What People Are Saying White House economic adviser Stephen Miran, earlier this month on Fox News: "What we did is we looked at every category in the inflation what we find imported goods are actually getting cheaper." Alberto Cavallo, Thomas S. Murphy Professor of Business Administration at Harvard Business School, told Newsweek: "As the graph shows, each time there was news suggesting rising trade tensions, prices tended to increase. When the news pointed to easing tensions (e.g., with the China pause), prices generally stabilized or declined. So I do expect announcements about trade deals to continue influencing prices. Whether that accelerates passthrough to consumers will depend on how high and how long-lasting the tariffs are expected to be." What Happens Next As Cavallo noted, trade deals recently signed and the prospect of a more fully-fledged agreement with China could lessen the overall impact of tariffs on imported goods prices. However, alongside these negotiations, Trump has continued to threaten higher tariffs on countries such as Brazil, while also stating that the global baseline rate on countries unable to secure a deal could rise to between 15 and 20 percent.


Newsweek
29 minutes ago
- Newsweek
World's Oldest Christian Church Newspaper Closes
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The Church of England Newspaper, one of the longest-running faith-based publications in the world, ended its print production months after the passing of its owner and key financial backer, Keith Young. The newspaper, founded by a group of young evangelical clergy in 1828 as The Record, had been a fixture in Anglican news coverage for nearly two centuries. The publication's editor, Andrew Carey, announced last week that the brand had to "review its operations" after Young's death on February 23, aged 86. Young was "generously the sole provider of additional finance to continue supporting the paper," Carey said. Newsweek has reached out to Carey for additional comment. Why It Matters The closure of The Church of England Newspaper's print edition marks a significant loss in the landscape of religious and historical journalism. As the oldest Anglican newspaper and one of the longest-running continually published papers globally, its closing underscores the growing challenges facing print media in an increasingly, digital-first era. What To Know Publication's Legacy In 1949, The Record merged with The Church of England Family Newspaper and became known by its current title. Over the decades, the paper cultivated a reputation for independent reporting on Anglican and broader Christian affairs, maintaining a generally evangelical editorial stance and providing analysis, opinion, and global church news. Closure Announcement Editor Carey announced on July 22 that the print edition would cease following the death of Young, who had served as both owner and the director of its parent company, Political and Religious Intelligence Ltd. Young had provided the crucial financial backing needed for the paper to continue publishing. What People Are Saying Andrew Carey, editor of the Church of England Newspaper, said in his announcement to readers on July 22: "Keith was generously the sole provider of additional finance to continue supporting the paper and we are now exploring all options to secure a future and hope that you will bear with us as we seek an orderly transition to serve our readers and subscribers, our advertisers and all other partners." Duncan Williams, of Son Christian Media, told Press Gazette: "Given that there is much talk of a Christian revival in the U.K, it is sad to hear reports this month that the long-established Church of England Newspaper is closing. "I am well aware that religious publishing is especially challenging, and that securing revenue through advertising or subscriptions is essential for survival. I would urge publishers to consider moving to a web-based platform or utilising the subscription advantages of services such as Substack. I strongly believe there is a readership that still needs to be served by this kind of publication, and that it is not simply a niche or heritage publishing model." What Happens Next Carey said The Church of England Newspaper will send out a weekly email newsletter "for the foreseeable future." There will be no more print edition "until further notice" while the paper explores "all options before us," he said.


Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Donald Trump's Hands Under Scrutiny in New Photos
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. New photos of President Donald Trump's hands have led to renewed scrutiny about his health. Posting on social media, users have shared images of Trump during his visit to Europe, saying his hands are "swollen and bruised." Others suggested he was wearing makeup to conceal bruises. Why It Matters Earlier this month, the White House announced that Trump, who became the oldest person sworn in as president at the beginning of his second term, had been diagnosed with chronic venous insufficiency (CVI), something his doctor described as "benign and common." CVI is a condition in which the veins in the legs are unable to efficiently return blood to the heart. It is not life-threatening. The White House's announcement came after photos of Trump at various events showed swelling in his legs and bruises on his hands, which sparked public scrutiny about his health and fitness. Some have called for the 79-year-old to release his full medical records. President Donald Trump clasps his hands as he speaks with the media during a meeting with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer at the Trump Turnberry golf course in Scotland on July 28. President Donald Trump clasps his hands as he speaks with the media during a meeting with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer at the Trump Turnberry golf course in Scotland on July 28. AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin What To Know X users weighed in on photos taken of Trump's hands during his recent trip to Scotland, where he met EU leaders. One user posted a video of the president's hands, saying Trump's signs of CVI had been "reportedly covered with makeup." Democratic activist Chris D. Jackson posted an image and added: "Wow. Look at those swollen and bruised hands in this photo from yesterday. Trump is not well." Another user replied, "So bad they're putting makeup on them." Age was a key theme of debate in last year's presidential election, with Trump often criticizing his opponent, then-President Joe Biden, as being too old to lead. Amid the increased scrutiny over Trump's fitness, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said, "The president remains in excellent health." At a news briefing, she said the president's medical team found "no evidence of deep vein thrombosis or arterial disease" and that he was not experiencing any discomfort related to CVI. Leavitt added that the bruise on his hand was consistent with irritation from "frequent handshaking and the use of aspirin." What People Are Saying Sean Barbabella, the president's physician, wrote in a memo: "The president underwent a comprehensive examination, including diagnostic vascular studies. Bilateral lower extremity venous Doppler ultrasounds were performed and revealed chronic venous insufficiency, a benign and common condition, particularly in individuals over the age of 70." Dr. Brian Funaki, a leading expert in vascular and interventional radiology at the University of Chicago Medicine, previously told Newsweek: "Generally speaking it is not life-threatening in and of itself, but it can predispose to developing blood clots in the veins in the legs—which, in the worst-case scenario, could break off and migrate to the lungs, causing pulmonary emboli, which can be fatal. This is why some people with this condition are treated with anticoagulation or other means, such as an inferior vena cava filter, which is a device designed to catch migrating blood clots." What Happens Next Though Trump's medical team has said he is in good health, scrutiny over his health is likely to continue.