
SIR and the sanctity of electoral democracy
Universal adult franchise is the centrepiece of Indian democracy. Election is mostly the only occasion when the small man in India gains a voice. The vote is the only weapon he has at hand to enforce accountability in governance. ECI's mandate is to protect it, not raise hurdles to deny citizens the right to vote. Its stubborn stance against the inclusion of Aadhaar, election identity card (EPIC), ration card etc., in the list of 11 documents acceptable for inclusion in the electoral roll on the ground that these can be easily forged was called out by the court — the judges said the EPIC, for instance, has a 'presumption of correctness'.
The spectre of infiltration, built around threat-narratives about infiltration by Bangladeshis and Rohingyas, is invoked to justify SIR. ECI would be on a self-defeating trip if the revision leads to the invalidation of the ballot rights of millions of voters, which, in spirit, is a negation of their citizenship. After the first phase of SIR, Bihar, a state with a relatively high birth rate, saw its electorate shrink. This is ominous. ECI needs to tread carefully on SIR, in Bihar and elsewhere.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hans India
27 minutes ago
- Hans India
Trump Rules Out Trade Talks With India Until Tariff Dispute Over Russian Oil Purchases Resolved
US President Donald Trump has categorically rejected the possibility of resuming trade discussions with India following his decision to impose comprehensive 50% tariffs on Indian imports, marking a significant deterioration in bilateral economic relations between the two nations. When questioned by reporters in the Oval Office about potential future negotiations, Trump firmly stated that talks would not proceed until the current trade dispute is resolved. His comments underscore the administration's hardline approach toward countries maintaining economic ties with Russia amid ongoing geopolitical tensions. The escalation began when Trump signed an executive order on Wednesday implementing an additional 25% tariff on Indian goods, bringing the total levy to 50% effective August 27. The punitive measures specifically target India's continued petroleum purchases from Russia, with the US administration arguing that such transactions undermine Western sanctions against Moscow. Trump's decision comes alongside threats of secondary sanctions against nations conducting business with Russia, as Washington intensifies pressure on countries to sever economic links with Moscow over the Ukraine conflict. The US president has demanded that countries choose between maintaining Russian trade relationships or facing economic penalties. India has responded with strong criticism, characterizing the American tariff measures as fundamentally unjust and economically unreasonable. The Ministry of External Affairs emphasized that India's energy imports are determined by market dynamics and the imperative of ensuring energy security for 1.4 billion citizens, rejecting any external interference in sovereign decision-making. Prime Minister Narendra Modi delivered a defiant response during his address at the MS Swaminathan Centenary International Conference on Thursday, declaring India's readiness to accept significant economic costs to protect national interests. Modi specifically emphasized his government's commitment to safeguarding farmers, fishermen, and dairy producers from external pressure. The Prime Minister's remarks highlighted India's determination to maintain policy independence regardless of international economic coercion. Modi stated that protecting agricultural communities remains the government's highest priority, even if such stance results in personal or national economic sacrifice. India has highlighted what it perceives as inconsistent American policy implementation, noting that other major Russian oil importers like China and Turkey have not faced similar punitive measures. This selective enforcement has raised questions about the fairness and strategic motivations behind the US tariff policy. The situation reveals complex geopolitical dynamics, as China and Turkey continue purchasing Russian energy without equivalent American retaliation. India, China, and Turkey represent the three largest importers of Russian petroleum, yet only India faces the new tariff regime, suggesting potential diplomatic or strategic considerations influencing US policy decisions. Interestingly, Washington maintains a temporary suspension of 145% tariffs on Chinese goods under a negotiated truce set to expire on August 12. This arrangement, designed to facilitate ongoing superpower negotiations, contrasts sharply with the immediate penalties imposed on India, further highlighting perceived inconsistencies in American trade policy. The trade dispute represents a significant test of US-India relations, which have generally strengthened over recent decades through strategic partnerships in defense, technology, and regional security cooperation. The current tensions threaten to undermine broader diplomatic coordination between the world's largest democracies at a time when both nations face common challenges in the Indo-Pacific region.

Business Standard
27 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Trump admin asks SC to lift curbs on Southern California immigration stops
The Trump administration on Thursday asked the Supreme Court to halt a court order restricting immigration stops that swept up at least two US citizens in Southern California. The emergency petition comes after an appeals court refused to lift a temporary restraining order barring authorities from stopping or arresting people based solely on factors like what language speak or where they work. The move is the latest in a string of emergency appeals from the Trump administration to the high court, which has recently sided with the Republican president in a number of high-profile cases. The Justice Department argued that federal agents are allowed to consider those factors when ramping up enforcement of immigration laws in Los Angeles, an area it considers a top enforcement priority." Trump officials asked the justices to immediately halt the order from US District Judge Maame E Frimpong in Los Angeles. She found a mountain of evidence that enforcement tactics were violating the US Constitution in what the plaintiffs called roving patrols." Her ruling came in a lawsuit filed by immigrant advocacy groups who accused President Donald Trump's administration of systematically targeting brown-skinned people in Southern California during the administration's crackdown on illegal immigration. Trump's Solicitor General D John Sauer asked the justices to immediately halt Frimpong's order, arguing that it puts a straitjacket on agents in an area with a large number of people in the US illegally. No one thinks that speaking Spanish or working in construction always creates reasonable suspicion ... But in many situations, such factors alone or in combination can heighten the likelihood that someone is unlawfully present in the United States, Sauer wrote. He also argued that the order flouted a recent Supreme Court decision restricting judges from handing down universal injunctions, since it restricted stops in the entire region rather than only the plaintiffs. Department of Homeland Security attorneys have said immigration officers target people based on illegal presence in the US, not skin colour, race or ethnicity. The order from Frimpong, who was nominated by Democratic President Joe Biden, bars authorities from using factors like apparent race or ethnicity, speaking Spanish or English with an accent, presence at a location such as a tow yard or car wash, or someone's occupation as the only basis for reasonable suspicion for detention. The Los Angeles region has been a battleground for the Trump administration after its aggressive immigration strategy spurred protests and the deployment of the National Guards and Marines for several weeks. Plaintiffs on the lawsuit before Frimpong included three detained immigrants and two US citizens. One was Los Angeles resident Brian Gavidia, who was shown in a June 13 video being seized by federal agents as he yelled, I was born here in the states, East LA bro! He was released about 20 minutes later after showing agents his identification, as was another citizen stopped at a car wash, according to the lawsuit.
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
27 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Taken note of reports of China building dam on Brahmaputra: Govt tells RS
India has "taken note" of reports about China commencing the construction of a mega dam project on the lower reaches of the Yarlung Tsangpo River (upper reaches of Brahmaputra) in Tibet, the government informed Parliament on Thursday. In a written response to a query in Rajya Sabha, Minister of State for External Affairs, Kirti Vardhan Singh, said the project was first made public as far back as 1986 and since then, preparations have been underway in China. The government of India has "taken note of reports about commencement of construction of mega dam project by China on the lower reaches of the Yarlung Tsangpo (upper reaches of the Brahmaputra) River in Tibet," he said. The government "carefully monitors" all developments relating to the Brahmaputra River, including plans by China to develop hydropower projects, and "takes necessary measures to protect our interests, including preventive and corrective measures to safeguard life and livelihood of Indian citizens residing in the downstream areas", he said. Various issues relating to trans-border rivers are discussed with China under the ambit of an institutionalised expert level mechanism, which was established in 2006, as well as through diplomatic channels, Singh sad in his response. "As a lower riparian state with considerable established user rights to the waters of the trans-border rivers, the government has consistently conveyed its views and concerns to the Chinese authorities, including on the need for transparency and consultation with downstream countries, and urged them to ensure that the interests of downstream states are not harmed by any activities in the upstream areas," he added. The need for cooperation on trans-border rivers, including resumption of provision of hydrological data by the Chinese side, has been highlighted by the government in several bilateral interactions with China, including during the recent visit of the external affairs minster to China from July 14-16 for the SCO Foreign Ministers' Meeting, the minster said. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)