SD veterans' thoughts on D.C. military parade
SIOUX FALLS, S.D. (KELO) – This weekend, over 6,000 soldiers and 150 military vehicles are expected to gather near the National Mall for a parade to honor the 250th anniversary of the Army.
Army National Guard veteran, Jeremiah Fawcett in Sioux Falls says he'll be tuning in to watch.
'I think it's a good idea. Any time that we can enhance and take a look at our national security, I think that goes a long way,' Fawcett said.
Motorcycle event an alternative to street racing
Nicole Ryan spent 21 years serving in the Air National Guard and thinks the parade may entice people to enlist.
'It'd be kind of cool for people who have no military background to see what's all involved in it. I think it would get a lot more people interested in possibly joining and realizing how much work they have put in to serve our country,' Ryan said.
The last notable military parade in Washington D.C. was in 1991 to celebrate the U.S. victory in the first Gulf War.
On Tuesday, president Donald Trump had this message for people planning to protest at the parade 'For those people who want to protest they are going to be met with very big force,' Trump said.
'It should be an exciting weekend, whether either for or against it. It's going to be something unique that South Dakota has and the state the union hasn't seen in a long time,' Military Heritage Alliance Executive Director, Brian Phelps said.Something the people at the Military Heritage Alliance are looking forward to watch.
'I think all in all, this country is still very supportive of our military. And like the alliance celebrating America and those who served,' Phelps said.
Saturday's parade will start at the National Mall and end near the White House and is estimated to cost upwards of $25 million.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Associated Press
an hour ago
- Associated Press
Israeli strikes on Iran lead to new test of Trump's ability to deliver on 'America first' agenda
WASHINGTON (AP) — Just hours before Israel launched strikes on Iran early Friday, President Donald Trump was still holding onto tattered threads of hope that a long-simmering dispute over Tehran's nuclear program could be resolved without military action. But with the Israeli military operation called 'Rising Lion' now underway — something Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu says will go on for 'as many days as it takes' — Trump will be tested anew on his ability to make good on a campaign promise to disentangle the U.S. from foreign conflicts. The administration's immediate reaction to the Israeli assault came not from Trump, but from Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who is doubling as Trump's national security adviser. He made clear that the U.S. was 'not involved' and that the administration's central concern was protecting U.S. forces in the region. 'Israel advised us that they believe this action was necessary for its self-defense,' Rubio said in a statement. 'President Trump and the Administration have taken all necessary steps to protect our forces and remain in close contact with our regional partners. Let me be clear: Iran should not target U.S. interests or personnel.' As Israel stepped up planning for strikes in recent weeks, however, Iran, had signaled that the United States would be held responsible in the event of an Israeli attack. The warning was issued by Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi even as he engaged in talks with Trump special envoy Steve Witkoff over Tehran's rapidly advancing nuclear program. On Thursday, just hours before the strikes, Trump made the case that there was still time for diplomacy — but it was running out. The White House had even planned to dispatch Witkoff to Oman on Sunday for the next round of talks with Araghchi. It wasn't immediately clear how the strikes would affect plans for those discussions. Trump is set to meet with his National Security Council in the Situation Room on Friday to discuss the tricky path ahead. Sen. Tim Kaine, D-Va., offered rare words of Democratic praise for the Trump administration after the attack 'for prioritizing diplomacy' and 'refraining from participating in tonight's actions.' But he also expressed deep concern about what the Israeli strikes could mean for U.S. personnel in the region. Iranian officials made clear that they intended to retaliate with decisive action after the Israeli strikes targeted Iran's main enrichment facility in Natanz and the country's ballistic missile program, as well as top nuclear scientists and officials. 'I cannot understand why Israel would launch a preemptive strike at this juncture, knowing high level diplomatic discussions between the United States and Iran are scheduled for this weekend,' Kaine said. Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., said the U.S. Senate 'stands ready to work with President Trump and with our allies in Israel to restore peace in the region and, first and foremost, to defend the American people from Iranian aggression, especially our troops and civilians serving overseas.' Trump in the hours before the attack still appeared hopeful that there would be more time for diplomacy. The president, in an exchange with reporters, again urged Iran to negotiate a deal. He warned that a 'massive conflict' could occur in the Middle East without it. He later took to social media to emphasize that his 'entire Administration has been directed to negotiate with Iran.' As long as there was a chance for an agreement, Trump said of Israel, 'I don't want them going in because I think it would blow it.' But it was clear to the administration that Israel was edging toward taking military action against Iran. The State Department on Wednesday directed a voluntary evacuation of nonessential personnel and their families from some U.S. diplomatic outposts in the Middle East. 'I don't want to be the one that didn't give any warning, and missiles are flying into their buildings. It's possible. So I had to do it,' Trump explained. Before Israel launched the strikes, some of Trump's strongest supporters were raising concerns about what another expansive conflict in the Mideast could mean for the Republican president who ran on a promise to quickly end the brutal wars in Gaza and Ukraine. Trump has struggled to find an endgame to either of those conflicts and to make good on two of his biggest foreign policy campaign promises. And after criticizing President Joe Biden during last year's campaign for preventing Israel from carrying out strikes on Iranian nuclear sites, Trump found himself making the case to the Israelis to give diplomacy a chance. The push by the Trump administration to persuade Tehran to give up its nuclear program came after the U.S. and other world powers in 2015 reached a long-term, comprehensive nuclear agreement that limited Tehran's enrichment of uranium in exchange for the lifting of economic sanctions. But Trump unilaterally withdrew the U.S. from the Obama-administration brokered agreement in 2018, calling it the 'worst deal ever.' The way forward is even more clouded now. 'No issue currently divides the right as much as foreign policy,' Charlie Kirk, the founder of Turning Point USA and an ally of the Trump White House, posted on X Thursday. 'I'm very concerned based on (everything) I've seen in the grassroots the last few months that this will cause a massive schism in MAGA and potentially disrupt our momentum and our insanely successful Presidency.' Jack Posobiec, another prominent Trump supporter, warned a 'direct strike on Iran right now would disastrously split the Trump coalition.' 'Trump smartly ran against starting new wars, this is what the swing states voted for — the midterms are not far and Congress' majority is already razor-thin,' Posobiec added in a posting on X. Rosemary Kelanic, director of the Middle East program at Defense Priorities, said the job ahead for Trump and his team is to protect U.S. forces who are highly vulnerable to Iranian retaliation. 'Israel's strike on Iran must not become the United States' war,' Kelanic said. 'The U.S. public overwhelmingly opposes another military engagement in the Middle East for good reason — an open-ended military campaign in Iran would risk repeating the catastrophic mistakes of the 2003 war in Iraq, which inadvertently strengthened Tehran's influence there.' ___ AP Congressional Correspondent Lisa Mascaro contributed reporting.
Fox News
an hour ago
- Fox News
Padilla cuffed, McIver indicted: Can Congress come back from the brink?
You have lots of places to choose from to get your message out to the press if you're House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La. It's best to get your message out succinctly, clearly and free of interference. So when Johnson decided to boast about the House making good on the first bill to codify DOGE cuts and slash $9.4 billion from USAID and public broadcasting, he stepped just outside the House chamber and into a throng of reporters gathered by the Will Rogers Statue. "Republicans will continue to deliver real accountability and restore fiscal discipline," said Johnson. But the Will Rogers Statue area is a major thoroughfare in the Capitol. At the moment Johnson spoke Thursday, dozens of House Democrats were headed toward the office of Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D. They were demanding answers about why federal agents tossed Sen. Alex Padilla, D-Calif., to the ground and handcuffed him during a press conference in Los Angeles with Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem. When Johnson finished talking about reeling in the money for public broadcasting and USAID, reporters only wanted to ask about Padilla. Yours truly included. "Did the federal agents go too far," I asked. "Was that a bridge too far?" A long line of angry House Democrats squeezed past Johnson in the Will Rogers corridor. But because Johnson chose to speak in such a heavily-trafficked locale, Democrats hectored Johnson as they marched to the Senate. "Yes it was!" shouted an unidentified Democrat as she strode past the scrum, answering my question for Johnson. But Johnson immediately pivoted to what Padilla did, standing up at Noem's press conference to holler questions at her from the back of the room. "It was wildly inappropriate," said Johnson of Padilla as he spoke to the Capitol press corps. "You don't charge a sitting cabinet secretary…" "That's a lie!" shouted another unidentified Democrat. "A lie!" yelled someone else. Rep. Sam Liccardo, D-Calif., stopped to snarl something at the Speaker. But it was impossible to hear over the din. "He was acting like a senator," charged Rep. Dan Goldman, D-N.Y. "Why don't you stand up for Congress!" "Can you respond to these people heckling you Mr. Speaker?" I asked. "I'm not going to respond to that," replied Johnson. The Capitol was pulsing at this point. The crush of House Democrats barged into the office of Thune, who was at the White House. Lucky him. The Democrats then trooped back across the Rotunda and poured into Johnson's office. "When the Speaker of the House refers to a sitting Member of the U.S. Senate who simply tried to exercise his First Amendment rights as acting like a thug, we're very concerned about that," said Congressional Hispanic Caucus Chairman Adriano Espaillat, D-N.Y. "Both the Speaker and Leader Thune should step up to the moment and preserve the institution of Congress, which are a balance in democracy and important balance in democracy." One lawmaker who didn't join the angry Democratic mob was Rep. Madeleine Dean, D-Pa. Dean stood apprehensively just beyond the wall of reporters and outside the invisible bubble created by Johnson's security detail. When Johnson concluded speaking, Dean tried to pierce the security ring to have a civil conversation with the Speaker. "Mike! Mike!" said Dean, trying to capture Johnson's attention. "It's Madeline." Johnson finally realized that "Madeleine" wasn't some reporter trying to squeeze in an extra question for the Speaker. But someone he obviously knew. A fellow lawmaker. Someone from across the aisle with whom he must have a friendship and working relationship. Johnson and Dean spoke in hushed tones as they walked quietly across Statuary Hall. Some in the press corps followed, trying to divine what they were saying. This wasn't an offstage chat back in the Speaker's Suite or on a private telephone call. But it went down in a very public part of the U.S. Capitol. The conversation continued as the duo stopped adjacent to the "British Steps" near the Speaker's Office. Dean clenched both of her hands into fists as she and the Speaker were about to part ways. She lightly touched Johnson on the right arm as he ducked into the Speaker's Office. "Thank you, sir," said Dean. "What were you speaking to the Speaker about?" I asked the Congresswoman. "I just want to keep that to myself," answered Dean. "But the one thing I wanted to say is that it's up to the President to turn the temperature down. Everyone is inflamed. And agitated. But it starts with the President. He said 'I'm talking to the President,'" said Dean. But other Republicans may have tried to dial up the temperature by blasting Padilla. Padilla left Washington earlier in the week to be in LA during the riots. The senator was supposed to start at first base for the Democrats in the Congressional Baseball Game on Wednesday night. Republicans charged that Padilla should have stayed moored in Washington. "He has a responsibility to show up at work not to go make a spectacle," said Senate Majority Whip John Barrasso, R-Wyo. "The fact that he's in California and not in D.C. while the Senate is voting means he's not as concerned about doing his job here," said Senate Majority Leader Steve Scalise, R-La. Scalise conceded he had gone home to Louisiana when hurricanes threatened the state. He argued that he "wouldn't go back home to try to stir angst against the federal agents that were coming and help us get back on our feet." Outraged Democrats thundered on the Senate floor, railing against the plight of Padilla. "This is the stuff of dictatorships. It is actually happening," said Sen. Brian Schatz, D-Hawaii. "It's despicable. It's disgusting. It is so un-American," said Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y. "I think it's unprecedented," said Sen. Mark Kelly, D-Ariz. "It's obnoxious, and it's rather escalatory." But the outrage wasn't limited to Democrats. "I've seen that one clip. It's horrible. It is shocking at every level. And it's not the America I know," said Sen. Lisa Murkowski," R-Alaska. The band of Democrats who ran over to Thune's office never did find him. But by nightfall, Thune said he spoke to Padilla, Senate Sergeant at Arms Jennifer Hemingway and tried to contact Noem. "We want to get the full scope of what happened," said Thune. This falls against the backdrop of the feds charging Rep. LaMonica McIver, D-N.J., for assaulting federal agents at a Newark detention facility earlier this spring. These episodes have shaken Congress. Lawmakers wonder what would happen if the shoe were on the other foot. And despite the partisan chasms, they're all lawmakers. They know that if something like this can happen to Padilla, well, they could be next. Confidence and trust are waning. "I remain hopeful that Leader Thune and other Republicans can walk us back from the brink," said Schatz. "But I am not so sure anymore."
CNN
an hour ago
- CNN
Wall Street looks past US deficit concerns for now as investors snap up bonds
Wall Street breathed a sigh of relief Thursday after a key bond auction eased concerns that the US economy might be falling out of favor with investors. Bonds rallied after an auction for US government bonds saw relatively strong demand. The Treasury on Thursday sold $22 billion worth of 30-year bonds. The auction settled with a yield of about 4.84%, signaling solid buying. Standard, boring bond auctions have drawn the attention of investors around the globe. The auctions serve as a gauge of investors' appetite for holding US debt as lawmakers debate President Donald Trump's massive bill, which is set to add to the federal debt burden. All eyes have been on whether there is weak demand for long-term debt, particularly from foreign investors. 'The 30-year auction just went very well,' Chip Hughey, managing director for fixed income at Truist Advisory Services, told CNN. There was relatively strong demand from foreign investors, Hughey said, soothing nerves about whether they might be shunning US bonds. Foreign investors bought about 65.2% of the bonds sold at the auction, according to Treasury Department data, up from 58.9% at the auction in May. Demand from foreign investors was the strongest it has been since January and hovered around the one-year average. Collin Martin, a fixed income strategist at Charles Schwab, told CNN that the uptick suggests foreign demand for long-term US assets remains strong despite concerns about foreign investors potentially selling Treasuries and nerves about the rising deficit likely resulting from Trump's mega bill. 'This was a good confidence boost for those worried about declining demand for US Treasuries,' Martin said. Truist's Hughey said the solid auction results showed that at least for now, investors are not overly panicked about federal budget negotiations in Congress or the deficit. 'Over the long term, our deficits and reliance on debt are going to have to be addressed,' Hughey said. 'For the time being, it is encouraging to see investors still seeking out US Treasuries for their haven assets.' The auction followed a similarly strong auction for 10-year Treasuries on Wednesday. The Treasury auction also came after two inflation reports that showed the effect of tariffs has so far been muted. That increases the likelihood the Federal Reserve can consider cutting interest rates later in the year, which is a signal for investors to buy bonds now to lock in current rates, helping bring down yields. The 30-year yield settled on Thursday around 4.84% and the 10-year yield settled around 4.36%. Both fell across the day as investors snapped up bonds. The 30-year Treasury auction, which is a regularly scheduled event, has become a closely watched barometer for how Wall Street is feeling about the Trump administration's policy agenda. When there is strong demand for bonds, prices rise and yields fall. Vice versa, when there is weak demand for bonds, prices fall and yields rise. Higher yields would squeeze the government with higher borrowing costs. Treasury yields are also benchmark interest rates for the economy, and higher yields can mean higher borrowing costs for consumers on everyday items including auto loans and credit cards. Long-term US debt, which is usually considered the safe, risk-free corner of the market, has come under scrutiny as Trump's bill is set to add to increase federal deficits. 'The idea that the US fiscal position is unsustainable over the long run has been frequently noted for years, but it has taken the current set of circumstances to get market participants to begin pushing back,' John Canavan, lead US analyst at Oxford Economics, said in a Wednesday note. Yields on 30-year Treasury bonds have soared this year as investors have demanded more compensation for what is looking like a riskier long-term loan to the US government. These concerns were exacerbated in May after Moody's downgraded the US, stripping the nation of its last perfect credit rating. 'The Moody's downgrade occurred as the ability to easily finance growing deficits increasingly comes into question,' Canavan said. 'Trump's tariff decisions are likely to raise inflation over the near term, while lowering economic growth and leading foreign investors to question the safe-haven allure of Treasury debt.' In May, the 30-year yield spiked above 5% and hit its highest level since 2023 after a Treasury auction for 20-year bonds that saw weak demand. There is robust demand for shorter-term Treasuries like 10-year bonds, according to Hughey. An auction for 10-year Treasuries on Wednesday saw strong demand from both domestic and global investors. Yet investors in recent weeks had shown hesitancy about longer-duration bonds like the 30-year bond, Hughey said. Investors have been increasingly uncertain about the long-term outlook for the US debt burden, giving them pause about the risk associated with loaning money to the government over a longer period. 'The 30-year reflects the uncertainties around those more structural questions around budget deficits and the US debt load going forward,' Hughey said. Pacific Investment Management Company, a global fixed income firm, said in a Tuesday report that bonds still look relatively attractive and affordable compared to stocks. However, Pimco expects to focus and be 'overweight' to 5- and 10-year bonds, while being less focused and 'underweight' to longer-term bonds. Martin at Charles Schwab said that while concerns about the deficit linger, investors are also assessing factors like inflation and the path of potential Federal Reserve rate cuts. 'We still find yields pretty attractive, and our outlook on the safety of US Treasuries hasn't changed,' Martin said. Elsewhere in markets, US stocks gained on Thursday as investors tried to digest recent trade developments. The United States and China have de-escalated tensions, but Trump's tariffs still remain a headwind to economic growth. The Dow closed higher by 102 points, or 0.24%. The broader S&P 500 rose 0.38% and the tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite gained 0.24%. The S&P 500 is hovering near an all-time high, but had stalled in recent trading sessions and was coming off a day in the red. The benchmark index is about 1.6% away from a record high. The Dow was weighed down by Boeing (BA), which sank 4.79% after a Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner carrying 242 people crashed in India on Thursday. At least 290 people are dead, health officials said. The plane hit a hostel for doctors when it crashed. The US dollar broadly weakened on Thursday as investors wrestle with continued tariff uncertainty. The US dollar index, which measures the dollar's strength against six major foreign currencies, tumbled 0.72% and fell to its lowest level since 2022.
