Alex Jones Claims Trump Officials Have Asked Him to Stop Talking About Jeffrey Epstein
Jones insisted at the top of his show with Nick Fuentes on Wednesday that 'of course' he would expose Trump 'if he's screwing kids.' Jones insisted 'I'm not tied to that wagon,' suggesting that he's not all-in for Trump as a political entity, despite all evidence to the contrary. But later Jones made clear that he's been getting calls telling him to stop talking about Epstein in order to make Trump happy.
'I got a bunch of calls the last three weeks, and the calls go like this, 'what do you want?' And I've never asked for anything. What I want is good policy. I always want to be the outsider,' said Jones.
'And I'm just like, what do I… what do I want? I want to make America great again. I want America first. So there's a real understanding of this administration that we're it, we're in charge. This is the way it is,' Jones said, referring to Trump-aligned influencers having real power.
Jones went on to make it abundantly clear that he was talking about powerful people in the Trump administration. 'And the fact that I get these calls like… the top of the administration and they're just cut and… they're cut and dry. What do you want? And I'm just like, uh huh, uh huh…' Jones said ominously.
Epstein died in prison during Trump's first term in 2019, and almost immediately, many people assumed he must have been killed by powerful forces to silence anything he might know. Trump has been asked for weeks now about why the Department of Justice closed its investigation into Epstein despite promises by people like FBI Director Kash Patel and Attorney General Pam Bondi that they'll get to the bottom of it. But Trump can't make the story go away, especially as new details seem to come out daily. That hasn't stopped Trump from trying to get his own folks to shut up behind the scenes.
Rolling Stone reported on July 17 that the White House has been engaged in a 'senior-level outreach campaign' to right-wing influencers to get them to shut up about Epstein. The magazine even reports that Trump himself has worked the phones, and for a time, it did seem like Fox News tried to move on to other stories. But it's much harder to control the internet, where MAGA influencers like Benny Johnson, Charlie Kirk, and Laura Loomer can't just ignore Epstein without their audiences getting very suspicious.
One tactic that Trump supporters have tried, with only mixed success, is repeatedly insisting that Trump's political enemies are the ones who don't actually want the truth about Epstein to come out. Trump was reportedly told by the DOJ that his name is in the files, but other prominent figures, like Bill Clinton, were associated with Epstein. Trump even recently called out Clinton by name, saying that people should be investigating the former Democratic president.
Jones insisted on Wednesday that the Democrats and the Anti-Defamation League were the ones who actually don't want to discuss Epstein. And mentioning the ADL wasn't just some random aside, as the show was promoted as a 'debate' with white supremacist Nick Fuentes, a Holocaust denier who's previously praised Adolf Hitler. Fuentes is one of the most prominent antisemites in the country and has been appearing on Jones's show more frequently these days.
Jones and Fuentes tried to present the Epstein controversy through the lens of Israeli foreign influence by claiming Epstein was an agent of Mossad, a claim that's never been proven. Julie K. Brown, one of the most important journalists on the Epstein beat, recently told Ross Douthat of the New York Times that she didn't believe Epstein was engaging in sex trafficking of minors for traditional blackmail purposes and instead was just engaging in criminally predatory behavior with other powerful men because they enjoyed it. That said, Brown wants the Department of Justice to release any classified assessments of Epstein from a national security angle to hopefully learn more about any potential connections to intelligence agencies.
Fuentes kept talking about Trump with Jones, and the white supremacist demonstrated perfectly why the story is bad for Trump, even giving the president the benefit of the doubt.
'I don't even think it's necessarily true that Trump was on the island or that Trump was raping kids or that there's a videotape of Trump. I don't think that's even likely,' Fuentes said.
'But when he has covered it up in the way that he has, and as he's dug this hole deeper and deeper—having the DOJ cover it up, asking the FBI to look for his name, they told him his name was in there. Now he says his name was planted in there. He says the whole thing's a hoax. You actually have to draw a negative inference and assume if he's covering it up, there must be something there.'
Obviously, this isn't the story Trump wants his defenders like Jones and Fuentes to be talking about right now. And it doesn't seem like it'll go away anytime soon.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
A $200 million endowment focused on Black Americans is taking shape
Started in 2020 as a five-year initiative inspired by the racial justice outcry following the police murder of George Floyd, the California Black Freedom Fund plans to expand to a $200 million endowment. The move is both rare in the world of philanthropy and politically bold, given the Trump administration's efforts to eliminate race-based grant making. Originally a designated fund of the Silicon Valley Community Foundation, the fund spun off on July 1, renaming itself the Black Freedom Fund, to indicate its new national scope. Over the past five years, it has drawn more than $97 million in donations. Of that, it has directed $45 million to 206 nonprofits in California, largely working to increase the sway of nonprofits that serve Black people, with a portion of the remainder being reserved to start the endowment. Marc Philpart, the fund's executive director, said the endowment will let the fund make grants of $10 million a year without cutting into its asset base, assuming historical rates of return on investments. By establishing a durable institution with a sizable reservoir of cash, the fund can serve as a lasting beacon to smaller organizations serving Black communities in California, Philpart said. 'When a crisis occurs in the Black community, philanthropy parachutes in, there's a wave of support, and then as soon as the news cameras turn away, the support recedes,' he said. 'We need enduring institutions that are led by and committed to the Black community in ways that have a lasting impact.' DEI targeted Philpart's fundraising for the endowment comes as the Trump administration has characterized diversity, equity, and inclusion programs as illegal and has called for investigations of large foundations that support diversity programs. Under Philpart's leadership, the California Black Freedom Fund started the Legal Education, Advocacy, and Defense for Racial Justice Initiative, which provides pro bono legal consulting and training for nonprofits. The program operates on the premise that there isn't anything illegal about racial justice funding. But the 2023 Supreme Court ruling against considering race in college admissions, in a pair of cases brought by Students for Fair Admissions against Harvard University and the University of North Carolina, was viewed by some as an indication that private philanthropies could not legally engage in race-based grant making — and the issue is far from settled. While Philpart's fundraising pitch might resonate with some donors, others are sure to be nervous, given the scrutiny placed on race-based grant making by the White House, said Dan Morenoff, executive director of the American Civil Rights Project, a litigation and advocacy nonprofit that has challenged affirmative action programs. The White House has directed the Department of Justice to root out instances of race-based grantmaking, which it considers discriminatory. 'You don't want to be on their radar because they are fervently looking for people to make examples of at this point,' Morenoff said. While some corporations and philanthropies, including the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, an early supporter of the California Black Freedom Fund, have retreated from supporting racial justice, Philpart is counting on securing support from donors who want to stay with the cause even as the issue is argued in various court cases stemming from Trump's anti-DEI executive orders. The attacks from the administration, Philpart said, have been a 'clarifying moment' for many donors and have generated interest in the fund. 'People have rallied to us and really doubled down on their commitments to support Black freedom and Black power,' he said. 'That is the most telling thing coming out of this moment — that there is a critical mass of leaders throughout the country who care very deeply about the community.' 70 financial supporters One grantmaker that has doubled down is the California Wellness Foundation. The foundation made an initial grant of $500,000 when the fund was first launched, then made a $200,000 commitment to a separate fund created by the California Black Freedom Fund in response to the January Los Angeles fires, and recently added $500,000 to support the spin-off. Richard Tate, president of the California Wellness Fund, said the new fund is 'needed now more than ever' because of attempts by the administration to roll back equity efforts. 'The fact that we are talking about a Black Freedom Fund is an acknowledgment that not everyone has equal standing in the culture,' he said. 'Whatever headwinds that may exist because of this political moment, now is the time for us to continue to be explicit about our intentions of supporting a community.' Philanthropy needs to act quickly by unleashing more money in grants to support areas like litigation, public advocacy, and the replacement of lost federal funds, said Glenn Harris, president of Race Forward, a nonprofit racial justice advocacy group. But, he said, lasting institutions that can respond to future challenges are also needed. 'There's a balancing act,' Harris said. 'It's really clear that struggles for liberation and justice are going to be with us for a minute.' Among the two dozen grant makers that chipped in to start the fund are the Akonadi, Conrad Hilton and San Francisco foundations as well as the Emerson Collective, Crankstart, the Evelyn and Walter Haas Jr. Fund and the Silicon Valley Community Foundation. The total of institutional funders to the effort since 2020 now exceeds 70. Why endowments Among the groups the fund has supported are the East Bay Permanent Real Estate Cooperative, a community-owned cooperative that 'removes land and housing from the speculative market and places it into permanent community stewardship,' according to the fund. A late 2023 survey of nearly 300 foundations conducted by the Center for Effective Philanthropy found that more than two thirds of grantmakers did not offer endowment grants. Half of those that did so made them to arts organizations and museums. Nonprofits led by Black people receive endowment grants even more rarely, according to a 2022 analysis of social change organizations by the Bridgespan Group, a philanthropy consultancy, which found that nonprofits led by Black people had endowments that were only a fourth as big as those led by white people. Since then, some grant makers have stepped forward to support endowments at organizations serving members of Black communities, said Darren Isom, a partner at Bridgespan. For instance, in 2022 the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation made grants of $5 million each to three racial justice organizations led by people of color: UnidosUS, the NAACP, and Faith in Action. 'Endowments are transfer of power from philanthropic organizations to the organizations that are closest to the work,' he said. 'From an impact perspective, the work is more high impact, more beneficial, and more durable if it's owned by and led by those that are the closest to issues and closest to the communities.' Philpart is confident that despite the blow-back against diversity and racial justice, the fund can raise enough money to meet its goal. 'We're drawing people out who want to prove we are greater than divisiveness, we are greater than bigotry, and we are a greater than racism,' he said. 'We are better than all the things that pull us apart and don't fundamentally improve anyone's well-being.' ______ Alex Daniels is a senior reporter at the Chronicle of Philanthropy, where you can read the full article. This article was provided to The Associated Press by the Chronicle of Philanthropy as part of a partnership to cover philanthropy and nonprofits supported by the Lilly Endowment. The Chronicle is solely responsible for the content. For all of AP's philanthropy coverage, visit
The Hill
21 minutes ago
- The Hill
Bessent calls for steep interest rate cuts
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said Wednesday that short term interest rates should be 1.5 to 1.75 percentage points lower than their current level, keeping up the administration's pressure campaign on the Federal Reserve. Bessent called for a half-point reduction in September at the next meeting of the Fed's interest rate-setting committee, starting a series of cuts that would lower rates substantially below their current level of 4.25 to 4.5 percent. 'We could go into a series of rate cuts here, starting with a 50 basis point rate cut in September,' he said on the Bloomberg News television network. 'We should probably be 150, 175 lower. I think the committee needs to step back.' Bessent's remarks were his clearest yet on what should happen with short-term interest rates. Treasury secretaries, which handles debt issuance and tax collection, don't traditionally weigh in on monetary policy, which is left to the Fed. While Bessent has called the Fed's independence on monetary policy a 'jewel box' not to be tampered with, he has also joined President Trump and other administration officials in criticizing the bank's handling of interest rates. Trump has been calling for interest rate cuts since the beginning of the year and has nicknamed Fed Chair Jerome Powell 'Too Late' due to his reluctance to begin cuts this year and the bank's sluggish response to post-pandemic inflation. The Fed has kept interbank lending rates at an effective level of 4.33 percent since January after making three cuts in the back half of last year. The Fed has been waiting to see the effects of tariffs on the economy. Inflation held steady from June to July at a 2.7-percent annual increase in consumer price index (CPI) after ticking up from 2.4 percent in May. The job market slowed down significantly over the past three months, adding just 106,000 jobs from May through July. Asked Wednesday if a half-percent rate cut in September would signal that the fundamentals of the economy are not in good shape, Bessent said the signal would be one of transition. 'That signals that there's an adjustment, and that rates are too constrictive,' he said. FPowell has said recently that he believes interest rates are now 'modestly restrictive,' meaning that inflation-adjusted interest rates are lowering potential profitability and restraining the level of investment. Bessent criticized Powell's reliance and reactivity to incoming data, which the Fed chair has often stressed during his tenure as chair. 'He's not Alan Greenspan, who was very forward-thinking. They try to be more data-driven, which I think is a mistake,' Bessent said. 'It's just very old-fashioned thinking.'
The Hill
21 minutes ago
- The Hill
Zelensky warns Trump ‘Putin is bluffing' ahead of Alaska summit
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky on Wednesday sent a warning to President Trump that Russian President Vladimir Putin is 'bluffing' about being open to peace, ahead of a high-stakes summit between the U.S. and Russian leaders in Alaska set for Friday. Zelensky made his remarks alongside German Chancellor Friedrich Merz in remarks following a video conference call with Trump and other European leaders. They said the call was aimed at setting 'the course for this meeting in the right way.' Trump has floated 'land swaps' between Russia and Ukraine as a path to peace, a possibility that Zelensky has resisted, drawing the U.S. president's ire. 'I stress that any questions concerning our country's territorial integrity cannot be discussed without regard for our people, for the will of our people and the Ukrainian constitution,' Zelensky said Wednesday. Merz said Ukraine is willing to discuss territorial questions, but only if a ceasefire is implemented on the current frontline, throwing cold water on reported Russian demands for Ukrainian withdrawals as a condition to halt the fighting. The two leaders spoke to reporters in Berlin. A translation of their remarks was provided by Sky News. Zelensky said he told Trump to expect Putin to downplay the impact of sanctions on the Russian economy and its military as a way to deter additional penalties. Trump has held off imposing additional sanctions on Russia and blew past a deadline last week to impose sanctions, instead announcing the face-to-face with Putin. 'In reality, the sanctions are very effective, and they're hurting the Russian military economy,' Zelensky said. Merz said that Zelensky and European leaders made 'clear' to Trump that a ceasefire along the current frontlines 'needs to be the starting point' for broader peace talks. Merz said there will be no discussion of legal recognition of Russian-occupied territory, rejecting another major pillar of Moscow's demands. Russia occupies an estimated 20 percent of Ukrainian territory but lays claim to four areas it only partially controls. Putin is reportedly calling for Ukraine to retreat from territory in the Donbas region that is not occupied by Russia. Zelensky said the leaders 'briefly talked about' security guarantees for Ukraine and emphasized that Russia should not be given a veto to block Ukraine from joining NATO, another red line for Moscow. Merz added that Trump 'largely' shares these positions. 'So if in Alaska there's no movement on the Russian side, then the US and the Europeans need to increase the pressure. President Trump knows this position. He shares them largely so I can say we've had a very good, constructive talk,' he said.
