Don't take AmeriCorps NCCC away from the next generation
"Cutting AmeriCorps NCCC isn't a budgetary win. It's a national loss." (Photo courtesy of Maria Wilkinson)
In 2015, just four months after graduating from Concord High, I arrived in California to begin a year of service to my country. Not through the military or college, but through AmeriCorps National Civilian Community Corps (NCCC) — a program that would change my life in ways I never expected.
On our first day, we were told: 'You're not here to help others — you're here for yourselves.' At first, that felt selfish. But over the next 10 months, I came to understand what that meant. Yes, we were serving others — but through that service, we were also learning, growing, and transforming ourselves.
I was assigned to the West Coast campus and placed on a team with 11 other young people from all across the country. We lived together, cooked together, worked out together — and most importantly, we served together.
In Montana, we helped build homes with Habitat for Humanity. In California, we spent months clearing brush to reduce wildfire risk. In Utah, we served as camp counselors for individuals with disabilities. On weekends, we volunteered in local communities — cooking Sunday breakfasts at churches, planting trees to prevent erosion, cleaning up community gardens.
We lived on less than $200 a month. We didn't join AmeriCorps for the money — we joined because we wanted to be part of something bigger than ourselves. I wasn't ready for college right out of high school. I needed to see more of the world first. AmeriCorps NCCC gave me that chance.
This program taught me what it really means to serve my country — not just through military service or government jobs, but through compassion, manual labor, teamwork, and meeting people where they are.
That's why it's devastating to see AmeriCorps NCCC being defunded and dismantled. Doing so doesn't just take away a year of service — it takes away a path of purpose, growth, and opportunity for thousands of young Americans.
Cutting AmeriCorps NCCC isn't a budgetary win. It's a national loss.
To the young people who won't be able to finish their year of service, and to those who will never get the chance to start: I'm sorry. You deserve this opportunity. And our country needs programs like this more than ever.
AmeriCorps Mission Statement:
I will get things done for America — to make our people safer, smarter, and healthier.
I will bring Americans together to strengthen our communities.
Faced with apathy, I will take action.
Faced with conflict, I will seek common ground.
Faced with adversity, I will persevere.
I will carry this commitment with me this year and beyond.
I am an AmeriCorps member, and I will get things done.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
42 minutes ago
- The Hill
Battle to define ‘America First' intensifies as Israel strikes Iran
The Movement is a weekly newsletter tracking the influence and debates steering politics on the right. Sign up here or in the box below. Thank you for signing up! Subscribe to more newsletters here The ideological battle over what 'America First' means in the Trump era is intensifying in wake of Israel's strikes on Iran, splitting the MAGA right and testing their relationships with the president. On one side, noninterventionist doves insist that the Trumpian tagline means the president must avoid U.S. troops, resources or dollars going toward the conflict, for fear of getting dragged into an endless war. 'Anyone slobbering for the U.S. to become fully involved in the Israel/Iran war is not America First/MAGA,' Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) posted on X on Sunday. But on the other end, foreign policy hawks and supporters of Israel are appealing to Trump's position that Iran should not have a nuclear weapon, and encouraging him to leave all options — including direct military intervention — on the table. 'How is it not AMERICA FIRST to congratulate those who just made sure Islamists who chant 'DEATH TO AMERICA' and who openly plotted to assassinate President @realDonaldTrump never have an opportunity to have a nuke?' right-wing provocateur Laura Loomer posted on X over the weekend. In a Saturday phone interview with The Atlantic, President Trump responded to criticism from former Fox News host Tucker Carlson — who said in a newsletter that 'politicians purporting to be America First can't now credibly turn around and say they had nothing to do with' the strikes — by saying he is the one that will ultimately write the definition. 'Well, considering that I'm the one that developed 'America First,' and considering that the term wasn't used until I came along, I think I'm the one that decides that,' Trump said. And on Monday, Trump offered one part of his definition: 'AMERICA FIRST means many GREAT things, including the fact that, IRAN CAN NOT HAVE A NUCLEAR WEAPON. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!!!' he posted on Truth Social. Trump beat back the dove side somewhat in another post calling Carlson 'kooky' — prompting Greene, who almost never criticizes the president, to make the stunning move to come to Carlson's defense. 'Foreign wars/intervention/regime change put America last, kill innocent people, are making us broke, and will ultimately lead to our destruction. That's not kooky. That's what millions of Americans voted for,' Greene said. Despite Trump claiming ownership of the tag line, different wings of Trump supporters spent much of the last few days warring about the 'America First' response to the conflict. Conservative radio host Mark Levin, who is on the hawkish side of the debate, made a lengthy post on Monday about 'Real MAGA and Fake MAGA,' saying 'Real MAGA is not isolationist or antisemitic. In another post, Levin took aim at Greene, calling her 'a little known politician from Georgia.' Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu also weighed in on the 'America First' debate in a Monday interview with ABC News. 'Today, it's Tel Aviv. Tomorrow, it's New York. Look, I understand 'America First'. I don't understand 'America Dead,'' Netanyahu said. 'That's what these people want.' As Trump takes responsibility for defining the America First response, he is being vague and open enough to give both the hawks and the doves reason to believe they are right about their own versions of America First. The initial response from the administration to the strikes, in the form of a statement from Secretary of State Marco Rubio, notably distanced the U.S. from the attacks — saying that 'Israel took unilateral action against Iran' and that the U.S. was 'not involved in strikes against Iran.' But the U.S. did assist in intercepting missiles that Iran shot into Israel in response — and NBC News reported that the U.S. had been 'quietly moving some pieces into place to prepare for the Israeli attack.' Trump slammed Iran for failing to make a deal after 60 days of negotiation on its nuclear program — referencing his warnings that there would be bombing if they did not do so. But even as the recent conflict derailed a round of peace talks that were supposed to take place on Sunday with Trump's Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff — in part because Iranians with whom the U.S. was dealing are now dead, as Trump said — the president has not taken negotiation off the table. 'They should talk, and they should talk immediately before it's too late,' Trump said Monday at the G7 Summit in Canada. The Wall Street Journal reported Monday that Iran is seeking negotiations in order to end the hostilities — a development that was cheered by noninterventionists like Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.). 'Iran's move to reenter negotiations isn't a coincidence. It's the result of a foreign policy that rejects endless wars and puts American priorities first,' Paul said. But Trump has declined to wholly rule out using U.S. force in Iran. Asked Monday in Canada what it would take for the U.S. to get involved in the conflict, Trump dummured: 'I don't want to talk about that.' Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) is among those urging Trump to use U.S. military might to help Israel in Iran if talks are not possible. 'If diplomacy fails, Mr. President, President Trump, you've been great, help Israel finish the job. Give them bombs. Fly with them if necessary,' Graham said Sunday on CBS's 'Face the Nation.' Further reading: Israel-Iran war spotlights MAGA divide, from my colleague Brett Samuels. Welcome to The Movement, a weekly newsletter looking at the influences and debates on the right in Washington. I'm Emily Brooks, House leadership reporter at The Hill. Tell me what's on your radar: ebrooks@ Not already on the list? Subscribe here President Trump is pumping the brakes, shifting gears, and speeding up on the kind of migrants he is targeting as he aims to fulfill his promise of mass deportations. The president is clearly sensitive about negatively impacting key industries that rely on migrants who entered the country without permission for labor — but seems to have reversed himself on pausing enforcement on such industries. Let's review. Thursday morning: Trump posted recognition of concerns from those in the agricultural and hotel industries about his 'very aggressive policy on immigration' taking away workers who are 'almost impossible to replace' — promising that 'changes are coming.' It was a notable shift in tone from the kind of hardline stances and messaging from the immigration hardliners in Trump's administration like Stephen Miller — particularly in wake of anti-Immigrations and Customs Enforcement (ICE) protests in Los Angeles that prompted Trump to activate the National Guard. Thursday afternoon: Trump made another post appealing to the immigration hardline side. 'I campaigned on, and received a Historic Mandate for, the largest Mass Deportation Program in American History,' he said, adding that migrants in the U.S. illegally should self-deport 'or, ICE will find you and remove you.' But directives to soften enforcement on certain industries as the president had first espoused still came. ICE was directed to 'largely pause raids and arrests on American farms and in hotels and restaurants,' NewsNation reported, citing DHS sources. Sunday: Trump made another long social media post giving further guidance on deportation targets: Democratic-run cities. 'ICE Officers are herewith ordered, by notice of this TRUTH,' Trump said, to expand detention and deportation efforts in the nation's largest cities that 'are the core of the Democrat Power Center.' Monday: 'Officials from Immigration and Customs Enforcement, including its Homeland Security Investigations division, told leaders at the agency in a call Monday that agents must continue conducting workforce site immigration raids on agricultural businesses, hotels and restaurants, according to two people familiar with the call,' the Washington Post reported. The whiplash is exposing some divisions within the Trump administration. The New York Times reported over the weekend that the initial post about agriculture workers came after Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins had told the president about worries about the effect of the immigration raids on the agricultural industry. Rollins appeared to respond to the reporting in a post on X saying to 'ignore the noise from the fake news media.' 'The President and I have consistently advanced a 'Farmers First' approach, recognizing that American households depend upon a stable and LEGAL agricultural workforce. Severe disruptions to our food supply would harm Americans. It took us decades to get into this mess and we are prioritizing deportations in a way that will get us out,' Rollins said. Related: Inside Trump's Extraordinary Turnaround on Immigration Raids, from the New York Times… Trump officials reverse guidance exempting farms, hotels from immigration raids, from the Washington Post. The shocking shootings of Minnesota Democratic lawmakers in the early hours of Saturday morning — killing Minnesota House Democratic Leader Melissa Hortman and her husband — set off an ugly ideological blame game on social media. Right-wing posters did not want to believe that the now-detained suspect in the shootings, Vance Boelter, was on their 'side.' And despite evidence piling up that Boelter shared right-wing beliefs, some still don't want to believe it. The first misdirection came after a number of accounts posted videos of Hortman earlier in the week getting emotional while talking her vote in favor of a bill vote that cut access to health care for undocumented immigrants — insinuating that her assassination was a result of progressive left anger about that vote. She was the only House Democrat to vote for the bill, averting a potential government shutdown. Other emerging details fueled the belief the shootings were left-on-left violence. Law enforcement confirmed that Boelter had flyers in his car that said, 'No Kings,' an apparent reference to the anti-Trump protests that occurred across the country on Saturday. And Boelter was in 2019 appointed by Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz (D) to a workforce development board. But Boelter's friend and roommate told CBS News that the suspect was a very conservative, listened to the right-wing conspiracy theorist Alex Jones's Infowars, and had voted for Trump. Local reporting in the Minnesota Star-Tribune said that Boelter did not know Walz; that the 60-member member board includes people appointed by the governor who do not agree with his political views; and voted in the 2024 primary election, but not in the Democratic primary. That has not stopped the narrative from taking hold, though. Donald Trump Jr. had this to say on right-wing influencer Benny Johnson's YouTube show on Monday: 'They're sitting there, 'Oh, please be a MAGA guy.' Oh, it happens to be a Tim Walz appointee in his own state. He happened to go after a Democrat legislator, but it seems like he went after a Democratic legislator because she voted against Democrat Party policy, which was the unabashed, unlimited health care funding for illegal immigrants.' Among those who pushed the left-on-left violence narrative: Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah), who posted a photo of the masked suspect on Sunday with the commentary: 'This is what happens When Marxists don't get their way.' Sen. Tina Smith (D-Minn.) confronted Lee about the post in the Senate Monday night, my colleague Al Weaver reports. Lee refused to answer questions from reporters about the encounter. Minnesota state Sen. Julia Coleman (R) posted on X on Saturday that she found the race to figure out of Boelter was a Republican or Democrat 'absolutely shameful.' 'The state needs unity. Not blame. Now more than ever we should come together and put partisan politics aside,' Coleman said. Related: Fact check: Did suspect in Minnesota shootings have close ties to Gov. Tim Walz? No, by Walker Orenstein in the Minnesota Star Tribune Thanks for reading. Check out more newsletters from The Hill here. See you next time!
UPI
44 minutes ago
- UPI
Bernie Sanders backs two progressives in NYC Democratic primaries
Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-VT, speaks during a press conference on March 6, 2025. Sanders will support a pair of progressive candidates running in Democratic primaries against more established candidates. File Photo by Bonnie Cash/UPI | License Photo June 17 (UPI) -- Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., has thrown support to a pair of progressive candidates running in Democratic primaries against more established candidates. Sanders is expected to officially endorse Zohran Mamdani in the party's mayoral primary in New York City on Tuesday. A Brooklyn native, Sanders joins Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y. in support of Mamdani, a left-wing Democrat who must compete against former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo in the primary. Current mayor Eric Adams is running for reelection as an independent. "Our nation faces a fundamental choice: Will we continue with a corporate-dominated politics driven by billionaires or will we build a grass-roots movement fueled by everyday people, committed to fighting oligarchy, authoritarianism and kleptocracy?" Mr. Sanders has said about Mamdani. "The New York City Democratic primary presents a clear choice as to the path forward," he added. Sanders has also announced his support for Michigan state Rep. Donavan McKinney, who seeks to unseat current Rep. Shri Thanedar, D-Mich. "As a Member of Congress, Donavan will fight to raise the minimum wage to a living wage, fully fund our public schools, invest in public housing and support Medicare for all," said Sanders of McKinney. "A former union leader, he has dedicated his life to standing with working people, and is ready to lead the struggle against Donald Trump, the oligarchy, and the corporate interests who prioritize profits over people." McKinney, who also has the support of Rep. Rashida Tlaib, D-Mich., said in a statement that "Senator Sanders has long been a progressive champion for working class Americans, and I am honored to receive his endorsement." Sanders had also announced in May he had partnered with the Run for Something young candidate recruitment organization, which posted to X in May that "His message is clear-run for office-and we're here to make sure new leaders have the tools to win."
The Hill
2 hours ago
- The Hill
Trump can and should force Iran's unconditional surrender
Since the Mullahs seized power in Tehran in 1979, the U.S. has been playing for a tie in Iran. Now, it is time for President Trump to play for a win. For forty-six years, Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and his predecessors have been waging a war against the U.S. and our allies in the Middle East. 'Death to America' and 'Death to Israel' have not been just slogans but decades-long causes. Iran's war against Washington has at times been overt, as when the regime sanctioned Iranian students storming the U.S. Embassy in Tehran in 1979. For 444 days, fifty-two Americans were held hostage. In the process, Iran also destroyed the second half of President Jimmy Carter's only term in the Oval Office. At other times, the war has been indirect. On October 23, 1983, 241 U.S. servicemen were killed and another 100 wounded in the Marine Barracks bombing in Beirut, Lebanon. Although responsibility for the bombing was claimed by the shadowy Islamic Jihad Organization, it is widely understood that Hezbollah was behind the attack, and that it had been planned and funded by Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps. The origins of Iran's proxy war against the U.S. and later Israel were born on that day. Other attacks would follow, including the June 1996 attack by Hezbollah Al-Hejaz — an Iranian-backed Shia terrorist group — on Khobar Towers in 1996 that killed 19 United States airmen. In October 2000, a suicide bomber hit the USS Cole using a small boat carrying C4 explosives, killing 17 sailors. In 2015, a U.S. court found that Iran was part of the al-Qaeda attack. Subsequently, Tehran's so-called 'Axis of Resistance' would repeatedly attack U.S. interests or allies. While Iran officially has been designated by the State Department as a State Sponsor of Terror since 1984, Tehran's proxies have actually been operating as paramilitary groups waging war on Washington. Operationally, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps has been in command. Paramilitary groups under its umbrella of control include Hezbollah in Lebanon, Hamas and Islamic Jihad in Gaza, and the Houthis in Yemen. In Iraq, it controls Kataib Hezbollah, Asaib Ahl al Haq, Harakat Hezbollah al Nujaba, Badr Organization, and Kataib Sayyad al Hamas Shuhada. In Bahrain, it controls the al Ashtar Brigades and Saraya al Mukhtar. Washington's response across five administrations, between 1995 and 2022, has been to sanction Iran. It was not until Trump in 2020 that the U.S. responded in kind to Iranian violence by ordering, as he put it, 'a flawless precision strike that killed the number-one terrorist anywhere in the world, Qasem Soleimani.' Soleimani commanded the Quds Force, the wing of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps responsible for funding, training and coordinating its 'Axis of Resistance Proxies.' Trump held that Soleimani was responsible for the Iraqi Shia militia that stormed the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad, Iraq and the Kata'ib Hezbollah rocket strike on the K-1 Air Base in Kirkuk, Iraq. After decades of countless Iranian proxy-attacks on U.S. targets and allies across the Middle East, Oct. 7 changed everything. Up to that point, Iran's nuclear weapons program had been viewed as the greatest existential threat to Israel. But suddenly, given Hamas's tactical surprise with aid from Iran and Russia, Israel was forced to treat Iran's decades-in-the-making 'Axis of Resistance' as an existential threat too. The wolf closest to the sled was Hamas. Next came Hezbollah and the Houthis. Now, after eliminating Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps command and control groups in Syria after the fall of Bashir Assad, Israel is focusing on eliminating Iran's Armageddon-like nuclear threat. Getting to this point, however, has told us a lot about Iran's long-term intentions if left unchecked by Washington. Not only has Tehran expanded its partnership with Russia becoming a critical part of Russian President Vladimir Putin's Arsenals of Evil in his war against Ukraine by supplying Shahed drones, but Khamenei also ordered his militias to take the fight directly to U.S. forces stationed in the Middle East. By November 2023 — just a month after Oct. 7. — those same paramilitary forces had attacked U.S. forces more than 50 times. This was on top of nearly 100 other attacks that resulted in Americans being killed by Iranian proxies since former President Biden had taken office in 2021. So Iran is not only in a hot war with Israel. It is also in a 46-year-old hot war with the U.S. This war could get and has gotten worse, including when Kata'ib Hezbollah attacked Tower 22 in Jordan, killing three U.S. soldiers. Tehran has long been a destabilizing force throughout the region. Alex Plitsas, an Atlantic Council counterterrorism expert, notes that a key element of Khamenei's motivation for backing Hamas and Oct. 7. was to scuttle the Saudi-Israeli normalization process. In addition to undermining regional diplomacy, Iran has also destabilized the Egyptian economy by encouraging Houthi rebels to attack commercial shipping in the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden. Consequently, at times, Suez Canal traffic and revenues have grinded to a halt as shipping companies avoid the area. Given Iran's nuclear ambitions, and given Khamenei's use of his ballistic missiles and drones to target Israeli civilians, it is time for Trump to demand the country's unconditional surrender. No more wash and repeats — rather, regime change. This would not only eliminate Iran's nuclear and ballistic missile threats, but it would also, as make CENTCOM's task of ensuring the security of U.S. allies and interests in the Middle East far more manageable — especially given Beijing's rising economic and military involvement in the region. If Khamenei's regime survives and Iran achieves nuclear breakout, CENTCOM's ability to safeguard both will become exponentially more difficult. Why take that chance? Iran and its proxies have effectively been at war with the U.S. since 1979, and the possibility of a lasting peace in the Middle East is right there, dangling. Why also risk letting Tehran entering into a grand alliance to create an 'Islamic Army,' as Mohsen Rezaee is suggesting — possibly involving a nuclear Pakistan as well — when this decades old U.S. and Middle East nightmare can be swept aside into the ash heap of history right now? Trump must enable Israel to complete its mission. It is time for Trump to say, 'no deal' — to put Khamenei and his regime down for the count. Trump can achieve that by providing Jerusalem with the munitions to destroy Fordow and to help Israel topple Khamenei's regime. Doing so would transform the Middle East, putting wins on the board against Russia, and sending a strong message to China and our Asia-Pacific allies. Mark Toth writes on national security and foreign policy. Col. (Ret.) Jonathan Sweet served 30 years as an Army intelligence officer.
