logo
Redistricting in Indiana: Republicans raise questions, Democrats have limited options if special session called

Redistricting in Indiana: Republicans raise questions, Democrats have limited options if special session called

Chicago Tribune17 hours ago
As Texas Democrats eye an end to their nearly two-week walkout to block Republican efforts there to redistrict, a growing number of Indiana Republicans have been voicing questions and concerns about redistricting in Indiana.
The Texas Democrats announced Thursday they will return provided that Texas Republicans end a special session and California releases its own redrawn map proposal, both of which were expected to happen Friday.
Democrats did not say what day they might return.
Republican Texas Gov. Greg Abbott still intends to push through new maps that would give the GOP five more winnable seats before next year's midterm elections. Texas House Speaker Dustin Burrows has said that if Democrats don't return the next time lawmakers reconvene on Friday, the session will end and the governor will immediately benign another one.
Abbott put redistricting on the agenda at the urging of President Donald Trump, who wants to shore up Republicans' narrow House majority and avoid a repeat of his first presidency, when the 2018 midterms restored Democrats to a House majority that blocked his agenda and twice impeached him.
It is unusual for redistricting to take place in the middle of the decade and typically occurs once at the beginning of each decade to coincide with the census.
Last week, Vice President JD Vance visited Indiana to meet with Gov. Mike Braun and other state Republican leaders to discuss redistricting Indiana's nine congressional districts. Braun told the Indiana Capital Chronicle Tuesday that he hasn't yet decided if he'll call a special session for redistricting, but said he and state leaders are 'considering it seriously' as they wait to see what comes out of Texas.
'I think mostly what happens here is going to depend on where Texas goes, because I think they've got five seats in play,' Braun said.
The Indianapolis Star reported Friday that Trump invited Indiana Republican lawmakers to the White House for an Aug. 26 meeting. Molly Swigart, a spokeswoman for Senate Republicans, said the meeting was scheduled 'to discuss President Trump's agenda.'
Indiana University Professor Emeritus of Political Science Marjorie Hershey said the effort to redistrict is 'a power politics move' because the Republican majority in the U.S. House of Representatives is 'as narrow as it could be.'
In the last 100 years, there have been two midterm elections where the party that holds the White House hasn't lost seats in the U.S. House of Representatives, Hershey said. If Republicans lose a handful of seats, they would lose control of the House, she said.
'That would essentially mean the end of President Trump's dominance of the political agenda. He's gotten where he has as a result of having complete control of the Congress,' Hershey said. 'In order to maintain his edge in the House of Representatives in 2026, Trump wants a cushion for Republican House members because he's afraid that otherwise he's almost guaranteed to lose the House.'
Historically, redistricting has occasionally occurred between censuses, Hershey said, but it goes against precedent.
'This is not normal in American politics,' Hershey. 'It's not the way that the constitution was written. It's not the way the supreme court has structured election law over time.'
Indiana Republican response
Indiana was last redistricted in 2021, which left Congressional Republicans with seven seats and Democrats two seats.
'It's not as though Indiana isn't already redistricted in a highly partisan way to favor Republicans, it is,' Hershey said. 'Even squeezing out one more Republican district in Texas or in Indiana might save President Trump from becoming as much of a lame duck as he otherwise would in 2026.'
Indiana's First District, held by Democrat U.S. Rep. Frank Mrvan, D-Highland, would be the most under threat for redistricting because it's become more Republican over time — though still Democratically held, Hershey said.
The First Congressional District remains Indiana's most competitive seat. In 2022, Mrvan won nearly 53% of the vote against Republican Jennifer-Ruth Green. In 2024, Mrvan saw a small increase in the number of votes to just over 53% when he won against Republican Randy Niemeyer.
The problem for Republicans with redistricting the First District, Hershey said, would be Democrats from the First District would be moved into other districts, which could make the other districts more competitive for Democratic candidates.
'Sometimes the majority party in a state gets a little too greedy and thinks, 'we might have a shot at this one additional seat,' and then they end up losing the seat next door and not winning the seat that they had hoped to gain,' Hershey said.
Aaron Dusso, an associate professor of political science at Indiana University Indianapolis, said he hasn't seen an appetite from Indiana Republicans to redistrict because of the risk that it will make safe Republican congressional districts more competitive.
State Rep. Ed Soliday, R-Valparaiso, said party leadership has reached out to him to gauge his thoughts on redistricting Indiana. Soliday said he told the leadership 'show me the facts, tell me the unintended consequences, then I'll tell you how I'll vote.'
'I haven't seen anyone show me about how this would work,' Soliday said. 'I have a lot of questions before I jump on board with this.'
Sen. Rick Niemeyer, R-Lowell, said he's discussed redistricting with his colleagues but he's still thinking about his position on redistricting.
'I'm not committing one way or the other,' Niemeyer said. 'We're looking at it and have not made a decision yet. That's where I'm at.'
State Rep. Mike Aylesworth, R-Hebron, said the state legislature 'did a good job' redistricting in 2021, but he's waiting to see what the leadership decides about a special session for redistricting.
'I don't think it's necessary, but we'll wait and see what the caucus says,' Aylesworth said. 'I'm hesitant to change things, but we'll see what leadership says.'
State Sen. Dan Dernulc, R-Highland, said he's spoken with leadership about redistricting, but that he needs more facts and the 'why' of redistricting.
'I don't see a need for it. I don't want to say yes or no, we're a work in progress on it,' Dernulc said.
Indiana Democratic redistricting maneuvers
In the Indiana House and Senate, two-thirds of members — or 67 House members and 34 senators – have to be present to call a quorum, according to each chamber's rules.
In the House, Republicans hold 70 seats to Democrats 30. In the Senate, Republicans hold 40 seats to the Democrats' 10 seats. Indiana Republicans have enough members to call a quorum.
Indiana Democrats 'wouldn't have a lot of options,' Dusso said, other than short-term delay tactics, like requiring readings of the whole redistricting bill or talking for long periods of time on the floor.
Democrats can talk about the issue publicly to try to rally support from voters to put pressure on Republicans to not hold a special session on redistricting.
'It doesn't really stop anything from happening, it just slows it down,' Dusso said.
The best move, Dusso said, would be for Democrats and lobbyists to talk with Braun now to persuade him not to call a special session.
'I think that's where they can win. Once it's called, I don't think they have a chance,' Dusso said. 'If you can get Braun to relent, I think that's where they're going to have their success.'
If redistricting were to occur in Indiana, Hershey said it's likely that lawsuits would be filed.
'I'm sure that the Democrats will fight as hard as they can because there's a point at which the party that's trying to take this unfair advantage just starts to look bad,' Hershey said. 'It's a game of chicken, and we'll have to see who it is who veers away first.'
State Sen. Rodney Pol Jr., D-Chesteron, said it's 'problematic' that President Trump has been pressuring Republican states to redistrict in the middle of a census. Trump's decision to do so shows he's scared to face the voters given the policies he's passed.
'He's afraid of his own base,' Pol said. 'It's not how our democracy works.'
Given Indiana's Republican supermajority, Pol said Indiana Democrats couldn't leave the state to delay the vote. If a special session were called, Pol said the Democrats would attend and voice their opposition from the House and Senate floors.
'The only thing that we have is our voice,' Pol said. 'We're going to have to show up.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Who really suffers from Trump Derangement Syndrome?
Who really suffers from Trump Derangement Syndrome?

Boston Globe

timean hour ago

  • Boston Globe

Who really suffers from Trump Derangement Syndrome?

Get The Gavel A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr. Enter Email Sign Up Two decades on, Krauthammer's coinage has been appropriated, rebranded, and defined down — way down. 'Trump Derangement Syndrome' is now flung at anyone who objects to President Trump's conduct or opposes his policies. The term is no longer reserved for over-the-top expressions of revulsion — like actor Robert De Niro using a televised appearance at the Tony Awards to Advertisement No — today 'Trump Derangement Syndrome' is used as an all-purpose put-down to deride any Trump critics, including those who stick to serious, fact-based analysis. I've lost count of all the times I've been Advertisement A woman seen at the Iowa State Fairgrounds on July 3, when President Trump was speaking there. Scott Olson/Getty The word 'syndrome' notwithstanding, this is merely political trash talk, popularized by Trump and his allies as a way to wave off criticism without having to engage it. Instead of refuting arguments or defending policy, the magic letters 'TDS' turn disagreement into proof of mental defect. Yet if 'derangement' means the loss of proportion and judgment Krauthammer was getting at, then the most severe cases aren't among Trump's critics. They're in the ranks of his most ardent loyalists. The real Trump Derangement Syndrome shows up in three telltale symptoms. First is the cult-like worship that treats Trump as infallible — his acolytes profess adoration not only for what he does, but for whatever could flow from him. Emblematic of that mindset are the Advertisement Second is the abandonment of principles that once seemed non-negotiable. Conservatives and Republicans who used to champion free trade A man with a MAGA tattoo on his stomach attended a rally at Macomb Community College in Warren, Mich., to mark President Trump's 100th day in office on April 29. EMILY ELCONIN/NYT Third is the unsettling delight so many supporters take in Trump's most outrageous behavior — a kind of giddy worship that equates offensiveness with authenticity. Such brazenness has been a hallmark of his political career — from mocking John McCain's Vietnam War heroism to charging undocumented immigrants with ' Advertisement Meanwhile, they reflexively use 'TDS!' as a go-to put-down for anything from mild disagreement to serious moral critique, framing opposition not as argument but as pathology — an easy, cheap discredit. Yes, plenty of Trump-haters go overboard — but in MAGA circles, the 'TDS' tag is sprayed far wider, hitting thoughtful critics just as readily as the genuinely unhinged. What is truly alarming is how some have sought to legalize that insult by casting dissent as disease. In Minnesota this spring, five Republican senators proposed a bill that would Krauthammer's original point in 2003 was that derangement is the breakdown of proportion and prudence. That breakdown isn't found among critics who quote Trump accurately and challenge his claims. The most alarming political derangement today affects those who cannot conceive that there are legitimate reasons to be appalled by the president, and so explain anti-Trump dissent as a sign of mental weakness. If reason is the measure, then those who shout 'TDS!' the loudest are the ones most in need of treatment. Jeff Jacoby can be reached at

Donald Trump and Prince Andrew Were 'Swapping Tales About Women'—Author
Donald Trump and Prince Andrew Were 'Swapping Tales About Women'—Author

Newsweek

timean hour ago

  • Newsweek

Donald Trump and Prince Andrew Were 'Swapping Tales About Women'—Author

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Donald Trump and Prince Andrew were overheard "swapping tales about women" by a diplomat in New York, a royal author told Newsweek. The two men have both been under fire over their respective friendships with Jeffrey Epstein, the New York sex trafficker who died in jail in August 2019. The president denied knowing Andrew that same year despite having previously said, in 2000, that he was a "lot of fun to be with." Now, historian Andrew Lownie argues in his new biography Entitled that the pair did enjoy each other's company and were seen together by diplomats. Steven Cheung, the White House communications director, told Newsweek: "It seems like this random individual wrote a book of fiction that belongs in the bargain bin of a discount bookstore." Donald and Melania Trump and Prince Andrew pose at Mar-a-Lago, Palm Beach, Florida, on February 12, 2000. Donald and Melania Trump and Prince Andrew pose at Mar-a-Lago, Palm Beach, Florida, on February 12, It Matters Prince Andrew's reputation disintegrated due to allegations by Virginia Giuffre that she was forced to have sex with him by Epstein and Epstein's former girlfriend, Ghislaine Maxwell, as a 17-year-old sex trafficking victim. Trump has denied knowing about Jeffrey Epstein's crimes, but their friendship has been haunting him in recent weeks, since botched promises to release the Epstein files this year. Trump administration officials had hinted at major revelations and even new charges in the case after the president ordered a review of the files. Yet in July, the D.O.J. and FBI released a memo saying there was no "Epstein client list" to release, there would be no new investigations and there was no evidence the financier blackmailed prominent figures. What to Know Lownie said in an upcoming episode of Newsweek's The Royal Report podcast: "I had this fascinating lunch with the diplomat at the New York consulate, who had stories of Trump and Andrew swapping tales about women, swapping notes about masseurs, talking about golf. "They have all these interests, golf, sex and money. So, I mean, it was amazing that Trump subsequently denied having any knowledge of Andrew, having any contact with him, when of course there's plenty of pictures of them together in London, in Mar-a-Lago and elsewhere. "They were all fishing in the same waters. But I can understand why they may want to distance themselves now." Newsweek representatives of Prince Andrew for comment. What Donald Trump Said About Andrew After Prince Andrew's car crash interview in 2019, Trump denied knowing the royal: "I don't know Prince Andrew, but it's a tough story, it's a very tough story." Yet he told People at a party in October 2000: "He's not pretentious. He's a lot of fun to be with." The magazine's article read: "Attending a Halloween costume party hosted by model Heidi Klum at the chic Hudson Bar, the teetotaling Andrew sipped bottled water and chatted with Maxwell, who wore a leopard-print jacket and platinum wig, as well as with Donald Trump and his girlfriend, model Melania Knauss [as the First Lady was then known]." Months earlier, that February, Andrew was photographed chatting with the Trumps at Mar-a-Lago. Epstein and Maxwell were at the same event and were also pictured socializing with both Andrew and Trump. Melania Trump, Prince Andrew, Gwendolyn Beck and Jeffrey Epstein at a party at the Mar-a-Lago club, Palm Beach, Florida, February 12, 2000. Melania Trump, Prince Andrew, Gwendolyn Beck and Jeffrey Epstein at a party at the Mar-a-Lago club, Palm Beach, Florida, February 12, Happens Next The Epstein-shaped storm swirling around Trump has moved to questions about Ghislaine Maxwell, who had meetings over two days with Todd Blanche, deputy U.S. Attorney General, in July. Shortly afterward, she was moved to a minimum security prison to continue serving her 20-year sentence for sex trafficking related offences. Maxwell was convicted over allegations that she groomed girls for Epstein to sexually abuse. Democrat Senator Sheldon Whitehouse has requested documents relating to the transfer, telling Newsweek it "reeks of a coordinated protection racket run at taxpayer expense to shield the president." Lownie said he was concerned Maxwell could be a flight risk: "I think she'll disappear. I mean, we may assume that she's in the American prison service but I think she'll be sunning herself on the beach somewhere." And on her transfer, he added: "The victims must feel very strongly about this, that you know, here's someone who had a very serious sentence, was charged and convicted on several counts, and, it was clear from the trial, had been deeply involved in what Epstein was doing. "And yet, you know, here she is with a 20-year sentence being basically given a get out of jail free card." Jack Royston is chief royal correspondent for Newsweek, based in London. You can find him on X, formerly Twitter, at @jack_royston and read his stories on Newsweek's The Royals Facebook page. Do you have a question about Charles and Queen Camilla, William and Kate, Meghan Markle and Harry, or their family that you would like our experienced royal correspondents to answer? Email royals@ We'd love to hear from you.

How to Keep Up With President Trump
How to Keep Up With President Trump

New York Times

timean hour ago

  • New York Times

How to Keep Up With President Trump

Times Insider explains who we are and what we do and delivers behind-the-scenes insights into how our journalism comes together. Erica L. Green entered Baltimore's foster care system when she was 7 years old. By the time she entered college, she had lived in six homes. From that experience, she learned how to navigate a diverse set of family structures and households. 'I'm extremely vigilant and extremely adaptable,' said Ms. Green, who credits those traits as essential to her job covering President Trump for The New York Times. 'I grew up that way. You go where the news takes you, and that means, especially under Trump, it could be in 10 different directions.' Ms. Green joined The Times in 2017, reporting on federal education policy. She saw the job as an opportunity to shine a light on an issue important to her — America's flawed education system — on a large scale. In 2023, she accepted a role as a White House correspondent. Soon after, she began reporting on the Biden administration and eventually Kamala Harris's 2024 presidential campaign. She's now covering the Trump administration, with much of her coverage focusing on how the president is attempting to roll back civil rights and change racial dynamics in the United States. 'It has become incredibly clear how important it is for people to see a Black White House reporter for The New York Times,' she said. In a recent interview, Ms. Green spoke about the day-to-day demands of the job and the challenges that come with the beat. This interview has been condensed and edited. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store