
Expert reveals the phrases that make employers cringe in job interviews - and how to answer common question that trips most people up
Rehearsing answers to expected questions ahead of an interview is, of course, recommended - but it's just as important to know what not to say.
While a candidate might have crafted a perfect response, if it's peppered with certain 'cringeworthy' words they could be seriously harming their chances, according to a UK recruitment expert.
Adrien Kallel, from Remote People, argues that even the 'throwaway' words and phrases that people use without thinking can negatively influence hiring managers.
By now, most jobseekers know to avoid highlighting their perfectionism as their biggest weakness - and they're aware that it's not enough to answer 'hardworking' when asked for their greatest strength.
But, there are a number of other words and expressions which can make a candidate come across as lazy, presumptuous or even unprepared.
Among the words that recruiter Adrien recommends avoiding are 'obviously' and 'workaholic', while clichés like 'motivated by change' and 'I love a challenge' can be just as harmful.
To help candidates put their best foot forward in their next job interview, the expert suggests alternatives to the overused, overfamiliar or vague words that can easily creep into even the most considered responses.
'OBVIOUSLY'
According to Adrien, starting an interview answer with the word 'obviously' is a definite red flag.
'Starting a sentence with "obviously" assumes the interviewer already knows your background or skills, which is rarely the case,' he says.
'Interviewers are seeking to understand your experience and how you would fit within their organisation. Avoid assuming they're already aware of your qualifications.'
'Instead, aim for more precise language that shows you're thoughtful about your qualifications.
'For example, instead of "Obviously, I have experience with this," try, "I have worked extensively on projects where this was a key focus, including…",' recommends the expert.
'WE' INSTEAD OF 'I'
In many cases, it feels natural to say 'we'. And, while a candidate might assume it's a useful way to show that they're a team player, interviewers are usually keen to understand someone's individual contributions.
'Employers want to know what part you played in your previous roles, not just what the team achieved,' Adrien points out.
'Avoid talking about what your team or department did. Focus on your personal input.' When asked about past accomplishments, use specific examples that showcase your efforts.
He adds: 'Replace "We completed the project on time' with something like "I led the project and ensured we met deadlines despite tight constraints."'
'WORKAHOLIC'
It's not difficult to understand why a candidate would claim they're a workaholic in an interview, especially if it's for a role in an industry known for long hours or tight deadlines.
A jobseeker might reasonably assume that the word 'workaholic' - proxy for 'I'll be at my desk every hour of the day' - would impress their future employer.
Yet, according to recruitment expert Adrien, the opposite is true - but not because interviewers don't want committed candidates.
Adrien says: 'Using the term "workaholic" can sound like a cop-out, a phrase with little substance. Hiring managers often see it as a catch-all term that doesn't actually highlight any specific strengths or skills.'
He advises interviewees to instead 'focus on specific areas of improvement' or the skills they're working to develop.
The recruitment expert offers the following alternative: 'I'm committed to learning how to better manage my time and delegate tasks.'
Another approach is to say: 'I'm keen to work on my work-life balance while ensuring I meet deadlines.'
'MOTIVATED BY CHANGE'
While hiring managers undoubtedly want employees who can cope with the dynamism of a growing business, using the phrase 'motivated by change' in an interview is unadvisable.
According to Adrian, the cliché is much too vague and difficult to back up with concrete examples. 'Change is something we all experience, but it's not always something people thrive on,' he says.
'In many cases, people become jobseekers because they've had to deal with change, and many of us prefer the comfort of routine.'
Instead of falling back on overused expressions like 'motivated by change', interviewees should be ready to show how they've adapted to challenges and how they maintain a flexible approach.
A good alternative, Adrien adds, is to say: 'I embrace new challenges because they allow me to grow and develop professionally, such as when I had to quickly learn a new software system to meet a project deadline.'
By offering a specific example, a candidate will appear much more credible to a hiring manager.
'I LOVE A CHALLENGE'
In a similar way to 'motivated by change', the seemingly innocuous phrase 'I love a challenge' could actually put an interviewer off.
Candidates might assume that the expression conveys both confidence and the kind of enthusiasm that companies crave, particularly when they're going through periods of profound change.
Yet, according to recruiter Adrien, simply stating 'I love a challenge' will almost always fail to impress - it is hollow and unhelpful.
'Challenges are part of every job, but candidates rarely follow up with a meaningful example of how they've tackled them,' he says.
Interviewees should instead provide solid examples of times when they've come up against obstacles and successfully overcome them.
Instead, jobseekers should say: 'One challenge I faced in my last role was managing a project with tight deadlines. I prioritised tasks and communicated effectively with my team to ensure we delivered on time.'
In addition to knowing which words and expressions to avoid, candidates must also master a particular framework for answering an extremely common interview question, according to career expert with a huge following on TikTok.
Jobseekers can often end up waffling when a hiring manager opens the interview with the 'Tell me about yourself' question - but there's a simple way to avoid this pitfall.
With almost 47,000 followers on TikTok, career influencer Lara, who goes by @laratechsales on the platform, tells candidates to use the 'triple P framework' to approach the question.
The framework, she explains, enables interviewees to talk succinctly about their past work or study and their present job or educational course.
The third 'P' stands for 'personality' and is an opportunity for the candidate to share their most important or relevant extra-curricular activities and hobbies.
In a clip that's been viewed thousands of times, Lara, who studied law but later decided to pursue tech sales, offers an example of how she would respond to the prompt 'Tell me about yourself' using the special framework.
Having introduced herself, Lara says, 'I'm a recent law graduate', before outlining the reasons why she decided to study law at university.
Elaborating on her past, the influencer cites the 'intellectually stimulating' nature of a career in law as a motivating factor along with the belief that 'every day would be different.'
Yet, conscious that she needs to provide a convincing reason for leaving law behind and instead pursuing tech sales, Lara refers to her 'work experience' and 'vacation schemes'.
She says these proved to her that life as a lawyer may in fact be repetitive since 'you specialise in one specific area'.
In addition, she cites the 'limited' earning potential of lawyers outside of London as an important factor in swapping the law for a career in tech sales.
Focusing on her past, Lara adds: 'I came across tech sales because one of my friends, who was actually president of the tech society at university. And she invited me along to one of the events.'
By referencing her interest in the tech society, Lara presents herself as curious and pro-active.
Similarly, by evoking her attendance at one of the society's events, she shows herself to be confident and genuinely interested in tech.
The career influencer explains that she had thought it was necessary to have a 'technical background to work in tech' but, having done some research of her own, she soon discovered that 'there are so many different avenues within the industry'.
Rounding off her answer, she adds: 'And that's how I stumbled into tech sales.'
Lara then moves on to her present, explaining that she works part time as customer service advisor because she wants to dedicate the rest of her time to 'learning a bit more about tech sales'.
She reaffirms her enthusiasm for tech sales by telling the interviewer that she is 'doing a couple of courses online' that are helping her develop the necessary 'soft skills'.
The career expert then moves on to the final 'P' - personality - and offers an insight into her hobbies.
She says: 'I love to travel. I've actually travelled across 25 countries in Europe over the last few years.'
Even here, she is careful to give a concrete example to illustrate her passion for travel, giving herself the best chance of impressing the interviewer.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Sun
29 minutes ago
- The Sun
Sainsbury's is testing a huge change to shelf labels – and shoppers will be divided
SAINSBURY'S is the latest supermarket to test a major change to shelf labels in stores - but it will leave shoppers divided. One of the UK's biggest supermarkets is trialling electronic shelf labels in a small number of branches. 1 The retailer installed the tech at three of its larger shops late last year and has been trying it out across different sections including alcohol, health and general merchandise. Sainsbury's has partnered with Harrison Retail to build the shelf fixings featuring the labels. A branch in Witney, Oxfordshire, is understood to be one of the three locations where the tech is being trialled. A spokesperson for Sainsbury's said: "We are trialling electronic shelf-edge labels in a small number of our stores." Sainsbury's shoppers are bound to be left divided over the new electronic tags though. Fears have been raised digital labels could lead to "surge pricing", which sees prices hiked when products are more in demand. The labels can make it harder for shoppers to spot cut-price items too, as they're not as visible as the paper yellow, orange or red stickers. Sainsbury's joins a host of other supermarkets trialling electronic shelf labels in stores. Co-op is replacing paper product tags with electronic labels throughout its whole estate over the coming months. The retailer said last month it had already made the change in 340 branches but would roll out the tags more widely. SAVE AT SAINSBURY'S It said 1,500 stores will have the labels by the end of this year and rolled out across all its nearly 2,400 shops by the end of 2026. Lidl also said it would roll out the digital labels across all its stores before the end of 2024. This came after a successful trial at 35 branches. Asda is testing the digital labels at a Manchester shop. WHAT ARE ELECTRONIC PRICE LABELS Electronic pricing labels are not easy to spot and look almost identical to the traditional paper labels which have existed in stores for centuries. They feature everything a shopper would expect to see on a label such as cost, weight and unit price. The only difference is that the information is displayed on screens instead of a paper label. Usually, they are connected to a wireless network that allows for prices to be updated in real-time - instead of it being done manually by a store clerk. Supermarkets say the technology will help cut down on waste and help with efficiency in stores. OTHER SAINSBURY'S NEWS Sainsbury's exclusively revealed to The Sun last month it had closed all remaining patisserie, hot food and pizza counters. It is not clear when the pizza counters shut while is understood the patisserie and hot food counters closed in April. The closures come as part of a wide-ranging update of Sainsbury's' store estate which also saw 61 in-store cafes shut on April 11. The cafe spaces are being replaced with restaurants run by franchises such as Starbucks and Gourmet Burger Kitchen. The supermarket said its hybrid cafe and food halls were becoming popular among shoppers. Sainsbury's first announced the store overhaul in January, as it revealed 3,000 head office staff would also lose their jobs in a senior team shake-up. At the time, chief executive Simon Roberts said the changes would "ensure we continue to drive forward our momentum". .


Telegraph
44 minutes ago
- Telegraph
National Lottery to suffer 36-hour outage in rush to deliver botched tech update
The National Lottery will be plunged into a 36-hour blackout this summer as its new owner rushes to deliver a botched tech upgrade. Allwyn, which is controlled by Czech billionaire Karel Komarek, has warned retailers their National Lottery terminals will stop working for around 36 hours while systems are updated. In a statement to shop owners this week, Andria Vidler, the chief executive of Allwyn UK, said: 'Technical switchover will happen over one weekend this summer, and to enable the new systems to go live, National Lottery terminals will be inactive for approximately 36 hours.' Ms Vidler did not provide a date for the shutdown, but asked retailers for their 'help and diligence to ensure a seamless transition'. It is understood that the upgrade will begin at about 11pm on a Saturday night to reduce disruption and loss of earnings. The National Lottery does not trade overnight and no draw-based games take place on a Sunday. Allwyn has pledged to overhaul the National Lottery's estate of 43,500 terminals at a cost of £350m. The update is critical to the company's promise to double the lottery's contribution to good causes. However, the IT upgrade has been plagued by difficulties and delays. Bosses are now racing to launch the new system amid pressure from the Gambling Commission. The complex update was supposed to be in place when Allwyn took over the running of the National Lottery from Camelot in February last year. However, this was delayed after the existing provider, International Games Technology (IGT), challenged the move in the High Court. The rollout has also been delayed by a separate legal challenge mounted by Richard Desmond, who is suing the Gambling Commission after missing out on the 10-year licence. He has argued the bidding process was unfair and is seeking £200m in damages. The delays have fuelled concerns that Allwyn will fall short of its ambitious pledge to funnel more money to good causes. The operator originally promised to increase its charitable donations from £17.9bn to £38bn over the course of the licence – equivalent to about £3.8bn a year. But it has now watered down these targets by pledging to double returns by the end of its licence, from £30m to £60m a week – or less than £3.2bn a year. The Telegraph revealed earlier this year that the National Lottery is already facing a £2bn shortfall toward its charitable donation target in its maiden year. This summer's outage, first reported by Better Retailing magazine, is also likely to spark concerns among shopkeepers who make commission by selling lottery tickets. Andrew Goodacre, the chief executive of the British Independent Retailers Association, said: 'My opinion is that anything that disrupts the normal running of a shop is not welcome. 'We also have to hope that the proposed works go to plan and that any switch is restricted to 36 hours – I fear this may overrun. I would also like to think that the retailers would receive some form of compensation for lost business or inconvenience.' A spokesman for Allwyn said: 'Allwyn is investing over £350m into improving the operations and technology of The National Lottery. 'This change is critical – it will give us the springboard from which we can continue to improve the player and retailer experience and enable us to deliver on our ambitious plans to double returns to good causes from £30m to £60m a week by the end of the licence.'


The Sun
44 minutes ago
- The Sun
I've lost 5 stone & learnt the truth about thin privilege – men are nicer to me but a restrictive diet isn't the answer
A WOMAN who's lost five and a half stone has explained she learnt the hard way about the so-called "thin privilege". Liv Ralph opened up about how her life has changed since her impressive weight loss, which she kicked off with a gastric band back in 2018. 6 6 6 6 And in a video on her TikTok page, she explained how attitudes towards her have changed now she's slimmer - especially from men. "This one is a little bit sad to admit but it's very true," she said. "Men are a lot nicer to me. "Men just take me more seriously and have more time to talk to me." Liv also went on to urge people to steer clear of a " restrictive diet" if they're trying to lose weight. "Every single restrictive diet I have tried over the years has been a waste of time," she sighed. "Absolute waste of time. "If you go too restrictive with it, one day you're gonna wake up and go, 'F**k this, I'm eating what I want!' "Sustainability leads to consistency and consistency is key." Another side effect she's experienced from her weight loss is the amount of loose skin she's been left with. I'm so happy with my Mounjaro body after dropping 4 stone but there's a side effect I hate & trolls say I 'cheated' "You're gonna get loose skin and also if you lose weight too fast your hair will fall out," she warned. "See this? "She's bald!" While her life has become "a lot easier" since losing the weight, Liv also admitted that she has struggled to separate from her former self, and will "ever forget how it feels to be the fat ugly friend". "I will avoid anything that reminds me of my old self," she continued. " Hair colour... style. I just try and avoid being that girl. "Sadly I feel like now my worth is tied to my appearance and I just obsess with the way I look. "Even filming this video I'm looking at myself thinking, 'What does my hair look like? What does my make-up look like? 'There's wrinkles there and oh there's flab there.' "It is absolutely exhausting. "I almost feel like the old me, the old Liv, was a little bit more free. "She didn't care as much." "I love this video so much," one person commented on the video. "It's so relatable as someone who has lost a lot of weight too...I feel like its not just men lots of women too!" "Amazing and honest!" another added. "I've always felt like people who have never been fat a lot of their life just don't get it, people never get it, and that's fine but everything you said is true." "I have lost so much weight," a third wrote. "And in my workout class the instructor needed me to demonstrate the technique. "I was BEAMING!" 6 6