logo
Americans Brace for Trump's New Travel Ban: Second Passports in High Demand

Americans Brace for Trump's New Travel Ban: Second Passports in High Demand

VANCOUVER, British Columbia – As political observers brace for a major policy announcement, reports indicate that former President Donald Trump, the presumptive Republican nominee for the 2024 U.S. presidential election, may reintroduce a sweeping travel ban—potentially as early as Friday.
Dubbed informally as 'Trump Travel Ban 2.0,' the measure is expected to bar or heavily restrict immigration and travel from a new list of countries, reviving a controversial hallmark of his first term in office.
Amicus International Consulting, a global leader in second citizenship and legal identity change services, reports a surge in inquiries from U.S. residents, Middle Eastern families, and green card holders now fearing that existing travel freedoms will be curtailed.
'Clients are contacting us using record numbers. They remember 2017, when families were stranded at airports and green card holders were locked out of their own lives,' said a senior consultant at Amicus. 'If 'Travel Ban 2.0' becomes law, having a second passport could mean the difference between mobility and detention.'
What Is Trump Travel Ban 2.0?
While the final text of the executive order is pending, insider sources suggest that Trump Travel Ban 2.0 will be broader and more permanent than the 2017 ban (Executive Order 13769). It is expected to: Target up to 12 countries with either complete bans or intense visa scrutiny
with either complete bans or intense visa scrutiny Affect both immigrant and non-immigrant visa holders
Include mechanisms for automatic visa denial based on place of birth or dual nationality
based on place of birth or dual nationality Reinstitute extreme vetting policies and introduce enhanced screening for asylum applicants
The original travel ban faced legal challenges and multiple revisions, but was ultimately upheld in a narrowed form by the U.S. Supreme Court. This time, analysts believe the policy will be structured more carefully to withstand judicial review.
Countries Potentially Affected
According to leaked campaign briefing materials, the proposed list of targeted countries includes: Iran Syria Somalia Libya Yemen Iraq Sudan Nigeria Afghanistan Pakistan Lebanon Eritrea
These nations are being flagged for reasons that include terrorism risks, visa fraud concerns, lack of cooperation on repatriation, and strained diplomatic ties. Sometimes, entire populations could be denied entry regardless of personal background or family ties.
Amicus International's Response to the Announcement
'We are seeing a repeat of the same panic and confusion we saw eight years ago—but this time, people want to get ahead of it,' said an Amicus representative. 'Second citizenship is no longer seen as a luxury item. It's a safeguard—especially for those with dual national backgrounds or family in vulnerable regions.'
Amicus is expanding staff to handle increased demand for: Citizenship-by-Investment (CBI) programs in the Caribbean
Legal name and identity change for stateless or blacklisted individuals
Emergency travel documentation for dual nationals fearing repatriation
Legal Risks: Dual Nationals and U.S. Residents in Limbo
Under Trump's prior ban, dual nationals were sometimes denied boarding, entry, or detention—even if they were travelling on non-banned passports. Green card holders, legal permanent U.S. residents, were also detained and subjected to secondary questioning.
Amicus warns that similar situations could arise again, and urges clients to take steps now: Apply for second citizenship or permanent residency in a neutral country
Avoid booking international travel for the week following the policy rollout
Keep physical and digital copies of all valid travel documents, including proof of nationality and legal residence
Case Study: Tech Founder Prepares for Second Ban
Faisal A., a Pakistani-American AI engineer and green card holder residing in Austin, Texas, contacted Amicus after learning that his family in Lahore might be unable to visit him for his wedding. His parents, currently waiting on U.S. tourist visas, fear being locked out for years.
'Even if they've done nothing wrong, my family could be punished by politics,' Faisal said. 'Amicus is helping us apply for Caribbean citizenship so we have a legal travel option that isn't politicized.'
Economic Impacts: Students, Tech Workers, and Medical Experts at Risk
In 2024 alone, U.S. universities welcomed over 150,000 students from countries now likely to appear on the new ban list. Similarly, the healthcare and engineering sectors rely heavily on foreign-born talent, many of whom are awaiting H1-B or family-sponsored visas.
Amicus analysts say that Trump Travel Ban 2.0 could: Disrupt global supply chains and education exchanges
Force multinational firms to relocate key staff
Undermine trust in the U.S. visa system, driving talent to Europe, Canada, or Asia
Increase demand for offshore banking and residence-by-investment programs in neutral jurisdictions
Case Study: Nigerian Physician Chooses St. Kitts Over New Jersey
Dr. Aminat A., a pediatrician from Lagos who completed her residency in New Jersey, opted not to renew her U.S. visa in 2023 after the first ban affected several of her colleagues. With the help of Amicus, she secured citizenship in St. Kitts & Nevis, where she now runs a mobile children's health program across the Caribbean.
'The unpredictability of U.S. immigration law made it impossible to plan my life,' she said. 'With St. Kitts, I'm not just safe—I'm respected.'
Second Passport Programs That Offer Fast, Legal Relief
Amicus International currently recommends the following fast-track citizenship or residency programs for those concerned about U.S. travel policy: St. Kitts & Nevis – Fastest route to citizenship (under 90 days)
– Fastest route to citizenship (under 90 days) Dominica – Low-cost entry and strong diplomatic ties
– Low-cost entry and strong diplomatic ties Grenada – Access to E-2 treaty visa with the U.S. and visa-free access to China
– Access to E-2 treaty visa with the U.S. and visa-free access to China Vanuatu – Pacific option with no income tax and quick processing
– Pacific option with no income tax and quick processing Portugal or Turkey – Residency-to-citizenship programs for EU or Eurasian mobility
Frequently Asked Questions
Will the ban apply to green card holders?
While not confirmed, prior bans affected lawful permanent residents. Second citizenship may provide flexibility in such cases.
Can U.S. citizens be banned from travel?
Not directly, but U.S. citizens with ties to banned countries may face visa denials or enhanced scrutiny.
Is getting a second passport legal?
Yes. Dual citizenship is permitted under U.S. law. Amicus only works with legally recognized programs.
How long does the process take?
Caribbean passports: 3–6 months. EU residencies: 6–18 months, depending on country.
About Amicus International Consulting
Amicus International Consulting is a global authority on legal identity change, second citizenship acquisition, and international mobility solutions. With clients in over 60 countries, Amicus helps individuals secure legal, private, and freedom of movement across jurisdictions, especially during political and economic uncertainty.
📞 Contact InformationPhone: +1 (604) 200-5402Email: info@amicusint.ca
Website: www.amicusint.ca

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'Return to your country' Kabul tells Afghans rebuffed by Washington
'Return to your country' Kabul tells Afghans rebuffed by Washington

Yahoo

time9 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

'Return to your country' Kabul tells Afghans rebuffed by Washington

The Taliban government on Saturday urged Afghans hoping to emigrate to the United States to instead return to Afghanistan, after Washington tightened entry conditions. US President Donald Trump this week announced a travel ban targeting 12 countries, including Afghanistan, which his proclamation said lacked "competent" central authorities for processing passports and vetting. Commenting on the ban on Saturday, Prime Minister Hassan Akhund urged Afghans to return to their country, saying they would be protected even if they worked with US-led forces in the two-decade fight against the Taliban insurgency. "For those who are worried that America has closed its doors to Afghans... I want to tell them, 'Return to your country, even if you have served the Americans for 20 or 30 years for their ends, and ruined the Islamic system'," he said in a speech marking the Eid al-Adha holiday, broadcast by state media. "You will not face abuse or trouble," he said, making reassurances that the Taliban Supreme Leader Hibatullah Akhundzada had "granted amnesty for all". After surging to power in 2021, Taliban authorities announced a general amnesty for Afghans who worked with the Western-backed forces and government. However, the United Nations has recorded reports of extrajudicial killings, detentions and abuses. In the past four years, the Taliban government has imposed a strict view of Islamic law and restrictions on women which the UN says amount to "gender apartheid". Afghans fled in droves to neighbouring countries during decades of conflict, but the chaotic withdrawal of US-led troops saw a new wave clamouring to escape Taliban government curbs and fears of reprisal for working with Washington. The United States has not had a working embassy in Afghanistan since 2021 and Afghans must apply for visas in third countries, principally Pakistan which has recently ramped up campaigns to expel Afghans. Since Trump returned to the White House in January, Afghans have gradually seen their chances of migrating to the United States or staying there shrink. Trump administration orders have disrupted refugee pathways and revoked legal protections temporarily shielding Afghans from deportation starting in July. qb-sw/rsc

TikTok influencer targeted with criticism after viral video about 'unchic' fashion choices sparks backlash
TikTok influencer targeted with criticism after viral video about 'unchic' fashion choices sparks backlash

Yahoo

time9 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

TikTok influencer targeted with criticism after viral video about 'unchic' fashion choices sparks backlash

Lifestyle influencer Tara Langdale talked to Fox News Digital about how she received hurtful messages from critics after a not-so-serious fashion post describing what she views as "unchic" went viral, spawning a cascade of events that made her apolitical post a victim of attacks. The self-described stay-at-home working mom amassed some 250,000 views and found herself on the receiving end of some hate after an April 7 TikTok of her seated, drinking from a wine glass with nicely done hair, gold jewelry and manicured nails as she skimmed through a list of "unchic" fashion sins. Tattoos, Lululemon, baggy denim, camouflage and visible panty lines were just a few that made part one of Langdale's controversial "unchic" list, which drew backlash from seething critics who called her out with a political twist. "Voting for Trump is unchic," one said. Vogue Attacks Melania Trump's Official White House Portrait, Compares Her To 'Freelance Magician' "To her, privilege = chic. Hope this helps!" said another. Read On The Fox News App A third said, "just say you're a republican and go lmao," while a slew of commenters took exception to her tattoo stance and ranted about classism. The video even caught The Guardian's attention, prompting an article that coined "chic" as "a shorthand for a type of conservative-coded aesthetic" and spoke of the "rigid and airbrushed" looks of Trump allies, sch as Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt. Though Langdale diddles cribe herself as conservative when speaking to Fox News Digital, she insists not everything is about politics. "When I get dressed in the morning, I'm not thinking about my political party and how I should dress to showcase that," Langdale said. "I think conservativism is more of culture, religion – all of those things go into your conservativist mindset. Now, if you're talking about conservative style of dress… that's also going to be more like religion and culture," she went on. "Of course, if I'm going to church on Sunday, I'm dressing very conservative. I'm going to keep it classy, but if you see me in the street in my regular day-to-day, I am not at all conservative. I would never consider my style to be conservative. But am I conservative? Absolutely, so I can differentiate the two. I know that the internet has a hard time doing that." Mom Living With Alopecia Reacts To Liberal Women Shaving Heads To Be 'Unattractive' After Donald Trump's Win Langdale addressed the politicized dogma, saying she doesn't understand why TikTok users jumped to conclusions about "conservative" or "Republican makeup" as they did. "Because I'm blonde, because I have more of a natural look about me, I'm not fully glammed all the time… I'm really not sure how that makes me appear conservative, but, again, I just think when people don't agree with what you say, they have to find a way to discredit you, and that's just an easy tactic," she continued. At the same time, Langdale pushed back against the idea of her video implying that people too poor to afford expensive items are automatically "unchic," and pointed to brand-name items like athletic apparel brand Lululemon, Apple Watches and Golden Goose sneakers – all of which can be pricey – as evidence pointing to the contrary. "Just keep in mind that money talks and wealth whispers, and I don't know any wealthy people that are wearing Gucci across their chest," she said in her original post. Langdale explained that the TikTok trend of users showcasing "things I find incredibly chic" grabbed her attention as they began circulating on the app. She found them "pretentious and off-putting," so she felt compelled to take her own stab at the video. New York Times Guest Essay Suggests Fashion Industry Has 'Given Up' On 'Woke' Values "Of course, my video came off as pretentious and off-putting as well, but it felt like a certain level of cringe for me, and I don't like to personally attack anybody on social media, so I wouldn't go after a specific creator. I just kind of wanted to hop on the trend… so that was my initial, 'Why I created the video.'" Langdale shared that her direct messages on the platform have been "insane" with threats and comments about her family since the video went viral. "It does make you step back and take a pause," she shared. "Like, is this really worth it for how crazy people react? And I would never want to put my family in danger, but I think a lot of it is just the keyboard pirates that are just back there behind their computer typing whatever they can to try to get more likes in the comments," Langdale article source: TikTok influencer targeted with criticism after viral video about 'unchic' fashion choices sparks backlash

FLASHBACK: Musk accused Trump, GOP leaders of not wanting to cut spending — here's where they said they would
FLASHBACK: Musk accused Trump, GOP leaders of not wanting to cut spending — here's where they said they would

Yahoo

time9 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

FLASHBACK: Musk accused Trump, GOP leaders of not wanting to cut spending — here's where they said they would

Elon Musk's fiery feud with President Donald Trump spilled onto the top Republicans in Congress, where the tech billionaire questioned if their zeal to cut spending had disappeared. Musk launched into a social media assault this week against Trump's "big, beautiful bill," and accused Republicans of crafting a "disgusting abomination" full of wasteful spending. What started as a rant against the bill turned into pointed attacks against Trump, Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., and House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La. 'He's Not A Big Factor': Trump's Senate Allies Dismiss Elon Musk's Calls To 'Kill The Bill' The tech billionaire and former head of Trump's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) lamented the bill as not cutting deep enough into Washington's spending addiction. The House GOP's offering, which is now being modified in the Senate, set a goal of $1.5 trillion in spending cuts. Musk set a benchmark of finding $2 trillion in waste, fraud and abuse to slash with his DOGE initiative, but fell far short, hitting only $160 billion in his four-month stint as a special government employee. Read On The Fox News App Elon Musk Warpath Against Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' Rattles House Gop Still, he came with receipts, questioning whether Trump, Thune and Johnson were actually committed to making deep cuts. Below are moments from the campaign trail and recent months compiled by Fox News Digital where the trio affirmed their commitment to putting a dent in the nation's nearly $37 trillion debt. A common theme for Trump during his 2024 presidential campaign was to go after the Biden administration, and his opponent, former Vice President Kamala Harris, for "throwing billions of dollars out the window." The then-presidential candidate vowed that should he win a second term, his incoming administration would halt wasteful spending. "We will stop wasteful spending and big government special interest giveaways, and finally stand up for the American taxpayer, which hasn't happened since I was president," he said. "We stood up. Our current massive deficits will be reduced to practically nothing. Our country will be powered by growth. Our country, will be powered by growth, will pay off our debt, will have all this income coming in." Gop Senators Express 'Concerns,' 'Skepticism' Over Trump's Spending Bill After Musk Rant Thune has agreed with his colleagues in the House GOP that the tax cut package needs to achieve steep savings, and believes that the Senate GOP could take those cuts a step further. After the bill advanced from the House last month, the top Senate Republican re-upped his vow to slash federal funding. "It does everything that we set out to do. It modernizes our military, secures our border, extends tax relief and makes permanent tax relief that will lead to economic growth and better jobs in this country, and makes America energy dominant, coupled with the biggest spending reduction in American history," he said. "So those are our agenda items, and that's what we campaigned on. That's what we're going to do." Johnson had to strike a balancing act in the House to cobble together enough support behind the legislation, and struck deals and satisfied concerned lawmakers across the spectrum of the House GOP while still setting a goal of $1.5 trillion in spending cuts. Rooting out waste, fraud and abuse has been a continued mantra of the speaker and his allies. "I said this is the beginning of a process, and what you're going to see is a continuing theme of us identifying waste, fraud and abuse in government, which is our pledge of common sense, restoring common sense and fiscal sanity," Johnson said. Original article source: FLASHBACK: Musk accused Trump, GOP leaders of not wanting to cut spending — here's where they said they would

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store