Defence Forces private refused to stop bus for toilet break, court hears
A summary court martial heard the driver eventually pulled in on a hard shoulder and told his passengers that "anyone who needs to piss and s**t can go there".
Private Aidan Graham, who is based in the Curragh Camp Co Kildare, pleaded not guilty to 11 charges contrary to military law at a hearing at the Military Justice Centre in McKee Barracks in Dublin.
The accused is charged with various breaches of the Defence Act 1954 over his alleged conduct on 15 March 2019 while driving 20 troops back to their base at Cathal Brugha Barracks in Rathmines in Dublin from training in Finner Camp in Ballyshannon, Co Donegal.
Pvt Graham is accused of four counts of disobeying a lawful command of a superior officer, including two in relation to refusing to stop the bus at a service station.
Five other charges relate to accusations that Pvt Graham used threatening or insulting language or behaving in an insubordinate manner towards his superiors including remarking to one NCO: "I'm sick of this f**king s**t, I'm going home. I've been on the road since 5am."
The military court heard he is also charged with showing aggressive behaviour to two corporals in Cathal Brugha Barracks.
Pvt Graham was separately charged with dangerous driving of a service vehicle over the aggressive manner in which he pulled the coach onto a hard shoulder.
He was also accused of displaying conduct that was prejudicial to good order and discipline over telling other soldiers that they could "piss and s**t" on the side of a road.
Opening the case for the prosecution, counsel for the Director of Military Prosecutions, Lieutenant Colonel Shane Keogh BL said the accused had shown disobedience and insubordination during a routine transport detail of the Defence Forces.
Lt Col Keogh said Pvt Graham had repeatedly refused to obey lawful commands and had used vulgar and threatening language as well as driving in a dangerous manner which placed other troops at risk.
He told the military judge, Colonel Michael Campion, that Pvt Graham's belief that he was the person in charge of the vehicle and was not bound to follow orders was "without merit".
Counsel said the orders to make a stop on a 200km-plus journey were "necessary and reasonable".
"He did not act in ignorance. He acted in defiance," remarked Lt Col Keogh.
Corporal would not let soldiers go to toilet on roadside, court hears
Corporal Paul Burke gave evidence that he assumed there would be no issue when other soldiers had asked him on the journey if the driver could stop for a toilet break.
However, he said Pvt Graham replied that he was not stopping as he had been on the road since 5am and had "places to be."
Cpl Burke said the driver complained that soldiers would take more than 10 minutes if he stopped as they would also go for food.
He recalled how Pvt Graham drove faster as he got near the service station.
Cpl Burke said he did not know what to do after the driver also refused to stop when asked by another NCO.
After the bus was pulled into a hard shoulder, Cpl Burke said he would not let 20 soldiers in uniform go to the toilet on the side of a road as someone would take a photo which would appear in newspapers and social media.
The trial heard that it was established that nobody else on the coach was qualified to drive the vehicle to allow Pvt Graham to be relieved of his duties.
Cpl Burke described the driver's demeanour as "crazy."
When they arrived at Cathal Brugha Barracks, he said he was twice told to "f**k off" by Pvt Graham when he ordered him to get out of the bus.
Under cross-examination by defence counsel, Pat O'Brien BL, Cpl Burke denied that the driver had told him before leaving Finner Camp that he was not planning to stop as he had to collect his kids.
"That's a lie," he replied.
Sergeant Derek Rochford, who was a corporal at the time, admitted that the driver had told him at Finner Camp that he was in a rush as he had to be back as quickly as possible "for another detail."
After the incident on the hard shoulder, Sgt Rochford said he did not feel it was safe to ask Pvt Graham to stop again.
The witness said he took it as a threat when the driver told him at Cathal Brugha Barracks to be careful as he was taking matters further.
Sgt Rochford said Pvt Graham showed no respect for rank and just wanted to get home.
Under cross-examination, Sgt Rochford said he was in charge as the most senior NCO but denied the driver was asked to go to a stop that was ten minutes off the route.
Several other passengers who were on the bus also gave evidence about the driver's refusal to stop for a toilet break apart from pulling in on a hard shoulder.
An officer in the Defence Forces' transport division told the court martial that a superior officer can tell the driver of a military vehicle what to do.
However, Commandant Ciaran Haughton said a document would need to be endorsed for any deviation from the driver's detail.
Comdt Haughton said he believed a driver had to show due respect to the rank of his passengers under military standing orders.
However, Mr O'Brien claimed an NCO was not allowed to endorse such a document as they were not defined as officers under the Defence Act.
In reply to questions from the judge, Comdt Haughton said toilet stops were generally only not allowed when transporting ammunition for security reasons but were encouraged for the welfare of personnel on other trips.
The witness said comfort breaks were not normally recorded on documentation but added they "probably should be per regulations".
The hearing was adjourned and resumes tomorrow.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Irish Sun
2 days ago
- The Irish Sun
‘My son died trying to protect his comrades' – Private Rooney's mum slams ‘sham' Lebanon trial & makes new justice vow
THE heartbroken mum of hero Private Sean Rooney insists a ruling by a court in Lebanon was 'not justice' for her son. Distraught Natasha Rooney was speaking days after a Advertisement 3 Natasha Rooney was speaking after a man was sentenced to death for the murder Credit: Liam McBurney/PA Wire 3 Pvt Rooney was killed in Lebanon in 2022 Credit: Defence Forces/PA Wire Peacekeeper Rooney was driving colleagues from the military camp in Earlier this week, Mohammad Ayyad, who has links to the Hezbollah militant group, The killer was controversially released on bail due to medical grounds in 2023, and has repeatedly refused to attend any subsequent court cases. He was sentenced in absentia this week, while other men linked to the killing were handed short prison sentences and hit with fines. Advertisement Read more in News Speaking for the first time since the judgement, Natasha Rooney slammed the 'hysteria' surrounding her son's murder. She said: 'What happened in Lebanon was not justice. What happened in Lebanon is unreflective of what we regard as a trial process. 'The trial into the murder of my son was heard and determined in less than half a day. 'Not only was justice not done, it was not seen to be done, with little to no information being disclosed or challenged in open court. Advertisement MOST READ IN THE IRISH SUN 'Instead, we are forced to believe the answers provided by a Lebanese justice system which from the outset has failed to hold those responsible to account.' Natasha continued: 'The factual reality here is that the perpetrator who has been convicted for my son's murder has been untraceable and untraced for many years. 'SHAM TRIAL PROCESS' 'Not only did he not appear for his trial, but it is clear that he might never appear. 'The verdict in reality is nothing more than a headline to the Lebanese authorities who masquerade this sham trial process as a semblance of justice for my son.' Advertisement Natasha Rooney concluded by She added: 'My son died trying to protect his three comrades as he made all efforts to escape an armed gang who had surrounded their vehicle and fired their shots. 'UNCOMFORTABLE TRUTHS' 'In his name, I will dedicate every bone in my body to ensure justice for Seán, and to highlight the uncomfortable truths about the systematic failings by the 'That is the very least I owe my son Sean. It is the very least I owe Sean's comrades. Advertisement 'And it is the very least the Irish justice system owe us all.' 3 The mum of Sean Rooney insists court ruling in Lebanon was 'not justice' for her son Credit: Family Handout/PA Wire
RTÉ News
3 days ago
- RTÉ News
Eight sexual assault cases tied to Defence Forces, reports reveal
Eight cases of sexual assault involving members of the Defence Forces were before the military or Garda authorities by March 2024, according to new internal reports obtained by RTÉ Investigates. The reports detail cases of alleged assault, sexual assault and "inappropriate behaviour." Most cases involve one member assaulting another, often linked to allegations of bullying or harassment. However, one alleged assault case with the Gardaí refers to a "domestic situation", in which a Defence Forces member was accused of the physical assault of an unnamed individual. Five of the cases were with the military authorities – either under investigation by the Military Police or with military prosecutors – while three had been referred to An Garda Síochána for criminal investigation. The figures are contained in two anonymised reports prepared by the Defence Forces. They were submitted to the Department of Defence last year and were recently obtained by RTÉ Investigates. One of the reports relates to cases under investigation by the Military Police or under consideration by military prosecutors as of March 2024. The other refers to cases that were initially with the Military Police, which forwarded those cases to Gardaí by March 2024 for investigation. The reports also reveal that 13 assault cases were before the military authorities or the Gardaí by March 2024 and refer to seven cases involving inappropriate behaviour. Criminal controversies In recent years, the Defence Forces have come under intense scrutiny for their response to the criminal behaviour of some of their members. A 2021 RTÉ radio documentary, "Women of Honour", brought national attention to the experiences of female personnel who were sexually harassed or assaulted while serving in the military. Last year, there was widespread public revulsion when soldier Cathal Crotty was given a fully suspended sentence after pleading guilty to assaulting Limerick woman, Natasha O'Brien. The sentence was appealed. Crotty, who was later discharged from the military, was jailed earlier this year. These controversies have prompted several internal and external reports in recent years, relating to the Defence Forces. An independent review, completed in 2023 and initiated following the Women of Honour campaign, criticised how military authorities handled complaints of sexual violence. It described a culture where victims are often discouraged from filing formal complaints and where investigations are "bungled" and "last for years." After this review, the Tánaiste and Minister for Defence at the time, Micheál Martin, announced in April 2023 that all allegations of sexual assault involving serving members of the Defence Forces would be referred directly to An Garda Síochána. Meanwhile, in 2024, following the Crotty case, several other reports on the Defence Forces were completed. Among them were two anonymised internal reports outlining cases investigated by the military authorities and, separately, An Garda Síochána, which RTÉ Investigates recently obtained in a Freedom of Information request. Assaults linked to social events One of the internal reports, relating to investigations conducted by the military authorities only, stated that by the end of March 2024, there were a total of 10 alleged assault cases, five sexual assault cases and five others involving inappropriate behaviour. It noted that some of the cases predated the referral direction in April 2023. Of the five alleged sexual assault cases within the military system, three were described as having occurred during various social events. In one case, a Defence Forces member allegedly sexually assaulted a colleague during a social event outside work. The alleged victim declined to engage with Military Police investigators and had not returned to duty. In another, an alleged sexual assault took place during a work-related social gathering, while a third involved a separate incident during a social event. In a separate case, a male private reported an alleged sexual assault and complained of inappropriate sexual behaviour by a colleague. Another case detailed allegations that a male Defence Forces member had sexually harassed and assaulted a colleague. Under investigation by the Gardaí The other internal report, which relates to cases referred to An Garda Síochána by the military authorities, refers to three alleged sexual assault cases, three assault cases, and two involving inappropriate behaviour. The sexual assault cases had not progressed to the civilian courts and remained under investigation by the end of March 2024. Two of those alleged sexual assault cases involved the Naval Service, while in the third case, a male recruit was accused of sexually assaulting a female recruit and engaging in inappropriate behaviour. 'Things don't get reported' Diane Byrne, a former army officer and spokesperson for the Women of Honour campaign, said that the number of cases contained in the internal reports represented a small proportion of complaints involving members of the Defence Forces. "First of all, lots of things don't get reported," she told RTÉ Investigates. "Second of all, sometimes things do get reported, but then they're not investigated properly. At those stages along the way, the volume just gets smaller and smaller. And then you're left with really just a handful of cases." Ms Byrne claimed that the military justice system was "designed to wear out the person making the complaint and keep them in the dark." "There's very little information that comes across. It takes huge effort on the part of a victim to consistently push, to be fobbed off, to keep coming back and keep coming back. It could take years of absolutely no communications whatsoever." 'Two different stories' Through the Women of Honour group, RTÉ Investigates spoke with two women who have each made separate complaints about members of the Defence Forces and have direct experience of the military criminal justice system. After reviewing the two anonymised reports obtained by RTÉ Investigates, Ms Byrne said these women's cases do not appear to be included. However, due to their vague presentation, she cannot say this with certainty. Both women say they have not received clear updates on the status of their complaints or the specific offences they reported. Last month, Ruth Coppinger TD referred to one of those women in the Dáil during oral questions. She told the current Minister for Defence, Simon Harris, that she had spoken with a woman who claimed to have been abused by an Army member. "He used his Army position, military surveillance, Army guns and even a grenade to threaten her and her family," she said. "He told this woman he was untouchable." Ms Coppinger added that the woman had been informed by the Defence Forces in July 2024 that the investigation into her case had concluded and that she would be sent the results. However, this information appeared to conflict with other information provided in response to a written parliamentary question submitted last April. In his written response, Mr Harris said: "The military authorities have advised me that these allegations were referred to An Garda Síochána and that the matter remains under investigation." "Which is it?" Ms Coppinger asked last month. "The woman has been given two different accounts." She also said that she believed that the soldier in question is currently on special leave with full pay. In response, Mr Harris told the Dáil he would look into the matter. Military Police allegedly met victim in a hotel bar The woman referred to by Ms Coppinger told RTÉ Investigates that she had been stalked and harassed over several years by a member of the Defence Forces. She also alleged that she had been physically assaulted. She reported the matter to the military authorities but was unhappy with how the Military Police handled her case. After complaining about the member in question, two Military Police officers arranged to meet her in a hotel bar, which she did despite feeling this setting was inappropriate and unprofessional, given the sensitive nature of her allegations. The woman insisted on a follow-up meeting in a more private location, which the Military Police agreed to. Her account of the meeting was confirmed by Diane Byrne, who accompanied her for support. 'We operate a victim-centred approach' In a statement to RTÉ Investigates, the Defence Forces said it would be inappropriate "to comment on specific cases or allegations." "Our Military Police personnel are trained to the highest standard and operate a victim-centred approach," the statement said. "All allegations of a sexual nature are now referred to An Garda Síochána." The Defence Forces explained that they had introduced several measures in recent years to help prevent unacceptable behaviour and cited the establishment of a Gender, Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Officer at Defence Forces Headquarters as an example. "Should unacceptable behaviour occur within the Defence Forces, there are robust procedures in place to protect the victim, investigate the allegation and deliver justice where necessary," it concluded. Separately, the Department of Defence told RTÉ Investigates that an "external oversight body of the Defence Forces" was created in April 2023 on a non-statutory basis and was later placed on a statutory footing in December 2024. The Department described this body as a "critical element" in driving cultural change within the Defence Forces. It further noted that a Tribunal of Inquiry was established in June 2024 to review how the Defence Forces handle complaints involving discrimination, bullying, sexual harassment, and sexual misconduct. The Tribunal's website states that it has three years from June 2024 to complete its work. 'Lack of understanding' Through the Women of Honour group, RTÉ Investigates spoke with a second woman who says that a male colleague in the Defence Forces sexually harassed her. She says he tried to pressure her into a sexual relationship in exchange for preferential treatment, and when she refused, he began to bully her. The woman told RTÉ Investigates that she gave a statement to the Military Police in 2023 but was also dissatisfied with how they handled her case. She said her statement was also taken in a public setting and did not accurately reflect her account of what happened. The Defence Forces declined to answer queries concerning this woman's case. However, Donna von Allemann, legal director of Rape Crisis Ireland, told RTÉ Investigates that there was an "obvious lack of privacy and confidentiality" in conducting interviews with assault victims in a public place, and said that this was unacceptable. "The lack of a basic understanding of the effects of trauma on a survivor is hugely problematic," she added. "It calls into question whether the skills or expertise of the Military Police when investigating sexual violence are up to the standards necessary to effectively investigate these types of crimes," Ms von Allemann said. 'A wall of silence' Meanwhile, the woman told RTÉ Investigates she was unhappy with the level of information she received from the military authorities about the progress of her case. Earlier this year, she learned informally that it was not being pursued. In April, she requested an update from the Military Police on why her case was not being progressed, but says she has yet to receive a response. Ms von Allemann said her organisation has supported survivors of sexual abuse within the military and noted that those individuals face "complex military structures" and can encounter a "wall of silence." Survivors of sexual violence experience additional difficulty when they are not properly informed about developments in their case, Ms von Allemann told RTÉ Investigates. "It should not fall to the survivor to have to spend countless hours, days and even months, trying to gain access to information," Ms von Allemann added. Military authorities are excluded from victims' legislation The second woman RTÉ Investigates spoke with also said that the Defence Forces gave her a handbook outlining her rights as a victim of crime within the military system. The handbook says victims are entitled to "information" and notes that "during the investigation of your complaint, you may ask the [Military Police]… to inform you of developments in the investigation." It also states that victims' legal rights are "primarily set out in the Criminal Justice (Victims of Crime) Act, 2017", a law designed to give victims access to information and the ability to seek a review of decisions not to prosecute. But the woman discovered that while the legislation applies to An Garda Síochána and the Director of Public Prosecutions, it does not refer to the Military Police or the Director of Military Prosecutions. As a result, victims of crime in the military justice system have fewer legal rights than those in the civilian system when it comes to accessing case information. Crucially, the former cannot have a decision not to prosecute reviewed. A Defence Forces spokesperson confirmed that the legislation does not apply to the military. However, the spokesperson told RTÉ Investigates that the military treats the legislation as a statement of best practice and "endeavours to afford victims in the military justice system the same rights as those covered by the 2017 Act." The Department of Justice refused to say why the military authorities had been excluded from the legislation.
Irish Times
4 days ago
- Irish Times
Lebanese authorities know where man sentenced to death for killing Pte Seán Rooney is, Irish officials believe
Irish officials believe Lebanese authorities are aware of the location of a Hizbullah member who was on Monday convicted of the murder of Pte Seán Rooney in December 2022. Mohammad Ayyad was sentenced to death in absentia by a Lebanese military court for killing the Defence Forces member. The sentence is likely to be later commuted to a prison term. Ayyad was accused of firing his weapon into Pte Rooney's jeep during an attack in the village of Al-Aqbiya. Six other accused received lesser sentences while one was acquitted. Pte Rooney and three other Irish peacekeepers, who were serving with the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (Unifil) mission in south Lebanon, were driving to Beruit Airport when their vehicle came under attack. READ MORE Trooper Shane Kearney was seriously injured in the incident while two other Irish soldiers suffered more minor injuries. Ayyad was produced to the court by Hizbullah in 2023 and charged under Article 549 of the Lebanese Penal Code, which states the murder of a public official carrying out official duties shall be punishable by death. He was later released on bail to receive medical treatment after his lawyers told the court he was seriously ill. Before his sentencing on Monday, documents were handed into court detailing the current location of Ayyad, sources said. The documents stated he was seriously ill in hospital. Another man present during the attack, Ali Suleiman, was sentenced to three months in prison and a fine of 100 million Lebanese pounds (€960). A third accused, Ali Khalifa, was jailed for one month and given a similar fine while two others, Hussein Suleiman, Mustafa Suleiman, and Ali Hakim fined 200 million Lebanese pounds (€1,920) each. A seventh accused, Mohammed Mazhar, was found not guilty. Before Monday, none of the accused aside from Ayyad had ever appeared in court. However, all six others turned up for the verdict and sentencing. A verdict had not been expected in the case until mid-September. The early conclusion of the case is seen by Irish officials as an attempt by the Lebanese authorities to draw a line under the incident before a crucial vote to renew Unifil's peacekeeping mandate, which ends on August 31st. The Lebanese government wants the mandate renewed. However, Israel has been lobbying for Unifil to be wound up or to have its mandate significantly curtailed. The value Lebanon places on the peacekeeping mission was emphasised by the chief military judge during Monday's hearing. 'Hearts beat for the continued presence of the peacekeeping forces in Lebanon, given the humanitarian, social, and even cultural work they are doing,' Brig Gen Wassim Fayyad said. The willingness of the court to convict the accused also underlines the reduction in Hizbullah's power and influence since Pte Rooney's murder, officials said. The militant group, which is designated as a terrorist organisation by the European Union, was left badly weakened following Israel's invasion of Lebanon last October. Monday's three-hour hearing was overseen by Brig Gen Fayyad, who was appointed earlier this year by Lebanon's new president, Joseph Aoun, a former army chief who has pledged to reform the Lebanese judiciary. The proceedings in Beirut were attended by: Nuala O'Brien, the Irish Ambassador to Egypt with responsibility for Lebanon; Bernie Maguire, an assistant secretary at the Department of Defence; Paul McCloskey, the husband of Pte Rooney's mother Natasha Rooney-McCloskey; Joe Karam, a Lebanese lawyer appointed to represent the Irish Government during the proceedings; and an observer from Unifil. During the proceedings, the court reviewed video and photographic evidence and heard testimony from the defendants. The defendants told the court that they had been watching a World Cup football match between France and Morocco in Al-Aqbiya, a town in south Lebanon, on December 14th, 2022, when a Unifil vehicle drove by crowds gathered there. The Lebanese men said Unifil did not typically undertake patrols in this area. They said the vehicle did not have a UN flag on it and was not accompanied by a Lebanese military patrol. The defendants told the court that they believed it may have been part of an undercover Israeli operation. The lawyer for the defendants told the military court there was no premeditated plan to kill a UN soldier, in particular a soldier from Ireland. The defendants said they had received no instructions from Hizbullah, or any other group, to kill a UN peacekeeper. The military court's decision is open to appeal by the defendants and the military prosecutor, Fadi Akiki, who was represented at the hearing on Monday by his deputy Roland Chartouni. If there is no appeal or once such an appeal concludes, civil proceedings can be instigated by Pte Rooney's family against the defendants. Evidence from the military court proceedings would then be presented in Lebanon's civil courts, according to Lebanese lawyers familiar with the system.
