logo
China considers lifting sanctions on UK parliamentarians as relations warm

China considers lifting sanctions on UK parliamentarians as relations warm

The Guardian9 hours ago

China is considering lifting the sanctions it imposed on UK parliamentarians in 2021, in the latest sign of warming relations between London and Beijing.
The Chinese government is reviewing the sanctions, which it introduced four years ago in response to what it called 'lies and disinformation' about human rights abuses in Xinjiang, according to two UK government sources familiar with the conversations.
Asked to comment, a spokesperson for the Chinese embassy in London said: 'China has always attached importance to developing relations with the UK. Currently, UK-China relations are showing a positive momentum.'
'Exchanges and dialogues between the UK and China at all levels and in all fields will help enhance mutual understanding and trust between the two sides, and will also help promote the continuous development of bilateral relations and practical cooperation, which benefit the two peoples.'
The development comes after a week in which several high-ranking Chinese officials visited the UK and held talks with senior government figures.
He Lifeng, China's vice-premier, and Wang Wentao, its commerce minister, were in London for trade talks with the US last week. He met Rachel Reeves, the UK chancellor, while Wang held talks with Jonathan Reynolds, the business and trade secretary.
Liu Jianchao, one of China's top diplomats who heads the international department of the Chinese Communist party, paid a three-day visit to the UK early last week where he met David Lammy, the foreign secretary, and Jonathan Powell, the national security adviser. None of these meetings were publicised by the UK government.
Liu also participated in an event with British MPs hosted by the Great Britain China Centre, an arm's-length government body, where China's sanctions on UK parliamentarians were raised repeatedly. The visit faced criticism because Liu is an architect of China's campaign of repression against its citizens overseas.
It is unknown whether China is considering lifting all the sanctions it imposed on UK citizens and organisations four years ago, or only some. Nine UK citizens were banned from China in 2021, including five Conservative MPs and two members of the House of Lords. They were targeted for highlighting human rights violations against the Muslim Uyghur community in the north-western province of Xinjiang.
China's sanctions were a retaliation against the UK imposing sanctions on Chinese officials held responsible for atrocities in Xinjiang. UK officials said there was no prospect of the government lifting those.
The five MPs sanctioned in 2021 were the former Tory leader Iain Duncan Smith, Tom Tugendhat, Nusrat Ghani, Neil O'Brien and Tim Loughton, who stood down last summer. The two peers were David Alton, a crossbencher, and Helena Kennedy from Labour. Several are members of the Inter-Parliamentary Alliance on China.
The Newcastle University academic Jo Smith Finley, whose research focuses on the Uyghurs, and Geoffrey Nice QC, who chaired the Uyghur Tribunal that investigated atrocities against the minority group, also had sanctions imposed upon them.
Those under sanctions are banned from entering China, Hong Kong and Macau, any property they have in China has been frozen and Chinese citizens and institutions are prohibited from doing business with them.
Sign up to First Edition
Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters
after newsletter promotion
In April, China lifted its sanctions on five MEPs and on the European parliament's subcommittee on human rights, which were also imposed in 2021 in response to the EU's own sanctions. The move was part of Beijing's charm offensive to improve ties and revive talks over a trade deal with Brussels, amid the turmoil caused by Donald Trump's tariffs.
There is no prospect of a UK-China trade deal. However, Beijing is awaiting a government decision over the fate of its proposal to build a controversial super-embassy near the Tower of London. Ministers are due to approve or reject the plan this summer. The US government has reportedly raised concerns about the security implications.
UK officials are drawing up plans for Reynolds to visit Beijing to revive a key trade dialogue with China later this year, and for Keir Starmer to make a bilateral trip to the country, potentially in the autumn.
Labour took a much stronger stance towards human rights abuses in Xinjiang in opposition, when it pledged to take action to recognise them as genocide. It has softened its position in government and sought to build closer ties with China in pursuit of economic growth.
During his visit to London last week, Liu also met Tony Blair, the former prime minister. Blair, who is expected to travel to China later this year, continues to informally advise senior figures in the UK and US on foreign policy matters.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Canada agrees to ratify Britain's accession to major trans-Pacific trade pact
Canada agrees to ratify Britain's accession to major trans-Pacific trade pact

Rhyl Journal

time18 minutes ago

  • Rhyl Journal

Canada agrees to ratify Britain's accession to major trans-Pacific trade pact

Ottawa will seek to introduce legislation to its parliament this autumn to formally approve Britain's entry to the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP). The UK joined the bloc in 2024, but Canada is yet to ratify its accession – meaning Britain still faces pre-CPTPP trade barriers in exporting to the country. Following a bilateral meeting between the Prime Minister and his Canadian counterpart Mark Carney on Sunday, Downing Street said: 'Prime Minister Carney confirmed that Canada would ratify the UK's accession to the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP), seeking to introduce legislation to their parliament in the autumn. 'This will bring huge benefits to UK businesses by lowering tariffs when buying from and selling to Canada. 'They also agreed to set up a joint taskforce to turbocharge progress on other areas of mutual benefit, including technology and artificial intelligence – in support of shared growth and our national security. 'The taskforce will also look to make progress on the wider UK-Canada Free Trade Agreement.'

Work to get underway on 96 affordable homes in Sunderland
Work to get underway on 96 affordable homes in Sunderland

BBC News

time27 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Work to get underway on 96 affordable homes in Sunderland

Work on a £23.6m housing development of 96 affordable homes is due to get under East-based not-for-profit housing association, Thirteen Group, is building the homes off Amberley Street and Harrogate Street in Hendon in homes, which will all be available for affordable rent, will consist of 75 two, three and four-bedroom houses and 21 two-bedroom East Mayor Kim McGuiness said too many families had been "locked out of affordable housing for too long". 'Empty too long' The scheme is being supported by Homes England, the North East Mayor, Kim McGuinness, Sunderland City Council and local charity, Back on the development is supported by a £1.9m contribution from the North East Combined Authority's Brownfield Housing said: "Too many families have been locked out of affordable housing for too long so I'm pleased we'll be delivering even more schemes like this with a further £17m to transform brownfield sites with great homes for our communities across the region."Everyone deserves a good home." The development is expected to be completed by 2028. Council leader Michael Mordey, who is also the Hendon ward councillor, said: "I'm delighted to see the start of work on these much-needed homes for social rent in the heart of Hendon."This site has stood empty for far too long, so it really is great to finally see the development start," he added.

Full-term abortion ‘to become legal' under change planned by MPs
Full-term abortion ‘to become legal' under change planned by MPs

Telegraph

time37 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Full-term abortion ‘to become legal' under change planned by MPs

Women will be able to abort their pregnancies for any reason at any point up to birth without facing prosecution under law changes to be considered by MPs on Tuesday, according to a legal opinion. In the biggest proposed changes to the abortion law for nearly 50 years, two rival amendments would enable women to terminate their pregnancy on the basis of the sex of the foetus without the risk of prosecution, the legal opinion claimed. But while both amendments would decriminalise abortion for women, one would retain criminal prosecutions for doctors who facilitated late abortions in such circumstances. The second would only see medics face disciplinary sanctions by making the 1967 Abortion Act 'obsolete,' according to the legal assessment. The opinion, by Stephen Rose KC, a leading criminal barrister, was commissioned by Sir Edward Leigh, the Father of the House, who has previously voted against moves to liberalise abortion laws. On Tuesday MPs will debate the amendments to the Government's Crime and Policing Bill. MPs will be given a free vote on the basis that abortion is a matter of conscience. Six women have been prosecuted in the past three years for ending or attempting to end their own pregnancies outside abortion law, a crime that carries a maximum sentence of life imprisonment. The first proposal put forward by Labour MP Tonia Antoniazzi would amend the 1861 Offences Against the Person Act – which outlaws abortion – so that it would no longer apply to women ending their own pregnancies. It would not affect the 1967 Act which allows abortions after 24 weeks, agreed by two doctors and where there is a risk to the woman's physical or mental health, or of the child being born with severe abnormalities. A second amendment, known as NC20, proposed by Labour MP Stella Creasy would repeal the sections of the 1861 Act prohibiting abortion and defining the offence of concealing the birth of a child. Ms Creasy would also amend the Abortion Act of 1967 to create a 'human rights framework ' to ensure women had safe access to abortion rights and to maintain the 24-week time limit for a termination. Carry out own abortion In his legal opinion, Mr Rose said Ms Antoniazzi's amendment would mean that it would no longer be illegal for a woman to carry out her own abortion 'at home, for any reason, at any gestation, up to birth' but would still retain criminal prosecution for a medical professional who assisted in a late termination. However, he said Ms Creasy's amendment would go further in rendering the 24-week time limit 'obsolete' in respect of the prosecution of women who undertook terminations 'in typical circumstances'. He suggested it would create a 'a hybrid situation characterised by uncertainty'. 'While the registered medical practitioner would no longer face prosecution for the repealed offences, it seems they may face professional discipline,' he added. 'It is foreseeable that this amendment might contribute to an increase in the incidence of medical termination after the 24-week period.' In his legal opinion on Ms Antoniazzi's amendment, Mr Rose said it ' would not be illegal for a woman to carry out her own abortion at home, solely on the basis that the foetus is female'. However, it would remain illegal for a doctor to assist. On Ms Creasy's amendment, he said: 'The effect of the amendment is that a woman who terminated her pregnancy solely on the basis that she believed the child to be female would face no criminal sanction in connection with that reason, or at all.' Only one amendment may be allowed Sir Lindsay Hoyle, the Commons speaker, will have to decide whether the amendments can be debated and subject to votes on Tuesday. Ms Antoniazzi's amendment has the support of more than 180 MPs, while Ms Creasy has the backing of more than 100. It is thought Sir Lindsay may only allow one vote on the issue. More than 70 per cent of MPs agree that women should not be liable for prison sentences if they have abortions outside the set rules, according to a YouGov poll of 100 MPs. There is, however, strong public opposition to changing the abortion time limits with only three per cent backing extending it to birth. A third amendment proposes a law change to ban the unsupervised use of abortion 'pills by post' to prevent women being coerced into terminations. Nearly 30 MPs including former Tory leader Sir Iain Duncan Smith are backing an amendment which would crack down on the pills-by-post scheme to prevent it being abused by coercive partners or result in mistaken terminations. Catherine Robinson, of Right to Life UK, said: 'The abortion lobby is pushing to decriminalise abortion to cover up the disastrous effects of its irresponsible pills-by-post scheme, which endangers women by removing the requirement for in-person consultations to reliably verify a woman's gestational age and assess any health risks, or the risk of coercion, before abortion pills may be prescribed.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store