logo
The wild life of Canada's favourite crack-smoking, escort-loving mayor

The wild life of Canada's favourite crack-smoking, escort-loving mayor

Telegraph5 hours ago

It is a feature of modern life that many of the world's best-loved politicians, from Donald Trump to Boris Johnson, are colourful, charismatic and deeply flawed characters to whom normal rules of behaviour simply do not seem to apply. The worse their actions are, the more they are beloved by a public who refuse to accept that their idols are not on their side. Yet few have been as swashbucklingly, hilariously outrageous in their buccaneering showmanship as Rob Ford, the one-time mayor of Toronto.
Ford came to international attention when he gave a press conference in 2013 in which he not only denied claims that he had smoked crack cocaine – something that the newspaper the Toronto Star had seen video footage of – but then proceeded to attack the media for daring to report verifiable fact as fact.
Over the course of Shianne Brown's frequently jaw-dropping new Netflix documentary, Trainwreck: Mayor of Mayhem, Ford's brief, chaotic and flamboyant life comes into focus once again. There are clear and obvious parallels with both Johnson and Trump, although Ford's hard-living, heavy-drinking ways have little in common with the teetotal president and the largely abstemious former PM. Instead, what is so remarkable about the politician is that he had an innate gift for connecting with his public, despite his outrageous and wildly controversial personal life.
The crack-smoking – which under normal circumstances would have finished his career forever – was only the most egregious of the many things that he did. But as one former colleague of his remarks, perhaps hopefully, 'in the long run, history will think of him as a man who had an illness and accomplished things that have never been accomplished before.'
Ford's father, Douglas, was a successful self-made businessman and member of the Progressive Conservative party who passed on both his political views and energetic drive to succeed to his four children, especially his sons Doug and Rob. They became known as the 'Ford family enterprise' as a result. Mayor of Mayhem does not explore Ford's initial rise to prominence, which came when he was a city councillor for Ward 2 Etobicoke North in Toronto, but it is a fascinating story.
In language which anticipated the rise of Trump and Elon Musk and their cost-cutting exercises, Ford declared in 2001, when the city was facing a budgetary shortfall and necessary rise in taxes, 'I have to give my head a shake because some of the rhetoric that comes out of the mouths of some of these councillors boggles my mind, I swear. ... Get the government out of our backyards. It's ridiculous. Government red tape here. Bureaucratic here. It's nonsense having all this government.'
He led by example, refusing to claim expenses and saying that 'all this office budget stuff is self-promotion to benefit yourself. Why should the taxpayers have to pay for it? It boggles my mind.' Ford also had a knack for the quotable insult or jest. He argued against installing suicide prevention barriers on the Prince Edward Viaduct, claiming that the money should instead be spent on prosecuting paedophiles 'who are the main cause of people jumping off bridges.'
He referred to political opponents as 'scammers' and 'goons', and when accused of racism, blithely denied it, saying 'I'm a conservative and the majority of people are left-wing and cannot stand my politics.'
Ford made many enemies in his early political career, but he, a self-described 'public servant', also was seen as energetic and accessible by voters. Prone to exaggeration – the documentary observes that even from his early campaign appearances, he would claim that a crowd of 2,000 voters was in fact 5,000 – and also to self-mythologising, he had a knack of communicating with the public that resonated with people tired of the same old politicians.
As one acquaintance put it: 'Rob Ford gives out his business card out to virtually everyone he meets and says 'if you have any problems, call me'.' This cut through usual expectations of public service, often to unexpected effect. At Ford's funeral, his brother Doug recounted the anecdote of how Ford, picking up a takeaway sandwich, was surprised to learn that there was no delivery driver available to fulfil an order. Ford volunteered to take the sandwich himself, on the grounds that it might endear him to a potential voter. 'They gave me $35 for a $32 order, so I got a $3 tip!' he later recounted.
Ford, a large, imposing figure who bore a resemblance to the late actor John Candy, decided to run for mayor in the 2010 election amidst public dissatisfaction with his left-wing predecessor David Miller, who had served two terms in office but had lost his standing amidst a lengthy strike by garbage workers in the summer of 2019. Ford's platform was unashamedly populist, with such slogans as 'Stop the Gravy Train' and 'Respect for taxpayers'.
His opponents attempted to draw attention to previous misdemeanours of his, including an arrest for driving under the influence of alcohol in Miami in 1999, but Ford shrugged them off. His popularity only grew with voters, who saw him as an accessible everyman figure, and he was elected mayor with 47 per cent of the vote. As his special assistant Tom Beyer puts it in Mayor of Mayhem: 'We were outsiders and now we were insiders.'
The first indications that it would be an eventful mayoralty came on St Patrick's Day in 2012, a little over a year since he was elected. Ford held a 'wild party' in which he was said to be under the influence of both alcohol and drugs, and when the Toronto Star reported that the mayor was a heavy drinker, angrily denounced the story as 'lies, after lies, and lies'. He was said to have hired a blonde sex worker named Alana for this party and to have drunk and taken copious quantities of drugs with her, before announcing that he intended to '[go] out then [get] laid.'
The newspaper now redoubled its attempts to find some dirt in Ford's eventful private life, and was rewarded with its vigilance by being informed, in May 2013, that a video existed of the mayor smoking crack cocaine. They were offered its sale for $100k, but as the Toronto Star had a policy of not paying for stories, was unable to back up a hugely significant scoop. It looked as if it could not be printed, until the gossip website Gawker, which got hold of the same information, published their own story first, to be picked up on by the grateful Toronto Star.
Even as one of Ford's aides acknowledged 'that's a problem', the mayor simply described the story as more falsehoods, and suggested that the video had been doctored. This may have been a blatant untruth, but it was said with enough conviction to persuade half the citizens of Toronto that the newspaper was biased against Ford and casting around for evidence to discredit him.
The mayor blithely admitted things that would have led to any other politician being disgraced – in August 2013, when asked about cannabis use, he announced that 'I won't deny that, I smoked a lot of it' – but he seemed in denial about the damning video. When his chief of staff Mark Towhey suggested, given the inevitability of its becoming public, that Ford should seize the initiative and enter rehab, the mayor simply fired him. And so, when Toronto police chief Bill Blair announced on October 31 that he had seen the video, which had been captured after a gun smuggling raid, Ford refused to admit its existence.
In an instantly notorious press conference, he came out fighting: 'I have no reason to resign, I'm going to go back and return my phone calls, gonna be out doing what the people elected me to do and that's save taxpayers money and run a great government.' He then addressed rumours that he had behaved inappropriately towards a young female staffer, Olivia Gondek, who had resigned the previous year. He claimed that '[The newspaper] says that I wanted to 'eat her p----'. I've never said that in my life to her. I would never do that. I'm happily married. I've got more than enough to eat at home.'
Matters fell apart swiftly. Five days later, Ford was compelled to admit that 'Yes, I have smoked crack cocaine but ... am I an addict? No. Have I tried it? Um, probably in one of my drunken stupors, probably approximately about a year ago.' Eventually, the penitent mayor announced 'I will be forever sorry', but a series of embarrassing videos were leaked of Ford claiming he was a 'sick motherf-----' and miming bizarre fight moves.
In another, the mayor was filmed shouting 'I need f---ing' ten minutes to make sure he's dead!' When asked in an interview 'have you purchased illegal drugs in the last two years', Ford was compelled to say 'Yes, I have.' By the time a video appeared of him speaking in Jamaican patois, it was all one long-suffering aide could do to say 'it all blurs.'
The Toronto mayor was now an international joke, lambasted on chat shows all over America. Jay Leno, observing the latest absurd development, quipped: 'There's not a lot to do in Toronto.' When Ford entered the council chamber, amidst public demonstrations demanding that he resign as mayor, his fellow politicians yelled 'shame' at him, leading Ford to retort that they were 'scumbags' before charging and inadvertently knocking one woman over with his significant bulk.
Unabashed, he then announced' 'This reminds me of when Saddam attacked Kuwait…you guys have just attacked Kuwait.'
Despite everything, Ford was not only able to remain as mayor, but he announced his intention of standing for re-election ('Why retreat when you can keep pushing ahead?'). Even as yet another video surfaced of him smoking crack, he tried to get his life into some sort of order, albeit on his own, inimitable terms. He entered rehab, lost weight, was seen in the company of Hulk Hogan (who he beat in an arm wrestling contest) and Mike Tyson and once again set about seducing the citizens of Toronto as only he could. Had he not been diagnosed with a rare cancer, pleomorphic liposarcoma, he may even have won re-election.
In the event, his brother Doug stood in his stead and came a close runner-up to the eventual winner, John Tory. Ford instead fought and won his city council seat once more, indicating his extraordinary public popularity, and held it until his death on 22 March 2016. He was only 46. In one of the last scenes in Mayor of Mayhem, a bald, pensive-looking Ford is interviewed while going through chemotherapy. 'I'm doing the best I can in the situation,' he says softly. He believed that he would beat his illness, as he had beaten everything else that had come at him in his brief and eventful life. He was wrong.
Doug Ford, now Premier of Ontario, has already denounced Mayor of Mayhem and its makers: 'It's just disgusting. Leave the guy alone. Let him rest in peace. Let his family rest in peace. They're just disgusting people. It just absolutely infuriates me, to be honest with you. [If] they want the truth, talk to the real people who absolutely loved him.'
Certainly, it offers an unvarnished and at times highly unflattering picture of his younger brother as a Falstaffian, self-centred ruffian whose lack of impulse control meant that what might have been a legendary political career ended up falling apart, mired in scandal and sleaze. But what scandal, and what sleaze! If Rob Ford is to be remembered for anything, more than a decade after his death, it is in taking political wrongdoing to new depths, and making himself immortal in the process. There will never be another politician like him. We hope.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Insight: How Trump, a self-proclaimed "peacemaker," embraced Israel's campaign against Iran
Insight: How Trump, a self-proclaimed "peacemaker," embraced Israel's campaign against Iran

Reuters

time38 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Insight: How Trump, a self-proclaimed "peacemaker," embraced Israel's campaign against Iran

WASHINGTON, June 19 (Reuters) - Roughly one month ago, from the stage at an investment forum in Saudi Arabia, U.S. President Donald Trump issued a warning to Iran that would prove prophetic. "We'll never allow America and its allies to be threatened with terrorism or nuclear attack," Trump told the crowd, sending a message to the leadership in Tehran. "The time is right now for them to choose. Right now. We don't have a lot of time to wait. Things are happening at a very fast pace." That May 13 ultimatum received little attention at the time. But behind the scenes, the president already knew an attack on Iran could be imminent - and that there might be little he could do to stop it, according to two U.S. officials. By mid-May, the Pentagon had begun drawing up detailed contingency plans to aid Israel if it followed through on its long-held ambition to strike Iran's nuclear program, the officials said. And the U.S. had already diverted thousands of defensive weapons away from war-torn Ukraine toward the Middle East in preparation for potential conflict, according to a Western source familiar with the matter and a Ukrainian source. The Pentagon declined to comment for this story. This account of the weeks and days leading up to Trump's decision to throw his support behind Israel's bombing campaign is based on interviews with over a dozen administration officials, foreign diplomats and Trump confidantes, most of whom spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss private deliberations. The picture that emerges is that of a long, secretive preparation process and a president who for weeks found himself torn between diplomacy and supporting military action - and was ultimately persuaded in part by an ally whose actions he did not fully control. While Trump has long described himself as a peacemaker - dispatching Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff to the region several times to try to seal a diplomatic accord - he had several trusted political allies pushing him to back an Israeli attack on Iran's nuclear facilities. And U.S. intelligence had indicated a unilateral Israeli strike was possible, even likely, even if Trump wanted to wait, according to two U.S. officials. While it is unclear if Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu or Trump's more hawkish allies ever got him to a "yes" to Israel's plans, by the days leading up the strike he was at least not a "no," according to two senior U.S. officials and a senior Israeli source. That stance, people familiar with the dynamics said, helped tip Israel into action. Seven days into the Israel-Iran conflict, Trump is left with a dilemma, said Aaron David Miller, a veteran diplomat who has advised six secretaries of state on Middle East policy. He can try again to pursue a diplomatic resolution with Iran, allow Iran and Israel "to fight it out," or he can enter the war with U.S. airstrikes on the deeply buried Fordow enrichment plant, a step that would have unknown consequences for the region. Trump "let it (the Israeli attack) happen," said Miller. "He got on the tiger and he's riding it." The White House, the Israeli prime minister's office and Iran's delegation to the United Nations did not respond to a request for comment. Tehran has consistently said its nuclear program is designed for peaceful purposes only, a conclusion Washington has rejected. One of the first hints that Trump might sign off on an Israeli bombing campaign came in April. During a closed door meeting on April 17, Saudi Arabia's defense minister delivered a blunt message to Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian: Take Trump's offer to negotiate an agreement seriously because it presents a way to avoid the risk of war with Israel. Reuters could not determine whether the message was sent at Washington's behest, nor whether Iran's leaders took that message seriously. With hindsight, they should have. The Israel Defense Forces and the head of U.S. Central Command, General Michael "Erik" Kurilla, were discussing detailed intelligence about Iran's missile buildup and nuclear program and steps that could be required to defend U.S. troops and Israel itself in any conflict with Iran, according to a U.S. official and senior Israeli official. Meanwhile, the U.S. was funneling weapons to Israel that would be useful for an air war with Iran. In one instance in early May, a large shipment of defensive missiles originally meant for Ukraine were diverted to Israel instead, according to the Western source and the Ukrainian source. The diverted shipment caused consternation in Kyiv and sparked continued fears that additional weapons needed to defend against Moscow will instead be used to defend U.S. interests elsewhere, the Ukrainian source said. In the opening months of Trump's term, Israel had already proposed to Washington a series of options to attack Iran's facilities, according to sources. While Trump had rebuffed those ideas, saying he preferred diplomacy for the time being, several people close to him said he was never dead-set against using military force against Iran. He had done so before. In 2020, despite a foreign policy during his first term that was otherwise marked by restraint, Trump ordered a drone strike that killed major general Qassem Soleimani, the head of the Iranian Revolutionary Guards' division responsible for its international operations. The Iranian government has since sought to murder Trump in revenge, U.S. prosecutors have said, an allegation Tehran denies. Behind the scenes, Trump had been pulled in multiple directions on the Iran issue since before he even took office. On one side, many supporters - including conservative media personality Tucker Carlson - and administration officials saw Trump's Make America Great Again movement as an antidote to decades of foreign wars that cost thousands of American lives without significantly advancing American interests. On the other, several close Trump allies - from conservative commentator Mark Levin to Republican Senator Lindsey Graham - were portraying a nuclear Iran as an existential threat that must be removed at any cost. Trump himself took pride in being a broker of peace. "My proudest legacy," he said during his inauguration address, "will be that of a peacemaker and unifier." Ultimately, no U.S. official, Trump confidante or diplomat Reuters talked to identified an epiphany that tipped the scales for the president. One senior administration official said that after months of sitting on the fence a lack of diplomatic progress, a push from the Israelis and appeals by hawkish allies likely wore him down. Trump aides and allies have noted that Israel's attack unfolded just after the expiry of a 60-day deadline the Trump administration had set for a diplomatic breakthrough with Iran. The senior U.S. official said another dynamic was at play: As U.S. intelligence consistently showed Israel might go ahead with an attack with or without U.S. support, the administration could look caught off guard if they did not get behind it. Worse, it could appear that the U.S. was opposing a longtime ally. Although Trump had appeared to some to snub Netanyahu as he pushed for a peaceful solution to the crisis, privately, Israel understood that Washington would stand by it, said a separate official. By the time Trump talked to Netanyahu on Monday, June 9 - one of many phone calls in recent days - his stance was one of tacit, if not explicit approval, according to one U.S. and one Israeli official. The Wall Street Journal reported that Trump had said he would like more time to see diplomacy play out. But the U.S. official said that he did not explicitly veto Israel's plans. By Wednesday, June 11, it was clear to Washington that Israel's plans were a go. That day, Reuters reported that the U.S. was preparing a partial evacuation of its Iraqi embassy amid fears of reprisals from Iran following an imminent attack. The next day, June 12, Washington sent a formal diplomatic note to several regional allies, warning them that an attack was imminent. That evening, Israel launched its overnight barrage, an attack that almost immediately escalated into an air war. Trump and some key cabinet members watched the events live from the wood-paneled "JFK room," part of the White House Situation Room. Other officials watched the events nearby. On the menu, per one official: stone crabs from a local restaurant. The initial attack appeared to be a success, with several close advisers to Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei killed and key nuclear sites seriously damaged. Over the weekend, the Israelis considered killing Khamenei himself, but were waved off by Trump, according to two U.S. officials. Almost immediately, a political civil war erupted in Trump's Republican Party, with several high-profile conservatives, including members of Congress, accusing his administration of fanning the flames of war. Seven days on, the U.S. intelligence community believes the strikes have set Iran's nuclear ambitions back by only months, according to a source familiar with U.S. intelligence reports, confirming a CNN report. A significant blow to Iran's nuclear ambitions, most analysts say, will require dropping bunker-busting bombs on the Fordow Fuel Enrichment Plant, the crown jewel of Iran's nuclear program. Only the U.S. has that capability. Trump has said he is considering such a strike, which would represent a major escalation for the United States. As of Thursday, his intentions were still unclear.

Donald Trump delays US TikTok ban again
Donald Trump delays US TikTok ban again

BreakingNews.ie

timean hour ago

  • BreakingNews.ie

Donald Trump delays US TikTok ban again

Donald Trump has signed an executive order to keep TikTok running in the US for another 90 days to give his administration more time to broker a deal to bring the social media platform under American ownership. It is the third time the president has extended the deadline. The first one was through an executive order on January 20, his first day in office, after the platform went dark briefly when a national ban — approved by Congress and upheld by the Supreme Court — took effect. Advertisement The second was in April when White House officials believed they were nearing a deal to spin off TikTok into a new company with US ownership that fell apart after China backed out after Mr Trump's tariff announcement. It is not clear how many times he can — or will — keep extending the ban as the government continues to try to negotiate a deal for TikTok, which is owned by China's ByteDance. While there is no clear legal basis for the extensions, so far there have been no legal challenges to fight them. Mr Trump has gained more than 15 million followers on TikTok since he joined last year, and he has credited the trendsetting platform with helping him gain traction among young voters. He said in January that he has a 'warm spot for TikTok'. As the extensions continue, it appears less likely that TikTok will be banned in the US any time soon. The decision to keep the site alive through an executive order has received some scrutiny, but it has not faced a legal challenge in court, unlike many of Mr Trump's other executive orders. Advertisement Jeremy Goldman, analyst at Emarketer, called TikTok's US situation 'deadline purgatory'. The whole thing 'is starting to feel less like a ticking clock and more like a looped ringtone. This political Groundhog Day is starting to resemble the debt ceiling drama: a recurring threat with no real resolution'. Donald Trump (Alex Brandon/AP) For now, TikTok continues to function for its 170 million users in the US, and tech giants Apple, Google and Oracle were persuaded to continue to support the app, on the promise that Mr Trump's Justice Department would not use the law to seek potentially steep fines against them. Americans are even more closely divided on what to do about TikTok than they were two years ago. Advertisement A recent Pew Research Centre survey found that about a third of Americans supported a ban, down from 50% in March 2023. Roughly a third said they would oppose a ban, and a similar percentage said they were not sure. Among those who supported a ban, about eight in 10 cited concerns over users' data security being at risk as a major factor in their decision, according to the report. Democratic senator Mark Warner, vice chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, said the Trump administration is again 'flouting the law and ignoring its own national security findings about the risks' posed by a China-controlled TikTok. 'An executive order can't sidestep the law, but that's exactly what the president is trying to do,' he added. Advertisement

Trump signs order granting TikTok a third reprieve from US ban
Trump signs order granting TikTok a third reprieve from US ban

The Guardian

timean hour ago

  • The Guardian

Trump signs order granting TikTok a third reprieve from US ban

Donald Trump has signed an executive order to delay the ban or sale of TikTok for the third time. The order gives the Chinese-owned social media company another 90 days to find a buyer or be banned in the US. 'I've just signed the Executive Order extending the Deadline for the TikTok closing for 90 days (September 17, 2025),' the president said in a Truth Social post. Trump's first executive order giving TikTok a reprieve came on his first day in office – just three days after the supreme court ruled to uphold the ban. Trump issued the second executive order in April. The deadline for the sale or ban was then set for 19 June. Now, TikTok has until September. Mark Warner, a Democratic senator and the vice-chair of the Senate intelligence committee, accused Trump of sidestepping the law with an executive order. 'Once again, the Trump administration is flouting the law and ignoring its own national security findings about the risks posed by a PRC-controlled TikTok,' Warner said in a statement. TikTok is a tremendously popular social media app with 170 million users in the US. ByteDance, TikTok's parent company, said in April that it had been in discussion with the US government regarding a solution for the app. It added that any agreement 'will be subject to approval under Chinese law'. Sign up to TechScape A weekly dive in to how technology is shaping our lives after newsletter promotion Before Trump issued his second executive order on TikTok, a possible deal was reportedly in place. But, according to Reuters, China put that deal on hold after Trump announced sweeping tariffs against the country. At the time, Trump indicated he was using tariffs for leverage in the deal. 'We have a situation with TikTok where China will probably say we'll approve a deal, but will you do something on the tariffs. The tariffs give us great power to negotiate,' Trump said. The idea of banning TikTok originated with Trump in 2020, who said the Chinese-owned app posed a danger to national security. It quickly became a bipartisan issue and Congress overwhelmingly voted to ban the app last year, which faced a legal challenge but was ultimately affirmed in the supreme court. The original deadline for the TikTok ban was on 19 January. Trump switched his stance on TikTok after joining the app while campaigning for president last year, amassing nearly 15 million followers and hosting the TikTok CEO, Shou Zi Chew, at Trump's Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida. Chew also attended Trump's inauguration. Several US investors have expressed interest in buying the social media app, which is likely worth tens of billions of dollars. Among those who've reportedly thrown in bids are a consortium led by the software giant Oracle, asset manager Blackstone, Amazon, Walmart, billionaire Frank McCourt, a crypto foundation and the founder of the adult website OnlyFans. TikTok, ByteDance and the White House did not return requests for comment.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store