Schroders outlines nearly $200 million in cost cuts in revamp
Summary
Companies
Operating profit beats analyst forecasts
Schroders aims to attract 20 bln pounds to private assets arm
Shares up 5% in early trading
LONDON, March 6 (Reuters) - Schroders (SDR.L), opens new tab outlined plans to cut 150 million pounds ($194 million) from its costs over the next three years in a strategy update on Thursday aimed at rebooting flagging performance at the 221-year-old British money manager.
The FTSE 100 company also said clients pulled a net 4.7 billion pounds from its funds in 2024 - underlining the pressure on the business - compared with 1 billion pounds of inflows the prior year.
Analysts at JPMorgan said in a note that the cost cuts - equivalent to 8% of Schroders' operating costs of 1.8 billion pounds - would be welcomed by investors, adding that its operating profit of 640.5 million pounds for the year beat forecasts.
Schroders' shares gained 5% in early trading.
Chief Executive Richard Oldfield stepped up to the role in November and is aiming to revive Schroders' fortunes after a poor run of earnings last year dragged its shares down 25%, a third straight annual decline.
Like rival mid-sized fund houses, Schroders has struggled to fend off competition from huge U.S. rivals such as BlackRock and Vanguard offering cheaper passive products like index-trackers.
Reuters reported last week that representatives of the company's founding Schroder family, which still own a 44% stake and has two family members on the board, had challenged executives to improve its fortunes faster.
The company said the targeted savings would come from simplifying processes and technology improvements.
Finance chief Meagen Burnett told reporters the company, which employs 6,400 people, would have fewer staff after the cuts, but did not give any further detail. Schroders said it would incur restructuring costs of around 200 million pounds, which often stem from layoffs.
RAMPING UP NEW BUSINESS
Former finance chief Oldfield also outlined targets to ramp up new business from its higher-margin wealth and private markets units, including attracting 20 billion pounds into its private assets arm Schroders Capital in three years.
"Schroders is an exceptional company. We have all we need to ensure this business thrives," he said.
Oldfield had already moved quickly to cut costs, shedding around 200 staff and more than halving the size of its executive committee.
Schroders' shares had gained 17% so far this year ahead of the strategy update.
The company's overall assets under management increased 4% to 778.7 billion pounds and it announced an unchanged dividend for the year of 21.5 pence per share including a 15 pence final dividend.
Oldfield said he had spoken to managers at French money manager Tikehau since they had built up a 5% stake in the company last month, adding they had expressed that they saw value in the business.
Tikehau leapt into its top five backers and has said it sees potential for "commercial collaboration" with the British company. Oldfield said he was open to collaboration if it was in the best interests of clients.
($1 = 0.7751 pounds)
Get a look at the day ahead in U.S. and global markets with the Morning Bid U.S. newsletter. Sign up here.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
7 minutes ago
- Reuters
Moelis CEO-designate joins Wall Street in signaling dealmaking rebound after tariff pause
June 10 (Reuters) - Moelis' (MC.N), opens new tab incoming CEO Navid Mahmoodzadegan told investors on Tuesday that he is optimistic about the dealmaking environment, as confidence returns following a pause in April triggered by U.S. tariff threats. "I'm optimistic. It definitely feels better and better each day ... The announcement in April, I think set us back a little bit in terms of the M&A environment," he said at the Morgan Stanley U.S. Financials Conference. Investor sentiment soured and stock markets slid after U.S. President Donald Trump's "Liberation Day" tariff threats, stalling risk appetite and slowing deal activity. Appetite for deals has since returned, with market participants and bankers once again seeing an opening for initial public offerings and signs of a pickup in M&A activity. "Everywhere I go, people want to transact. They want to lean into transactions, whether it's companies or private equity firms or capital providers," Mahmoodzadegan said. "We're seeing our clients push us to launch transactions, even if the environment isn't crystal clear." Earlier this week, Moelis said Ken Moelis would step down as CEO of the investment bank and hand the reins to Mahmoodzadegan, its co-founder and co-president. The succession marks a major step for the bank, which has been led solely by Ken Moelis since its founding in 2007. While succession at companies closely tied to founding CEOs can be challenging due to their outsized personal influence, Mahmoodzadegan said it was part of the "natural evolution of the firm." "I think Ken felt that even though he's fully active and will continue to be fully active with clients going forward ... this was a great opportunity at a great time to give more responsibility, not just to me, but to the next generation of bankers," Mahmoodzadegan added. The bank's deal pipeline currently is up from April and is as high as "it's ever been at the firm, or close to it," the CEO-designate said. The comments echo Morgan Stanley (MS.N), opens new tab CEO Ted Pick's expectation of a strong end of the quarter for the bank as dealmaking and the calendar for equity capital markets are picking up. Last week, top executives at the New York Stock Exchange (ICE.N), opens new tab and Nasdaq (NDAQ.O), opens new tab also said the IPO market is gaining momentum despite the Trump administration's rapidly shifting tariff policy, adding to the industry's optimism about a meaningful recovery.
North Wales Chronicle
an hour ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Planning reforms ‘critical' to 1.5m homes pledge delivery clear Commons
MPs voted by 306 to 174, majority 132, to approve the Planning and Infrastructure Bill at third reading on Tuesday evening. Housing minister Matthew Pennycook said the Bill, which aims to improve certainty and decision-making in the planning system, will help to tackle the UK's housing crisis. Meanwhile, shadow housing secretary Kevin Hollinrake described the draft legislation as 'dangerous' and warned it could lead to 'rows of uninspiring concrete boxes'. Speaking in the Commons, Mr Pennycook said: 'This landmark Bill will get Britain building again, unleash economic growth and deliver on the promise of national renewal. 'It is critical in helping the Government achieving its ambitious plan for change milestone of building 1.5 million safe and decent homes in England in this Parliament. 'When it comes to delivering new homes and critical infrastructure, the status quo is patently failing the country and failing the British people. 'We can and we must do things differently, this Bill will enable us to do so. It is transformative. It will fundamentally change how we build things in this country, and in doing so it will help us tackle the housing crisis and raise living standards in every part of the country.' Mr Hollinrake argued it is not possible to 'concrete our way to community', adding: 'This Bill, in its current form, is not just flawed, it is dangerous. It risks eroding trust in the planning system and widening the gulf between government and the governed. 'We need homes for first-time buyers, for young families, for key workers, for the next generation. But we need the right homes in the right places, shaped by the right principles. 'What are we being offered instead is a top-down model driven by arbitrary targets and central dictats. The result: solar settlements, identikit developments, rows of uninspiring concrete boxes that bear no relation to the history, the heritage or the hopes of the communities they are building.' This comes after Labour MPs rebelled on Monday over the Government's plans to change current nature protections in the planning system. Campaigners have raised concerns the Bill will allow developers to effectively disregard environmental rules and community concerns, increasing the risk of sewage in rivers, flooding and loss of valued woods and parks. Mr Pennycook said the 'suboptimal status quo' for the environment and development is not working, as he pledged to introduce a nature restoration fund to bolster conservation efforts. He added: 'We want to take forward a new strategic approach across wider geographies, ensuring that Natural England bring forward plans that go beyond offsetting harm to driving nature recovery as well as unlocking development.' During the Bill's report stage on Tuesday, Conservative former minister Robbie Moore accused the Government of permitting 'absolute theft' in its compulsory purchase order (CPO) reforms. The Bill will allow an inspector or, where there are no objectors, authorities to remove 'hope value' from land when a CPO is made, meaning any uplift calculated on the basis that a developer could be given planning permission in future is ignored. The MP for Keighley and Ilkley said: 'So-called 'hope value' is not a capitalist trick, it is not a racket, it is not unfair, it is simply the true market value of the property. 'Property rights matter. They are the foundation of our society. 'If the state chooses to use its powers to confiscate property of a law-abiding person and then they must stipulate on how that land must be used, and then tell the landowner how much they are entitled to receive from the state, that is wrong and in my view is an absolute theft of private property.' Labour MP Chris Hinchliff urged the Government to go further, calling for it to remove 'hope value' for any land or property which is being compulsory-purchased for the purpose of delivering housing targets. The North East Hertfordshire MP said his amendment 68 would 'give councils the land assembly powers necessary to acquire sites to meet local housing need at current use value, and so do away with speculative hope value prices, which put taxpayers' money into wealthy landowners pockets'. 'This would finally make it affordable for local authorities to deliver the new generation of council homes. That is the true solution to this nation's housing crisis,' he added. The Government has previously said it will ensure that compensation paid to landowners through the CPO process is 'fair but not excessive' and that development corporations can operate effectively. The Bill will now be sent to the House of Lords for further scrutiny.
Leader Live
an hour ago
- Leader Live
Planning reforms ‘critical' to 1.5m homes pledge delivery clear Commons
MPs voted by 306 to 174, majority 132, to approve the Planning and Infrastructure Bill at third reading on Tuesday evening. Housing minister Matthew Pennycook said the Bill, which aims to improve certainty and decision-making in the planning system, will help to tackle the UK's housing crisis. Meanwhile, shadow housing secretary Kevin Hollinrake described the draft legislation as 'dangerous' and warned it could lead to 'rows of uninspiring concrete boxes'. Speaking in the Commons, Mr Pennycook said: 'This landmark Bill will get Britain building again, unleash economic growth and deliver on the promise of national renewal. 'It is critical in helping the Government achieving its ambitious plan for change milestone of building 1.5 million safe and decent homes in England in this Parliament. 'When it comes to delivering new homes and critical infrastructure, the status quo is patently failing the country and failing the British people. 'We can and we must do things differently, this Bill will enable us to do so. It is transformative. It will fundamentally change how we build things in this country, and in doing so it will help us tackle the housing crisis and raise living standards in every part of the country.' Mr Hollinrake argued it is not possible to 'concrete our way to community', adding: 'This Bill, in its current form, is not just flawed, it is dangerous. It risks eroding trust in the planning system and widening the gulf between government and the governed. 'We need homes for first-time buyers, for young families, for key workers, for the next generation. But we need the right homes in the right places, shaped by the right principles. 'What are we being offered instead is a top-down model driven by arbitrary targets and central dictats. The result: solar settlements, identikit developments, rows of uninspiring concrete boxes that bear no relation to the history, the heritage or the hopes of the communities they are building.' This comes after Labour MPs rebelled on Monday over the Government's plans to change current nature protections in the planning system. Campaigners have raised concerns the Bill will allow developers to effectively disregard environmental rules and community concerns, increasing the risk of sewage in rivers, flooding and loss of valued woods and parks. Mr Pennycook said the 'suboptimal status quo' for the environment and development is not working, as he pledged to introduce a nature restoration fund to bolster conservation efforts. He added: 'We want to take forward a new strategic approach across wider geographies, ensuring that Natural England bring forward plans that go beyond offsetting harm to driving nature recovery as well as unlocking development.' During the Bill's report stage on Tuesday, Conservative former minister Robbie Moore accused the Government of permitting 'absolute theft' in its compulsory purchase order (CPO) reforms. The Bill will allow an inspector or, where there are no objectors, authorities to remove 'hope value' from land when a CPO is made, meaning any uplift calculated on the basis that a developer could be given planning permission in future is ignored. The MP for Keighley and Ilkley said: 'So-called 'hope value' is not a capitalist trick, it is not a racket, it is not unfair, it is simply the true market value of the property. 'Property rights matter. They are the foundation of our society. 'If the state chooses to use its powers to confiscate property of a law-abiding person and then they must stipulate on how that land must be used, and then tell the landowner how much they are entitled to receive from the state, that is wrong and in my view is an absolute theft of private property.' Labour MP Chris Hinchliff urged the Government to go further, calling for it to remove 'hope value' for any land or property which is being compulsory-purchased for the purpose of delivering housing targets. The North East Hertfordshire MP said his amendment 68 would 'give councils the land assembly powers necessary to acquire sites to meet local housing need at current use value, and so do away with speculative hope value prices, which put taxpayers' money into wealthy landowners pockets'. 'This would finally make it affordable for local authorities to deliver the new generation of council homes. That is the true solution to this nation's housing crisis,' he added. The Government has previously said it will ensure that compensation paid to landowners through the CPO process is 'fair but not excessive' and that development corporations can operate effectively. The Bill will now be sent to the House of Lords for further scrutiny.
