logo
Black Renters Could Be Displaced by Historic Affordable Housing Cuts

Black Renters Could Be Displaced by Historic Affordable Housing Cuts

Yahoo28-04-2025
Elisha Fye Jr. grew up hearing his father's stories of the Jim Crow South. There, Elisa Sr. was born on a plantation in 1918 and one of 14 children in a family of sharecroppers who toiled all year for just $200 and a share of the crops in Vidalia, Georgia. After a violent run-in with a white man forced him to flee to the Army, the elder Fye fought in World War II and then moved to New York City, where he rebuilt his life — and the city — from the ground up.
In New York, Elisha Sr. helped build the underwater Brooklyn–Battery Tunnel before working in the boiler room of Cooper Park Houses, a public housing complex. There, he would raise Fye and his five other children alone after his wife died.
Decades later, Fye is now leading the fight to protect that same affordable housing community — owned by the New York Housing Authority — against funding cuts and privatization schemes. He is frustrated that the federal government fails to see the hard work and sacrifice that define the lives of those living in subsidized housing. Over the past decade, his community has fought and won battles against a fossil fuel company and a private buyer who attempted to purchase the complex.
This legacy of perseverance is now under threat as federal funding for subsidized housing faces deep cuts and privatization efforts. The Trump administration is proposing a dramatic — and, for many, devastating — transformation of the country's support for low-income renters. The administration has proposed cutting billions of dollars in funding for government-subsidized housing, including a $1 billion program to preserve and renovate aging affordable housing units and a program used to house people escaping domestic violence.
Black people make up about 45% of public housing residents and 33% of government-subsidized private housing, despite making up about 12% of the population. In some cities across the Northeast like Boston and Washington, D.C., and across the Gulf Coast, as many as 40% of all rental units are subsidized. At the state level, Rhode Island, New York, Massachusetts, Connecticut, and Louisiana have the highest number of subsidized housing units per capita. By far, New York City has the most subsidized units, with roughly 25% of NYC's Black residents living in subsidized housing.
'I fear the federal government and Trump has no respect for the Black family at all. I worked for 40-something years, my father worked almost his whole life, but our home has always been under threat,' Fye said. 'I don't think [the fight] will end in my lifetime, but we'll keep on fighting.'
Already, there is a national shortage of 7.1 million homes for the country's low-income renters, and a majority of Americans struggling with access to housing are in the workforce or retired.
The proposed cuts are a part of a long history of neglecting public housing and could lead to an increase in homelessness by tens of thousands of people, explained Kim Johnson, manager of public policy at the National Low Income Housing Coalition. The long trajectory of underfunding subsidized housing began when public housing, initially designed for white working-class families, saw a sharp increase in Black families moving in after World War II.
'Public housing has been systemically disinvested in for generations, and, unsurprisingly, it has its roots in racism,' she said. 'With new cuts, thousands of people are going to lose the assistance that they rely on to keep a roof over their heads.'
The cuts to rental assistance align with the Trump administration's goal of shrinking the footprint and costs of the federal government. The reductions have largely focused on reducing federal programs meant to alleviate poverty and inequality, which the administration has cast as too generous or wasteful.
With fewer vouchers and rental assistance available, Black families may be forced onto long waitlists, to double up with relatives, or risk homelessness when they can no longer afford rising rents. In recent years, homelessness has risen to record highs and people experiencing homelessness have faced threats of incarceration and fines and fees for sleeping on the street.
'The mood around here is sad right now,' said Fye, who is 72 years old and recently suffered a stroke.
He knows the current fight is as important as it might ever be.
It is estimated that roughly 1 out of 5 government-owned housing complexes are in disrepair, and more than 5% of privately owned but government-subsidized properties face the same struggles. The loss of funding for local programs and building repairs means families may see their apartments deteriorate: leaks go unfixed, heating systems break down, and mold or pests become persistent hazards.
Now the focus is on simply holding on to what little security they have left instead of improving it, Fye said.
Since January, at least $60 million in funding for affordable housing developments has been frozen or thrown into limbo, with contracts to distribute these funds canceled for two of the three national nonprofits tasked with the job. This has left hundreds of projects — and the jobs and homes they would create — at risk. At the same time, the $1 billion program to preserve and renovate aging affordable housing units is also being terminated, threatening the long-term viability of tens of thousands of apartments for low-income Americans.
Central to these changes is the proposed overhaul of the Section 8 voucher program, which could see millions of Americans lose access to the rental assistance that helps keep roofs over their heads.
Section 8 housing, officially known as the Housing Choice Voucher Program, is a federal assistance program that helps low-income individuals and families afford housing in the private market by subsidizing a portion of their rent. Under Section 8, eligible participants typically pay about 30% of their monthly income toward rent and utilities, while the voucher covers the remaining amount, paid directly to the landlord. Due to funding limitations and landlords routinely turning down vouchers, currently, about 2.3 million households receive Section 8 assistance, but only about 1 in 4 eligible families can access the program due to these constraints.
The administration is considering replacing vouchers with more limited state-run grants. Unlike the current program, which adjusts funding based on actual housing costs and needs, state block grants would likely be capped and less responsive to rising rents. Proposed changes may include time limits on assistance and restrictions on eligibility for certain groups, such as mixed-status immigrant families. Advocates said this move would likely result in fewer federal dollars reaching families in need and put even more pressure on already overstretched local and state agencies.
Additionally, the government is expected to allow the Emergency Housing Voucher program, which gave rental assistance to 60,000 families and individuals fleeing homelessness or domestic violence, to run out of money. It would be among the largest one-time losses of rental assistance in U.S. history, leading to a potential historic increase in homelessness, according to the Associated Press.
Russell Vought, the director of the federal Office of Management and Budget, who will play a role in what funding cuts are pushed forward, previously endorsed an end to the federal voucher program. He said the Section 8 program 'brings with it crime, decreased property values, and results in dependency and subsidized irresponsibility.'
Residents like Fye are already grappling with shuttered community initiatives, stalled repairs, and the looming risk of displacement. Community programs that once offered after-school care, health services, or tenant advocacy are being shut down, leaving residents isolated and without support.
'The evil, nasty part about this, especially with the idea of these programs being 'fraudulent and wasteful' is they're only talking about programs that help many of the most hard-working yet vulnerable and needy people,' said Andreanecia Morris, executive director of HousingNOLA, a public-private partnership focused on increasing access to affordable housing in New Orleans.
Black renters are more likely to live in subsidized units with unsafe or unhealthy conditions such as faulty plumbing, unreliable heat, or broken elevators than their white counterparts, yet often pay more for these substandard homes, studies show. Without support, residents worry about their homes' long-term safety and livability.
The proposed cuts extend beyond direct housing assistance. Enforcement of the Fair Housing Act and other civil rights protections is also being gutted. The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development's office responsible for investigating discrimination expected to lose more than 75% of its staff, jeopardizing the process of investigating most housing discrimination complaints and leaving many tenants with nowhere to turn for help. HUD's workforce is being slashed by half, and a key office that helps communities recover from natural disasters is slated to be dismantled.
This chronic underfunding of subsidized housing created a self-fulfilling prophecy.
'Because they put absolutely no money into its upkeep, it's easy to point at public housing and say, 'See, look, this is a broken program' when, in fact, we've never adequately funded the program at the level needed,' Johnson said.
For Fye, while the fight continues, it is a disheartening reality: 'My father picked cotton as a child and fought for this country, and even today, we're not seen as worthy.'
The post Black Renters Could Be Displaced by Historic Affordable Housing Cuts appeared first on Capital B News.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

What a weaker dollar means for inflation
What a weaker dollar means for inflation

Yahoo

time22 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

What a weaker dollar means for inflation

The US dollar ( has fallen this year, and that can have big implications for inflation. RSM chief economist Joe Brusuelas talks about that connection and when the impact of tariffs may start to show in the US economy. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Market Domination Overtime. turning out to the dollar index, it's seen many swings we know amid economic uncertainty. Joe, you highlight what the moves in the currency mean for inflation? Walk us through that. All right. When you get a sustained 10% decline in the value of the dollar, typically, you should expect to see a 1/2 of 1% increase in inflation over the next 6 to 12 months. We clearly are at that point, even though we had a nice rebound. I think it was 3.3% for the month of July, strongest month for the greenback this year, but nevertheless, the policy mix out of the administration, all points towards a weaker dollar, and I think that's what we're going to get. Moreover, when you take a look at import prices, especially import prices ex petroleum, it tells the tale. We're going to see more inflation and a weaker dollar going forward. Does Trump want a strong dollar? I would think he does, and I think, well, I think like all politicians, he wants to have his cake and eat it, too. He doesn't want de-dollarization, clearly, but he wants a weaker dollar because A, it really tends to juice the tech sector, and B, it will provide relief to the beleaguered manufacturing sector that's been in an effective recession for the past couple of years. Is it too soon to say the kind of impact the softer dollars had during this earnings season, particularly what it's meant for the multinationals? It's way too early to jump on that bandwagon. I think we're really going to be talking in the fourth quarter earnings, and then next year. Moreover, a lot of those firms that he wants to help are actually having real problems with the tariff issue because, you know, 45% of everything we import goes into domestic manufacturing. So policies at a cross purposes, a good portion of the time this year, which is why that economy slowed to 1.2% growth in the first half of the year, and we think it's not going to do much better. Our forecast for this year is 1.1%. Can I ask you when we talk about these tariff policies? We've been talking about them all show. There's the near to intermediate impact, but how long do we have to wait to see what the long-term impact is? Meaning, do I have to wait till does it have to be August 2026, and Joe and Josh are back on set for me to really know, okay, it's really boosted manufacturing job. It's really opened up all these new markets for American business. It's really raised this much revenue. It's a little worse, actually. So as of midnight last night, on once we get to October 5th, we're going to have an effective 18.3% tariff. The real problem is we won't really understand what any of this means, not till October 5th, 2026, but more like October 5th, 2027. Why? Why do you say that, Joe? Because it takes so long to pass through the tariff costs. You know, there are four points along the chain. You've got your retail, you've got your consumers, you've got your importers, and you've got your exporters. At each point of the supply chain, you're going to see a bit of it absorbed, a bit of it eaten. When we went through this in 2018, for example, we didn't see the full price of the increase in the price of washing machines, dryers, and dishwashers caused by tariffs show up on consumers' balance sheets until about two years later. Turned out 90% of that cost was eaten entirely by consumers. So when we talk about whether where the cost falls falls on the value chain, and there was this big debate, maybe it's really the key debate inside the Fed. Tell me if I'm wrong, but this debate about whether the the the tariff induced inflation is one time or transitory persistent. Even if it's one time, it could go on for some time. Is that part of the point? Well, that's right, and that's why they've been counseling patients because you just don't know. Right now, for all of the noise, right? The tariff rate that's showing up, which is causing revenues to rise, right? And from the Trump administration's point of view, that's an absolutely good thing. It's about 8.85%. It's not 30, it's not 50, it's not 15. But as we get into mid-October, it'll be closer to 20 is my sense because we're still not done with Mexico, and we're still not done with China, and then USMCA has to be renegotiated next year. So this is going to be a variable target. It's going to be a moving target, but nevertheless, if you cause the average price of goods imported in the United States to rise by 18.3%, that's going to be eaten. And here's why we say that. There's a lot of talk that, well, foreign exporters are just eating the price. You know, they're going to engage in invoice pricing. If that was the case, import prices would be falling significantly. They're not. They're actually rising. So that's just not happening. So that means it's not the exporter, it's going to be the importer, the retail, or the consumer. Those points on the chain where those are going to be eaten. Joe, I can honestly say that given the news flow today, you were the perfect guy to be sitting in that chair. That's very kind of you to say. Thank you. Thank you, sir. Thank you so much, Joe.

Dems' grim outlook for '26, ‘Palestine' is a made-up cause and other commentary
Dems' grim outlook for '26, ‘Palestine' is a made-up cause and other commentary

New York Post

time23 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Dems' grim outlook for '26, ‘Palestine' is a made-up cause and other commentary

From the right: Dems' Grim Outlook for '26 'November 2026 may not go the way conventional wisdom suggests,' and Dems may lose, warns the Washington Examiner's Michael Barone. During midterm elections, 'the president's party almost always loses the House and, slightly less often, Senate seats.' But this time around, 'it looks like the Democrats' baggage, especially from the Biden years, is heavier than the loads Trump Republicans must juggle.' Black marks like 'the Russia collusion hoax, COVID-19 school closings, 'transitory' inflation, the Hunter Biden laptop, and open borders immigration' have too deeply damaged' Dems' credibility. Trump and Republicans are also becoming widely popular, with 'Republican gains' being 'widespread while Democratic gains are scarcely visible.' 'Nothing's inevitable in politics, but so far, the Democrats have not gotten up off the floor.' Mideast beat: 'Palestine' Is a Made-Up Cause Advertisement Westerners should 'understand that the George Soros-funded agents of Jew Hate and chaos' in the streets 'have zero to do with the overwhelming majority of Muslims around the world,' argues Christopher Messina at Messy Times. As Dalia Ziada, an Egyptian political analyst notes, protesters claim ' 'Palestine' is the cause of all Muslims,' but there's 'no trace of anything called 'Palestine' or anything similar to it in the Quran or the Prophetic Hadiths!' Indeed, the 'Palestinian Cause' was 'invented by the Pan-Arabist communists,' who 'attached it to Islam' to 'fool ordinary Muslims' and gain 'legitimacy' to commit crimes against nations 'in the East and the West.' 'I am a Muslim,' but Palestine 'will never be my cause,' because it hinders 'peace' — 'a divine obligation of all Muslims.' Former U.S. President Joe Biden speaks at the National Bar Association's 100th Annual Awards Gala in Chicago on July 31, 2025. REUTERS Capitol watch: Rep's War on DC Dementia Rep. Marie Gluesenkamp Perez (D-Wash.) wants a 'way for Congress to evaluate whether some politicians are no longer fit to serve,' reports The Free Press' Gabe Kaminsky. Most Dems 'would rather talk about anything other than the Biden cover-up — and the wider problem of the gerontocracy that runs the party and Washington.' But, Gluesenkamp Perez is pushing'an amendment that would direct the Office of Congressional Conduct to develop a standard to determine House members' 'ability to perform the duties of office unimpeded by significant irreversible cognitive impairment.' ' Some Democratic colleagues took her move 'personally,' and it 'failed in her first attempt to tuck it into a federal spending bill, with Democrats and Republicans all voting against its inclusion.' But her office is 'still exploring avenues to build a coalition.' Advertisement Liberal: Democrats' Best Way Back 'The Democratic Party faces a conundrum,' observes the Liberal Patriot's John Halpin. Despite President Trump's struggles with voters on 'his overall job approval rating' and among specific issues, 'Democrats are doing even worse with Americans.' They've tumbled 'from roughly a 3-point net unfavorable rating just before [Joe] Biden was elected in 2020 to a 30-point net unfavorable rating today.' With polls showing more than half of voters believe 'Congress isn't doing enough to keep Trump in line,' a 2026 message 'arguing for divided government to stop Republican overreach' may help 'Democrats to retake the House.' Ahead of 2028, Democrats should offer 'new voices without cultural baggage' and a message of 'economic uplift for America's working- and middle-class families.' Advertisement Foreign desk: Chinese Dam's Regional Threat China has 'officially acknowledged' that it's building 'the biggest dam ever conceived,' gasps Brahma Chellaney at The Hill. The structure will 'generate nearly three times as much hydropower' as the massive Three Gorges Dam but 'portends a looming geopolitical and environmental crisis.' The new dam 'is on a geologic fault line — a recipe for catastrophe.' Moreover, 'capturing silt-laden waters before they reach India and Bangladesh, the dam will starve' farmers of crucial riparian nutrients. While China's dam-building 'has long alarmed downstream nations, from Vietnam and Thailand to Nepal,' this project 'raises profound questions about regional stability.' By seizing control over regional water, 'China is methodically locking in future geopolitical leverage.' — Compiled by The Post Editorial Board

What does TACO mean? What to know when Trump issues new tariffs after 2 delays
What does TACO mean? What to know when Trump issues new tariffs after 2 delays

USA Today

time23 minutes ago

  • USA Today

What does TACO mean? What to know when Trump issues new tariffs after 2 delays

President Donald Trump signed an executive order to issue a new slate of tariffs on July 31, the latest in a long saga of policy changes for imports from countries around the world. Reciprocal tariff rates for 70 countries will range from 15% to 41%, set to go into effect seven days from the order. Trump also separately raised the tariff rate on imports from Canada from 25% to 35%, which is set to go into effect Aug. 1. Tariffs are a tax on goods from other countries that importers pay, and economists generally agree it leads to higher prices for consumers. Trump began imposing tariffs on imports from the U.S.'s top trade partners in February, only to change their effective date, scope or rate over the following months. The on-again-off-again tariffs have been a theme of Trump's second term, leading to the creation of the term TACO. Here is what to know: Live updates: Trump fires head of labor statistics bureau after weak jobs report What does TACO mean? Financial Times columnist Robert Armstrong coined "TACO trade" in May, describing how some investors anticipate market rebounds amid Trump's on-again, off-again tariff policies. The acronym stands for "Trump always chickens out." Armstrong describes TACO trade as many investors' strategy to buy into the market that dips when Trump announces steep tariffs on the assumption that he will back off his tariff order, and the market will rebound. Trump hit back at a reporter who asked about the term on May 28, saying, "you ask a nasty question like that. It's called negotiation." Trump's tariffs have been on-again-off-again Back in February, Trump announced a 25% tariff on goods from top trade partners Mexico and Canada and 10% on goods from China. Such was the start of a series of delays and negotiations that left Canada and Mexico relatively untouched when Trump expanded steeper tariff orders to the rest of the world in April. China and the U.S. were caught up in an intense trade war where the economic powerhouses retaliated until both sides issued tariffs in the triple digits. They reached a truce in May and have discussed extending the 90-day pause while they work out a deal. Trump on April 2 announced widespread tariffs in what he called "Liberation Day." Shortly after, he paused the climbing rates for 90 days. That pause was set to expire on July 9, but instead of the tariffs going into effect, Trump extended the deadline. That deadline was Aug. 1, and Trump had said the deadline would not change, but the recent order gives it another week. Mexico remains at 25% while it continues to work on a trade deal for the next 90 days, Trump said. Contributing: Joey Garrison, USA TODAY Kinsey Crowley is the Trump Connect reporter for the USA TODAY Network. Reach her at kcrowley@ Follow her on X and TikTok @kinseycrowley or Bluesky at @

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store